The news of New York City teachers’ pension fund selling off its stock in gun manufacturing isn’t all that surprising — at least not as much as it should be. It should be surprising because most people don’t make their financial decisions based on politics. But you can’t assume that public school officials would make such rational decisions, can you?
New York isn’t the only place where public pension funds are being sacrificed for a political agenda. Cities like Chicago and Los Angeles have also forfeited profitable investments for politics, which really makes you wonder: What is the role of a pension manager — to make money for teachers’ retirement funds, or to use the heft of a public pension fund as a weapon to hurt political opponents?
Something tells me New York, Chicago and L.A. probably wouldn’t object to investing pension funds in failing alternative energy schemes which would lose money, but investing in profitable gun manufacturers… that’s apparently a no-go.
Update: The mismanagement of these worker pensions is even worse when you consider this:
Western New York (WKBW) School districts across the State are now trying to figure out how to pay a 37% increase for a mandated Teachers Retirement System.
“Could it be devastating? Very much so. It is one more expense,” said Jane Burcynski, Executive Director of the Erie County Association of School Boards.
Currently, school districts contribute at a rate of 11.84%.
For the 2013-2014 school year, the employer contribution rate will rise to 16.25%
The New York State Teachers Retirement System has 277,000 active members and 149,000 retired members
“The increase in the employer contribution rate is primarily due to lower investment returns as a result of the financial crisis and continued global economic volatility,” added Heidi Brennan, spokesperson for the State Teachers Retirement System.
The increased expense could cost local school districts millions of dollars, and force administrators to consider layoffs, consolidations, and school closures.

























































































































ObserverOnTheHill
Feb. 17, 2013 at 11:10amThis is why Pelosi thinks it’s in our best interest fro the crooks in DC to take a per-centage of non unionized employee’s retirement funds and have the government ( they do so well with money ) manage those funds – so we don’t make the mistakes that the average common and uninformed worker would which is why we need the great guidance from people like her.
Report this comment
skyguy51
Feb. 16, 2013 at 5:30pmMuch more important to some politicians to make a political statement, especially when it is with other people’s money. So the pension fund goes bust! So what? The taxpayer will bail them out. And the politician moves on to bigger and better things. . . .to screw up!
Report this comment
lel2007
Feb. 16, 2013 at 5:19pmSame bovine excrement, same lier & cheat, different day.
Report this comment
Billca
Feb. 15, 2013 at 9:11pmWatch the results of these political divestitures and/or the investment in “green” programs between now and about 5-6 years from now. When pension funds show a flat-line growth after selling off gun stocks and/or purchasing into money-losing “green” schemes the stakeholders in those pension funds will be demanding someone’s blood (and treasure). The politicians who directed pension fund managers to dump profitable investments will be held financially responsible.
Report this comment
jjwelsh11
Feb. 15, 2013 at 5:15pmSorry my post was not related to the Pension Fund artcle. I am new to the Blaze and was trying to post a comment about Glenn’s comments today about Bengazi and President Obama’s strange lack of interest in what was happening in Benghazi. In view of my experience with President Nixon’s personal involvement with the situation that was occuring in Amman, I can only shake my head with disbelief. Sort of like what dedicated, patriotic Roman citizens must have felt like when, under the riegns of Caligula and Nero, they thought back to the men who founded the Republic. We had arrived there.
Report this comment
jjwelsh11
Feb. 15, 2013 at 5:03pmIt was September 1970. The PLO led by Arafat was trying to overthrow King Hussein in Jordan. All power in Amman was out and our embassy was taking heavy fire from the PLO. Causualties had been reported. Power was then lost in the entire city and there was now no communication with the embassy. On Cyprus, our small Navy-Staffed NSA listening post was intercepting comms between the combatants. We were working 12 on/12 off. One night our teletype started clattering. I went over to it and read the comm: “This is the White House. We need to speak with the person in charge”. I called our Senior Chief and told him the White House wanted him. He walked over and typed: “Senior Chief ——- here. Who is this?” The reply was: This is the President. We need to know what the situation on the ground in Amman is. Can you provide?” The Chief replied “YES SIR” and asked for a few minutes to get a full recap together. We did so and then transmitted our analysis to him. The President then thanked us. We later learned that President Nixon was, at that moment, considering sending in Helicopters from Sixth Fleet units that had been sent to stand by off Israel. Fortunately the Jordanian Army got the upper hand the next morning and our Navy units were not needed. I write this to show the difference between Richard Nixon and Barack Obama. (Later we found out that the President had not been typing on the Teletype but had actually been standing behind an Air Force Captain who typed verbatim his
Report this comment