Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

Politics

2012 Dem Platform Drops Language Committing to Keeping Jerusalem the Capital of Israel

Sep. 4, 2012 1:13pm Erica Ritz

Democrat 2012 Platform Removes Commitment to Jerusalem as Israel Capital, Anti Hamas Language

President Obama visited Jerusalem and its holiest sites while still campaigning for president. (Photo: AP)

The Democrat Party ran on a strong pro-Israel platform in 2008, and, though their actions may indicate otherwise, the administration has repeatedly claimed it is Israel’s strongest ally.

That is, when they’re not trying to play both sides on whether or not Jerusalem is actually the country’s capital.

Back in July, TheBlaze’s Billy Hallowell noted how drastically Obama’s Israel rhetoric has changed from 2008 to 2012, and now the Democratic Party has seemingly embraced the changes as part of its official platform.

In 2008, the Democrats clearly stated that Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and that Hamas must be isolated until it renounces terrorism and recognizes Israel’s right to exist.

Here is an excerpt, via the Weekly Standard:

The United States and its Quartet partners should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and abides by past agreements. … The creation of a Palestinian state through final status negotiations, together with an international compensation mechanism, should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel. All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949. Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. [Emphasis added]

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Barack Obama meet at the White House. (AP File Photo)

But now?

In its 2012 platform, the Democrat Party has removed all language referencing Israel’s contentious capital, and no longer mentions Hamas. Instead, Democrats simply reiterate an “unshakable” commitment to Israel’s security which, Israelis note, would be nearly impossible if they complied with the president’s stated positions.

Here is the revised platform, also via the Weekly Standard:

President Obama and the Democratic Party maintain an unshakable commitment to Israel’s security. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States not simply because we share strategic interests, but also because we share common values. For this reason, despite budgetary constraints, the President has worked with Congress to increase security assistance to Israel every single year since taking office, providing nearly $10 billion in the past three years. The administration has also worked to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region. And we have deepened defense cooperation – including funding the Iron Dome system – to help Israel address its most pressing threats, including the growing danger posed by rockets and missiles emanating from the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. The President’s consistent support for Israel’s right to defend itself and his steadfast opposition to any attempt to delegitimize Israel on the world stage are further evidence of our enduring commitment to Israel’s security.

Critics note that providing billions in additional funding to Israel does not necessarily mean what it used to, since the region has become significantly less stable (partially due to our actions), and because we are also doling out billions to Israel’s potential aggressors.

Others simply ask why the language was removed. Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, which the administration now considers a valid negotiating partner in Egypt. Is it possible that the administration will consider legitimizing the recognized terrorist group Hamas, as well?

Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin pointed out that it is unlikely the mainstream media will investigate the change, despite their eagerness to brand the new Republican platform “extreme.”

She wrote: “The Democrats, I am sure, will rush forward to say platforms are meaningless and Obama isn’t obligated to abide by any of it. Aside from the egregious hypocrisy in coverage of the two platforms, you do have to wonder why it is so important to expressly downgrade language on Israel…”

–

RELATED:

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (83)

verbatim
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:54pm
I want to thank all of The Blaze’s Christian and faith based readers for the continued support of the land of Israel. While we Jews and Christians alike continue to have faith in G-d’s leadership and plan for the world, we do need to expend our earthly efforts to make ourselves and the world better. Israel continues to need all of your prayers and support.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RossPoldark
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 4:55pm
  God bless Israel!! Don’t ever let obama desecrate the wailing wall again by even coming near it.
  
  Report this comment
pwatkins
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:32pm
All I can say for this article is pray for our country,Israel and all God-fearing people around the world. Vote Obama out in November and then pray some more.
God bess America! We the people will stand with Israel.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RossPoldark
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 4:56pm
  Obama and his cronies will feel God’s wrath soon enough.
  
  Report this comment
- pdw
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 9:47pm
  I loved his feet of sand busted bust they built for him before the Convention.
  
  Report this comment
HotFixIt
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:48pm
Notice the 2008 platform includes language of present and future action and ideas. (should continue, is and will remain, should remain)

The 2012 platform is generally language of past actions and ideas… no real ideas or support for the future. BIG… HUGE change. (has worked, in the past, has also worked)

Where is the language for the FUTURE of ISRAEL?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
COFemale
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:42pm
So when Jews turn against other Jews what are they called? Rahm Emanuel, Valerie Jarrett, and George Soros seems to be running from their Jewish roots and are willing to turn against Israeli Jews. There must be a name these people are called besides “Traitors”. Perhaps COWARDS?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- kalli
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:58pm
  I just found out jarrett’s ethnicity is black. As for her being Jewish, I’ve not heard that. She is a communist, and her parents were close to frank marshall davis…thus, befriending the commie-in-chief.
  
  Report this comment
- pdw
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 9:45pm
  Mostly you call them GREEDY
  
  Report this comment
eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:06pm
Off Subject…BUT…
JOE BIDEN, once again shows his MASTERY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

He begins his statement with – ” Folks, let me make this CLEAR…and continues …
” America is better off today than they left us when they left.”

Joe, YOU might be THE REASON I MIGHT WATCH THE DNC. :)

What a HILLARIOUS IDIOT!
But…THIS is who would be ” IN CHARGE” if something were to happen to the head idiot!
S C A R Y, huh? EVEN MORE of a reason why BOTH OF THEM SHOULD GO!

VOTE ROMNEY / RYAN 2012 – P L E A S E !!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
mcsledge
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:05pm
It’s hard to back the President when the President’s Muslim side supports Islamic rule, not Judaism, in Jerusalem.

Christians acknowledge Jerusalem as a Jewish city. Added evidence that the President isn’t all that Christian afterall.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- JRook
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:38pm
  Always interesting to see individuals support the designation of Jerusalem as part of Israel or even the capital given the history and the number of times it has been conquered. But of course any ownership claimed by the original inhabitants of Jerusalem and specifically any conquers is not recognized. But these same people have no problem with the taking of North American from the Indians, similarly the original inhabitants. How do people actually rationalize these 2 positions.
  
  Report this comment
- hayesstephen
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:14pm
  I have been for some time now pleading for America Jews to WAKE UP!!!
  In the 1930′s they voted for Hitler and the Nazis party. Here they voted for every Liberal that comes along. They vote for the very people who have built the FEMA camps. Camps with railroads leading up to them. The OberKapo Juden have been brain washed they are ready and waiting for their uniforms. Not far off the sound of jack boots will be heard on the streets, children screaming, rail road cars waiting to be loaded. Sharia law is going to be the law in the United Muslims States of America. Jewish vote will not cinch the election for NoBama2013 nor make him lose it. But one thing is certain, when the Religion of Peace and Love Islam becomes the Law in the U.S.A. you folk will certainly be responsible. Christians will be offered life if we convert. Jews will get no such offer. Next will be Liberals who will shoot their big mouths off as if The Republic of the United States of America still existed. Many will grow cold and recant Yeshua, many will convert, I pray to Yahweh I will not grow weak, but walk to the wall and be singing my Saviors praise waiting for death. Yes you think I am a crank, but look back seventy years or so and tell me it can not happen. Yahweh bless Our Glorious Country, protect Israel and her people. My Yeshua is a Jew, how could I not love Israel and all Jews?
  
  Report this comment
- WindyDualism
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:22pm
  Rookie
  I’ll await the DemCairRainbowCoalition and their response, as you seemed more scattered than usual.
  
  Report this comment
kalli
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:59pm
This step, in and of itself, is enough to bring the wrath of God upon the wicked empire.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- kalli
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:36pm
  The name of God has just been dropped from the dem platform….perhaps due to having a platform that supports taxpayer abortion and gay marriage. Turning your back on Israel brings His wrath, but even as God is slow to anger, I can imagine by now He is losing patience with these wicked people.
  
  Report this comment
I SPY
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:46pm
I can’t understand how the news agencies are getting these ‘polls’ that reflect a “dead heat tie” between voters. Just take a look at the obama bashing on Yahoo News, which normally is very liberal and pro obama. Practically no one posts anything positive for the criminal in chief.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- kalli
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:03pm
  Ignore the polls…Rasmussen is probably the best of any, but even it can be skewed. Most of the polls are controlled by the leftists trying to fool the people in believing in their idol. These people need to see 2016, and if they have any intelligence, they will see the light in what another 4 years of the evil empire has in store for America. Btw, The Hill has an article on polling that puts the majority of Americans against the thug-in-chief.
  
  Report this comment
watersRpeople
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:46pm
I’ll say this: greater is the man who sins so his son doesn’t have to, than is a man who gets another to sin in his place.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RANGER1965
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:04pm
  If only that were true.
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:05pm
  You know, if Obama had a son, he’d probably sin like Obama.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:11pm
  But it is true. Don’t you think the Father in Heaven sinned when he let his only begotten son get crucified?
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:21pm
  “Don’t you think the Father in Heaven sinned when he let his only begotten son get crucified?”
  
  Nope. If that was true, every time something bad happens in the world, God would have sinned because He didn’t get involved. Christ is God, but He was also man: He could have turned away from His fate because like all men He had free will. Instead He embraced it and sacrificed Himself for us.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:23pm
  And even the Lord God won’t ask another to do God’s sacrificing for God, and yet men will have other men do sacrificing for the men. God even stopped Abraham saying “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:25pm
  The Lord loved his children so much, that he fell for them.
  
  Report this comment
- RANGER1965
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:32pm
  God is not a man like you. He can no more go against his perfect righteousness, than you can be righteous on your own. You are powerless to do so.
  
  The sacrifice that Jesus made was not about sin and judgement. It was about love in it’s highest form.
  
  A god that sins cannot save you. And you’re powerless to save yourself. I would re-think things if I were you.
  
  “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”
  
  Report this comment
- hayesstephen
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:35pm
  The Book teaches us that Satan can disguise himself as an angle. You have a nice knowledge of the Book and use it to confuse people who know nothing or very little about it. Perhaps you should remember the Christs warning to those who would be an stumbling block to others. Just a little reminder that Yahweh does not forget and will repay.
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:44pm
  “The Book teaches us that Satan can disguise himself as an angle.”
  
  A right angle, an acute angel, or an obtuse angle? Inquiring minds wish to know!
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:31pm
  RANGER1965,
  But God doesn’t think about himself as perfect, because if God did, then God would keep on falling. That’s why God rather enjoyed, and approved of Job’s rational thought when Job rationalized himself as not being a perfect lest he doesn’t see his own flaws. God couldn’t be perfect – I mean, look at you.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:33pm
  Locked,
  Why don’t you tell me about Satan, after-all his dust is in all men, and that’s why you aren’t righteous.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 3:43pm
  Locked,
  Yet you’ll deny that you have Satan dust in you which makes you more like Satan than you know, because you also speak the deception and lies Satan speaks, and you are right about disguises, because you embody the “Angles” you speak of. And since you are not righteous because you have Satan dust, yet you deny, then you can only also deny the Father.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 4:00pm
  RANGER1965,
  And you are wrong, because someone who thinks themselves perfect wouldn’t bother saving you. Because after-all – they are already perfect – no need to feel good saving you.
  
  Report this comment
- RANGER1965
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 4:22pm
  Waters,
  
  The truth hurts. Believe me, I know.
  
  What you are feeling now is the conflict between your broken humanity, and that part of you that aspires to greater things. The daring and courageous soul that wants to put aside foolishness and get to know the Most High God. His love is a fierce and powerful thing, once encountered it’s never forgotten. His plan for you is to do mighty things, not this humanistic philosophic drivel. Don’t fall for it. It’s powered by nothing more than spite and hubris.
  
  Needling Christians used to be a full-time sport for me. It’s funny how a few battlefields can change that, and show you with perfect clarity, the extent of your brilliance, and the worth of your pride.
  
  Report this comment
- Individualism
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 8:00pm
  Israel determines their own capital not the United States, they need to get out of our goverment and we need to get out of theirs.
  
  Report this comment
Locked
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:44pm
Why should the US have any bearing or direction on telling a foreign country what their capital can or cannot be? Would most of us be nodding if France suddenly added a plank saying “Washington DC is the capital of the United States!” or would we be scratching our heads going “Well, duh. And who the heck are you to tell us that?”

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RANGER1965
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:19pm
  Because there are 2 forces in opposition. The Jews and most Christians believe that Jerusalem is the capitol of Israel since Ancient times. They point to the Torah, the Bible, and an almost infinite archeological record which confirms this.
  
  The Muslims point to the fact that they and Allah hate Jews, therefore whatever they say is not only right, but approved of by their god. (infallible logic, that).
  
  Nations that want to share in the bounty of Middle East (ie: decent prices for their oil) are being forced to choose the Arabs over the Jews. In some cases it’s an easy choice. Our president has always disliked the Jews personally, and you will see greater and greater anti-semitism as time goes on.
  
  As a Christian I see this growing Antisemitism from a biblical standpoint. This is somthing that has been foretold to be a harbinger of very dark times ahead.
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:27pm
  @Ranger1965
  
  “The Jews and most Christians believe that Jerusalem is the capitol of Israel since Ancient times.”
  
  What does that matter though? I could claim the Garden of Eden was in Missouri, but that doesn’t mean I should be allowed to make it the capital of the US. The only people to decide the capital of Israel should be the people of the country.
  
  “This is somthing that has been foretold to be a harbinger of very dark times ahead.”
  
  You might think so. I opine differently; I don’t think the Bible said “And lo, the United Nations will appoint a new Israel. Totally God’s will, that United Nations thingy.” I also believe that it’s an issue that the country in question should decide for itself (and as far as I know, it has done so), not an issue that other countries should decide for it.
  
  I stand with Israel as an important ally, not as a portent of prophecy. They’re our most steadfast ally in the Middle East, but that does NOT mean they are infallible nor beholden to us. Israel can decide its own matters; that includes what the capital city will be, and if it wants to initiate a war in the region.
  
  Report this comment
- RANGER1965
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:45pm
  Then let me put it to you simply.
  
  There is no worldly judge or jury that tell nations or their leaders what rights they have to say this or that. There is no worldly force outside of the community of nations to tell a nation what policies to make, or what is right or wrong.
  
  It’s a big playground with no teacher. The biggest and meanest kid on the playground wins, or….the biggest toughest gang of kids.
  
  Soooo…If I am a rich muslim dictatorship/theocracy which is pretty good friends with all the other rich muslim dictatorship/theocracies around me, and we all have a crap load of oil to sell….well then we have a nice fat lever into your western “democracies” that need the oil because they don’t want to drill in their own lands.
  
  So we (the Middle East) could tell you that it is important to us for you to tell the Jews that Jerusalem is not the capitol of Israel. You could say; “Screw You! that’s not true”, as long as you accept the consequences of high gas prices and all that comes with it,,,,or you’re willing to do somthing about it, like drill for your own, or go to war with the Middle East.
  
  Obama has decided to placate his muslim friends, and say somthing that is utterly untrue for political reasons.
  
  Understand now?
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 4:14pm
  @Ranger
  
  “Obama has decided to placate his muslim friends, and say somthing that is utterly untrue for political reasons.”
  
  Or… the other option is that he’s not sticking his nose into Israel’s foreign affairs. As far as I have read, he hasn’t said “Jerusalem is not the capital;” this article just doesn’t mention it as an issue at all. Right?
  
  Report this comment
- RANGER1965
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 4:39pm
  What he and his administration has said is:
  
  Jerusalem’s disposition is yet to be determined by negotions. He won’t openly side with the Mulsim world on the issue until this election is behind him. He would lose even more of the Jewish vote. It’s a critical time for him which is why he doesn’t want the State of Israel to respond to Iran’s Nuclear Threat.
  
  Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:43pm
Obama is committed to the destruction of Israel once and for all; he will probably join in with the arab forces when the war commences to ensure their final victory. Of course he will claim it is for the purpose of ensureing ‘Palestinian people safety’ while our troops get killed daily as in Afghanistan.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
dlivelli
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:43pm
If obama had any balls he would just come out and say what he really feels……”allah akbar”…right mr obama? He has NO INTENTION of ever helping Israel….period. The sooner the Jews come to that conclusion, the better off they will be. We have to put someone in the whitehouse that understands the cost of a war-torn Israel……..a wildly radical Middle east with only bad tidings for the “great satan”….us. Obama has no idea of history or theology. If you have not read The Harbinger by Johnathen Cahn…do….it WILL blow you away! The decision we make in 2012 is way more important than you think!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- kalli
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:08pm
  I have read that book…in one sitting! It is astounding! If any non-believer read this book, it may just get them to rethink their beliefs.
  
  Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:43pm
Well, of course – this is no surprise considering that obama is sworn enemy of Israel.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- MeteoricLimbo
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:22pm
  That about sums it up Tri-ox..
  
  Report this comment
RightThinking1
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:41pm
Gee, did I hear correctly that they are going to roll out Clinton, Carter, Frank and… Dukakis?
My god.., it’s like the Dem hall of shame. Obammer is desperate to make himself look good, the only way to do that is to parade the worst losers they have. Of course Teddy Kennedy is not available, but I’m surprised they aren’t hauling out Condit, Weiner, and Spitzer

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GlennaBeckski
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:02pm
  RIGHTTHINKING1 Hilarious Post! Hahahahahahahaha Rofl
  
  Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:41pm
I think that some of the Presidents choices and lies will come back to haunt him.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Justus39
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:35pm
I am looking forward to Bill Clinton speaking and bringing back some old memories. All of you know the rumor going around about the military training to handle domestic issues I suppose. Well I for one will not forget this when Clinton speaks:
Waco Seige
The Waco siege began on February 28, 1993, and ended violently 51 days later on April 19.[5] The siege began when the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), accompanied by several members of the media, attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian ranch at Mount Carmel, a property located in the city of Elk, Texas[6] nine miles (fourteen kilometers) east-northeast of Waco, Texas. On February 28, shortly after the attempt to serve the warrant, an intense gun battle erupted, lasting nearly two hours. In this armed exchange, four agents and six Branch Davidians were killed. Upon the ATF’s failure to execute the search warrant, a siege was initiated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The siege ended 50 days later when a fire destroyed the compound when a second assault was launched. Seventy-six people[7] died in the fire, including more than 20 children, two pregnant women, and the sect leader David Koresh.
Former Clinton adviser Dick Morris disclosed on Monday that it was Clinton himself, and not Attorney General Janet Reno, as Americans have been led to believe for the past 17 years, who called the shots during the 1993 botched invasion that led to the death of seventy-six people.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:41pm
  I have heard the same matter; and do not forget the Congressional investigation into the matter was denied much of the physical evidence they requested as well. Just like Holder and Obama are denying the records of fast and furious.
  
  Report this comment
watersRpeople
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:30pm
Here’s the thing, if God saves the nation Israel, then Israelis will become even more hard hearted that it’s the geographical region God was talking about when God gave them the land.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
G.E.R
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:26pm
Mitt Romney made a tragic mistake by, for the first time since 1952, failing to mention the troops serving overseas

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CatB
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:42pm
  “But the Republican campaign was quick to point out what critics seemed to be ignoring – Romney spent the day before his convention speech visiting the American Legion conference in Indianapolis, where he talked exclusively about national security and America’s veterans. President Obama, by contrast, addressed that conference in the form of a three-minute video aired at the conference site.”
  
  “Though Romney did not mention the war in Afghanistan on Thursday night, he focused on that issue, as well as the veterans who are returning home, in his American Legion speech.”
  
  Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/02/romney-camp-touts-legion-speech-disputing-dems-claims-ignored-wars/#ixzz25WXwD1Ok
  
  Report this comment
- Wool-Free Vision
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:42pm
  You made a tragic mistake in thinking your diversionary troll wouldn’t be recognized as such. You, like Dora Glasperger, are truly making a fool of yourself by interjecting a completely stupid remark into a completely unrelated conversation.
  
  HEY, YOU GUYS TALKING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS REJECTING OUR ALLIES? GUESS WHAT! ROMNEY BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH. LOOK OVER HERE, GUYS! LOOK AT THE STUPID BAUBLE I’M WAVING AROUND! WHY AREN’T YOU LOOKING????
  
  Because you are an idiot.
  
  Report this comment
- G.E.R
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:12pm
  Romney makes motions of supporting the troops, but when it really counts, when all the world is watching, the perception continues that it is the furthest from his mind.
  
  Report this comment
LestWeForget
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:25pm
Pattern of behaviors tells true intentions.

Glad Bibi and Romney are friends – that will help quicker healing of our relationship (and credibility) if the country gets the election right. That and investigation and prosecution of National Security leakers.

–@advancingtruth–

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:37pm
  Well why don’t you put yourself right on the front-lines over there then? Or you could be like Glenn Beck wanting someone else to be President being his savior as President, but he himself won’t run for President lest he sins, but he supports someone else sinning as President.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:52pm
  Muslims do the same thing only they strap a vest on someone else.
  
  Report this comment
- watersRpeople
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:59pm
  That’s why I say Mormons are diluted Muslims, and a nation that embraces Mormonism will soon follow embracing Islam.
  
  Report this comment
- pdw
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 9:44pm
  I see WATERONTHEBRAIN is busy with his hate mongering again
  
  Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:25pm
The only people who will claim to be shocked by this news are the liberal Jews who intend to vote democrat, as always. The sad part is that they will refuse to hear this news until November 7. If you try to tell them now, they will just talk over you because you’re a dumb anti-semitic neanderthal. Then, after the election, they will be shocked, but they will still dismiss it because they would never admit they might have been wrong.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
watersRpeople
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:24pm
Ah, the bottom-line is that if the nation Israel doesn’t bow to Christ, they aren’t going to be spared. Otherwise there was no point for Jesus crucifixion.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- iampraying4u
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 2:19pm
  Take your meds tim
  
  Report this comment
Shakespear
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:23pm
Now if we could just get the Dimocrats to pledge “an unshakable commitment” to offer us a candidate that is not a communist, and not afraid to show his real birth certificate, and college records!
Not to mention, a president that will abide by the U.S. Constitution.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jacobstroubles
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:27pm
  well…that’s never going to happen.. sad days are about to happen..
  Rapture coming/Tribulation starts soon
  
  Report this comment
- eyestoseeearstohear
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:31pm
  They’d have to suggest a REPUBLICIAN – because ALL OF THEM ARE COMMUNIST!
  
  Report this comment
NewLife56
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:22pm
To all our Jewish friends, PLEASE WAKE UP!!! This guy wants you to cease to exsit.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jacobstroubles
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:29pm
  it’s mind boggling how the jews were so easily decieved by him, but if you read The Bible, this will happen one more time.. with the “unwalled city”..they will saddly buy into a boat load of crap covenent offered up by a vile creature, who is soon going to be revealed.. “da ac”..
  
  Report this comment
- eyestoseeearstohear
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:36pm
  @ NEWLIFE56
  
  Your prayer and mine! Catholic’s TOO!
  
  He is a EVIL man who doesn’t believe in God OR Hell.
  
  Report this comment
- CatB
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:42pm
  DNC = Muslim Extremists.
  
  Report this comment
SREGN
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:21pm
Perverted baby-killing communist antisemites, the lot of them.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- newtwahoo
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:34pm
  Well said….
  
  Report this comment
teddrunk
Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:17pm
I wonder if Israel ever heard of Neville Chamberlain and why he was famous.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:28pm
  Although unwittingly, Chamberlain did manage to buy time for the Brits to at least regroup some, and start gearing up up for the coming war. 0bama will just put a boot on the neck of Israel when the time comes.
  
  Report this comment
- Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:46pm
  I think you mean infamous.
  
  Anyone interested in more insights to the truth of Chamberlains actions please read the book entitled “The Specter of Munich.” by Jeffrey Record. Its worth the investment.
  
  Report this comment
- Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
  Posted on September 4, 2012 at 1:49pm
  @RJing
  
  I have to disagree with you on Chamberlain in one context: his waffling and absolute desires to appease Hitler led to the dismemberment of Czekloslovika by Germany. At that point there was nothing holding him back.
  
  Obama is the same with Israel, in he is willingly and deliberatly selling them down the river; and I do see a fair chance that when war comes, Obama will send in US troops to aid the arab invasion.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.