Politics

Conservatives Can Learn Latinos

Nov. 30, 2012 1:13am

- IAmWholelife.com

Jason Jones is a human rights activist, president of IAmWholelife.com, Co-Executive Producer of “Bella,” and associate producer of “The Stoning of Soraya M.”

It was galling to watch Republican pundits in the wake of the election, sitting before TV cameras treating Latino-Americans as if they were slow-witted children. Like parents who spell out “s-e-x” in the hope that their kids cannot yet spell, consultants told interviewers that the Republican party needs to repackage itself to lure in Latino voters—for instance, by reluctantly and belatedly granting them what Democrats have long been offering with both hands: immigration reform. These party operatives acted as if “those people” they hoped to win over could not possibly be watching—or perhaps as if they didn’t know enough English to understand. What is worse, they seemed to accept the Obama principle that Americans are programmed to vote along ethnic or racial lines. This Balkan concept of politics is highly dangerous in a diverse country like ours—and thankfully, it doesn’t prevail, as Obama’s hefty share of the white vote testifies.

American Latinos are highly diverse—hailing from more than a dozen different countries, with widely divergent interests and perspectives. Some are conservative Catholics, some Pentecostalists, still others religious “seekers” torn between a stale local parish and the boisterous megachurch down the street. And many are thoroughly secularized. For better or worse, they’re modern people. It’s patronizing and false to assume that Latinos are a solid voting bloc that wants simply to vote a collective racial or economic interest. The Democrats already assume that, taking for granted that they can snag “the Latino vote” by offering generous welfare benefits and lax immigration policies (or, as the embittered Mitt Romney foolishly dubbed them, government “gifts”). Now Republicans who accept the “gift” theory want to jump in and outbid the Democrats. Such politics won’t work, and they don’t deserve to.

There are several things conservatives could address to remove the artificial barriers that repel Latino voters. And there are some issues of broad interest to many Latino voters which Republicans should address. I’d like to lay them out, and offer a mode of outreach which rests on core principles that millions of American Latinos (like other Americans) share with conservatives:

  • The border with Mexico. Any sovereign country needs to control its borders. Currently, the U.S./Mexican border is controlled—by drug gangs, human traffickers, American-based gun smugglers, and other criminal elements who are ravaging whole cities throughout Mexico. No American, Latino or otherwise, should favor this chaos. It is mostly Latinos who suffer as a result—who are gunned down by narco-terrorists, packed into Mack trucks to suffocate, or left in the desert to die. If America is ever to manage a comprehensive reform of immigration, securing the border must come first. If that means fencing it off and patrolling it, then that needs to happen, for the safety of citizens on either side, and would-be migrants themselves. No path to citizenship can (or should) be passed until this is accomplished. To offer an amnesty without it would simply invite millions more would-be migrants to risk their lives. We would be advertising the fact that using coyotes works. Thousands more will die in the desert.
  • Economic exploitation. Americans who favor mass-removal of immigrants, or even “self-deportation” rarely admit the central fact that draws most migrants north: These people want to work, and they will work cheaply, sometimes in dangerous jobs, for wages Americans won’t accept, in businesses owned by Americans. So who is the true culprit here—the hard-working, underpaid laborer, or the well-off American who’s violating U.S. labor and safety laws? We need to end this underground economy, where workers are treated like they were in 1870, and extend the protection of law to every worker in America. That means (as part  of immigration reform) imposing controls on employers, improving and making mandatory a program like E-Verify, by which employers can (in minutes) check the legal status of any new employee. They will have no more excuses for their sweatshops. This was the feature of the 1986 amnesty that broke down—thanks to complaints from businessmen to the Reagan Administration.
  • Nativist rhetoric and hypocrisy. As a prolife activist, I move in conservative circles. Sometimes I hear otherwise humane people—who raise money to save the unborn babies of Latino mothers—switch gears to speaking of immigrants as if they were aliens landing from some hostile planet. I have met people who pray to Mexican saints like Miguel Pro speak from the other side of their mouth about “invasion” and “reconquista.” I even met dogged supporters of mass-deportation who employ illegal workers—explaining this away as “a reality of doing business.” Conservatives need more integrity and a deeper sense of common, human solidarity with the people whose actions have left them trapped in the underground economy. It has been a long time since any of us have used rhetoric like “welfare queens” to describe impoverished Americans. It is long past time for discussions of immigration to reflect a similar courtesy and decency. Those are, after all, conservative values.
  • An orderly path to citizenship. Immigrants who came here illegally have certainly benefited from America’s order and prosperity. They have gained untold opportunities, used public schools and hospitals, and sometimes collected government benefits. But Americans have also benefited from their presence. Employers have prospered using cheap labor, consumers have enjoyed lower prices, and countless Americans have had their houses built, grounds maintained, meals cooked, and children or elders cared for, by workers who did not enjoy the protection of law. Large elements of America’s market economy used these people to evade the costs imposed by the New Deal. We have enjoyed for decades a two-tier system: 21st century labor and safety laws for legal workers, and 19th century “robber baron” conditions for illegal immigrants. As we impose order on the border and in the workplace, we must acknowledge the fact that the people already here are not some looming threat to national security, or a tumor to be removed. They are neighbors, co-workers, friends, fellow parishioners, even family members of millions of Americans. They have earned through sweat equity a place at our national table, and it’s time to bring them up out of the underground economy. The way to do that is to offer a path to citizenship to otherwise law-abiding migrants—as the final phase of a comprehensive approach to controlling the border and enforcing our workplace laws.

Essentially, conservatives must be truer to ourselves. At its best, the conservative tradition recognizes deep human values that are shunted aside by rapid changes in technology, economics, and culture. We understand why traditional marriage is deeply different from a “hook-up,” that individuals cannot thrive outside the family, that unborn human beings deserve protection, that men and women are not simply interchangeable economic units, that a culture in collapse cannot maintain a stable economy, that parents (not the feds) are a child’s primary educators, that hard work (not government programs) is the only road to prosperity. In the words of Gov. Bobby Jindal, “We need to continue to show how our policies help every voter out there achieve the American Dream.”

Such truths deeply resonate with Latinos, as with other Americans. We can remove the artificial barriers to understanding that have grown up in recent decades, and address the real, urgent problems we face alongside our neighbor countries. We can even make our positions politically popular. But we must start by abandoning the cheap rallying cries that have satisfied us for too long, by facing bravely our own moments of hypocrisy, and most of all by seeing the sacred human dignity of every person.

Comments (3)

  • zman173rd
    Dec. 2, 2012 at 11:38am

    I’m not sure I read the same article as PIGPEN but my take on it is this: The writer’s more right in his thinking than SE Cup is in hers. She wants us to move politically to the center and this guy wants us to stay right. SE Cup is an atheist and in her thinking she denies the religious reasoning backing an anti-marriage ideal. She’s more Pen Jellette while this guy is more Ron Reagan. He detailed what has to take place in order for us to maintain our sovereignty. I’m “Hispanic” and came from a “dependent on the gov’t” upbringing. When I turned 17 I enlisted and never looked back. Today I know many “minorities” who have similar stories. I see PIGPEN’s direction of how the white man might have guilt and votes his life away because of his ideals but you can’t cast an entire pall over everyone who is white just like saying all Hispanics feel the same way. This article is a reiteration of staying the course. I agree with him.

    Report this comment

    zman173rd  
    • The Third Archon
      Dec. 2, 2012 at 8:24pm

      More to the point, Latinos are a much larger demographic than homosexuals, so from a political perspective if Republicans want to improve their electoral chances as much as possible, while giving up as little of their insanity as possible, they’d be much better off focusing on Latinos than on homosexuals.

      At the end of the day, though, it amounts to the same problem conservatives have ALWAYS had–change, or die (politically speaking). So long as conservatism remains what it is in America, it will be attractive to NEITHER the majority of Latinos, NOR the majority of homosexuals (nor the majority of clear-minded intelligent rational people, but that’s an American demographic that’s probably as small or smaller than homosexuals, so it’s not like ANYONE in American politics is going to need to pander to them in our electoral system).

      Report this comment

      The Third Archon  
  • Pigpen
    Dec. 1, 2012 at 3:52am

    Article stated: “What is worse, they seemed to accept the Obama principle that Americans are programmed to vote along ethnic or racial lines. This Balkan concept of politics is highly dangerous in a diverse country like ours—and thankfully, it doesn’t prevail, as Obama’s hefty share of the white vote testifies.”

    Yes, I agree that people voting along ethnic or racial lines IS DANGEROUS, but I KNOW that you don’t believe that the large white vote for Obama means that “people” don’t vote along ethnic or racial lines. I KNOW that you are aware that only WHITES (who are delusional about America’s and their own omnipotence) are willing to vote against their own best interest on based on IDEALS ALONE. And WHITES are ALONE in that dubious honor. You know that, I know that, anyone who THINKS (and who has that rarest of capacities to be HONEST with themselves) KNOWS THAT. So, IF you know that what you said is NOT TRUE, why did you say it? BECAUSE you, like so many others, are willing to write persuasively to CASH IN by selling the “high-mindedness” of the Left. What a waste. You manipulate TOO CLEVERLY to be an unwitting dupe or a well-meaning dolt. Tell me, did you really think that the subtlety you are using would work forever? Your liberal ascendancy is at an end. At the height of its success, it will suddenly and without warning find itself alienated and alone surrounded by angry “balkanized” nationalists unwilling to respect the once revered fasces of the old r

    Report this comment

    Pigpen  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

TheBlaze

Channel Finder

Find TheBlaze on your TV

This zipcode is invalid, please try again

Channel Finder

TheBlaze is available on channel .

Spread the word!

If you can't find TheBlaze, please call to upgrade your package

Channel Finder

Unfortunately, TheBlaze is not available on .

But you can help! Call at or press CONTINUE to email your provider and urge them to add TheBlaze to your channel lineup.

But you can help! Press CONTINUE to email your provider and urge them to add TheBlaze to your channel lineup.

Continue

Request TheBlaze

Please complete the form

I would like to receive news and information from TheBlaze.
Skip

Thank you for supporting TheBlaze

Interested in doing more? Spread the word about TheBlaze to your friends and family.

Spread the word!

TheBlaze Magazine
Restoring Love