Watch Live: Second House Hearing on IRS Scandal
Live Blazecast Now: The Viral Videos from the IRS Hearing plus your comments
House Dems push for government health care — again
Steering the country toward government-run health care is hard work, y’all. Fortunately for the progressive cause, however, a handful of liberal Democrats in the House of Representatives apparently have nothing better to do:
Dozens of House Democrats on Tuesday reintroduced legislation that would amend the 2010 healthcare law to create a government-run health insurance option, or a so-called “public option.”
The Public Option Deficit Reduction Act, H.R. 261, was introduced by Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), along with 44 other House Democrats.
Congress considered the creation of a government-run healthcare plan during the debate over the healthcare law, but it was eventually removed from the final bill that passed in 2010. Schakowsky says bringing it back would help reduce insurance premiums.
Now, I haven’t taken a close, detailed look at H.R. 261, but a “public option” is already taking root — thanks to Obamacare.
As you’ll recall, Obamacare established government-sponsored national health plans. Over its multi-year implementation, these government health plans will gradually evolve into a single-payer government-run health system ans private insurers are forced out of the market.
Public option-single payer, potato-potahto.
These liberal Dems are just apparently not into waiting for crony capitalism to take its natural course.
“Obamacare is already helping millions of Americans get the health care they need, but it can be made even better,” she said. “The Public Option Deficit Reduction Act will give health care consumers more choice and lower their premiums.”
Her bill would set up a government-run plan that would provide premiums that are 5 to 7 percent lower than private insurance plans. This, she said, would “put pressure on all insurers to lower their premiums in order to compete.”
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

















































































































NigelTufnel
Posted on January 19, 2013 at 3:30amAh yes….exactly what so many supporters of Obamacare said would not happen. All of Obama’s executive orders pertaining to gun control were pretty mundain and redundant. Except for the one that said doctors should be able to ask if there are hand-guns at home. Oh yeah sure they will tell you it’s only when one’s mental health is in question but remember that Obamacare implements a national data base that will allow anyone in government to access some very personal information. The democrats understand they cannot outright attack or coherse you simply because you are NOT a democrat. But they WILL attack the ideals that make you NOT a democrat. Take the simple case of Joe the Plumber all of a sudden being audited. Not a coincidence but a simple act of using an arm of government to coherse. It’s real grease-ball stuff. You smoke? Use drugs? Are fat? Own guns? Religious orientation?(oh we need that like in the military for last rights). Is your car an electric?(you could commit suicide with an old fossel fuel burner). As time goes by just about anything can be used to make your health insurance premiums higher. Because now the goverment is writing the rules. Not physicians and insurance companies. Have you flown or been to Mexico in the last year? Oh yeah that’s gonna cost you. Get the picture yet?
Report this comment
wellright
Posted on January 18, 2013 at 1:00amI’m waiting for the administration to sue H&R Block for their tv ad. Ad says 900 pages of new tax laws due to Affordable care act
Report this comment