Comments (81)

• General K

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 8:14pm

  Hillary is just another sock puppet for Soros I hear Soros paid for Clintons daughters wedding, look it up. Same difference.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Diamond Girl

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 7:19pm

  I heard this today…he had me chucklin’…most of the Loony-Leftists won’t even get what the hell he’s talking about.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• reconmarine

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 7:17pm

  Just so everyone knows, part of the Soros gang has been tasked with flooding all of the conservative blogs and news blogs with their venom and garbage. Expect alot more trolls than usual. It’s the liberal way.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• clhathaway

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 6:45pm

  This is a dumb story. It has Zero chance of success because no one wanting Hilary for President is going to vote against Dems and for Republicans. It worked in the primary because Republicans could cross over and play spoiler just like Dems do.

  Besides, wouldn’t Obama have a stronger hand for relection if he can campaign against the ruling Republicans? If Hilary wants him to be more unpopular in 2012she should hope he carries ALL the blaim for the next two years.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• PhoenixThunder

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 6:03pm

  Vote your ideals, give strategy a rest.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• steve-o-con

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:49pm

  Rush is so slick! What a great idea!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Jezreel

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:44pm

  Jump from the frying pan into the fire?!!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Beetle1971

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:39pm

  Rush is a political strategy genius. I don’t know why every one here thinks he’s nuts cause he’s so right. Think about it if the democrats win this election and they continue on there current course which leaves Hillary out to dry. If they lose people will start to blame Obama and will think we should have voted for Hillary. Glen Beck said something similar not to long ago about how people are starting to see Obama as far to radical so they will put in some one who will say, “I’m not as crazy as that guy.” Which very well will be Hillary. Rush knows what the democrats are thinking and he knows they won’t vote republican just to screw over Obama. They very well could leave him out to dry though. He’s looking at the long term strategy not just Nov. 2nd.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • General K

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 8:16pm

    None better than Dick Morris the GOP should hire him and let him mastermind a trouncing of the left for many years to come. What are they thinking?

    Report this comment

     

• JenniferNB

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:26pm

  It is legitimate and not illegal. Considering there is voter fraud running rampant on the left. They will never know if they can win on their own merit because they have to do it in a corrupt fashion. Considering they are under investigation in Cincinnati for busing high school seniors to “teach” them how to vote. they gave them ballots with just the green candidates name on it. This could be going on at many many many places!!!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• mlakester

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:20pm

  …if it had been Hillary that got elected in 2008, the progressives’ destructive agenda would have been accomplished a whole lot faster. Not that Obama isn’t doing the job…but Hillary has the experience and the know-how to have done it way quicker. Get them ALL outta DC…don’t just replace them with ‘a lesser evil’.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Spyder

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:07pm

  In a very partisan political environment, like we’ve seen in the past 20 years where elections are so closely decided by almost a 50-50 margin. So currently, having Obama vs. (Republican Candidate) vs. (Other small party candidates) = Approx. 50%-40%-10%, including the independent votes that go for their chosen parties. However, when you split the democrat vote intake for their party’s ticket, now you have Obama or Hillary vs. (Republican Candidate) vs. (Other small party candidates) = 25%, 25% – 40% – 10%. It makes it almost twice as hard for both Obama and Hillary to reach the level of support that a solely backed Republican candidate can in a presidential election. This is obviously a very simplistic explanation, but it points out the type of strategy being used here. Perhaps a variation of the ‘Monty Hall” problem?

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• teahugger

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:05pm

  The original operation chaos worked because the people he was ecouraging to vote for Hillary were his listeners. Why would any democrats either a) listen to him or b) do anything he says? My concern is that the democrats will do the opposite of what he proposes and show up in droves at the polls! But he is a pretty smart fellow, so I will assume he has thought this through and knows what he’s doing (I hope)

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • WISEPENNY

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 6:52pm

    It is a brilliant idea, but some of you dumb-o-crats don’t even know when you’re being made fun of. LOL

    Report this comment

     

• WISEPENNY

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:58pm

  Giving that some thought, that is a brilliant strategy! The Democrats are set to lose big on Nov. 2. There is no way around that. By the Hillary supporters to abstain from their vote, to send a clear message to BHO, that would also send a clear message to Hillary, as well. It would actually be her duty to rally the DNC to save it from extinction altogether, because 2012 election results will find the Republicans replacing the President, along with several more Senators on that dreadful day. On second thought, Democrats, never mind what Rush just said. I like the idea of only a handful of democrats left, at best, after 11/02/2012.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Zombee

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:56pm

  You Kennedy Democrats that are tired of the socilaist/progressives that have hijacked your party…this may be you last chance to save it. Democrats may not like the messenger but message has great merit. You may actually thank Rush Limbaugh some day for this . Democrats the balls in your court.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• DE411Q25

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:44pm

  Hillary??????The dumbest idea ever brought forward. Get rid of the whole bunch, the Administration and all it’s “hanger on’s” as well, including all of Obummer’s appointees, csars etc. And clean Congress as well while at it. Otherwise there is little hope for a free America. November 3 is your chance and only chance.!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Masamune

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:34pm

  I’ll do anything to help divide the Democrats. It would be even better if she ran as a third party candidate. Go Rush!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• Sunnyr

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:32pm

  There is not a nickle’s worth of difference in Hillary and Obozo. They are both Progressive Saul-Alinsky-loving Nutwads. I would drop dead before I would ever vote for Hillary OR Obozo!

  I like Rush but I am NOT a Ditto-Head. Sorry, El-Rushbo.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • WISEPENNY

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:00pm

    So, are you saying that you are a democrat, though?

    Report this comment

     

  • bringdough

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:23pm

    Presidents that have a primary challenge normally do not win. It weakens them too much. Ford in 76, Carter in 80, Bush in 92. That is the reason this is such a great idea.

    Report this comment

     

  • Doc_Slammin

    Oct. 23, 2010 at 6:46pm

    I’m not a ‘ditto-head’ either, but there is a reason to Rush’s madness you haven’t ascertained. Divide and conquer. It’s the Democrat’s own playbook being used against them.

    Report this comment

     

• jacobstroubles

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:28pm

  This weekend might be a really good weekend to get as much food/water as you can.
  Beat the rush!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• caitlynsdad

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:24pm

  I have long thought that Hillary Clinton was going to run in 2012 on the “See I Told You So” platform. What better time for her to announce so publicly than January or February 2011, when she can best be able to say, “See what Obama has led to: A Republican Majority in Congress!”

  That’s not necessarily the best turn of events from the conservative perspective, of course, because Hillary would be tougher to beat in 2012 than Obama. Republican nominee would not be able to run against the past 4 years as easily; Hillary could say, “See, but the past four years would have turned out much differently with me in the White House, and now you don’t have to accept the far-out Tea Party as the only alternative. I, Hillary Clinton, am the Third Way.”

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • woodsdog

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:56pm

    Well I guess she could say that, but would anybody believe her? I wouldn’t. She’s a lefty through and through. No one should forget that. Could you see her and Pelosi? Cat fight???

    Report this comment

     

  • caitlynsdad

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 10:13pm

    Her and Pelosi? Yeah, but under this scenario it would probably be Boehner as Speaker of the House. I wouldn’t believe Hillary either, with that line … but those independent fence-sitters with a post up their **** could believe anything.

    Report this comment

     

  • Taquoshi

    Oct. 23, 2010 at 12:56am

    Woodsdog -

    Oooohhh, catfight? Could be interesting. Will it include hair pulling, and scratching? Or how about mud wrestling? Okay, too messy, I understand. Maybe brooms at twenty paces? When do the tickets go on sale?

    Report this comment

     

• General K

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:22pm

  Hillary is a progressive, get rid of her too.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • Bevaboo

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:39pm

    Agreed, it would have been the same difference if she had won the presidency instead of Obama. Lest we forget, she was in charge of trying to implement universal health care under Bill Clinton.

    Report this comment

     

  • cheezwhiz

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:40pm

    Rush should not be giving free publicity to Hillary …ofcourse its his show but its our country that she is destroying as Hussain’s team-member.
    She is not given too much daily coverage in the kneepads media. Why does Rush keep giving her air-time ? If its not to expose her activities on our country’s behalf using our money , she doesn’t deserve any free campaign time. Not in 2010 atleast

    Report this comment

     

• HillCountryPatriot

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:16pm

  Rush is Right!!! As usual.

  Seriously, I was thinking the same thing the other day about Democrat and Independent voters that drank the kool-aid in 2008. How much buyer’s remorse is really out there? What are they willing to do for their country? Their best bet is to put up a Clinton again.

  MegaDittos Rush!!!

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

• cheezwhiz

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:14pm

  Whats wrong with you Rush ? You got a thing for Hillary ?
  She is a just another left-wing alinskyite who is throwing around US taxpayer money on muslims , as a down payment for cash in return , from muslims all over the world. How is that any different than Hussain ?
  She is even more dangerous for our country because she is not alone. She has Bill Clinton.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • cheezwhiz

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:29pm

    and how can we forget her bitter demeanor and vindictive disposition !!
    How is a bitter avenger in mom-jeans any different from a bitter avenger in pant-suit ?

    Report this comment

     

  • RantNationDotCom

    Oct. 23, 2010 at 12:44pm

    He’s trying to get democrats who supported Hillary in ’08 to stay home on Nov. 2nd. It’s not like he’s going to support Hillary in 2012 except to defeat Obama in the democratic primary, if there is one. When the primaries are over, he’ll be supporting the republican, but don’t tell anyone. It’s a secret. ;o)

    Report this comment

     

• Awakenow

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:12pm

  I havee a better idea, democrats we welcome you to a party that will listen to the governed vote republican/indeprndent. After all did the democrats pay you one iota of attention? This is our country, yours mine our children’s and their children’s lets ‘start thinking of it that way and not left or right. Term limits are way over due, get rid of the political class, ALL OF THEM.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • Bauervision

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:07pm

    I agree about term limits, for instance, here is one fries my ass: The Constitution clearly says that the House can run for terms, 2 years and recurring. It says the Senate is 6 years…….period. Why would they go through all the versions they did, comb over every word, not to include “recurring”? I think they were saying something that has been looked over for WAY too long.
    6 years and out!

    Report this comment

     

  • Bauervision

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:12pm

    here’s the actual wording:
    Section 2 – The House
    The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year…

    Section 3 – The Senate
    The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State,
    ….for six Years;

    Seems to be pretty clear to me. Why didn’t they say “every 6 years”? Because they wanted term limits!

    Report this comment

     

  • Orion the truth hunter

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 6:12pm

    Bauervision, at the time it was written, senators were selected by the states, not by popular vote.

    Report this comment

     

  • CollateralDamage

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 9:49pm

    @ Orion/ Bauer: It was the 17th Amendment that said that the State Legislature no longer elects Senators to Congress as representatives of the States. Before this, the States elected Senators to Represent them. Now States have NO representation in the Federal Government. The popular election of Senators is why we all of these unfunded mandates on the states, and why we are all going broke.

    REPEAL 17th AMENDMENT !!!

    Report this comment

     

  • Doc_Slammin

    Oct. 23, 2010 at 6:34pm

    I hear this ‘term limits’ argument thrown around here ceaselessly. This only guarantees one thing, that incumbents leave office no matter what their performance. So where is the reward for publicly elected officials to do anything the constituency wants?

    All you’ve done is given notice to these officials that they have a certain time period to achieve their personal agendas while at the same time telling them they have no chance at re-election. Again, where is the motivation for candidates to work for the public?

    You already have the power to exercise term limitations with your vote.

    Report this comment

     

• joseph Fawcett

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:01pm

  This sounds like Rush is dividing the Dems. But he is right about Hillery.

  http://www.josephfawcettart.com western artist

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • snowleopard3200

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:41pm

    The strategy Rush is suggesting is brilliant!!! Divide the Progressives among themselves.

    Report this comment

     

  • nosycophant

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 9:32pm

    yeah Republican cowboys from DC.

    Report this comment

     

• FreedomOfSpeech

  Oct. 22, 2010 at 3:55pm

  I am angry today. Free speech is under attack everywhere we look.

  Obama is now burning books like the Nazis.

  Reverse Operation Chaos. Rock On.

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • snowleopard3200

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:00pm

    Good Luck to Reverse Operation Chaos.

    May oru nation live on.

    http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mix art)

     

  • FreedomOfSpeech

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:02pm

    I’m not affiliated with a political party but I would take Hilary any day over the Kenyan-born usurper in office now.

     

  • snowleopard3200

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:17pm

    @Freedomofspeech

    Understandable. I just want people in the DC that are able to do the job, and support the fact they work for the People of America and keep the Constitution as the daily reminder of what they can and cannot do.

    We need to change things peacefully, and if violence is suggested as the solution, then the game is over if we go for it. Anyone doubts this, remember, the old Roman Republic was a Republic until violence begat violence then it turned into a dictatorship as did the bloodbath of the French Revolution where a persons rights mattered for nothing – just what was good for the whole.

    http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mix art)

     

  • walkwithme1966

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:18pm

    This is the stupidest idea I have ever heard – I am a Hillary Democrat and I won’t do anything Rush told me or suggested I do. I swear he is on drugs again! http://maboulette.wordpress.com

     

  • Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 4:34pm

    we’re proud members of the ORIGINAL ‘Operation Chaos’!!
    beat them at the ballot box!! (or don’t if you are a proud member of ‘Reverse Operation Chaos’)

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Its-Time-to-Support-Fox-News-Glenn-Beck/161352563885889

    Report this comment

     

  • moonpeace

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 5:35pm

    WALKWITHME1966: You are so wrong. Much more stupid than that was the idea that Obama would be able to lead our country. What a terrible mistake we made. The color of a man’s skin does not a good President make.

    Report this comment

     

  • nosycophant

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 9:28pm

    Long live mix art with pointy heads, can you draw me one with pointy hat to cover pointy head and God preserve our freedoms.

    Report this comment

     

  • missbosslady

    Oct. 22, 2010 at 11:38pm

    walkwithme, you are truly one of the most obtuse bloggers that I have suffered. Good grief!

    I’ll bet that you can’t remember the last time you had an original thought, or the last time that you DIDN’T have a knee jerk reaction to anything political.

    Bah-bah, little liberal sheep.

    You are tedious, predictable and sharp as a marble.

    Report this comment

     

  • Taquoshi

    Oct. 23, 2010 at 12:51am

    Walk with me 1966 -

    No thanks, I’ll stick to the other side of the street, particularly after you may have committed libel -

    “I swear he is on drugs again! ”

    Personally, I don’t mind different opinions, but making statements like that could conceivably land you in court, if not in jail or result in your having to pay a monetary fine.

    Report this comment