Since the passage of the “Affordable Care Act,” it has been some cause for concern — scandal even — that several businesses have been granted waivers excusing them from participation in the federal program.
And now we have a final number of how many businesses are exempt from “Obamacare.”
Roughly 1,200 companies received waivers from part of the healthcare reform law, the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) said Friday.
“One for you, and one for you, and one for you…“
“Friday marks the last time HHS will have to update the total number of waivers, putting to rest a recurring political firestorm. The department had been updating its waiver totals every month, prompting monthly attacks from the GOP,” writes Sam Baker of The Hill.
Naturally, Republican opposition to the bill seized on these waivers as an opportunity to advance the argument that the healthcare law is “unworkable.”
So how does the HHS justify granting the waivers? The department argues that the waivers show the law provides “flexibility.”
But who gets to choose when the law is “flexible”?
“All told, 1,231 companies applied for and received waivers from the law’s restrictions on annual benefit caps,” Baker writes. “The law requires plans to gradually raise their benefit limits, and all annual limits will become illegal in 2014. Companies that received waivers can keep their caps intact until 2014.”
When added together, the healthcare waivers excuse about 4 million people, or about 3 percent of the population, from having to participate, HHS said.
However, what’s slightly unsettling is the fact that the majority of the waivers were handed out to labor unions.
“Documents released in a classic Friday afternoon news dump show that labor unions representing 543,812 workers received waivers from President Barack Obama‘s signature legislation,” writes Paul Conner of the Daily Caller. “By contrast, private employers with a total of 69,813 employees, many of whom work for small businesses, were granted waivers.”
Because of the backlash over the waivers, HHS announced last summer that it would stop accepting applications for one-year waivers and would simply grant or deny waivers all the way through the end of 2013, according to The Hill.
The total of 1,231 includes all of the waiver requests HHS granted — companies that only applied for a three-year waiver, companies that got a one-year waiver and an extension, and companies that received a one-year waiver but did not ask for an extension.
A total of 96 waiver requests were denied by HHS. Why the healthcare law couldn’t be “flexible” for those 96 requests is anyone’s guess.
“The final total is actually lower than the last monthly update. Earlier in the process, HHS had been granting waivers to a type of plan that it later decided should be completely exempt from the restrictions on annual limits,” Baker writes. “HHS had granted waivers to almost 500 of those plans before exempting them altogether.”
(h/t Weasel Zippers)























































































































Comments (112)
diversity
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:55amthis whole thing is a scandal/scam……..who’s trying to get big votes for the fall????????!!!!!
Report this comment
classicalgas
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:43amAARP, who supported the health care legislation was among the first to get a waiver. Was anyone really surprised that the unions would get a waiver?
Report this comment
Workforit
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:31amDon’t you get it? Health care is only for the select few, and this administration aims to keep it that way.
Report this comment
nosharia
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:30amC’mon Obama! You want to share the wealth so much, how about making everyone equal on health care? Everybody participates…or NOBODY participates. Let’s be fair now.
Report this comment
nosharia
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:27amChicago type favors being granted to muslims and unions. Who could have seen that coming?
Report this comment
agsb02
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:22amIts not fair to everyone if certain people are exempt!
Report this comment
c.foster4722
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:10amIf Ron Paul gets in the white house, we will be called the United Rag Heads of America, or China, or Russia, or just??????????.
Report this comment
Ohio Guy
Jan. 7, 2012 at 10:03amMy waiver for Obama will be waving goodbye as Marine One lifts off to usher him out of DC once the new President has taken his oath of office. Buh Bye!
Report this comment
bioya1
Jan. 7, 2012 at 9:59amWith apologies to Jeff Foxworthy
If you think that excessive taxes should be paid by everyone, except you, you might be a liberal.
If you think that government knows how to spend your money better than you, you might be a liberal.
If you think that the ACLU is good for this country and that the Tea Party is bad, you might be a liberal.
If you think that class warfare for political purposes, is good for this country, you might be a liberal.
If you disagree with the notion that as government gets bigger the people become smaller, you might be a liberal.
If you don’t mind that the US is becoming a mediocre and socialistic country, you might be a liberal.
If you think that being nice to our country’s enemies will make them love us, you might be a liberal.
If you think that opinionated and mouthy Hollywood types are smart and love this country, you might be a liberal.
If you think that it’s good for government to take from the productive and give to the lazy, you might be a liberal.
If you agree that a lifetime of bad choices makes one eligible for government money, you might be a liberal.
If you think that that a more successful person than you owes you something, you might be a liberal.
If you think that those who believe in God and Country are dumb, you might be an elitist liberal.
If you think that 9/11 happened because “we deserved it” you might be a liberal.
Report this comment
KangarooJack
Jan. 7, 2012 at 9:41amBingo!!!!
Report this comment
cassandra
Jan. 7, 2012 at 9:23amobama is not a socialist guys we are talking Marxist/.Communist he is alot more dangerous than people think, what the heck is wrong with Congress why are they NOT impeaching this imposter
Report this comment
KangarooJack
Jan. 7, 2012 at 9:39amThanks for asking the obvious question. I’m wondering that too.
Report this comment
EqualJustice
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:58amIf we elect the RIGHT candidate, maybe we can ALL be exempt come 2012?? Halleluiah!
Report this comment
mikee1
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:56amSo only CONSERVATIVE TAXPAYERS HAVE TO ENROLL AND PAY FOR IT ALL…LOL.
Report this comment
Starkadder
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:47am“I refuse to take ‘No’ for an answer… when Congress refuses to act in a way that hurts our economy and puts people at risk, I have an obligation as president to do what I can without them.”
Barrack Obama 1-4-2012
Report this comment
Maidoff101
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:40amall that “Hopey Changey” crap coming to fruation!
Report this comment
kuhl
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:37amA law that is unequally enforced is a law I can break.
Report this comment
Krazy_Kreepy_Ketchup
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:33amTHIS should be a headline. This is absolutely disgusting and seriously needs to be addressed. THANK YOU BLAZE for reporting this story.
The implications of these individual waivers is enormous because now if you are “a worker of the world” you have a clear incentive to get on board. Obama and company knows that we are storing food and essentials. Starving us all into submission may be a little bit more difficult than expected.
But withhold medications-think about how many people you, as a reader, know who is on life saving meds. The whole lives portion of the healthcare bill is already getting life breathed into it.
Report this comment
simplygilly
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:32amEvery waiver means HIGHER health care costs for those who do not receive a waiver. What about Obama’s mantra “everyone pay their fair share”? My healthcare insurance went up 50% [yes, fifty %] since Obama’s healthcare bill was passed and the more waivers he gives the “Friends of Obama” the higher it will go.
Report this comment
whereareyourbrains
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:13amOh Yeah he is crooked as they get. Watch the debates tonight. They will go easy on Mitt. Go after Gingrige and make an idiot out of Santorum…they could care less about Paul…but you can bet you lucky stars that he will get most the questions. I bet Newt does not get asked to many questios either. The fix is in…Romney against Obama is what they want and the GOP is falling right in to their plans….This president and his crew do know what they are doing. They keep saying he never had a job in his life. Trust me…he didn’t need a job. He got lots of help trying and succeeding at making America his country not our. Remember how Castro took over…look it up. One day at a time………….one week at a time and one year at a time…Obama is winning and we are going to hand him Romney…..we lose……. another McCain twin…………I wish I had enough money to move out of USA…after Obama wins again…………..they even have the GOP brainwashed…lol
Report this comment
Founding Dad
Jan. 7, 2012 at 8:10amIf Obamacare is so wonderful and Obama and the unions are arguing that Americans must be forced to buy it, then why is the Obama administration giving thousands of waivers? And why are 92% of the waivers going to unions when unions are less than 7% of the workforce? Why can’t republicans senators and representatives open their mouths about this on a regular basis???
The unions control Obama and his administration, and through him control the country. Unions were the brainchild of Karl Marx and his Communist Manifesto. 93% of Americans reject unions, so why are unions running the Country?
Report this comment
piper60
Jan. 7, 2012 at 7:33amIS ANYBODY SURPRISED that it is the unions that got the majority of the waivers. I am just waiting for the day that the prez starts wearing his Mao suit in PUBLIC. Coming soon, I’m sure.
Report this comment
Arc
Jan. 7, 2012 at 7:25amWhat better way to gain complete control of all branches of government. Create so much confusion in all areas of all 3 branches that eventually chaos will ensue and just when it gets to the point of insurrection, the self appointed messiah of hope and change uses one last executive order to declare martial law, at which time, the true patriots will be pitted against their fellow countrymen. If Obama is of the opinion that todays military will fire on their own, then we need to seriously question said executive. Remember the Emmanuelism ” Never let a good emergency go to waste” With so many branches of government being controlled by Czars and his Pentagon appointments, isn’t it time to take a good hard look at how close we are to anarchy??????
Report this comment
FLDeb
Jan. 7, 2012 at 7:05amAlright, all this political talk really pi…. me off. Do we have laws or do we not? Why has so many unlawful things this administration has been doing over the last 3 years not gotten them thrown in jail? Think about it, 5 – 10 years ago how many times would we be saying “not going to happen” when hearing these outlandish maneuverings of this administration? Now we just tolerate it?!!!!!! HE can change any law and do anything he darn well pleases?!!!!!!!
How the heck do we recover from THAT? Why is any other president/administration not going to think they can just change things as they please if we do not hold this administration to the letter of the law and the Constitution?
Report this comment
almont
Jan. 7, 2012 at 6:18amI think they meant to say OBAMA(doesn’t)CARE PLAN !!!!!!
Report this comment
GETLIFE
Jan. 7, 2012 at 5:18amGee, I wonder if ABC will ask a question about this at their debate?
Report this comment