Nude protesters? Why would we expect anything less from the liberal left?
President Obama is charging up the left-wing base of his party to oppose the GOP on a fiscal deal and liberal activists are storming Capitol Hill today to deliver the message — as only the liberal left can: loud, naked and profane.
Is it really a coincidence that at the exact time nude protesters shed their clothing (and dignity) in Boehner’s Longworth House Office Building office, a dozen or more reporters just happened to be on the scene? Â Mind you, this is Speaker Boehner’s regular House office, not the Speaker’s office where you could normally find him. Â So it’s not as if these reporters were there to hear from the leading House Republican. Â No, no — it’s pretty clear they were notified of the protest in advance and were eager to capture the stunt on film. Â (There’s video, and it’s gross.)
I feel bad for the poor staffers and interns in Boehner’s office. Â Their mediocre salaries will never be enough to cover the hours of therapy required to erase this from their memories.
Note to liberals: I don’t think “The Naked Communist” was ever meant to be taken literally.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
















































































































Mapache
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 7:15amI am trying to understand why AIDs funding is special? More important than defense, more important than cancer funding, more important than Sandra Fluke and free birth control? If these loons think that simply taxing the rich will provide the funding they need they need to look at who supports all those aids ribbon causes….its not the poor.
Report this comment
USA5
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 10:00pmAids funding isn’t special
These so called nude adults will have this on their life records to explain to
their children and grandchildren why they were so extremely foolish.
Report this comment
dj_bonneromics1982
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 3:22amLook at it this way: they’re not smashing windows or torching cars. They’re simply exploiting one of society’s pet peeves – stuck-up attitudes toward nudity – as a way of forcing attention toward an issue.
Report this comment
Mapache
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 7:17amso, because they could have been worse, this conduct is acceptable? You have a strange way of thinking,
Report this comment
USA5
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 9:58pmExploiting, pet peeves, stuck up attitudes , forcing attention = $1,000′s of dollars of college education
Report this comment
Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 2:10amAIDS seems to be easier to prevent than CANCER. Cancer also kills more Americans.
These freaks were let in.Security needs to be investigated.
Report this comment
gandalf1g
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 1:59amThey should have tossed them in jail nude for a couple of days. They would have came out with a new perspective on jail, and protesting nude
Report this comment
Mapache
Posted on November 28, 2012 at 7:16amThey wanted to prosecute them but on second glance, the case was thrown out due to lack of evidence.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 5:05pmI consider myself blessed for not having to see those protesters.
Report this comment
TeresaJ
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 4:51pmHa! Ha ha ha!
I don’t think many have accused the far left of being well-brought up or classy.
Maybe we should slap them with fines where the sun is shining.
Report this comment