Watch Live: Second House Hearing on IRS Scandal

Entertainment

Caption that photo!: Ron Paul

May. 11, 2012 3:50pm Eddie Scarry

No one knows what Ron Paul is still doing in the Republican presidential primary race. You almost want to take him by the arm and calmly lead him back to bed. But he says he has a plan. Or, he implied it on CNN earlier this week when he was asked why he has yet to concede the race to Mitt Romney.

“Well, it certainly isn’t for the reason of disrupting a convention as you were alluding to,” he said. “That is not in my plan. That is against my plan.”

Hmm. Okay.

In the spirit of Paul, who shows perseverance like no other, caption that photo!

We’ll run the winner and a few runners-up this weekend.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (717)

bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:01pm
Hey news media! these hands have bullied many a kid when I was younger.

Report this comment
- SlickAtlas
  Posted on May 11, 2012 at 9:22pm
  Wrong but he’s delivered over 4000 babies as an OBGYN
  
  Report this comment
- bikerr
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 11:07am
  @SlickAtlas—Lighten up!–it’s a caption contest! Gheeeez.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 6:16pm
  Caption:
  
  “Not only have I been getting more delegates than Romney, as of late, but it turns out that state delegates cannot be bound to vote for Romney at Tampa, after all. Ron Paul 2012!”
  
  See here.
  
  Epic Ben Swann / Reality Check: This Primary Contest Has Only Just Started!
  http://www.dailypaul.com/230663/tonights-ben-swann-to-be-epic
  
  “I am going to show you how the RNC is breaking its own rules by giving money to the Romney campaign… Plus, something you won’t see anywhere else. Why all these “bound” delegates from across the country may NOT be bound at all. How the race for the Republican nomination is barely getting started.”
  
  And here.
  
  May 10, 2012 Ben Swann Reality Check: All GOP Delegates Unbound at Tampa Convention
  http://www.dailypaul.com/232576/may-10-2012-ben-swann-reality-check-all-gop-delegates-free-to-vote-for-whoever-they-want
  
  Report this comment
- Mr. V
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 7:47pm
  Caption: I be remindin’ them of liberty, and they be hatin’
  
  Report this comment
- TheCoffinMaker
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 9:40pm
  Oooohaaooohwhoooaaaaabblewwahbloowahawhooohaaa…
  
  Report this comment
- vladimir1025
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 9:49pm
  Look mom! I’m the catcher and I made a touchdown!
  
  Report this comment
- rickc34
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 10:45pm
  So he spanked 4000 little butts then? Well at least these babies made if Obama was the OBGYN they would have all been aborted.
  
  Report this comment
- barstoolblogger
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 10:48pm
  caption: “I’m a libertarian, which means I’ll wear my hat any damn way I want.”
  
  Report this comment
- XScramblerX
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:30am
  caption: “I’m the only candidate that doesn’t have his hands in YOUR pockets! See!”
  
  Report this comment
- XScramblerX
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:44am
  Good one BB! I like it.
  
  Report this comment
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 1:17am
  Caption: What Newsletter?
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 3:53am
  @RepubliCorp,
  
  “Caption: What Newsletter?”
  
  That would be the Ron Paul Newsletters, the supposedly racist content of which has been addressed in the following article, Ron Paul’s name also being cleared of being racist.
  
  See here.
  
  Why the Beltway Libertarians Are Trying to Smear Ron Paul
  http://takimag.com/article/why_the_beltway_libertarians_are_trying_to_smear_ron_paul/#axzz1h0nfwejq
  
  I’m happy to have finally cleared this issue up, for you. If you have any more concerns about Ron Paul, please let me know so I can try to address those, as well.
  
  Report this comment
- scruffycat
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 3:54am
  caption: “I’M DEHYDRATED!”
  
  Report this comment
- Pigpen
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 4:15am
  Caption: “Thanks to me, everybody but elitist shills like ‘Fast Eddie at theBlaze’ can see the conspiracy now!”
  
  Report this comment
- ThreeMile
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 6:31am
  “I will forever hold tightly to the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights! Now, let’s PLAY BALL, America!”
  
  Report this comment
- pscully17
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 8:00am
  Caption :” I made Poopy”
  
  Report this comment
- Ballot_Box_Revolution
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:22am
  “Which hand? Any hand!!!…..Guess which hand most of the founders signed the Constitution with, and you can have your hat back!!”
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:37am
  @REPUBLICORP The one they tried to take me down with when my record speaks for itself..when I helped deliver an interracial couple’s baby when no one else would touch it and when it was a still birth..I sent them a bill marked paid in full..and that’s probably when you were just a kid..and I didn’t tell anyone..the couple did.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:45am
  The first Presidential Candidate in History To Be carried by “We the People”Instead of the Un Federal Reserve Rothchild Media..
  
  Report this comment
- AZindependent
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:58am
  “Put your hands in the air like you just don’t care!”
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:16am
  @ BIKER..I would bet that you are speaking from experience..
  
  Report this comment
- Aldo_the_Apche
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:28am
  Medical Marijuana….FOR EVERY ONE YAY
  
  Report this comment
- Miami
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:39am
  ———-I should be taken seriously but I rather be a joke—————-
  Lead my minions in a way they never question any of my arguments no matter how baseless they are. Making my serious arguments to be dismissed along with the rest by the media and “Progressive” you know the Socialist/Marxist politicians.
  
  We have serious problems in this country and we need serious people to deal with them. Not those who play the game as Rep Paul has said before with his ear marks.
  
  Report this comment
- SUNTZU
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:40am
  David Crocket said it first,but here goes.
  You all can go to he!! ,I’m going to texas
  
  Report this comment
- Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:58am
  Let’s have a contest to mock and marginalize the one man in congress who has shown integrity and steadfastness in defending the Constitution.
  
  Caption: “The Blaze and Beck are becoming more irrelevant every day!”
  
  Report this comment
- Go-rin-no-sho
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 11:26am
  OT: Shameless way to provoke internet fights, and increase web traffic. Horrible :P Now I’m REALLY curious what you’ll use for a caption, with 355 comments at the time of my posting.
  
  Report this comment
- spotcoon
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 11:34am
  CAPTION :
  
  What company makes black condoms that j u u ust fit ?
  
  Report this comment
- Live_Free_orDie
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 11:44am
  Gee Willikers…it’s my turn to ride in the big spaceship.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:06pm
  @Aldo_the_Apche,
  
  “Medical Marijuana….FOR EVERY ONE YAY”
  
  … And raw milk, too, since the government doesn’t have the right to tell you what you may, or may not, put into your own body, YAY.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:18pm
  @Miami,
  
  “We have serious problems in this country and we need serious people to deal with them. Not those who play the game as Rep Paul has said before with his ear marks.”
  
  The earmarks (aka, “allocations” of Treasury money that is intended to be appropriated if the Appropriations Bill passes) issue has already been dealt with.
  
  See here.
  
  In Defense of Ron Paul’s Earmarks
  http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/phillips5.html
  
  And here.
  
  Earmarks Don’t Add Up
  http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul513.html
  
  “The misconception seems to be that members of Congress put together a bunch of requests for project funding, add them all together and come up with a budget. The truth is, it is not done that way. The total level of spending is determined by the Congressional leadership and the appropriators before any Member has a chance to offer any amendments. Members’ requests are simply recommendations to allocate parts of that spending for certain items in that members’ district or state. If funds are not designated, they revert to non-designated spending controlled by bureaucrats in the executive branch.” …
  
  … “If a congressman does not submit funding requests for his district the money is simply spent elsewhere. To eliminate all earmarks would be to further consolidate power in the already dominant executive branch and not save a penny.”
  
  Report this comment
- recoveringneocon
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:58pm
  When “nnelG”, his 2 stooges, ” ezalB ehT” and the so called Conservativs are done having your fun….
  
  “Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
  ― Ron Paul
  
  Report this comment
- godlovinmom
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 1:33pm
  “I will never give up the fight”…apparently he’s not going to either…Anyhoooo…Happy Mother’s Day…You American Moms!
  
  Report this comment
- DisgruntledInClinton
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 1:37pm
  “Rollin’ with the homies”.
  
  Report this comment
- Leavon
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 1:39pm
  What has two thumbs and enjoys a “Hummer”? Me!!!
  
  Report this comment
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 2:24pm
  Ron Paul is still in the race as he is winning. I find it hard to believe that most people on The Blaze are so misinformed that they do not realize how the primary election works. Paul supporters have been at this for four years, learning how the process works, recruiting more to learn the process, getting involved insrtead of sitting on the couch and listening to the media tell you who to vote for.
  
  Here is a picture for you: http://i.imgur.com/UvJTT.jpg
  
  Lets not leave out Mittens: http://imgur.com/siFYl
  
  The primary is not about the vote, it is about gathering delegates to vote at the national convention. Do any of you really think that with the thousands of Paul supporters, that have been preparing for four years, have learned the rules and process, are actively out there instead of sitting around listening to the media, will not be able to land 1144 + supporters as delegates to the convention? This is a small number compared to the thousands that show up to his rallies in every state. Wake up people, quit listening to the media, they are incompetent.
  
  Report this comment
- EndTheFedNOW
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 3:36pm
  The media, even the blaze is pushing the agenda of the state. More importantly the neocon ideas. The blaze wants small government but HUGE military industerial complex? How does that work? It doesnt. You can not have a small government with sound econmics and a military industerail complex that is big enough to wage war 24/7. Thats why the neocns hate Ron Paul. He sees thru their lies and evils of war and death. Peace
  
  Report this comment
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 4:27pm
  Here is an example of why Paul is winning: http://www.examiner.com/article/gop-establishment-makes-a-mockery-of-the-democratic-process-oklahoma
  
  You see, the GOP establishment of these state conventions are breaking their own rules, hoping nobody notices and are paying the price because Paul supporters know and follow the rules. Becaus of their election fraud tactics, Paul took 95% of the delegates because Romney supporters believed them and left! LMAO
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 4:50pm
  Sniff my finger and tell where it has been!
  
  Report this comment
- Rational Man
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 5:43pm
  Here is Ron Paul at a party celebrating the announcement of his signature line of Depends
  With a user endorsement from John McCain
  
  Report this comment
- The_Almighty_Creestof
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 7:31pm
  Caption?
  
  “I love my new cap…and you can’t even tell it’s made of tinfoil!
  
  Report this comment
- M1A2_Tanker
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 8:44pm
  “Hmm. Okay.”
  
  “See The Blaze’s Eddy Scarry’s Truth does have an agenda”
  
  Report this comment
- Rational Man
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:25pm
  This weekend Ron Paul attended a gala affair in his honor after the unveiling of his new signature line of Depends. Also in attendance was John McCain, celebrity endorser of the new Ron Paul designer diapers. Mr. Paul is seen here, (from the waste up thank goodness), modeling one of his new creations and demonstrating the effectiveness of it’s “No Leak No Mess” design features while ‘soiling’ himself. According to reports from other prehistoric politicians in attendance, a good time was had by all. Although, as evidenced in the photograph, it appears Mr. Paul had a few too many Howdy Doodys in preparation for the “No Leak No Mess” demonstration. Some in attendance even claimed that the demonstration was actually empromptu on Mr. Paul’s part. Do to the excessive amount of Howdy Doodys consumed.
  
  Sorry, my caption turned into a story……………..
  
  Report this comment
- Rational Man
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:57pm
  This breaking news story is still evolving;
  
  There is talk in the air by fashion moguls, that Mr. Paul will also be introducing a new designer “No Leak No Mess” product with the Ron Paul non-supporter in mind. This will greatly enlarge the appeal and sales base of this new product. It will be similar to the ‘signature’ series, but with the addition of a silk screening of Ron Paul’s likeness on the inside ‘seat’ of the designer protection. It’s said to be a way to remember Mr. Paul everytime one makes a “boo-boo”. Mr. Paul is considered a gracious man for making this designer upgrade just for non-supporters of his campaign for president.
  
  Report this comment
- Miami
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:00pm
  A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  
  “If a congressman does not submit funding requests for his district the money is simply spent elsewhere. To eliminate all earmarks would be to further consolidate power in the already dominant executive branch and not save a penny.”
  
  This is very true, but so why is he such a hypocrite? Voting against his own earmarks, he says he does not support or votes for earmarks, he only playing the game. One fights by their convictions or one mouth the words and play the game. You can’t have it both ways…!
  
  Honor… Is standing by your convictions, regardless of the price it may cost you.
  
  A Hypocrite is one who speaks of his convictions yet does not live up to them…!
  
  Report this comment
- stopspendingourmoney
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:25pm
  Things that make you go hmmmmm……………… I will vote for Romney if he get’s the nomination we need to get obozo out under any circumstances even if it means voting for Romney…..Just here still hoping for Ron Paul and I am even Mormon…. Watch the video’s and you will know what I mean.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ypeDedNo8&feature=share
  
  Report this comment
- MEANS2RESIST
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:31pm
  Hey Ya’ll, I’m not Herman Cain & I ain’t goin nowhere but in the lead!!
  
  Report this comment
- Uranium Wedge
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 12:06am
  “Hey Blaze this is stupid.”
  
  Report this comment
- godlovinmom
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 12:44am
  “Whose up for a Beer”…And your right it is stupid…but fun.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 1:29am
  @Miami,
  
  “This is very true, but so why is he such a hypocrite? Voting against his own earmarks, he says he does not support or votes for earmarks, he only playing the game.”
  
  You’re missing an important piece of information.
  
  Congress is supposed to control the spending, NOT the Executive Branch. But because Congress isn’t following the Constitution, what we have is an Appropriations process which leaves any unallocated appropriated funds to be spent by the Executive Branch. This is unconstitutional.
  
  So, in order to follow the Constitution, Congress MUST earmark (or “allocate”) the funds which are to be appropriated, otherwise it would result in the unconstitutional situation where the Executive Branch gets a slush fund, essentially.
  
  This is why Ron Paul says that ALL money that is to be appropriated should be earmarked.
  
  Ron Paul is being both consistent and Constitutional in his views on earmarks. If he had it his way, though, Congress and the Supreme Court would follow what the Constitution ACTUALLY says, and deny the Executive Branch their de facto slush fund, and then this wouldn’t even be an issue.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 1:46am
  @Miami,
  
  I forgot to mention why Ron Paul votes no on many Appropriations Bills.
  
  The reason is because he doesn’t think government needs to spend as much as it does.
  
  But he still must earmark (or “allocate”) the money which is to be appropriated, because if he didn’t, and the Appropriations Bill passed, then the Executive Branch would direct the spending of any unearmarked funds; And, again, it’s Congress’ Constitutional role to direct spending, NOT the Executive Branch’s role.
  
  Report this comment
- Miami
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 2:24am
  A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  
  Congress is supposed to control the spending, NOT the Executive Branch. But because Congress isn’t following the Constitution, what we have is an Appropriations process which leaves any unallocated appropriated funds to be spent by the Executive Branch. This is unconstitutional.
  
  ——————
  
  I agree that congress is the responsible funding branch, but the “earmark” format is a shortcut to the spending bill format. In it’s self it is unconstitutional to earmark unrelated spending propositions to structural laws as they did in ObamaCare. The Bill process has been turned into a joke.
  
  Just as running the government without a budget, it’s all a joke
  
  Gold regulations in a “Health Care” Bill, that has nothing to do with healthcare
  
  Congress (state and Federal) are the only power that is allowed to write the laws, yet we have the EPA, the Obama’s new Banking oversight comity (Dodd / Frank), The DOJ is picking what laws it wants to enforce and on who.
  
  The fact that earmarks have been done fore some time, does not make it right. That is what spending Bills are for, if it is a worthy expenditure it should stand on it’s own…!
  
  As it is now, it puts far to much power in D.C. when it should be done at the state level For example: why should Texas fund California’s Solar Panel experiments? I could go on and on, but if you don’t get it by now you just won’t
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:46am
  @Miami,
  
  “I agree that congress is the responsible funding branch, but the “earmark” format is a shortcut to the spending bill format. In it’s self it is unconstitutional to earmark unrelated spending propositions to structural laws as they did in ObamaCare.”
  
  I think you still suppose that earmarking is when spending gets ADDED TO Appropriations Bills, but this is not the case.
  
  If the Appropriations Bill called for withdrawal of $100 from the Treasury, only $100 worth of earmarks could apply.
  
  And if Congress only earmarked only $50, then $100 would be appropriated from the treasury, and $50 (half of what was appropriated) would be allocated according to the earmarks, and $50 (again, half) would unconstitutionally go into a slush fund for the Executive Branch.
  
  So it doesn’t matter if $0, $50, or $100 worth of earmarks are part of an Appropriations Bill; If $100 is the amount of money to be appropriated from the Treasury, then if the bill passes, $100 will be withdrawn and spent – no matter what.
  
  Earmarks allow Congress to retain control of the spending, rather than giving the Executive Branch a slush fund.
  
  Rick Santorum understood this when he said that it’s easy for a Presidential candidate to be against earmarks, because to get rid of them would be giving the Executive Branch all of the money that came out of the Treasury.
  
  This is also why the Line Item Veto is extremely dangerous.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:16am
  @Miami,
  
  “That is what spending Bills are for, if it is a worthy expenditure it should stand on it’s own…!”
  
  Appropriations are only constitutional if they’re made according to law. So, I can’t imagine the purpose of a Spending Bill, other than to attempt to bypass the Constitution.
  
  See here.
  
  US Constitution, Article 1, Section 9
  
  “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
  
  If that which a Spending Bill is intended to fund already lawfully exists, then I don’t see a need for a Spending Bill – it would simply be included in the amount of money to be appropriated in the Appropriations Bill. And if it’s not already lawful, then money may not be appropriated for it.
  
  Report this comment
- little big man
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:09am
  Yeah my BIGWHEEL has arrived
  
  Report this comment
- deeberj
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:40am
  A doctor’s labor – I’m voting for Dr. Paul in my state primary. I don’t agree with his foreign policy and I will vote Romney if he wins the primaries, but I just don’t like how the Media pushed Romney down our throats. I worry they have a plan too and it will not be good for conservatives.
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:33am
  @deeberj,
  
  “I don’t agree with his foreign policy and I will vote Romney if he wins the primaries, but I just don’t like how the Media pushed Romney down our throats.”
  
  Thomas Jefferson and George Washington held Ron Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy; Also, the Republican Party, itself, used to hold Ron Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy.
  
  See here.
  
  Third Annual Message to Congress
  http ://www.teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?docu*****ment=664
  (Remove asterisks.)
  
  “We have seen with sincere concern the flames of war lighted up again in Europe, and nations with which we have the most friendly and useful relations engaged in mutual destruction. While we regret the miseries in which we see others involved let us bow with gratitude to that kind Providence which, inspiring with wisdom and moderation our late legislative councils while placed under the urgency of the greatest wrongs, guarded us from hastily entering into the sanguinary contest, and left us only to look on and to pity its ravages.”
  
  (Continued)
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 12:38pm
  (Continued)
  
  “These will be heaviest on those immediately engaged. Yet the nations pursuing peace will not be exempt from all evil. In the course of this conflict, let it be our endeavor, as it is our interest and desire, to cultivate the friendship of the belligerent nations by every act of justice and of incessant kindness; to receive their armed vessels with hospitality from the distresses of the sea, but to administer the means of annoyance to none; to establish in our harbors such a police as may maintain law and order; to restrain our citizens from embarking individually in a war in which their country takes no part; to punish severely those persons, citizen or alien, who shall usurp the cover of our flag for vessels not entitled to it, infecting thereby with suspicion those of real Americans, and committing us into controversies for the redress of wrongs not our own;”
  
  (Continued)
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 12:48pm
  (Continued)
  
  And here.
  
  Washington’s Farewell Address
  http://www.heritage.org/initiatives/first-principles/primary-sources/washingtons-farewell-address
  
  “The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.”
  
  (Continued)
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 12:57pm
  (Continued)
  
  And here.
  
  War, Ron Paul, and Conservatism
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUoWhWsOWk
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 1:03pm
  @deeberj,
  
  It was because Progressives didn’t mind their own business that America fought WWI and WWII.
  
  See here.
  
  Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
  http://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan198.html
  
  And here.
  
  Rethinking the Good War
  http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance181.html
  
  And here.
  
  Ron Paul as a Stooge for Adolph Hitler
  http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block190.html
  
  Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 5:00pm
Thought bubble” I’m smiling because I know where that guys hand is”.

Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:11am
  Is that where your hand is? lol
  
  Report this comment
bpodlesnik
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:58pm
“I’m still 18 on the inside”

Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:57pm
I like TSA screenings!

Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:55pm
I’d give you two thumbs up but their dirty from being elsewhere!.

Report this comment
- pscully17
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 8:01am
  LMAO…lol too funny.
  
  Report this comment
extinction
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:55pm
Question: What are you going to do now that you’ve finally dropped out of the race?
Answer: I’m going to Disneyland!! I hear that’s a pretty good fantasy world as well.

Report this comment
- RailRoadCar9
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 7:08am
  rubish . Caption . Freedoms on the march and shills are a runnin scared
  
  Report this comment
dannno
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:55pm
Hey Constitution, it’s your birthday, we gonna party like it’s your birthday!

Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:54pm
Is that door to nowhere still behind me?

Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:53pm
I’ve got good grip,I just need something to hang on to.

Report this comment
polswack
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:52pm
“Hava Nagila, Hava Nagila….

Report this comment
- shirelover
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 7:55am
  Love it! I wonder how many other people will catch it!
  
  Report this comment
- bikerr
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 11:03am
  @polswack—Now that’s a funny caption.
  
  Report this comment
- XScramblerX
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:40am
  Good one!
  
  Report this comment
- Zoe
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 7:06am
  Man that’s what I was thinkin!
  
  Report this comment
- Rational Man
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 5:51pm
  An anti-semite singing a Jewish wedding song?……Guess I don’t get it. Maybe I don’t want to.
  
  Report this comment
TheBoltz
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:50pm
This is Ron, Evolving……

Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:50pm
I hate this Simon says game. Just who is Simon? and why do I do What he says?

Report this comment
watchdog_jedi
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:45pm
http://www.the-vignette.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/ImPrettyGangsterMyself.jpg

I noticed you’re gangster…I’m pretty gangster myself.

Report this comment
- Mtroom
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 12:36pm
  The white man’s hoodie…. Be careful out there.
  
  Report this comment
Highstreet
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:45pm
It must embarrass Romney every time I win a State delegation, and Obama every time I beat him in the polls!

Report this comment
CharlieCheaterNejedly
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:43pm
In my right hand I hold Romney’s political platform. In my left hand I hold Obama’s political platform. Good luck guessing which one belongs to either.

Report this comment
- Smokey_Bojangles
  Posted on May 11, 2012 at 7:55pm
  Good one!
  
  Report this comment
- american1st
  Posted on May 11, 2012 at 8:49pm
  yep.. good one!!
  
  Report this comment
- Cosmos102
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 3:15pm
  Why? Because neither Romney or Obama support legalizing dope?
  
  Report this comment
- A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 6:29pm
  @Cosmos102,
  
  “Why? Because neither Romney or Obama support legalizing dope?”
  
  No, because they both think that the government can take your right to do whatever you want with your own body, whether it’s using dope, drinking raw milk, or being disgusting with your same-sex partner.
  
  Neither Obama nor Romney understand the Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- supermansdad
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 5:37am
  @ Doc
  
  Please tell me your not that ignorant? You do not have the right to do what ever you want with your life or body hence we are a nation of laws. Were your assement correct that would be the definition of anarchy. While raw milk is overboard for sure it is not the case with the other two. What about abortion? “It’s your body” they say but what about the babies body? Even if it were rape why would you punish the kid for the crimes of father?
  
  The truth of the matter is Libertarians dislike the idea of anybody being able to tell them anything no mater what it is, even if its that the sky is blue. However there are certain truths and natural laws that are unequivical. Both dope and sex fall in those categories. There is also always somebody higher than you, at minimum God. And no matter what liberals or libertarians want to claim our found was as a Christian nation.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:05am
  @Supermansdad, Yes we are a rule of laws. The supreme law of the land was supposed to be the Constitution. PROGRESSIVES broke that law when they justified policing those vices you mentioned at the federal level. Like it or not, you are a progressive. If you don’t believe me, which I’m sure you don’t, study the progressive era and how those laws you cherrish came about. The busy-body do gooders were the useful idiots to the Margaret Sanger’s and Woodrow Wilson’s at the height of the Progressive Era. Not a lot has changed really.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:59am
  @SUPERMAN”S DAD You sound like a really kind man..and I appreciate your stance..however.women who do not want to have children will abort them in back street abortions..We cannot force everyone into Christianity..but we would remain free to be Christians in order to spread the word of God..which is our duty as Christians to do ..and through the power of the Holy Spirit..many will be won..In the meantime..people doing drugs won’t stop..and people fornicating and committing adultery will not stop..until they have accepted Jesus as Lord and Savior..Paul only wants to decriminalize at a Federal level…not at a state..A government big enough to give you everything you want..is big enough to take it all away..They enacted 40 thousand new laws and people are spending time in prison for something as insignificant as using the wrong type of barbeque grill..This country was founded on freedom..this is the first time in history where we really have 2 paths we can go on..it’s either Obama/Romney or it’s Ron Paul.. Let’s take freedom..we can straighten it out step by step,,instead of placing ourselves in a Communist prison.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 10:09am
  @JUST ANGRY Excellent post!!
  
  Report this comment
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 2:54pm
  Just and Angry, Keep up the good fight for freedom. Most people have been lulled into thinking that we are a democracy instead of a republic. No worries though as Paul is winning. I truly believe that with his grassroots organization of thousands upon thousands of supporters, that he will go into the convention with well over 1144 supporters as delegates. Some, we are told, are bound to vote for Romney. That is a misconception and is just nudges (progressive tactic) in order to make people do what they want. The RNC and DNC are private clubs and have no say in who anyone can or cannot vote for. Rule 38 states that no delegate is bound to any candidate, and the RNC attorney stated in writing that no delegate is bound and every delegate can vote their conscience on the first round of voting at the national convention. It will be a great day.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 4:21pm
  @West, I hope you’re right. I have a feeling they’ll pull some crap though. Remember how they brought the cops in to shut down that MO caucus. Maybe the division of Vets for Paul will give them pause in trying to some pull some crap in Tampa though.
  
  Report this comment
- mercenary4freedom
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 12:37am
  SUPERDAD, spoken like a true neocon err, excuse me , progressive neocon
  
  Report this comment
- supermansdad
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:10am
  @Merc
  
  Wow! A Paulbot used the Neocon tagline….again. Try to come up with something else that OWS/Paulbots don’t over use more than they try to claim that they are the only true owner/follower of the Constitution. I bet you also think Thomas Payne was GREAT!
  
  Report this comment
- SgtB
  Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:13am
  @ Supermansdad, Please tell this Marine, Libertarian, and Oath Keeper where you reside so that I can keep my oath and destroy an enemy of our Constitution and consequently an enemy of Liberty. Just where do you get off trying to tell me or anyone else that I do not have a right to do with my body as I see fit so long as it doesn’t affect anyone else through force or coercion? I’d really like to know how you make that leap. Do you really wonder why so many people in this nation dislike the “religious right” when they are trying to act as God and tell everyone what they can and cannot do? Well, actually, I take that back. God doesn’t even act as you do. God allows mankind to have FREEWILL and does not force you to do anything. In fact, if he forced you to do good, there would be no morality to your actions.
  
  So basically, my question for you is what are you going to tell Saint Peter or God himself when you get to those pearly gates and they ask you why you thought it would be okay to use the barrel of a gun and the force of government to tell others how to live their lives, thus stealing from men the freewill that God instilled in them through their divine creation? What are you going to tell them? I really want to know the words your soul will utter before being cast out.
  
  Report this comment
AZGranny
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:36pm
“I’m number zero! I’m number zero!”

Report this comment
- supermansdad
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 5:39am
  Lol!!!!!!!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- BigFoot
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 7:44am
  funny!!
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 2:03pm
  @AZGRANNY..”I’m number zero” Sorry to hear that granny!..here’s hoping whoever you hold special.. will hold you just as special ..Happy Mother’s Day!!
  
  Report this comment
Blazebanned
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:29pm
“Yay, the short bus is here”……..

Report this comment
- AllAmericanGirl22
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 2:17pm
  lol, good one!
  
  Report this comment
RedDirtTexas
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:27pm
I still do my Jack Lalanne Exercises! Hey Cubbie! Hey Annette! What happened to the mouse ears on MY hat?

Report this comment
tharpdevenport
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:23pm
Paul: “No, that’s not to keep the aliens from reading my mind, it’s from keeping the Jews from controlling it. What?”

Report this comment
- American_Woman
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 9:57pm
  Oh no! That’s horrible and funny at the same time.
  
  Report this comment
MrSunshine
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:22pm
Steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeriek three! I’m out!

Report this comment
- MrSunshine
  Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:31pm
  Make that: Steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerike three, I’m out!
  
  Tell me he doesn’t look like he belongs behind home plate!
  
  Report this comment
KidCharlemagne
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:16pm
“No one knows what Ron Paul is still doing in the Republican presidential primary race.”
=======================================

Winning, of course!:

“RT Reports Ron Paul Winning 11 States” (so far……more to come!)

Report this comment
- CaKe
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 3:29pm
  Love this!!! Go Ron Paul!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- CaKe
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 3:36pm
  I love you Glenn but please stop the Ron Paul foreign policy bull crap line! Yer all about cracking down on conspiracies yet you haven‘t noticed Romney’s ties to bilderburg and the elite? Makes me very dissapointed you don‘t talk at all about the corrupted crap all around what’s happening to Ron Paul! Alot of respect lost my friend, makes people wonder… If you really care about america you should pull for Ron! Not the bankertards! Romney was paid for by them and your fallowing the same herd! WHY???? Shame on you Sir!! Shame on you…
  
  Report this comment
- pscully17
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 8:03am
  Neither does he!!
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on May 13, 2012 at 2:13pm
  @Kid..thank you for the link!!
  
  Report this comment
jcarcinogen
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:12pm
Great news, we’ve cured his apathy!

Report this comment
KickinBack
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:11pm
Look ma! No antennae!

Report this comment
PusherMan
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:10pm
“I has delegates!!!”

Report this comment
windwardtack
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 4:02pm
“I always win!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtl2ZuJpG9M

Report this comment
- inblack
  Posted on May 11, 2012 at 11:42pm
  Hey Eddie Scary – you are an ass.
  
  We know why Ron Paul will not leave the race. Big money bought Romney this primary.
  We know Romney has no dedication to the constitution or the principles of liberty.
  So does Ron Paul.
  
  So how is Romney different from Obama?
  
  Report this comment
- spirited
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 10:21am
  @BLACK : “So how is Romney different from Obama?”
  
  Romney has sons; Taggart (Tagg), Matt, Josh, Ben and Craig.
  ;^> None look like Trayvon.
  
  Is there a prize?
  
  Report this comment
- inblack
  Posted on May 12, 2012 at 10:47am
  @SPIRITED
  
  You win, the only differences are superficial.
  
  The country loses.
  
  Report this comment

Comments are closed.

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.

« Back to The Blaze