Politics

Obama on the Defensive: I’m Not First President ‘Unable’ to Visit Israel ‘in Their First Term’

There was an intriguing moment during President Barack Obama’s press conference today (a number of them, actually). Of particular note was a question by Fox’s Ed Henry. The reporter asked the president why he hasn’t visited Israel during his first term.

Obama responded by saying he isn’t the first president not to visit Israel during his first term. Additionally, he reiterated his support for and devotion to the Jewish state.

Obama Defends Not Visiting Israel in His First Term

“I am not the first president who has been unable, because of a whole range of issues, not to visit Israel as president in their first term,” he said. “I visited Israel twice as senator — once rightΒ beforeΒ I became president.”

While critics will likely go digging to disprove Obama’s claims, the president is telling the truth. It isn’t uncommon for individuals to say that the Obama administration hasn’t been as supportive of Israel as many would like. Regardless, his predecessor — George W. Bush — did not visit the nation during his first term either. The Jewish Forward reports:

President George W. Bush, hailed by Israelis as a great friend of the Jewish state, visited Israel twice, but both events took place deep in his second term. Bush first visited Israel in January 2008, a year before leaving the White House and then once again in May of 2008, to mark Israel’s 60th anniversary.

His Father, President George H.W. Bush served only one term and never got around to visiting Israel. Bush’s relations with the Shamir government in Israel were strained and ended on a sour note as the Israeli government refused to freeze settlement as demanded by the Bush administration.

After explaining this, Obama went on to discuss hisΒ commitmentΒ to the Middle Eastern nation (his comments come just one day after he met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to pledge a “rock solid”Β commitmentΒ to Israel).

“The measure of myΒ commitmentΒ to Israel is not measured by a single visit,”Β the president proclaimed during today’s press conference. “The measure of myΒ commitmentΒ toΒ IsraelΒ is seen in the actions I’ve taken as president of the United States. And it is indisputable that I’ve had Israel’s back over the last three years.”

But the president did take time to sharply criticized his opponents who have taken to tough talk about Iran.

“This is not a game and there is nothing casual about it,” Obama told reporters. “When you actually ask them what they would do, it turns out they repeat the things we’ve been doing over the last three years. It indicates to me that that’s more about politics than actually trying to solve a difficult problem.”

He said that if any of the Republican candidates truly believe it is time to start a war, they should explain their positions to the American people. “Everything else is just talk,” he said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (118)

  • Paul
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:56pm

    Was it 90 rounds of golf at last count ? Liar.

    Report this comment

    Paul  
    • 83plus
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:00pm

      Yeah, what’s stopping him besides his next golf game or vacation?

      Report this comment

      83plus  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:11pm

      We need to put harder sanctions on Iran, such as stopping their financial transactions. This would hurt the government and not the people as much. Then if they don’t cease, we need to keep military action on the table to back up Israel. That is what you do with allies, you back them up and their actions, unlike Obama wants, he wants more diplomacy and weaker sanctions that are more harmful to the people.

      Romney and Santorum will stand with Israel. They gave great speeches at AIPAC, almost constant standing ovations. Here is Romney’s speech: http://url2it.com/lscf

      Report this comment

      TeaPartyForRomney  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:43pm

      This is a must see,,our leaders are working towards the end of the American dream..UN AGENDA 21 http://my.brainshark.com/Agenda-21-for-Public-Officials-472185383?mid=5560

      Report this comment

      MCDAVE  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 5:04pm

      Hmmmm maybe it’s the tons of vacations and record number of golf games that prevented him from visiting? I do recall him visiting Israel as a candidate…when the rumours were flying that his pals are anti-Israeli…Rev Wright for instance.

      Report this comment

      AvengerK  
    • TheBurningTruth
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 5:23pm

      Don’t forget about those campaign trips that are oh so vital to both our and Israel’s national security. He needs all those billions of “dinner-dollars” from Hollywood celebs and big liberals for our own good.

      Report this comment

      TheBurningTruth  
    • Grey Eagle
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 6:11pm

      Yes he is the only President who has not gone to Israel back beyond Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter.

      Report this comment

      Grey Eagle  
    • db321
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 7:19pm

      Obama – we heard your speech yesterday – “America is rock solid in support of Israel” and “don’t underestimated America resolve” – We as Americans already knows that we support Israel- the question is were do you stand.

      You double talking knucklehead!

      Report this comment

      db321  
    • sparkspeaks
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 8:54pm

      I agree….He’s a liar. Just like that serpent in the very beginning…. twisting the truth, and tempting others to follow his lead….

      Report this comment

      sparkspeaks  
    • burdenedsoul
      Posted on April 24, 2012 at 2:26pm

      Damn, I hope that’s just a bad picture because that expression is showing not only anger but rage and a little bit of “IF I WANT TO KEEP MY POSITION AS PRESIDENT I CAN’T LOP OFF YOU’RE LEGS AND FEED YOU TO MY DOGS BUT I REALLY REALLY WISH THAT WASN’T TRUE!”………..”Change CHANGE cHANge Change change change……………”

      Report this comment

      burdenedsoul  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:55pm

    .
    Iβ€˜m Not First President ’Unableβ€˜ to Visit Israel ’in Their First Term’

    I’m just the frist one to refuse to go to Israel……..

    Report this comment

    SpankDaMonkey  
    • walkintruth
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:59pm

      I guess he means that you need to vote me in again so I can go.

      Report this comment

      walkintruth  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on March 7, 2012 at 12:52am

      He’s already got ads out on youtube “Obama Stands with Isreal”. Damage control working diligently to keep the fleece job in full swing.

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • IIIcorp
      Posted on March 7, 2012 at 4:55pm

      Read his statement and it’s Bushes fault. Both father and son. What a loser.

      Report this comment

      IIIcorp  
  • RightUnite
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:48pm

    If that’s what he calls having their back, I’d tell Israel to run as fast as they can!

    Report this comment

    RightUnite  
    • TerryDo
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 7:25pm

      I would tell Israel to pay attention to this truth posted by http://www.hillaryis44.org/
      And which I concur with…

      β€œObama simply cannot be trusted.
      Obama cannot be trusted on any issue.
      Obama cannot be trusted by his friends.
      Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies.
      Obama cannot be trusted.”

      Report this comment

      TerryDo  
    • hallkbrdz
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 11:32pm

      He is at their back – with a knife in his hand.

      Give up your buffer zone so you can’t defend yourselves – or else… Just the kind of person you want at your back – NOT.

      Report this comment

      hallkbrdz  
  • wboehmer
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:42pm

    The two-faced Worst-President-Ever Obama here admits he favors lower gasoline prices PRIMARILY BECAUSE HE WANTS TO BE RE-ELECTED!

    So. this hypocrite has no problem setting aside his ideological agenda to deceive the electorate so he can be re-elected. Who can respect a guy like this?

    Report this comment

    wboehmer  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:38pm

    As a sworn enemy of Israel, obama is not welcome there, and he knows it.

    Report this comment

    Tri-ox  
  • geonj
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:36pm

    spin, obaby, spin.

    Report this comment

    geonj  
  • Conservative New Yorker
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:33pm

    You guys are so unfair! I mean, really, it would cut into his golfing,vacations, basketball playing.

    Priorities people, priorities… (where’s the eye roll icon??)

    Report this comment

    Conservative New Yorker  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:41pm

      Romney and Santorum railed into Obama on his ‘inactivity to defend Israel,’ the council were almost at standing ovation the whole time they spoke. Here is Santorum’s speech: http://url2it.com/lscc

      Report this comment

      TeaPartyForRomney  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:50pm

      romney and santorum just parroted exactly what barry is doing…exactly what bush did…etc

      i call bs.

      israel can defend itself .

      Report this comment

      Razorhunters  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:05pm

      Obama has done nothing for israel, much like Ron Paul says, Ron Paul wants to decrease sanctions and use diplomacy, sounds like Obama.

      Santorum and Romney want to back up an ally, sounds nothing like Obama.

      Report this comment

      TeaPartyForRomney  
  • jungle J
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:33pm

    only the sane know waht was truly said.

    Report this comment

    jungle J  
  • AllAmericanGirl22
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:31pm

    MmmmmHmmmm….so I’m wondering: what Middle Eastern countries HAS he been to as President? Just wondering cuz I’m sure he has. And we all know he doesn’t like Israel, so he can just say so, oh wait…I forgot, he doesn’t like to tell the truth, my bad. I feel bad for Netanyahu having to put up with him.

    Report this comment

    AllAmericanGirl22  
  • Vickie Dhaene
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:30pm

    I don’t care what “other” Presidents have done or not done with Israel. Ed Henry asked WHY he hasn’t and Obummbler never answered the question.
    Saying that, I wouldn’t believe a word he had to say about the subject anyway.

    Report this comment

    Vickie Dhaene  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:28pm

    The sulfur emissions from the Marxist POS must violate some regulation from EPA,and our long national nightmare will be over in November.

    Report this comment

    progressiveslayer  
  • JP4JOY
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:26pm

    They only have 3 golf courses in Israel.

    Report this comment

    JP4JOY  
  • docmacs411
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:21pm

    “And it is indisputable that Iβ€˜ve had Israel’s back over the last three years.” Sorry for this, but my first thought was of bummer in a sexual position with Israel….that is basically what he has done to them for 3 years.

    Report this comment

    docmacs411  
  • aChameleon
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:18pm

    O-blah-blah did find time to bow down to a saudi king, and give the arab spring his full blessing.

    Report this comment

    aChameleon  
    • CatB
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:22pm

      No time … you know … it would have gotten in the way of his golf, basketball, parties and vacations!

      Report this comment

      CatB  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:43pm

      and call Sandra Fluke-it.

      Report this comment

      GeorgieJo  
  • Diablo4965
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:17pm

    I understand BO not enough time with all the vacations and stuff.

    Report this comment

    Diablo4965  
  • JP4JOY
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:13pm

    If that first picture of Obammer isn’t that of Lucifer himself wanting to explode out of his visage I can’t imagine a more telling one.

    Report this comment

    JP4JOY  
    • aChameleon
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:21pm

      Kinda looks like Adam Sandler in Water Boy when capt. insano laughed at him or when “mama” told his girlfriend he wets the bed.

      Report this comment

      aChameleon  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:51pm

      Don’t worry, he’s not Satan. Satan is a lot smarter than that clown.

      Report this comment

      Gonzo  
    • walkintruth
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 5:01pm

      Wow! I was thinking the same thing. That photo is creepy.

      Report this comment

      walkintruth  
    • burdenedsoul
      Posted on April 24, 2012 at 2:35pm

      Damn, I hope that’s just a bad picture because that expression is showing not only anger but rage and a little bit of β€œIF I WANT TO KEEP MY POSITION AS PRESIDENT I CANβ€˜T LOP OFF YOU’RE LEGS AND FEED YOU TO MY DOGS BUT I REALLY REALLY WISH THAT WASN’T TRUE!”………..”Change CHANGE cHANge Change change change……………”

      sorry for the double post but I just noticed that people are talking about the photo
      all the
      W-
      -
      -
      -
      -
      A
      -
      -
      -
      -
      -
      -
      -DowN HerE-

      Report this comment

      burdenedsoul  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:11pm

    Obama will not visit Israel as that will destroy his alliances with the Radical Extremists of his such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Iran and so many others. Remember, as the nation of Israel was created from the old British holding of Palestine, Obama declares it a mistake that needs to be driven into the sea; Trumans recognition of the nation also adds insult to injury in Obama’s eyes.

    The only way he will travel to Israel is after the nation is destroyed.

    Report this comment

    Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
  • Slowman101
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:10pm

    His schedule really has been to full for him to have time to visit Israel. Numerous vacations, parties, concerts, theater, travel, golf, private time with Moochelle and the kids, private time with Rahm. Plus he doesn’t like Israel. No Obama 2012!

    Report this comment

    Slowman101  
    • bpodlesnik
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:19pm

      Unable?! You have got to be kidding me. Seriously, how many vacations did he have to go on, or games of golf did he have to play, to where he was unable to make a visit to the country he so-called pledges allegiance with. Lying right through his teeth.

      Report this comment

      bpodlesnik  
  • TeaPartyForRomney
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:10pm

    The GOP candidate really ripped Obama in their AIPAC speech, that is except for Ron Paul who almost backed Obama’s rhetoric. They ripped Obama and reminded the councel about O’s his past ‘lack of support’ for Israel. The people there were almost at a constant standing ovation during the three speeches.

    Here is Romney’s speech at AIPAC: http://url2it.com/lsca

    Report this comment

    TeaPartyForRomney  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:20pm

      bs …everyone said they would do exactly what barry is doing now.

      ron paul said to let isreal defend itself.

      israel would have already taken care of this problem.

      we wouldnt have been dealing with this bs for 50 years.

      Report this comment

      Razorhunters  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:39pm

      b.s. about your b.s. Obama is talking about diplomacy still and has not done anything that efficient when it comes to sanctions. Romney and Santorum both spoke about making sure Iran knew they would do whatever was necessary to get the job done, even military action. Obama has been inefficient to do anything and has emboldened Iran with inactivity.

      Ron Paul said let them do it themselves but that is not working with an ally, he even fought against hard sanctions saying today that it would push Iran into building their nukes.

      Romney and Santorum are talking about working with Israel and helping them, Obama goes back to diplomacy which has failed, Paul says the same thing.

      Report this comment

      TeaPartyForRomney  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:54pm

      barry is talking diplomacy while moving the military.

      same thing romney and the other sobs.

      they said they would surround iran…barry has iran surrounded.

      check yourself.

      Report this comment

      Razorhunters  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:57pm

      and sanctions just hurt the people.
      you want to hurt govt…stop the money .

      Report this comment

      Razorhunters  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:59pm

      how many decades have we had sanctions on iran…?

      same bs policies rolled over again and again.

      Report this comment

      Razorhunters  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:07pm

      Sanctions can be effective and stop the money. Such as sanctions on the Bank and Transaction Bank. If you put sanctions on all their financial transactions, like the GOP has talked about then you will make a difference, but if the keep going we need to keep military action on the table.

      Nothing like Obama wants. Ron Paul’s diplomacy and ‘let Iran have a nuke’ is not working and will be a disaster.

      Report this comment

      TeaPartyForRomney  
  • AJAYW
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:09pm

    Yep time for golf I guess

    Report this comment

    AJAYW  
  • blackyb
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:09pm

    If our votes count then I guess the Prez will get a chance to go to Israel.

    Report this comment

    blackyb  
  • cemerius
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:08pm

    Having “one’s bacK’ means he can throw them off the cliff easier!

    Report this comment

    cemerius  
  • blackyb
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:06pm

    Well Prez, I guess you wont get to go then, will you? ‘Cause you will not have a second chance.

    Report this comment

    blackyb  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:04pm

    He had a lot of good reasons he didn’t have time to go to Israel in his first term: golf, vacations, parties at the White House, campaign fund raising…and oh yea, he hates them.

    Report this comment

    Gonzo  
  • ModerationIsBest
    Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:01pm

    Sadly for conservatives(and yes I count myself one fiscally), Obama is picking back up steam. The GOP needs to get behind Romney already and end this primary. 40% of people asked by NBC-Wall Street journal said that this Republican primary is weakening their view of the Republican party.

    I urge the GOP to pull back the reigns before there is a pox on the Republican party and people throw the good ideas of conservatism out with the bad.

    Report this comment

    ModerationIsBest  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:14pm

      So, we should vote for Romney because a left leaning NBC poll says a minority of the people asked, think the primary is weakening our candidates? I have heard some really bad arguments for supporting Romney but, that takes the prize.

      Report this comment

      Gonzo  
    • My Two Cents
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:20pm

      40% of the people NBC talks to couldn’t even pick a Republican candidate out of a lineup.

      Report this comment

      My Two Cents  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:35pm

      The Wall Street journal is left leaning? Since when?

      Report this comment

      ModerationIsBest  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:36pm

      And if you can’t see that this process is hurting the Republican brand you aren’t watching the same race as everyone else is.

      Report this comment

      ModerationIsBest  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:39pm

      Did you miss the NBC part? If you base your decisions on 40% of the people you lose BTW.

      Report this comment

      Gonzo  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 3:51pm

      @GONZO

      No obviously I didn’t miss the “NBC” part because……I typed out the sentence.

      It’s okay, continue to ignore the obvious. For some reason that seems like the conservative agenda. Watch as the Republican party continues to lose more and more potential voters because they feel you are out of touch with reality.

      Why do you think almost every establishment Republican has come out in support of Romney? They want someone who can win, and they don’t think Santorum, Gingrich or Paul have the chance. Romney is the best shot, unfortunately he’s had to go so far to the right to win the nomination, he likely alienated independents.

      Report this comment

      ModerationIsBest  
    • dmerwin
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:04pm

      Gonzo
      This was one of your better responses. “I got you in a stranglehold baby.”
      Whack em and Stack em.

      Report this comment

      dmerwin  
    • dmerwin
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 4:08pm

      ModerationIsBest
      Most conservatives DO NOT think that THEREPUBLICANESTABLISHMENTISBEST. You state you are a fiscal conservative the establishment is not. They provided enough votes to allow record spending.

      Report this comment

      dmerwin  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on March 6, 2012 at 5:34pm

      @DMERWIN

      I agree, which is why I say that Conservatives have lost their way. Let’s get one thing clear though, none of these candidates except Ron Paul is a true fiscal conservative.

      Fiscal conservatives have to find a way to still be fiscally sound and solvent, without attacking the social programs we currently have. There are ways to reduce things over time. Simpson Bowles came out with a good idea that both parties liked and this President flat out rejected it.

      The reason I voted for Romney is because while he may not be completely fiscally conservative, I can hope that he will at least be a little bit more fiscally conservative then Obama.

      Santorum has made too many outlandish remarks to get independent, moderates and disenfranchised Democratic voters.

      Gingrich has too much baggage

      No one takes Ron Paul seriously.

      Therefore I think Romney will be the best chance to kind of pull the reigns back on the GOP on social issues and will hopefully be fiscally conservative.

      That being said, I still think they’re all going to lose to Obama. To me, the Republicans would be much better served by finding a younger, fiscally conservative individual, with strong new ideas on Immigration, foreign policy and the economy and stays away from social issues for 2016. Not saying give up on this election, I just don’t think it’s going to turn out good and I worry the GOP will go even further to the right then Santorum.

      Report this comment

      ModerationIsBest  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In