The Economist endorses Obama
President Obama‘s endorsement for reelection from The Economist isn’t exactly glowing. (The subheader: “America could do better than Barack Obama; sadly, Mitt Romney does not fit the bill.”) But it’s something.
From the endorsement:
A man who once personified hope and centrism set a new low by unleashing attacks on Mitt Romney even before the first Republican primary. Yet elections are about choosing somebody to run a country. And this choice turns on two questions: how good a president has Mr Obama been, especially on the main issues of the economy and foreign policy? And can America really trust the ever-changing Mitt Romney to do a better job? On that basis, the Democrat narrowly deserves to be re-elected.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
















































































































OneTermPresident
Posted on November 1, 2012 at 4:55pmI’m assuming The Economist is about economics and that they might know a thing or two about a budget and about debts and deficits… obviously I’m wrong.
Report this comment
auntmoxie.com
Posted on November 1, 2012 at 3:15pmI used to read this magazine cover-to-cover back in the mid-2000′s (or whatever you call the ’04, ’05 years); but in the past couple of years the magazine seems to have taken a sharp turn to the left. I quit reading the piece of junk that it now is and have never looked back.
Report this comment