Joe Del Rio’s story starts off two years ago. The 72-year-old man from East Austin, Texas, was woken up at 7 a.m. on a Saturday in May 2010 by a local SWAT team and fire department at his door. Why? To investigate a multilevel bunker under his home.
In the years following, Austin’s American-Statesman reports, Del Rio’s home has been condemned by the city as uninhabitable; he’s been served a $90,000 bill from the city to make the street on which he lives “safe” again (his bunker apparently made the street’s structure unsafe); and more recently set out to sue the city for unconstitutional seizure of his property without compensation.

Inside Del Rio's bunker. (Photo: Code of Compliance Department City of Austin via American-Statesman)

(Photo: Code of Compliance Department City of Austin via American-Statesman)
Here are more details on the case from the American-Statesman:
“The ordeal they put me through was unnecessary,” Del Rio, now 72, said the afternoon before the second anniversary of his forced eviction. “I’ve gotten the runaround. I think they want the property. Condemning it is a cheap way to get it.”
The city released this statement in response to the suit: “The City of Austin has yet to be served with a lawsuit from Mr. Del Rio; however, actions taken by the City at 2006 Canterbury St. were done due to a public safety risk caused by the structure located on the property.”
Del Rio said the space in question started out as a Cold War-era fallout shelter — by no means uncommon at the time — which he later expanded into what he described as a work space when he took possession of the family home.

Graphic showing the layout of Del Rio's home, bunker and where the authorities found what they considered questionable items. (Graphic: Robert Calzada/American-Statesman)
The American-Statesman goes on to note several instances where complaints had been issued by neighbors over the years due to holes in the land as well as construction of a retaining wall. It also points out that war memorabilia and firearms were found in Del Rio’s bunker and home when it was searched. Armed with these findings and complaints during the military veteran’s morning wake-up call in 2010, Del Rio said the police treated him like he was the “Unibomber” over his disheveled appearance — uncombed hair and shirtless nature — which he attributed to just waking up. He says he was interrogated for 10 hours.
Watch Del Rio describe the situation:
The American-Statesman goes on to report local structural engineer Jeffrey Tucker, who constructed the retaining wall, as saying he inspected the house in 2009 and at the time it seemed “structurally safe” with no signs to indicate it would fall in.
Off the Grid Survival reports some of the $90,000 bill Del Rio received from the city was for filling in his bunker with 264 tons of concrete.

Cement trucks filing toward Del Rio's home in Austin to fill his underground bunker with concrete. (Photo: Rodolfo Gonzalez/American-Statesman)

Del Rio's bunker being filled with concrete. (Photo: Rodolfo Gonzalez/American-Statesman)
Del Rio is seeking compensation for the land that was taken from him, which the American-Statesman reports in 2010 was valued at $172,000.
See more photos of Del Rio’s bunker and surrounding property here.
This story has been updated to change pounds of concrete to tons.























































































































Comments (258)
99oxymoron
May. 14, 2012 at 11:28am$90,000 for filling his bunker with 264 pounds of concrete????
Government spending at its finest. 4 bags of quickrete for 90 grand, wow!
Home depot has them for $3.77 a bag!
Report this comment
symphonic
May. 14, 2012 at 11:39amsloppy journalism. The Blaze must have meant “tons”
Report this comment
99oxymoron
May. 14, 2012 at 1:47pmFreaky, Now it says tons.
I have effected change in the world!!
Can anyone else say that today??
Report this comment
goodgrubguy
May. 14, 2012 at 11:24amWelcome to the intersection of “Get the F out of my life” and “I’m crazy street”. One of the posts above mentioned that he should’ve done it outside the city limits and he’s right there. But the biggest things that this guy did wrong was trying to do this under the radar and doing it with redneck construction techniques. It’s essentially a really cool basement. If he had done it right, it would not only be legal but add to his property value. Instead he built like a gopher with no regard to the community. If he built in the country and it caved in into a huge sinkhole…no problem. But in the city, it could cause major issues to infrastructure and other folks’ homes.
Report this comment
TexasIndependant
May. 14, 2012 at 11:23amBoy the whole Safety Ideology is Scary, Not supporting either side here, but what happens when they decide guns are unsafe and they kill people. Who gets to decide whats safe and whats not safe? MOB RULE? When did personal property rights become the governments business? Is it really Ownership if someone else tells you what you can and cant do? Sounds more like slavery to me.
Report this comment
symphonic
May. 14, 2012 at 11:41amNo, I think generally building permits is a GOOD idea and helps prevent huge gopher holes like this one.
Report this comment
mike057
May. 14, 2012 at 11:22amAnother example of government over stepping thier authority. Another example of why we need small government. So is 72 yr old on his own? Is there any local outcry? This country was founded on private ownership of property.
Report this comment
symphonic
May. 14, 2012 at 11:42amDid you see the pictures? Didn’t it look like there was a potential “cave in” hazard there? It did to me. I thought, “what’s holding this thing up???”
Report this comment
capitalismrocks
May. 14, 2012 at 11:21amAs long as he didn’t dig under the street easement, I don’t see how the city could do squat… its his property and he can do what he pleases with it as long as its within regulation/code…. if there is a code saying he can’t build higher then 3 stories, then fine he could do that, if there is no code as to what he can do under the ground, that is up to him solely…
Report this comment
chuck_in_st_paul
May. 14, 2012 at 11:17amI don’t know if this guy is one of those clowns that refuses to work with the government when challenged or not. Having said that, it would seem normal for him and the city to both send structural engineers to do an audit. Based on that he could then modify the structure accordingly. I only see half a story here.
Report this comment
Sr Newk
May. 14, 2012 at 11:17amThis is a good reminder to not move or live in the reaches of Austin’s city limits. Austin needs signs posted city limits where highway and county roads enter into the city. Beware; Brain Dead Liberals have the majority rule of this city. .
Report this comment
Blazen420
May. 14, 2012 at 11:12amWho ever ordered the concrete should get a bullet in the rear-end, not to kill them, but to mame and hamper their sorry life until the end.
Report this comment
symphonic
May. 14, 2012 at 11:06amI’m a CIVIL ENGINEER, not a communist, not a socialist, but all one has to do is look at the PICTURES of that very dangerous mess the man did “downstairs” to know why they require PERMITS to make sure we do things right in this country. We can’t have this kind of danger. This has nothing to do with freedoms. He didn’t do it right.
Report this comment
Upthegut
May. 14, 2012 at 11:04amHow did it affect the integrity of the street when the diagram shows all excavation was done under the homes footprint? In one of the pictures it looks like the homes footprint is about 15-20 feet from the road.
Report this comment
symphonic
May. 14, 2012 at 11:45amWhen big trucks go down a road, and pound the pavement, there is also horizontal force that would travel towards this house. Over time, that could crack and a collapse happen, and then the road sinks a bit, maybe a lot. Pipes could shift, could leak, gas leak? All kinds of ramifications to a road sinking. When a POOL goes in, there is this large and rigid CONCRETE wall with rebar holding it firm. This “basement” bunker had no such safety measures. Its a hazard.
Report this comment
Blazen420
May. 14, 2012 at 11:04amFolks, this is flat out wrong. I hope this man wins enough money from the lawsuit to build a fortress.
Report this comment
cashe
May. 14, 2012 at 11:03amI know many here want to blame a liberal conspiracy for this issue. But in reality, building permits and building inspections have been the norm in urban and suburban areas for at least 60 years. Most cities that the issue seriously and are usually not very flexible.
Report this comment
schroeder123
May. 14, 2012 at 11:00amThis is a great story. 72 years old, and he is a threat to all mankind.
Don’t fill the basement with mud…use concrete at $ 100+ a yard. Little extreme ? Yes.
The guy is 72. He wants to live one more year after the end in Dec, 2012 . Let him dig.
After he dies, the house will have an excellent foundation. No earth quake will take that place down.
With that foundation..You can build a ten story low income housing project on the property.
Think of all the money Obamamama will give the city.
Report this comment
RinkyDink34
May. 14, 2012 at 11:00amHow bizarre
Report this comment
avgconservative
May. 14, 2012 at 10:57am264 POUNDS???? of concrete???? Try yards!
Report this comment
99oxymoron
May. 14, 2012 at 1:53pmFunny, the story now reads “tons” of concrete. Although when I read it the first time it did say pounds.
Report this comment
mixplix
May. 14, 2012 at 10:49am264 is probably the number of cubic yards of concrete and a concrete truck usually has a 6 cubic yard capacity. 264 pounds of concrete would be about a wheelbarrow full.
Report this comment
Americanius
May. 14, 2012 at 10:48amThe city is PO’d because he didn’t have a building permit and seized his property for his “own protection” and the “safety” of his neighbors.
“Danny Perez, with the East Town Lake Citizens Neighborhood Association, says fencing the area off is not enough to protect neighbors.” Oh really Danny? You have some reason to trespass on the property? I would imagine 264 yards of concrete pretty much took care of your safety concern.
As for the owner, he was reckless and certainly put himself and possibly others in danger by excavating a multi-level underground facility without what appears to be properly engineered support. But, that’s his choice if he wants to risk his own life. Now he’s out $90k and the city owns a large paper weight.
Report this comment
Rickfromillinois
May. 14, 2012 at 10:46amThe government took his house away from him for his own good. Now he won’t have to worry that his house will fall down on him even if an engineer did say that is was safe in 2009. Besides, this veteran had GUNS and WAR paraphernalia in his house, not to mention TWO fifty-five gallon drums! Obviously he is some kind of psycho who is about to go off the deep end and wipe out his neighborhood. The government put him out on the street for everyone’s safety.
I also am a veteran with guns and war paraphernalia but I don’t have to worry because I don’t have any fifty-five gallon drums, although they might be a good idea and digging another level to my basement doesn’t sound too bad either………..never mind. Pretend like I didn’t say anything.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
May. 14, 2012 at 10:46amYet again the power of ‘eminent domaine’ is being forced on someone against their desires; the communists win one more, I hope his lawsuit succeeds.
Report this comment
quickstudy
May. 14, 2012 at 10:41amYou think the cement company had any influence on this action by the city? How much do you think they got paid for all that cement? Cha-Ching!
Report this comment
dont_drive_slow_in_the_left_lane_obliviot
May. 14, 2012 at 10:38amCity of Austin is run by committed progressive liberals who are 100% unqualified to run such a unique place. If they are so bent on “mixed use” zoning, what is wrong with a shelter that has been there since the 50′s?
He was way too close to downtown to be trying something like this. If he wanted a zombie shelter he needed to sell that property and move out of town. He could have easily done that. But Austin severely overreacted.
Report this comment
GrumpyCat
May. 14, 2012 at 10:38amThat shed was supposedly worth $172,000?
$90,000 to fill that hole with concrete? Stupid. That structure wasn’t worth saving. Knock it down and fill with dirt. Is likely the excavated dirt is laying around somewhere close.
Government sure is stupid.
Report this comment
abbygirl1994
May. 14, 2012 at 10:36amPeople should be able to do whatever they want with their own property! Personally I am disgusted with city ordinances.. building permits.. etc! It infringes on our freedoms.. I find it disgusting to have to pay a forty dollar fee for a permit to put a pellet stove in my home, or a hot water heater! Not to mentio a roof, siding etc! I would like to see the same government our ancestors had! Like chickens in the back yard!! They are a awesome pet that gives you eggs to eat! Our freedoms have been swallowed up for years! As long as we do things within reason then why not! In my town you can’t even have rabbits.. in the animal control laws it clearly says we can have both, but in their residential it vaguely says no.. SO last year they went around and ticketed people who had such. All who had read animal control! Yeah, I am disgusted with city laws.. who infringe upon peoples rights!
Report this comment
ChiefGeorge
May. 14, 2012 at 10:36amDo the reverse and hide among the enemy. Bunker in Berkeley! They’ll never look there!
Report this comment
NOT A CRAZY
May. 14, 2012 at 10:35amThere are Liberal idiots no matter where you live, but it is good to see the Texas bigotry is alive and well on The Blaze. I used to do the same thing until it happened to me. I am as conservative as they get and now I understand that it doesn’t matter where you are from. What matters is what is in your heart and how you think and act.
Report this comment