Regarding the Obama administration limiting access of the “morning-after pill” without a prescription to girls 15 years and older — a decision by a federal court had previously made it available to all ages — we have the New York Times on the left:

Lack of access to safe contraception will not stop adolescents from having sex. Girls who have sex should not be punished with unintended pregnancies.

The Washington Times on the right:

[...] Congress can’t build the momentum needed to ditch Plan B in favor of Plan A, or abstinence, which works every time it’s tried.

And then the Washington Post:

If Congress and the president want to consider whether the sale of emergency contraceptives to young teenagers has unique moral implications that demand special government restrictions, they should have that debate.


Other Must-Read Stories