UK Officials May Take Four ‘Obese’ Children From Parents
Scottish officials say they may take four heavy children away from their parents after warnings to help their kids trim down have apparently failed.
The children are aged one to 11. The parents are obese and have three older children who are also heavy. For the past two years, the family has lived in government housing and had their eating habits scrutinized.
“We might not be the perfect parents, but we love our children with all our hearts,” said the 42-year-old mother to the Daily Mail. “To face a future where we will never see them again is unbearable.”
Last week, officials in Dundee told the family their four youngest children could be taken into foster care or adopted. A government spokesman said they would act in the children’s best interests.
In the U.S., there have been several cases where obese children have been taken into care after their parents couldn’t help them lose weight according to the Associated Press.
The parents plan to fight the government decision to try and remove their children.
The couple are not guilty of any crime and have faced no accusations of deliberate abuse or cruelty reports the Telegraph:
“Critics said the case, which is without precedent in Britain, was a serious breach of the family’s human rights and exposed the worrying extent to which the State can interfere in family life.”
What do you think? Is taking the kids away in the children’s best interest, or cruel and textbook nanny-state?
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.















































































































Comments (106)
Tear Em Up
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:32pmAny government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take awy everything you have….
http://traffic.libsyn.com/mikeleeandterrymartin/Number_79_September_4th_2011.mp3
Report this comment
Nehemiah6.3
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 12:13amThis is one more thing to throw on the ever growing pile of atrocities that people who want all the power to control other people are piling up to themselves. They will keep it up until one day they come to realize they have thrown away their own eternal souls forever. They have deceived themselves into thinking God is not watching. But their spirits will eventually remember who they really are and what they have done. I feel sorry for the people who think this is right.
Everyone has a right of choice given them. We as parents are also held responsible by God of our actions and what we have taught our children. Children are then responsible to listen to their parents and be respectful and live according to principles of a good decent, God fearing parents.
Everyone will be responsible to God for their own actions, he will judge individually. You can try to blame others all you want, but in the end, I face God alone.
Report this comment
ghostsouls
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:05amComing to a country near you! Then we can take kids away from parents who do drugs, smoke, eat salt, smoke weed, drink alcohol, go to strip clubs. read adult magazines, watch adult videos, drink soda, cook with trans fat, oppose obama, where does it end?
Report this comment
Nick84
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:06amGHOSTSOULS
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:05am
Coming to a country near you! Then we can take kids away from parents who do drugs, smoke, eat salt, smoke weed, drink alcohol, go to strip clubs. read adult magazines, watch adult videos, drink soda, cook with trans fat, oppose obama, where does it end?
—-
Some of the examples you gave are already in place and for good reason. Should drug addicts be allowed to have kids? What about in a meth lab house? Having excessively obese children should be considered neglect, just as not feeding them enough is. Or do you think it’s the parents right to raise a kid that will most likely die due to their poor choices?
Report this comment
loriann12
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:09am@ghostsouls
That was my exact thought: coming to a country near you. It’s exactly what Obama wants. Even though he claims to hate Great Brittain, he acts just like them. He has become what he claims to hate. He wants to turn America into the British and UK mentality.
Report this comment
1proudAmerican
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:31amWhat will happen if the kids don’t lose weight with the foster parents? Will they be put into another foster home, and another, and another? This family could have an inherited disease like Hypothyroidism – maybe they should be tested before assuming they are abusing their children! Too much government, and too many lost freedoms.
Report this comment
robert
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:20amIf they’re going to take away fat kids for their own good, then why not take those who listen to rap away for their own good, because listening to rap is far more harmful to a child than being fat?
Report this comment
blossom999
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:39pmFrighteningly true.
Report this comment
likwidlizard
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:32pmThat picture looks like a herd of buffalo coming in at feeding time.
Report this comment
RepubliCorp
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:45amIt will never happen here. What would the do with those Mexican kids?
Report this comment
MUDFLAPS
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:50amIf you think those people are buffalo, you should go to any airport in the US. It looks like a fat convention.
Report this comment
bondroid
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:20amLOL!! Okay. I know this is a serious issue on so many levels, but that was just too dam# funny!
Report this comment
bondroid
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:23amOkay, I know this is a serious issue on so many levels, but the was just dang funny!! LOL!
Report this comment
likwidlizard
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:30pm“We cooked em every HIGH IN STARCH food we could and they still are fat”. Well, idiots that’s what makes anyone FAT. Why don’t you try lettuce or celery or water? Also, if you give them all they can pack down that gullet then they don’t have a chance of becoming slim. Besides, the taxpayers don’t appreciate raising a hog farm. Remove the chairs and sofas and replace them with tread mills. That’s a start. Take them to a track field and make them RUN RUN RUN. Obesity causes health problems. No more soda pop period. No more candy. Give them an apple for breakfast. A pear for lunch. A small piece of chicken or fish with a carrot stick for dinner and only water drink all day.No more hot chocolate. Lock their BR doors at night so they don’t sneak food. More water intake=less food to eat. “but I love my childre!” BS!!! You’re killing them. If they’ve obeyed all week, reward them with an extra carrot stick or an apple. I guess some hog farmers are really weak minded. Grow some kahoonas and take your over-eating welfare *sses off the system.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:40pmI spent a year in West Virginia a few decades ago and I was surprised to see that most all of the children were having Pepsi and biscuits with sausage gravy for breakfast. I wanted to puke.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:27pmGovernment takes the children….
Parents go into depression and can no longer work…
Government pays the parents lifetime disability…
Children grow up without their parents and blame themselves…
Children get depressed and can not work to pay the taxes to pay for their parents lifetime disability…
Cycle repeats until we get to where we are today…
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:08pmWhat’s next? “UK Officials May Take ‘Obese’ Parents From Children?”
How about…. “UK Officials May Take ‘Obese’ Teachers From Children?”
Or, “White House to remove ‘Obese’ First Lady From Children?”
Report this comment
PeachyinGA
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 9:45pm“What do you think? Is taking the kids away in the children’s best interest, or cruel and textbook nanny-state?”
NOT in the best interest of the children or their family. They are being made an example of how to abandon your God-given rights to your government. Coming soon to a country near (very near) you.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:13pmIf the Government is now in charge of everything, then blame the Government. Remove all the fatso’s in Government and their fatso pay checks and their fatso health care and their fatso perks.
Report this comment
obama-mecca-me-sick
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:22pmWill gov. Christie be removed from NJ?
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:49pmIn this case I think NJ will be removed from Gov. Christie.
Report this comment
drybackinpi
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:27amTake away the food stamps
Report this comment
Pigpen
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 9:13pmThis is hard for most Americans to understand because most Americans mistakenly believe that the UK has been burnt down and destroyed during the recent race riots… LMAO The UK police don’t have the courage to stop the RACE RIOTS, but they know they can beat up on whitey… IF the crackers in the UK don’t sweep the BNP into power at the next election cycle, they deserve what they get. Oh, and one last point:
UK POLICE, YOU ARE COWARDS!!! KICK THE W0GS OUT ALREADY!!!
Report this comment
Slayer
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 9:08pm1) If the State was involved the last several months with this bunch, doesn’t that make the State culpable?
2) Who decided that only thin people represented true humanity? That fat people may not be fat because of genetics? That all people must conform to some kind of a universal appearance?
Report this comment
hopetochange2012
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:09amWell put! The emotional damage done to this family will be FAR WORSE than the “damage” of being overweight.
GET A BACKBONE, BRITISH! It’s time YOU had a revolution against your government!
Report this comment
suzy000
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 9:04pmI just finished reading an article where they have now uncovered a skinny gene and obese gene and they are coming to the conclusion 1 in so many thousands of families carry this gene. They better make sure that this family is not genetically carrying a rare gene or these liberal countries can be sued and should be!
Report this comment
Sgt.Murph
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:47pmNot even in France!
Report this comment
Fight for America
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:43pmIf the kids were temporarily taken into care and they lost weight at a healthy rate – I guess that would signal where the problem is. The parents – if that’s on the outside – don’t seem to be changing for themselves either. The kids deserve a chance at health.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:17pmWho decides what a “healthy rate of weight lose is?” Suppose the Government just starves these children or makes them throw-up after every meal? Once the Government takes your children you will never know what happened to them… or their minds.
Report this comment
Lucy Larue
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:06pmFIGHT FOR AMERICA,
Really? Well…, how long would your temporary custody be in linear time?
Look at the picture! Do these children look morbidly obese? They do not!
You CANNOT legislate human behavior.
“NANNY” is a synonym for “COMMUNIST”.
Report this comment
abbygirl1994
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:39pmThis is bull… absolute bull.. How dare a government tear apart a family.. I hope they rot in he–!
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:30pmDarn kids of mine been eating all my chickins and I tell ya something ever since that thar reverent Right promised them thar chickins were coming home , I ain’t seen nair one , so he’s darn wrong.
Report this comment
tower7femacamp
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:41pmTake them ? Americans are only to happy to give up their kids and their rights.
How else could this happen ever ????
Report this comment
Elena2010
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:20pmMakes the Chinese “One Child Policy” seem rather tame, now doesn’t it?
Report this comment
Elena2010
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:18pmFat Nazis! Food Nazis!
Where does it end?
Report this comment
tower7femacamp
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:42pmhey we never bothered fat kids !
Report this comment
RepubliCorp
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:19amThey came for the cigarettes and I said nothing………………
Report this comment
RedheadTexan
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:15pmIt is ridiculous to compare this to the American cases to date where children have been taken for obeisity. In the American cases, the children weren’t just “fat kids.” They had serious life threatening illnesses and were actually in imminent danger of DEATH and the parents still didn’t do jack. It was actually the medical effects of their obeisity they were taken for, not just for being fat. That is something this articlee fails to mention. Do these children have uncontrolled type 2 diabetes? Obstructive sleep apnea? Cirrosis? All are the effects of super obeisity. It is these conditions, ignored and untreated, which usually lead to children being taken, not their BMI.
Report this comment
squeaker
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:01pmthey should remove obambam’s kids…. look at the hate he is feeding them…!
Report this comment
abbygirl1994
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:40pmGood one!!
Report this comment
Salamander
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:55pmThe question I have is: Are they taking the children away from their parents; or, taking the parents away from their children? Why is it that government ‘feels a need’ to step in? If a liberal thinks the parent is doing such a bad job, why don’t THEY step in and not use the ‘cat’s paw’ technique to cause someone else (the government) to do it for them–so they don’t have to get involved? Sometimes, children get bad parents: sometimes parents get bad children. So what! Count your blessings! There are so many parents that take care of ‘challenged’ children. There are so many children that learn to handle adversity from bad parents! How is the government intervention solution any better?
Report this comment
KickinBack
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:54pm“For the past two years, the family has lived in government housing and had their eating habits scrutinized.”
Kick them out of the government welfare program and I guarantee they will slim down when they have to buy their own food.
Report this comment
Salamander
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:00pmOnce you start intervening in peoples lives, there is no end to it! Government housing, government food support, government healthcare, government jobs, government caskets! Is it really government’s responsibility to look after its citizens or is it the citizens responsibility to look after its government? I’t think it more effective to remove government interference (a.k.a. support) from the family and let things fall where they may!
Report this comment
US_Veteran
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:12pmHeavens NO, they would never do that
Report this comment
dontbotherme
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:46pmIf a child’s life is in danger because of parental neglect or abuse, “someone” is obligated to step in & save the child’s life. Obesity can be a life threatening condition. I think we are obligated to teach people a healthy lifestyle IF ASKED, but I don’t think the Government has the right to take a child away from the parents if the parents are truly trying to change. I was watching some older clips from television earlier today. One thing that kept catching my eyes is how emaciated the actors looked…almost anorexic. But they weren’t. That was normal. I realized, after looking at older pictures, we were all a lot thinner way back. What happened? When did society become so dang fat? Seriously? What changed? Fast food? Mom’s having to work? Something put in our food sources to plump everyone up? Laziness? Lots of questions.
Report this comment
Salamander
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:51pmFood stamps!
Report this comment
dontbotherme
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:57pmSalamander- good point. Food stamps (although sometimes necessary for emergencies) go hand in hand with laziness and or depression which leads to taking the easy way out to junk food.
Report this comment
squeaker
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:03pmour diet, lifestyle (less exercise today), more stress…. the list goes on and on
Report this comment
lisapa
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 9:56pmActually, something did change in the foods and it could very well be linked to obesity. Food coloring creates ADHD behavior in many children, which has been acknowledged by other countries for quite some time. One of the other wonderful effects of food coloring is that is seems to be highly addictive. As in, once a child who reacts to it eats it, they will not want to eat anything else for quite a while. So, could we be creating our own obesity problem? Sure– with both parents employed full time to survive financially there is precious little energy left for fighting about food in the grocery store, and the cheap crap is what is most loaded with coloring. Food for thought, all pun intended.
Report this comment
RepubliCorp
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:33amNo game boy……… and as kids we worked. cutting grass, shoveling snow, helping your Mom and Dad with whatever. Playing outside! We didn’t have time to get fat
Report this comment
Islesfordian
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:44pmIsn’t Britain, in effect, already taking care of these children? Is not a vast percentage of the British population living directly off the government teat and having all of their needs and wants supplied by the government? How’s Britain’s record for taking care of its infantile charges so far?
Fat, drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to run a former empire, but it seems Fool Britania is up to the challenge.
Report this comment
Mandors
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:10pmThe socialists took over in the UK a long time ago. They were instrumental in breaking up British Empire and instituting a “progressive”society where unless you are of the “educated class” is very difficult to get ahead.
Take a hard look at what Barrack Obama wants this country to look like.
Report this comment
lonewolf57
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:36pmWhere was Chris Christie born?It must suck to ….nevermind.
Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:27pmDamned Brownshirts; even Britain has been reduced to repeating history.
Report this comment
captaincanuck
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:24pmI am confused on what right the government has in this manner. If a mother doesn’t properly take care of a child’s teeth, or doesn’t teach a child certain things before they are ready for the entrance grade into elementary school, should the government step in as well?
The thought police are always at work.
Report this comment
82dAirborne
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:32pmThis is a tough one. Would you have the government remove children from a home in which they were near starving? If so – why? Possibly because the children’s well-being was being threatened. Is the well-being of obese children threatened?
NOTE: I don’t know if I agree with removing the children or not. It is an interesting question…………..
Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:48pmNo, the government has no right to do jack squat in this matter. It’s ridiculous. Some kids are portly when they’re young and grow out of it, and some do not. It’s called life and free will. Damned progressives and their insane desire for a Utopian society; they outta be behind bars. Save a fat kid, but mess his mind up in the process? It’s sickening that this kind of behavior is acceptable in an educated society like Britain. These people ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Report this comment
jb.kibs
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 10:16pmthey are discriminatory against “Fat” people.
define fat. define well-being. these are relative words… “eye of the beholder”.
pretty much everyone in the world is fat to an 80lb person. … so… hmmm
and a 200lb person is thin compared to a 300lb person… and so on so forth..
same with well-being… it’s all relative to the person looking at it…
you are going to say it’s relative to the average right? well.. if everyone lets their child get fat, then there is no problem by that logic… the average would be raised and fat wouldnt be fat anymore… see how dumb that whole system is?
Report this comment
N37BU6
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:19pmI like chubbies.
Report this comment
Exrepublisheep
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:25pmrofl!
Report this comment
BetterBob
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 7:29pmMan the harpoons!!
Report this comment
lonewolf57
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 8:04pmHe tasks me! That whale, he tasks me!
Report this comment