Media

Bob Beckel and everyone else should start using titles in politics

Bob Beckel wont call Allen WestFox News’ Bob Beckel caught our attention yesterday when he criticized Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.) on “The Five.” Our business editor Becket Adams wrote about Beckel taking exception with West’s recent remark that Democratic leadership should take their “message” and “get the hell out of the United States of America.”

But the most important part of Beckel’s rant on “The Five” was his co-host Eric Bolling chiding him about not appropriately referring to West as “representative” or “Lieutenant Colonel.” Beckel said he wouldn’t.

There’s a lot to be said about using titles in American politics. It’s endlessly irritating when people don’t use them. It’s a sign of respect, not necessarily for the individual with the title, but for the hundreds, thousands or even millions of people who elect them.

It’s not necessary to use a title on each and every reference, for example, in a conversation about President Barack Obama. That takes a lot of effort. But at least once, the president (whoever it is) should be acknowledge to actually be the guy that the country elected.

Writing on the blog, I often don’t use titles when referring to the Republican presidential candidates unless it helps to clarify or to avoid redundantly using names. It’s reasonable to assume if you’re reading this, you know who Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are.

But in the case of the president, representatives, senators and governors, I use the title on first reference (not to mention, that’s the formal Associated Press style of writing).

Where am I wrong on this? I’m not.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (2)

  • randyschmidt74
    Posted on February 1, 2012 at 11:57am

    Military, Congressional or other “commissioned” office titles are sworn under oath and ‘earned’ by the individual – due mainly to the unique aspect of: “Service above self”.
    I adamantly disagree with the Five™ cast in designating Bob Beckel jokingly as “admiral”. In the longest of traditions those who are dedicated to “service about self” deserve the respect of using titles which they have attained.
    In the case of Dr. Paul, I think if you ask him he would say that since he did not retire with the military rank (and may well have not been a regular commissioned officer for life, he would probably not prefer to be addressed as one of those ranks that he attained during his time in service. Representative or Doctor Paul would be appropriate. Lastly I feel that the “service above self” is a key differentiator. Let Bob Beckel tell us what service above self he’s accomplished and maybe we’ll address him as Mr.

    Report this comment

    randyschmidt74  
  • Okie from Muskogee
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 9:50am

    I wonder if Eric will chide himself for all the times he cast ridicule and vile remarks at Ron Paul without using Representative or his military title before hand….

    I’m not one to get wrapped up in titles or usage of such and don’t think Bob should be chided for not doing so….

    Report this comment

    Okie from Muskogee  

Comments are closed.