There’s more to the Benghazi story — will we ever get the truth?
In case you needed proof that there’s still more news to come from the terrorist attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi, one U.S. Senator says he and his questions are being stonewalled:
Sen. Richard Burr, a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said that the CIA has “flatly refused” to give some Benghazi-related documents to the committee, which is conducting an investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks on the State Department and CIA personnel and facilities in Benghazi, Libya. …
None of the other members of the committee contradicted Burr’s assertion.
Burr’s Spokesman David Ward later told CNSNews.com that the committee had initially requested the documents in question four months ago.
In light of Burr’s statement, CNSNews.com put some questions to the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) James Clapper. Specifically, CNSNews.com asked: Is it true that the CIA, or any agency under the umbrella of the DNI, has withheld documents, or refused to provide documents, to the Senate intelligence committee that the committee has sought in its investigation of Benghazi? If the administration withheld documents from the committee, on what basis did it do so? And if the administration withheld documents, who was responsible for making the decision to do that?
The ODNI responded with a statement. “Since the attack on our facility in Benghazi, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, on behalf of the entire Intelligence Community, has worked closely with members of Congress to respond to all requests for information,” said the statement. “We have testified before committees and delivered numerous briefs, provided thousands of pages of intelligence data and answered hundreds of written questions. DNI Clapper values the strong relationship between the IC and members of Congress and remains committed to being responsive to the requests of our oversight committees.”
Click here for more on Benghazi’s unanswered questions.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
















































































































zygmont
Posted on February 17, 2013 at 10:10amZyMar/MarZy, Here’s a letter that I sent to Senators Graham and Scott of SC, Bennet and Udall of Colorado, and McCain of AZ. You may recall that I also had contacted these Senators in December on the topic of Benghazi.
I also sent the letter to the NYTimes, LATimes, and Washington Post. Last night I sent an earlier draft of the communication to Larry Kudlow of The Kudlow Report (CNBC), Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor (FOX), and 60 Minutes (CBS). I do not want to see the truth remain hidden and I remain concerned that we (the American People) do not yet know the answers to the questions in the letter below. Let’s hope somebody in Washington gets us answers. frank
Letter on Benghazi
The nomination of Chuck Hagel is sidetracked for many reasons, but it would not be incorrect to say that Senator Hagel has been ghazied. Why? President Obama has nominated him for a critically important role to serve our country, following tragic deaths and a less than well-managed aftermath to Benghazi.
The American public still lacks complete, directly-stated answers related to Benghazi. And, yesterday, President Obama indicated via Google that Benghazi was not relevant to the position of Secretary of Defense or the nomination of Chuck Hagel. Some of us respectfully disagree. Obama, Clinton, Panetta, and others can and should do our Country a great service by speaking out completely, and honestly to end further discussion. Stepping forward now might we
Report this comment