‘Scam’: National Review editor on Rubio’s immigration plan
The conservative National Review magazine editorialized yesterday against all talks of immigration reform in Washington, asserting that each proposal contains some form of amnesty.
Rich Lowry, editor of National Review, is out again today with a column specifically calling Sen. Marco Rubio‘s (R-Fla.) position on the issue a “scam”:
It’s never a good sign when lawmakers can’t call things by their real names. Even conservative star Marco Rubio — the gang’s most important member, who has been energetic and fearless in making his case — calls illegal immigrants “undocumented” workers. He referred to them in a recent blog post as people “living in the United States without proper immigration documents.” …
Sen. Chuck Schumer stated it with admirable clarity in the news conference announcing the principles: “On Day One of our bill, the people without status [i.e., illegal immigrants] who are not criminals or security risks will be able to live and work here legally.” You can’t get more direct than that.
The scam is to pretend that this isn’t the most significant point in an immigrant’s changing status. “Our purpose,” the Gang of Eight says in its statement of principles, “is to ensure that no one who has violated America’s immigration laws will receive preferential treatment as they relate to those individuals who have complied with the law.” This is manifestly not their purpose.
On the other hand, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said earlier this week… “it would be a good thing” if Rubio “can solve [the immigration problem] in the way he set forth.”
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

















































































































CamilleF
Posted on February 1, 2013 at 3:05pmI wouldn’t call NR conservative, but they are surprisingly on the traditional conservative side this time. Good for them.
Pigpen is right about the jobs; I recently heard that the pro-Amnesty crowd, especially those at the WSJ, are no different from the people who brought slaves to America: they both place cheap labor above all else.
Report this comment
Pigpen
Posted on January 31, 2013 at 8:44amThe idea that Hispanics “do jobs Americans won’t do” is a complete fabrication. The TRUTH is that Hispanics “do jobs AT A WAGE RATE at which Americans won’t work”. All the rank-and-file Republicans are against amnesty because the presence of all those workers will depress wages. All the senior Republicans are against amnesty because LEGAL WORKERS won’t depress wages far enough. So all of these bills are the rich and powerful trying to find a way to keep their illegal WAGE RATES (illegally low wages which are subsidized by government social programs at the expense of the tax paying middle class) and still at least APPEAR to be in control of the borders. WAKE UP. Congress is full of drug using perverts. Senior leadership SEE US ALL, NOT JUST THE CHICANOS, AS THEIR CATTLE!
Report this comment