Politics

Reason #458 not to vote for Lindsey Graham: Michael Bloomberg

In case his centrist bromance with John McCain wasn’t enough of a reason not to support Lindsey Graham, consider this:

Nanny Mayor Michael Bloomberg is a big fan.

Reason #458 not to vote for Lindsey Graham: Michael Bloomberg

(Photo: CBS)

Via The DC’s Neil Munro:

South Carolina’s embattled Sen. Lindsey Graham is getting some home-state aid from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. …

Bloomberg’s aid came in the form of a March 13 press-conference in Columbia, S.C., that was organized by people working the Partnership for a New American Economy. The group is headed by Bloomberg, several Democratic politicians and numerous government-tied business leaders. …

“Lindsey Graham for years has shown incredible courage to lead on this issue at potential cost to himself,” said Jeremy Robbins, a director of Bloomberg’s Partnership for a New American Economy. By supporting Graham in South Carolina, immigration-advocates “will encourage other senators, and encourage other business leaders to get out and get more vocal,” he said during the telephone press conference.

Graham’s election war chest is estimated at a hefty $6 million.  Given his funding, strong support from the state’s GOP leaders and incumbent position, any challenger faces a serious uphill battle.

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (2)

  • fdraiden
    Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:53am

    What? There’s only 458 reasons?

    Report this comment

    fdraiden  
  • Tom K
    Posted on March 14, 2013 at 11:16am

    We are LIVING Obama’s AND Bloomberg’s ” New American Economy ” failure. Lindsey Graham showed his true colors when he and John McCain WASTED Sentae time making fun of Sen. Rand Paul’s successful fillibuster. Big war chest or not, Sen. Graham IS the problem and Must be RECALLED along with McCain and the rest of the RINO’s.

    Report this comment

    Tom K  

Comments are closed.