At the Pentagon Thursday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters that the U.S. government knew too little about what was going on in Benghazi and therefore couldn’t deploy forces to defend our consulate and personnel:
“You don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta said.
Lacking that information, Panetta said he, General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, and General Carter Ham, head of the U.S. military’s Africa Command, felt they couldn’t “put forces at risk in that situation.”
“This happened within a few hours and it was really over before, you know, we had the opportunity to really know what was happening,” Panetta said.
But today we learn that the State Department and the Department of Defense were receiving real-time updates from the ground, multiple requests for support — right down to the exact coordinates air support could’ve targeted. The info on the ground couldn’t get much clearer than that. Yet requests for help went unheralded and as two brave Navy SEALs ran into the fire, the Obama administration turned their back on them.
Why?
The Obama campaign and the Obama White House repeatedly insist that President Obama’s “gutsy call” green-lighting the raid on Osama bin Laden’s Pakistan compound demonstrated a steel backbone as commander in chief. This is actually one of the key talking points of his campaign:
Yet we have since discovered that the OBL raid was less a “gutsy call” and more of a no-brainer. Now, with details of the Benghazi attack continuing to emerge more than a month after the fact, it seems the only “gutsy” declarations coming from the Obama White House are platitudes and falsehoods trying to shield the president from responsibility.
There’s nothing “gutsy” about blaming a YouTube video for the senseless violence of barbarians.
There’s nothing “gutsy” about hiding behind your U.N. ambassador as she delivers your lies.
There’s nothing “gutsy” about wrongly blaming the intelligence community.
There’s nothing “gutsy” about attending campaign fundraisers just hours after a terrorist attack on American citizens.
And there’s certainly nothing “gutsy” about dodging and distracting from the truth.
Barack Obama had a real chance to make a “gutsy” call that only an American president could make, but instead of meeting the challenge, he ran from it.





















































































































barbeque
Oct. 29, 2012 at 1:55amCan someone interview the 30 people who were rescued in Benghazi? Or, are they off limits?
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Oct. 28, 2012 at 6:17pmIt is noteworthy that as head of our civilian military obama can give a ‘by any means’ order to commandeer the entire power structure. This can be done with less than a handful of bullets to the head of those who refuse to comply. If that doesn’t do it there is always their family and children. It’s been done before. As a matter of fact– THAT IS THE WAY IT IS ALWAYS DONE! Do not underestimate to the degree the power structure has already been implanted and embedded over the last 3 years.
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Oct. 28, 2012 at 6:09pmThat’s it? Deciding whether or not to kill a pedophile pervert terrorist murderer by somebody else’s hand?
That’s all we get”?
Report this comment
Civican
Oct. 28, 2012 at 10:45amSarcasim!
Report this comment
Clausvons
Oct. 28, 2012 at 12:09amJudge Jeanine, on FoxNews tonight, blew the cover off the White House by showing (through interviews with experts) that Obama watched the Benghazi attack live from the Situation Room in the White House. It was Obama, and Obama alone, who could, and should have approved or given the command to provide the help that was requested three times by those on the ground in Benghazi.
The White House watched and allowed the attack to proceed unabated, without ordering any of the special operations forces, which were in place in the Mediterranean, to intervene, thereby allowing Navy Seals, and others, to die at the hands of the attacking force.
There are not words strong enough to describe the anger that some are feeling at the outright cowardly betrayal of those Navy Seals and others who died in the attack.
In addition, the failure of the Mainstream Media, both newspapers and television networks, to report in detail on this travesty is both beyond belief, and traitorous. It is clear that the Mainstream Media may be becoming a clear and present danger to the Republic by not informing the electorate of the gross negligence demonstrated by this administration.
This type of journalism is common, and expected, in totalitarian countries, but not in the United States.
Now, having seen all that, and having learned all the preliminary facts of the Benghazi attack, and inaction by the President as he watched the attack in real time, there are two critical questions that all Americ
Report this comment
meister41
Oct. 27, 2012 at 6:49pmHe, Obama did not want to see any of “HIS” Brothers in Arms die!!!!!! Yeah, I’m talking “Muslum Brotherhood!
Report this comment
schlob
Oct. 27, 2012 at 4:59pmPerhaps GEN Ham was not quite so willing to go along with it. And has been fired over it. http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/p/37144547/Interesting-Rumor-Concerning-General-Carter-Ham-and-Stand-Down-Order.aspx
Report this comment
schlob
Oct. 27, 2012 at 4:56pmhttp://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/p/37144547/Interesting-Rumor-Concerning-General-Carter-Ham-and-Stand-Down-Order.aspx
Report this comment
Lone Ranger
Oct. 27, 2012 at 2:25amObama prides himself in being “deliberative,” which means he’ll put off making a decision as long as he can. That’s why it took weeks to decide to send surge troops into Afghanistan. Even when he was asked to approve the bin-Laden raid, he said he’d sleep on it. This time, he deliberated four people into the ground. This has to be a low point in our history, along with all the other low points the democrats have given us.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Oct. 26, 2012 at 11:11pm“Gutsy move”?
Like Bush and Iraq?
Do 12 year olds write for the Blaze?
Unlike Bush, Obama doesn’t need to show his fantasy manhood to his father.
Just like George Zimmerman.
Report this comment
Ron_A
Oct. 27, 2012 at 1:39amManhood includes a thing called honor which this man can not even spell. I’ve seen some of your posts and I’m quite convinced that you are unfamiliar with the concept as well.
Report this comment
Civican
Oct. 28, 2012 at 10:29amWhy do you ask? Are you looking for a job for after school (if you even go to school) What are you doing here if you don’t like The Blaze? I know, you’re just a troll practicing to become a democrap.
Report this comment
I-have-black-immunity
Oct. 26, 2012 at 6:18pmOwbama’s hidden records of his life before 2009 have been partially discovered. The records show that Owebama served as a NAVY Seal Team 6 for 12 years. He also worked full time in a beer distrtibution warehouse to make enough money to go to college and law school, he refused affirmative action, he refused any grants, scholarships or student loans because he felt that must accomplish all that he does on his own. He got his Bachelors dregree, his Law Degree, he did it on his own, at his own expense, and nobody else helped him build that. Nobody else made that happen. His hidden records show this to be true.!?
Report this comment
Ron_A
Oct. 27, 2012 at 1:41amlol. By liberal logic I guess the “we just don’t know” argument applies.
Report this comment