Back to The Blaze »

Comments (12)

• noslave

  Posted on January 25, 2013 at 9:20am

  LAWS ARE ONLY LAWS IF YOU CHOOSE TO OBEY THEM? if the communist pass a law your to shoot those who oppose them?would you of course not,its like russia who sent soldiers to kill other russians who rebelled,they wouldnt do it,so every country did studies&found they would have the same problem,so they would use U.N. FORCES?french hate americans,no koreans hate japanese??etc.to do the job??in our case it will be holders blks&mexican armies??if they disarm the opposition it will be much easier to eliminate the opposition??******* on them won’t drive them off,only shooting back will.

  Report this comment

   

• skyguy51

  Posted on January 25, 2013 at 7:29am

  I don’t buy the government false flag theories. The Federal government is too incompetent to pull off something that big. I do think there are politicians who will use any tragedy including the massacre of children to advance their political agenda.

  They can’t arrest us all. Lock up 10% of the truck drivers or utility workers and see what happens. When the limousine liberals can’t get their fresh arugula or their condo doesn’t have any electric for their heating and air conditioning they might rethink their pious sanctimony. Especially if only the gang bangers have guns.

  Report this comment

   

• r3dbull4dd1kt

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:39pm

  I WILL NOT COMPLY…Mrs. Looneytunes can forcefeed whatever legislation she wants; the Second Amendment “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” and ANY Elected Official who tries is committing TREASON–it is still a capital offense punishable by Death…

  Continue to forcefeed your Socialism BS and you Liberals are going to unleash the most devastating Military Force in the World: The American Militiaman…Ask Britain how that worked out for them>

  Report this comment

   

  • Afungi

    Posted on January 25, 2013 at 1:16am

    Are you ready to do civil disobedience? Are you ready to fight this in the courts? Are you ready to tell the police “You will be the criminal if you steal my weapon and violate my 2 amendment rights? Are you willing to go down to the police station with your Lawyer and say to the police I’m here with hundreds of my neighbors we will flood your jail and swamp your court and vote you out of office.” Are you willing to trust your neighbors to not convict in a trial of 12? Are you going to be there as one of those 12 to say no? We stand together or hang alone. I am old but I will do what I can. Murder is murder.

    Report this comment

     

  • r3dbull4dd1kt

    Posted on January 25, 2013 at 8:28am

    There are TENS of THOUSANDS of Law-Abiding Firearms owners Nationwide sharing the same sentiments: Sheriffs are now standing defiantly saying the have no plans to uphold UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS…

    NO, sir, I am not going to be following Beck’s moronic “peace and harmony” approach–we learned some lessons from History; Like the Gestapo and the SS shooting innocent Jews who ‘Complied with Policy’…

    The ‘Line in the Sand’ is clearly drawn–if Comrade Oblahblah signs an Executive Order that defecates on the Bill of Rights and his Supreme Court of Puppets upholds it, the powderkeg has been lit and armed resistance is the only course left…

    “The Tyrants Power Only Exists, Until His Slaves Revolt”

    Report this comment

     

  • Highlo3517

    Posted on January 25, 2013 at 9:55am

    i remember a time in the history books when the government was talking about taking the citizens rights and property. it divided a nation. this happened back in the 1860′s. I see a similar result in the future if they try to press this issue. They will not take my guns.

    Report this comment

     

• Charles Curtis

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:24pm

  Remember this: Use your head not your arse to do your thinking.
  And READ and THINK before you act.

  “Our main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn’t matter if you have to distort the facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.”
  Sara Brady
  Chairman, Handgun Control Inc, to Senator Howard Metzenbaum
  The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3

  YES that quote said SOCIALIST America… They have not lost sight of their objective.

  Report this comment

   

• noslave

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:58pm

  DONT WANT TO LOSE YOUR GUNS??NRA IS MILLIONS STRONG??contract out a stealth hit man, bound to be one around??gladly give my dues to that purpose,the more anti-gun nuts you pop,the less will be so outspoken?like comunists and gays in the 50s they hid ?no comeing out ofthe closet for either of them??THE RESULTS WILL BE THE SAME?

  Report this comment

   

• countryboy6025

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:43pm

  SOMETIMES THE ANSWER IS BITING YOU IN THE ****!!
  Why is it that none of the disturbed and evil men, who steal guns, then go and kill movie-goers and children in school, has ever been identified as a conservative NRA member?
  Fort Hood~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim
  Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals
  Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat
  Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal
  Connecticut School Shooter- ~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians,
  Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.”
  INTERESTING, isn’t it?

  Report this comment

   

• BIGDANE

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:25pm

  We’re going to lose our guns rights because of this? http://ssristories.com/index.php?p=school
  http://www.ignatius-piazza-front-sight.com/2012/12/19/front-sight-special-blog-our-message-is-being-heard-keep-it-moving/
  http://www.drugawareness.org/recentcasesblog/why-i-took-a-gun-to-school-1

  Report this comment

   

• judyaz

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:48pm

  Kinda odd that our Government is trying to disarm the American citizens (while being lawbreakers themselves of Constitutional Law). And yet, we trade Egypt 20 more F-16s. (And so much more military weapons are being traded, as in Benghazi and Fast ad Furious, and more than we’ll ever know.)
  Feinstein’s argument should apply to non-citizens in frienemy countries, and also in dealing with terrorists. Are they using the F-16s for hunting deer or game or for peaceful pursuits? What about all the military grade automatic weapons we give those teenagers in Al Qaeda affiliates to do covert ops, say in Syria or Libya? Anybody “felt” like they may have the intent to harm themselves or another? How about as many others as they can kill?
  So why turn against the American public, as though we are the enemy, and treat the enemy as precious trusted kids? Why would we turn surveillance against the American people (who have freedom of speech) and yet pay no attention to what Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leaders say, clerics, Al Qaeda, etc.? Why give them weapons for war, and take away handgun and small semi-automatic weapons painted black from Americans? Are we an easier target? Nice people usually are.
  You know that old saying, if owning a gun becomes a crime only criminals will have guns. What will single women or grandmothers do to protect themselves from the increasing armed home invasions lately?

  Report this comment

   

• ccseng

  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:23pm

  I don’t think that the Sandy Hook shootings were fake or were a “false flag” or were a government training op. I also don’t think that this awful tragedy is being exploited by “truthers”. The generalization of all people who see something wrong as kooks — in our leaders’ (that’s “leaders” in the ironic sense of the blind leading the blind) irrational reactions and self-serving politicization of tragedy — is disgusting and insulting. Your coverage has not really debunked anything and is weak on the libs’ exploitation. If you don’t see something wrong in the slanted reporting and the attacks on Constitutional rights, you aren’t paying attention.

  In 50 or more mass murders like Sandy Hook, Zoloft, Prozac, Paxil, Ritalin, Luvox, Effexor, Celexa, Lexapro, and/or many other anti-depressant and psychoactive prescription drugs were being taken by the shooters. The fathers of both James Holmes and Adam Lanza were both scheduled to testify before a Senate committee on the LIBOR scandal. Could such father’s sons be on anti-depressant drugs? Do you ignore the implications? Do you ignore the possibility of a hidden motive in cover-ups, suppression of news immediately after first release, suppression of police reports, and straw-man attacks on gun owners, the right to bear arms, and the gun industry? You don’t need a grand conspiracy for politicians to take advantage of tragedies. Do Americans have a reason to doubt the news media and the government? I think

  Report this comment

   

Comments are closed.

« Back to The Blaze