Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Mount Soledad Memorial Cross CaseSAN DIEGO (The Blaze/AP) — The Supreme Court won’t get involved in a fight over whether a 29-foot war memorial cross can remain on public land overlooking the Pacific Ocean in San Diego, with justices refusing Monday to review an appeals court ruling that deemed the Mount Soledad cross an unconstitutional mixing of government and religion.

It was in 2011 that the Blaze first told you about a controversial cross atop the Mt. Soledad War Memorial in San Diego, Calif. As we reported, the religious symbol was deemed unconstitutional by the the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. But, supporters, led by the non-profit, conservative legal firm, Liberty Institute, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to save what they see as an important memorial that commemorates U.S. soldiers — a fight that was lost today when the court refused to hear the case.

You can read more about the cross in a report The Blaze published back in Jan. 2011. The high court’s decision not to hear the case came despite the fact that the justices plunged into the dispute over the use of religious symbols to honor fallen troops two times recently. The court has recently signaled a greater willingness to allow religious symbols on public land.

(Related: Memorial Day Music Video Asks That Mt. Soledad Veterans’ Memorial Cross Not Be Torn Down)

The current cross sits on a 14-foot base, surrounded by walls that display more than 2,100 plaques commemorating individual veterans and veterans groups.

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Mount Soledad Memorial Cross Case

Last year’s ruling by the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that deemed the cross unconstitutional capped two decades of legal challenges over the 1950s cross that became a memorial to Korean War veterans.

A number of military memorials on public lands across the country have been challenged in recent years by civil liberty activists and atheists who say they violate the separation between church and state.

The Supreme Court in 2010 refused to order the removal of a congressionally endorsed war memorial cross from its longtime home atop a remote rocky outcropping in California’s Mojave Desert. That cross was later stolen and supporters are working on getting one restored to the spot.

The Supreme Court last year also refused to hear an appeal of a ruling that ordered the removal of 12-foot-high crosses along Utah highways in honor of dead state troopers.

(Related: ‘An Unforgivable Insult’: Supporters Appeal to Supreme Court to Save ‘Unconstitutional’ War Memorial Cross)

David Loy, of the American Civil Liberties Union in San Diego County, said the Mount Soledad case now goes back to the U.S. District Court in California to decide what measures should be taken to remedy the situation.

“In this case the government has no business playing favorites with religion, thus the Supreme Court decided properly to stay out of it,” he said.

Allyson Ho, lead counsel for the co-defendant, the Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, said her group remained hopeful the cross would still remain in place despite Monday’s defeat.

“While we are disappointed the Court did not accept this case for review at this time, we are hopeful we can find a solution that will allow this veterans memorial to remain where it has stood for over half a century,” she said.