The BlogRSS Feed

World Who’s in Charge of the Holy Sepulchre?

Israel-based journalist Sharona Schwartz covers Middle East news for The Blaze:

In The Simpson’s episode The Greatest Story Ever D’ohed, Homer and the gang travel on a Holy Land pilgrimage at the urging of his Evangelical Christian neighbor Ned Flanders who wants to open his heart to religion. Predictably, Flanders is frustrated time and again by Homer, who after pigging out at the hotel breakfast buffet and goofing around at King David’s tomb, falls asleep at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre on the site of Jesus’s burial and resurrection.

Homer: It’s so cool here in the Tomb of the Unknown Savior. 
Ned: Unknown? He’s the most famous person who ever lived! 
Homer: Porky Pig? 
Ned: Porky Pig isn’t a person! He’s a pig, and he’s not even a real pig! 
Homer: But he is buried here, right?

Irreverent animated jokes aside, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is one of the most sacred sites in Christendom, situated in the Old City of Jerusalem which has been under Israeli control since the 1967 Six Day War. Since then, the Israeli government has shown commitment to maintaining the sanctity of all holy places – regardless of whose religion it’s holy to.

But take just a peek outside Israel and you see a different picture entirely. One by one, time and again, here is how some of Israel’s neighbors, Muslim-controlled countries, demonstrate their commitment to respecting Christianity and Judaism.

Palestinian Authority:
You need drive only an hour north of the Holy Sepulchre to observe how the Palestinian Authority has treated sites holy to Christians and Jews under its control.

The patriarch Joseph is believed to be buried in the biblical town of Shechem, which is today called Nablus. When the second Intifada started in 2000, a battle took place at Joseph’s tomb, killing 18 Palestinians and an Israeli border policeman who was left to bleed to death inside. To avoid further tension, Israel quickly withdrew its forces and handed control of the site to the Palestinian Authority, even though under the Oslo agreement, Israelis were supposed to have free access to Jewish holy sites. And what was the first act of self-determination the Palestinians carried out within hours of taking charge? They stormed the compound and devastated the site, using pickaxes and setting it on fire.

Jewish Virtual Library says, “…the Palestinian Police stood by as a mob ransacked the site, burned [prayer] books and destroyed reading stands; the mob also burned down the army outpost. On that same day, an American-born rabbi, who taught at the seminary, was found slain outside Nablus.”

The not particularly pro-Israel European Union condemned “without reserve” the site’s destruction by Palestinians, calling “for the absolute respect of holy sites for believers of all religions.”

The desecration did not stop there. Let’s travel from the site of Jesus’ burial and resurrection to the site of his birth.

In 2002, trying to stem the plague of suicide bombings against its innocent civilians, Israel carried out military operations in cities under Palestinian Authority control. In Bethlehem, 39 wanted gunmen carrying explosives and assault weapons busted into the Church of the Nativity for a five week standoff, holding hostage 46 priests, church workers, and 200 civilians, including children. The church is believed to sit atop the cave where Jesus was born.

Despite the Palestinian terrorists’ cynical use of innocent civilians and this holy location as cover, Israel said it did not want to use live ammunition that might damage the sacred site. Instead the IDF imposed a curfew, took shots from the terrorists, and placed snipers on nearby buildings who succeeded in killing seven gunmen all the while doing their best to not hit the church. Subsequent interviews with the terrorists revealed they intentionally chose the church as their refuge to pressure Israel.

Priests held hostage said the gunmen stole gold, crucifixes and prayer books. When the siege ended, Israeli police reported finding 40 explosive devices – some booby-trapped – left by the Palestinians in the church.

Egypt:
How has the Arab Spring treated its Christian minority?

Within weeks of President Hosni Mubarak’s resignation, the Two Martyrs Church in south Cairo was torched after being attacked by a Muslim mob.

In May, The New York Times reported on concerns among Egypt’s Christians, who due to the weakening of the Egyptian police “fear that the Egyptian revolution had made their country less tolerant and more dangerous for religious minorities.”

Then on September 9, The Assyrian International News Agency reported the intolerance is looking like an MO of the new Egyptian order, where Muslims in the Upper Egyptian village of Elmarinab in the Aswan province are threatening their Christian neighbors to demolish their church.

Dr. Naguib Gabriel, head of the Egyptian Union of Human Rights Organization (EUHRO), said this incident is one in a series of persecutions and attacks on Copts and their churches. “The Muslim Brotherhood announced immediately after the revolution that it is impossible to build any new church in Egypt, and churches which are demolished should never be rebuilt, as well as no crosses over churches or bells to be rung.”

Showing it’s not just the Israeli embassy that’s vulnerable, France 24 filed this report from Egypt on the targeting of Christians:

Turkey:

In 2009, 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon profiled Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew, who feels “crucified” in modern Muslim Turkey:

Turkish authorities have seized Christian properties and closed Christian churches, monasteries and schools. His parishioners are afraid that the authorities want to force Bartholomew and his church – the oldest of all Christian churches – out of Turkey.

Lest we forget, Turkey’s largest city Istanbul “was called Constantinople and was the most important city in the Christian world.”

Iran:
According to The Christian Post, in 2009, Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani was arrested for protesting the Iranian policy of forcing Christian children to participate in Muslim religious education. He was convicted of apostasy and sentenced to death by hanging. This summer, the Supreme Court in the Qom province annulled his death sentence but with a twist.

“The Supreme Court has annulled the death sentence and sent the case back to the court in Rasht (his hometown), asking the accused to repent,” said attorney [Mohammed Ali] Dadkhah.

Repent meaning renounce his faith in Jesus Christ.

The lower court is being asked to investigate whether Nadarkhani was indeed an apostate, that is, someone who converted away from Islam.

Saudi Arabia:
Perhaps the best example of religious intolerance comes from non-other than Saudi Arabia. King Abdullah calls himself the “Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques,” a pious title that gains him legitimacy in the eyes of Muslims as he controls Islam’s holiest sites of Mecca and Medina.

But what about other religions in the kingdom?

Guess how many churches there are in Saudi Arabia. Zero. While Christians are allowed in the country, they are not allowed to worship together openly or own any religious symbols like Bibles or crucifixes. Not to mention Jews, who if they admit to their religion are not allowed into the country.

And these rules aren’t never-enforced arcane policies on the books. Last year in Riyadh, Saudi police raided a secret Catholic mass and arrested a dozen Filipinos and a Catholic priest.

Yes, it’s true Israel is the only flourishing democracy in the Middle East, it shares core values with the United States and shares the burden of fighting terrorism, but don’t forget it is also the custodian of Christianity’s holiest places. This wasn’t the case before 1967 when Jordan held East Jerusalem and the Old City.

When you hear the Palestinians ask the United Nations this week to recognize them as an independent state with East Jerusalem as their capital, take pause to remember what Palestinian militants did at the Church of the Nativity and at Joseph’s Tomb.

When you hear President Obama talk about returning to the 1967 borders, make no mistake what that means.

The argument over Palestinian independence, control of East Jerusalem and 1967 borders boils down to this: who should be custodian to Christianity’s most sacred places?

The fight over Jerusalem is not just about the Israelis and Palestinians, it’s also about the Christian world. Can it afford to outsource protection of its holy sites to those who don’t share its values?

When did statehood become an entitlement? Doesn’t a populace first have to prove it respects international law, which at last check didn’t include a requirement to lob rockets at civilian neighbors. Has a Palestinian Authority that spends $5 million every month paying salaries to terrorists sitting in Israeli prisons for blowing up innocent civilians demonstrated it’s worthy of the responsibility that comes with statehood?

On 8/24, Glenn Beck asked us to “Stand with Israel” during Restoring Courage in Jerusalem – mere steps from the Temple Mount, the al Aqsa Mosque and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, all sites that since 1967 have enjoyed Israel’s respect for freedom of worship.

Who should you stand with? The Palestinian one-sided declaration of statehood or the country that stands with you and all you hold holy and dear.

Comments (14)

  • Tom K
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 11:13am

    The Blaze: Were the first two paragraphs of this story really necessary ? The dunderheaded Homer Simpsons ( fortunately a fictional character ) of this world voted overwhelmingly for Obama and would do it again. Making light of the destruction of Christian Holy sites by Palestinians was not necessary.

    Report Post »  
  • Jenny Lind
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 10:51am

    I was so hoping I was wrong, but I have come to realize last days are coming much faster than I thought. I do not see any of this getting better in the world. We may get a short reprieve from a new president, but the real evil is here and now and it is making itself felt as if evil too has a time line. Those with their heads in the sand better get them out of it. I now realize my last and hopefully best task on this earth is to get my family prepared for what is unfolding. There is little hope for any Christians in the middle east to stay and live in peace. They will die if they stay, sadly. Only Israel will survive, but it will be ugly. I had so hoped for generations of living, learning and growing as our Father’s children, but I have always known this world has an end date, but none of us wants to go through what’s coming. My prayer is we can stand our ground, be prepared, and never loose our faith. My heart is sad for those who will suffer for the evil in the world.

    Report Post »  
    • lel2007
      Posted on September 22, 2011 at 7:43am

      Horrible as it is and will be, could there be a more significant period of time to be alive? The fruition of Gods Plan, and it’s possible we could all be front row observers. That’s incredible.

      Report Post » lel2007  
    • lel2007
      Posted on September 22, 2011 at 7:50am

      Did I say ‘observers’ ? More correct would be ‘participants’ or ‘witness’, whether the part be canon fodder or remnant of the faithful.

      Report Post » lel2007  
  • markgl
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 9:45am

    Excellent article.

    Report Post » markgl  
  • MrObvious
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 8:24am

    Islamic radicals shouldn’t be negotiated with.

    When they take hold of nations, they destroy them.

    When they take hold of an area within a nation they destroy it.

    When left to their own devices they destroy themselves.

    Gaza should be considered a victim of Hamas, and before that the PLO.

    Israel should consider invading and liberating it from them.

    All members of Hamas in Gaza should be tracked down, captured or, if necessary, killed.

    If Israel lacks the man power needed, NATO, and the UN Peace keepers should offer their assistance.

    If the UN truly cared about the lives of the people in Gaza and the West Bank, they would offer up this alternative themselves.

    Palestinian statehood must not happen while Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terror organizations have free reign there.

    The PLO was a terror organization; and, it would be a mistake to think they have given that up entirely.

    Until the attitudes of the Palestinian people themselves change, they won’t be ready for statehood.

    These folks need to find a non-terror based political party and rally behind it.

    In the West Bank they should be able to do that safely.

    At this point Gaza doesn’t get a vote; because, it’s a hostage of Hamas and, by extension, Iran.

    Report Post »  
  • Bill Rowland
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 8:23am

    There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim. The Koran tells them to spread the religion by war. All infidels must be converted or killed – if you leave Islam for another faith the sentence is death.
    The Muslim Brotherhood, that Obumbler and Hilrod love so much, has stated that they want to establish a caliphate under Sharia law and eliminate Isreal. Hilrod and Obumbler want us to bvelieve they are good guys and are eliminating dictators and establishing democracies. Good luck with that.
    If they gain control of the holy sites they will destroy them just like the Taliban destoryed the statue of Budda in Afghanistan.
    They are programmed to destroy everything that does not honor Allah.

    OMG – Psalm 109:8

    Report Post »  
    • Melvin Spittle
      Posted on September 21, 2011 at 11:47am

      To conclude that Islam is a religion of peace, one must ask themselves who or what organization leads Islam? From what I can see, if we look at the actual Islamic leaders, we find a distributed leadership across Sunni and Shia sects. Terrorists come from both sects. Although many of the Imams and clerics may disagree, they all believe in the destruction of Israel and it’s people. Given that the leadership is shared within these sects, the most powerful force that has risen to political power and influence is the Muslim Brotherhood. It is logical that when looking fro answers from those that represent Islam, you need look no further than the chief players in the Muslim Brotherhood and their influence over ALL Muslim countries. Therefore one must logically assume that Islam’s leadership is dominated by the violent as is evidenced by the actions of the Muslim Brotherhood and the absolute silence of all supposed moderate Islamic leaders, and therefore is a religion of terror and violence. If one is to accept this logic, then one must also accept that although there may be moderate Muslims, extremism dominates.

      Report Post » Melvin Spittle  
    • Melvin Spittle
      Posted on September 21, 2011 at 12:11pm

      Although the citizens of Germany followed Hitler when he declared war on the world, we responded by destroying him. If one is to accept the justification for entering WWII, how can one not accept the need to declare war on Islam itself for the very same reasons? Islam is dominated by extremist leadership. The citizens of Germany and Japan may not have been considered extremists but their leaders were.

      Without Hitler, you would not have a Muslim Brotherhood. When we destroyed the leadership of Germany and Japan, we did not complete the job and let the Muslim Brotherhood go unscathed without justice for their SIGNIFICANT part in the Holocaust.

      Report Post » Melvin Spittle  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 7:14am

    Indeed, we are once again seeing the fruits of the seeds Mr Obama has sewn in the Middle East; in the efforts to make Islam and the Caliphate a reality again, the extremists will do all in their own ability to purge the land itself and the area of all reminders of other religions save for Islam (Radical Islam at that).

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
  • BlondLab77
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 2:20am

    Intollerance of free thought is the greatest danger from Islamic governing. Free society tollerates Islamic governing. Looks like free thought is going to lose in the end.

    Report Post » BlondLab77  
  • SandyfromChesterfield
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 1:35am

    I was shocked to learn that Bethlehem is not part of Israel. If the holy lands are turned over to the palestinians they will destroy them. They do not want any sites standing that are older than Mohammad.

    Report Post »  
  • bestartist
    Posted on September 21, 2011 at 12:21am

    It goes without saying that I stand with Israel.
    As long as “palestine” refuses to recognize Israel’s right to exist and is supported by Holocaust deniers and those who want to drive Israel into the sea this is an absurd show of spleen about nothing.
    I was gratified to hear Rick Perry speak about how this entire current charade can be viewed as the fruit of Obama’s flawed and dangerous narcissistic rhetoric.

    Report Post » bestartist  

Comments are closed.