Back to The Blaze »

Comments (5)

• Assunta

  Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:35pm

  She’s prettier than the gal he had a baby with…so…yeah. But then again, he can’t seem to keep his zipper up around women. Just like he’s doing with the female jurors now. OJ jurors all over again – mesmerized by the culprit.

  Report this comment

   

• Livia

  Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:13pm

  She’s no ravishing beauty, but she’s not ugly by a long shot. She was a foolish person for giving him her phone number, though. I wouldn’t give that dirtbag my dog’s droppings. He deserves nothing from any decent woman, he should go back to that frightful creature he messed around with when his wife was dying.

  Report this comment

   

• Bete Noire

  Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:17pm

  I agree it is pretty harsh to ridicule this girl. No justification for that.

  But as far as Edwards goes, he’s a degenerate, he’d hump a pile of rocks if he thought there was a snake under it.

  Any man who would cheat on his wife, no less one that is fighting for her life should be taken out and beaten to unconsciousness. Then when he wakes up beat him again.

  Report this comment

   

• prolifeevangelical

  Posted on May 29, 2012 at 1:52pm

  What is with the incredibly mean blog post? Why is the blaze being so cruel to this woman?

  How would you like to have your picture on a major website and be mocked?

  For the record, I think the woman is a nice looking lady that may not be a supermodel but certainly didn’t deserve to be publicly mocked.

  Report this comment

   

• hatchetjob

  Posted on May 29, 2012 at 1:19pm

  “pretty”???

  Report this comment

   

Comments are closed.

« Back to The Blaze