Howard Kurtz wants ESPN to re-hire Keith Olbermann
Writing for CNN.com, media critic Howard Kurtz says ESPN should give Keith Olbermann, a man of many former jobs, another shot:
Now it would be easy to torpedo that idea by noting that Olbermann has burned bridges everywhere he has worked and could inflame things back at ESPN.
But I won’t. Instead, I’m going to lead a chant: Let’s Go Keith!!
It would be great fun to see him holding forth again on sporting matters. Is the guy supposed to stay sidelined for the rest of his life, just because he’s got a bit of a temper? Don’t the fans of America deserve better? …
I miss the guy, even though there have been times when he has thrown brushback pitches at me. But I’m going to rise above that, for the greater good of television. …
And it couldn’t hurt for ESPN to jazz things up.
The New York Times reported this week that Olbermann is likely looking… for a job back at ESPN, where he worked in the mid-1990s. When he left, an executive at the sports channel said, “”He didn’t burn bridges here. He napalmed them.”
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.


















































































































savagenatn
Posted on March 7, 2013 at 12:20amMust not want anyone to watch espn. EVER
Report this comment
NigelTufnel
Posted on March 6, 2013 at 3:31amKeith has tanked the ratings everywhere he’s gone. Since I have no use for ESPN I think they should hire him. He should get along splendidly with the like of the womanizing Mike Tirico and the rest of the over0testosterone meat heads yammering away uselessly. The MLB Network and NFL network are gonna relagate ESPN to the likes of MTV. MTV is to music as KFC is to chicken as ESPN is to sports. Only the stupid and poor subscribe to it.
Report this comment
Highland
Posted on March 5, 2013 at 2:57pmOlbermann knows as little about sports as he does about world events or politics. He’s an equal-opportunity ignoramus. Or ignoranus, as the case may be.
Report this comment