Author Bob Woodward’s upcoming book, “The Price of Politics,” details fascinating revelations surrounding strained relationships between prominent government figures (even among leaders who belong to the same political parties) and the collapse of a historic debt and spending deal being negotiated by President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner last year.
While the two parties were apparently close to reaching an important deal that would have brought the nation additional, much-needed revenue and massive changes to the country’s entitlement programs, the agreement imploded.
Woodward’s book, which comes out September 11, purportedly uncovered what ABC News calls ”an explosive mix of dysfunction, miscommunication, and misunderstandings” both inside and outside of the White House. The situation was apparently so intense as a result of these factors that the historic deal ended up flat-lining, leaving essential issues unresolved and positioning America to continue on a path that some say will end in fiscal chaos.
The key issue that apparently led to the communication breakdown was Obama’s push for extra added taxes, something Boehner wasn’t prepared to give in on. When the deal had progressed along and this disagreement was evident, Obama tried to unsuccessfully reach the House speaker three times. When the president finally spoke with him him later that day and Boehner rejected the deal, the president purportedly became irate.
Woodward’s book claims that Obama had a “flash of pure fury.” Even Boehner admitted to the author that Obama “was spewing coals” in an incident that the book describes as being on the edge of a “presidential tirade.”
Watch an old ABC News report that recaps Obama and Boehner and their search for fiscal agreement:
For those doubting the story, Obama did admit to Woodward that he “was pretty angry” about the breakdown in communication and the subsequent inability to strike a deal.
“There’s no doubt I thought it was profoundly irresponsible, at that stage, not to call me back immediately and let me know what was going on,” Obama said of Boehner’s failure to respond to his initial phone calls.
The congressman was also candid about the situation.
“He was pissed….He wasn’t going to get a damn dime more out of me. He knew how far out on a limb I was,” the speaker told Woodward. “But he was hot. It was clear to me that coming to an agreement with him was not going to happen, and that I had to go to Plan B.”
Plan B, as described by Woodward, led Boehner to cut Obama out from key negotiations. Both parties in Congress, minus Obama, then essentially came together to come up with a plan that would ensure that the nation avoided default.
While Boehner claims that the larger deal failed because the president was seeking additional funds through taxation, the Obama camp apparently believes that the congressman was afraid of backlash from people within his own party. Regardless of who was at fault, Woodward issued a strong condemnation of both parties, but the book apparently takes greater issue with Obama’s failed leadership on the matter.

President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. Listen in back are Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner, right. (AP Photo/Saul Loeb, Pool)
“It was increasingly clear that no one was running Washington. That was trouble for everyone, but especially for Obama,” the author wrote.
Among the criticisms that both sides threw around to explain why negotiations on important program amendments and spending patterns collapsed, Boehner alleged that the White House is impeded by internal disarray.
“The president was trying to get there. But there was nobody steering the ship underneath him,” he said in an interview with Woodward. “They never had their act together. The president, I think, was ill-served by his team.”
The House speaker went on to say that there was “no process” and that nobody seemed to be in charge. Decision-making, Boehner contends, is an anomaly – one that he can’t solve and a process that seems impossible to nail down.
“The Price of Politics” barely mentions Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and has no real focus or substantive information about the 2012 presidential election — a noteworthy mention, considering the fact that the nation will cast votes in just two, short months.

President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, left, meet with Congressional leadership in the Cabinet Room of the White House, Sunday, July 10, 2011, in Washington, to discuss the debt. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
On Wednesday, The Daily Beast’s Miranda Green outlined the six juiciest details from the new Woodward book. Here are the tidbits she selected: “Obama alienated people with his arrogance,” “Biden was the Republican ‘whisperer,’” “Obama ‘chomped on Nicorette’ during secret meetings with Boehner,” “Ryan said Obama ‘poisoned the well’ by ripping apart his budget plan in his face,” “Cantor and Boehner had awkward tension” and “Obama told Cantor: ‘Don’t call my bluff.”
Obviously, there’s plenty of other meat in the book, particularly when it comes to the odd relationships and the dynamics that existed between Cantor and Boehner and between Obama and Pelosi, to name just two scenarios. As numerous outlets have noted, the book claims that Pelosi would mute Obama on conference calls when he went into lengthy speeches. Again, just one example.
POLITICO has more about these odd dynamics that unfolded during the “debt war”:
“The Price of Politics” tackles Vice President Joe Biden’s role, and highlights his work recruiting Republicans for the fiscal commission. Woodward recounts the relationship Biden built with Cantor, writing that the vice president told Cantor, “You know if I were doing this, I’d do it totally different,” and Cantor replying he would do the same if he were in charge. They agreed that they would be able to make a deal if they were both in power, according to The Daily Beast, who dubbed Biden the Republican “whisperer” of Woodward’s narrative.
Cantor and Boehner, meanwhile, did not get along quite so well, the book reveals. Cantor felt like he was just a pawn in the process, always playing second fiddle, and he completely disagreed with Boehner’s idea that political compromise could solve the crisis. Woodward quotes Rob Nabors, the director of legislative staff at the White House, as joking that “he felt awkward being in the same room with the two of them.”
In the end, the book depicts Obama as having confidence in his abilities to court to American public. However, it shows discontent among some Democratic and Republican leaders, alike, who believe that the president wasn’t prepared with a Plan B of his own.
As ABC News notes, a short-term deal was reached to cut spending and extend the debt ceiling, but at the end of the year, these issues will need to be contended with once more.
(H/T: ABC News)



























































































































Comments (80)
FEMALL
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:06pmDear Romney aide assigned to read the Blaze:
Please note what creates a “Near ‘Presidential Tirade’ ” and incorporate into Presidential debate tactics.
Report this comment
The-Obama-Romney-Ticket
Sep. 6, 2012 at 5:33pmDear Romney aide assigned to read the Blaze:
Please note how marxist dictator Barack Hussein Obama acts … and practice until you get it right or you’ll screw up the America-collapse-timeline.
Report this comment
johndoesoetoro
Sep. 6, 2012 at 6:11pmDear Romney aide assigned to read the Blaze:
Please make sure Romney is fully aware of the destruction Obama and the Left have wrought, so that he can destroy Obama during the debates.
Here is a list of things Romney must know:
http://american-trojan-horse.blogspot.com/2011/03/list-of-factual-googleable-statements.html
Report this comment
pap pap
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:40amSpoiled little brat Obama just can’t get it done except in the Chicago way.
Report this comment
wboehmer
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:53pmPresident Øbama thought he was holding all of the cards & pushed Boehner too far by requiring at the last minute $100s of billions of more taxes than what they had agreed.
In my book, this is called RENEGING on the deal! Any “fury” should be directed squarely at Øbama. If I was Boehner, I wouldn’t have returned Øbama’s call either.
Øbama is a spoiled child.
Report this comment
thankfulness
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:29amBob Woodward and Robert Frost bring back memories of the Nixon era. My earliest political memories.
Report this comment
Sirfoldallot
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:41amObama has trouble with adding his golf score card & u want another term with this nut ?
Report this comment
Nevermind
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:21amaleena
I am proud that George W. Bush was president. The party that made the mess was the Democrats. The economy collapsed because of the housing market bubble. The housing market bubble was cause by the Democrats forcing banks to issue subprime loans. Also the Democrats gained control of Congress in 2006. They made the mess, and President Obama is still making an even bigger mess. Clinton didn‘t clean up anyone’s mess; he went along with the Republican Congress. Obama has not worked well with anyone and looks incompetent.
*******
Nice lie but it has to be correct. Google the name ROland Arnell, he was head of Ameriquest and Bush’s friend. All employees of Ameriquest had to donate $2500 for his campaign and they were funneled out of a condo on 653rd and collins in Maimi, i know becasue i worked for them and my friend owned the condo. Bush relaxed Mortgage guildines in 2002 (June 17th to be axact) and subprime mortgage increased close to 300% from 2002-2007 ( all GOP administration) and it blew up. The dems had to come in and clean it up.
As a payback to ROland Arnell bush made him ambassador to the netherlands. Just google it. Your lies are cute but they are lies and it shows how stupid you actually can be
Report this comment
WindyDualism
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:53amAre you in a countrywide frank/dodd house now? You sound sub-prime, typical white guy. 0 bit for your upcoming kiniption fit.
Report this comment
VRW Conspirator
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:47pmwait…didn’t you hear Clinton last night…the last 52 years was split between Rep and Dem Pres almost exactly…66 million jobs created since Kennedy….24 million for GOP…42 million for the Dems…their policies are better…didn’t you hear…come one now…
Granted a simply Wikipedia search gives another story….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms
It all depends on how you look at the numbers…do you count the jobs created from when their first budget is passed, do you give them credit for the jobs created during their first months where the budget was set by the outgoing President…
Report this comment
DrKev
Sep. 6, 2012 at 1:02pmnevermind why call someone stupid before you offer them to find the material u suggest they look at inorder to become enlightened not very nice but you seem to know everything newrly firsthand look forward to seeing your book with rferences etc so that u can educate all of us remember to give us your ckndo friends owners name in the book
Report this comment
steveh931
Sep. 6, 2012 at 2:42pmIf the Community Reinvestment Act signed into law by Mr. Carter in 1977, revamped in 1995 and 2005 by Congress did not exist, would the housing bubble existed, NO. Progressives pushed this Act through and made it law, so they can sit in Washington D.C. and become rich off of the tax paying citizens while giving to those getting free handouts in poor neighborhoods for re-election bribes. Big Government destroys commerce, jobs, education, and foreign affairs. The Federal Reserve and Federal Housing Authority oversaw the biggest economic disaster since the great depression. President Bush asked Barney Frank and others to look into lending practices and they flat out refused that there were any issues before a congressional committee, “there is no problem”. The next President needs to take a deep look into the crisis and throw the law makers responsible behind bars for a very long time and the C.R.A. needs to go!
Report this comment
rfycom
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:54amhow about two parties working together as apposed to working to vote each other out all the God damn time.
Report this comment
cannon12pdr
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:25amHow about both parties working with in the frame work of the Constitution and its original intent of LIMITED GOVERNMENT and not gaming the system and total disregard to their oaths to UPHOLD and DEFEND the CONSTITUTION.
Report this comment
Incredulous321
Sep. 6, 2012 at 2:30pmI’ve compromised all I’m willing to. I will not support unlimited government funded abortions for irresponsible women that keep telling us how responsible they are. I believe in the rape, incest, and life of the mother exceptions, but only agree with third term abortions in the most dire consequences. I also disavow funded contraception, and think federal funding for sex changes is obviously out of the question. Life begins at conception and therefore abortion is murder. I will not compromise on the 35%, highest in the world, corporate tax rate. It’s forcing companies to leave this country, and it’s immoral. I will not compromise on the death tax. It leaves no incentive to work hard and leave anything to your children. I will not compromise on Obamacare. The Federal Government has no place controlling 1/6th of the private economy. I will not compromise on illegal immigration. It’s draining our treasury and allowing criminals and terrorists to cross our border. I will not compromise on the sequestration of $500 Billion more dollars from the defense budget, it’s suicidal. I believe we should abolish; Homeland Security, the new consumer protection bureau, The Department of Education, and the EPA should be severely cut back. There’s more, but only so many characters. The government should do it’s job, which doesn’t include dictating daily activities of American citizens. By the way, I’m not science illiterate, and I’ll talk science with that DNC delegate any time. Comp
Incredulous321
Sep. 6, 2012 at 3:12pmOh Ya. Lets talk about illiterate. (I hope I’m spelling that right, I don’t feel like using the dictionary right now. It looks right to me and that’s all that counts.) Try being historically illiterate. Socialism doesn’t work. It never has worked. It can’t work. It leads to war, death, and destruction. If I hear one more time how it works in Sweden I’m going to scream. The jury on Scandanavia is still out, and ask Brevik if it worked for him. …I won’t compromise on gun control. We have the right to bear arms so that we can turn them on the government when they become too oppressive. Scientifically illiterate? The dems think spending money on space exploration is a waste of money that should be given to the “poor.” I think they should look for dark matter in the skulls of dems. I definately think public sector unions should be illegal. The military can’t strike, but the police, and firefighters, and teachers, and garbage collectors, and air traffic controllers can? I don’t believe in $100,000 plus pensions for people that spent 30 years not doing their job and teaching our kids. How can we spend soooo much, and still produce illiterate, undereducated, not ready to work children that now need to mooch off of their parents until age 26? I don’t agree on bankrupting our country with green energy projects while we ship our coal to China so they can pollute the planet with no EPA and no controls. I don’t believe in cozying up to our enemies. I think dems are delusion
Incredulous321
Sep. 6, 2012 at 3:49pmWait, there’s more. I don’t believe in a 1.2 to 1.7 trillion dollar deficit, or a 16 trillion dollar debt, or out of control government spending, or a Senate that hasn’t done a darn thing in 3 years, including passing a budget. I don’t believe in political correctness. Facts trump verbage. I don’t believe the whole country should pay the bills of California, New York, and Illinois. I think we should tap our own energy resources in an ecologically sensitive way. Common sense people. No one wants dirty air and water, and pollution that causes birth defects. Really? Get a grip.
What do I believe in? God, Guns, The U.S. military, and personal responsibility, (even though I’m not always the best at it,) love, humility, and half of the American people. The other half should go live in Iran, or Egypt, where they crucify Christians, and would stone to death women that said half the crap American women are saying.
Report this comment
sajack
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:14amIncredulous,
I agree with 99% of what you wrote; however, you do not want Homeland Security to be abolished. They are responsible for enforcing the border, deporting illegal and criminal aliens, stopping alien smuggling, drug smuggling, sex trafficking (foreign and domestic), child pornography and child exploitation, illegal export of weapons, illegal exports to Iran, and so much more. It is better under one umbrella than spread out among countless agencies running up redundant bills. There are parts that need work, but the whole world is like that.
Respectfully,
Jack
Report this comment
III_percenter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 5:54am@Sajack
Actually the DHS is more akin the the Secret Police. I am a conservative (not Repuke-ican, Demonrat or Libel-tarian) but the role of protecting our borders and all subsequent actions falls to the military. If there are illegal immigrants in this country that are making portions of our country too dangerous for our citizenry, the answer is not to send warnings to our citizens but bombs to the illegals: in the traditional fashion. And the inner policing of moral choices by citizens is headed by the FBI and the US Marshals. The DHS, in its stated intent, is completely superfluous; in its true purpose, is blatantly tyrannical and in its actual practice is fundamentally incompetant.
Report this comment
Nevermind
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:43amNoah_fing-whey
BTW Bush left office nearly four years ago. The Bush you keep seeing is from drug induced hallucinations.
******
I know , we are still cleaning up his mess and your party is so ashamed of him they wont even have him at their convention. What abot Bush Sr? Thats right , another GOP screw up. Clinton and Obama are the clean up team for the GOP’s failed policies and record debts.
I look forward to November when you are all crying about the establishment picking a RINO that mad eyou lose another election. One day you will realize that there arent as many conservatives as you thought, if so you wouldnt have a liberal Gov. from Mass. as your nominee.
Report this comment
WindyDualism
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:50amSo you can name a bidness 0 was involved with? Go with the Marxist pos.
Report this comment
WindyDualism
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:54amExpand on jobby czar Biden too while you are high and feeling all extra omniscient … you are right on exactly 1 thing; nevermind. Can you promise a quiet anurism if you learn in Nov that there aren’t as many pos Marx and Mao fans as you purport to be?
Report this comment
aleena
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:56amI am proud that George W. Bush was president. The party that made the mess was the Democrats. The economy collapsed because of the housing market bubble. The housing market bubble was cause by the Democrats forcing banks to issue subprime loans. Also the Democrats gained control of Congress in 2006. They made the mess, and President Obama is still making an even bigger mess. Clinton didn’t clean up anyone’s mess; he went along with the Republican Congress. Obama has not worked well with anyone and looks incompetent.
Report this comment
Noah_fing-whey
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:02amI reject your premise – cleaning us Bush’s mess?!? What has Obama done that he said he was going todo to clean up Bush’s mess? Nothing. Let’s assume for the sake of your incredibly weak argument that Bush really screwed things up. He clearly made bad decisions more in line with lib thinking but let’s just say every decision he made had a horrible result. What specifically has zero done to fix the mess. Start with his only budget being defeated 97-0 – that’s NINETY SEVEN TO ZERO – and take it from there.
Report this comment
WashingtonIsMyHero
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:21amIt’s hard to match the 20% of Americans who claim to be liberal. I wonder what the other 80% are? Conservatives?
Report this comment
CRINTHONEY
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:29amWake up! This is what socialism, marxism, communism, whatever you want to call it looks like. We have been yelling from day one that this country would be in this mess if this dictator was elected. You and people like you are the problem and noone will be excempt from the aftermath of his destruction.
What an idiot!!!!!
p.s. may god bless you
Report this comment
III_percenter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 6:07amEven if you ignore the truth–that the democratic-controlled Congress flubbed up the economy–the truth of the matter is that Obama has done nothing to fix the problem. By your own definition, “the clean up crew,” Obama is a failure. The economy still sucks, the debt is skyrocketing, Obama got us into *another* war in Libya and looks to again with Syria. On top of that, his domestic and energy policies are simply “more of the same” from the liberal ilk, imposing the standard of “no standard” on everyone and insisting on the debunked theory of human influenced climate change. Even his “success” with bin Laden was–finally!–just a President doing his job: telling the military to do what they do best!
Still….there is some truth in your words. There aren’t nearly as many conservatives as we wish and the establishment does always pick a RINO. But, since Romney is a liberal in Republican clothes, what’s your problem with him? He’s not as radical as BO? Only a truly sadistic or purely selfish person desires the current political state of the country to continue as it is.
You make the argument that there aren’t as many conservatives as we would like, and you are right. Strange how the more the minority conservatives become, the more liberty we lose and the more unequal our society becomes. The defacto dictatorship of Radical Left and RINO Right has done more to destroy this country than either side could do by themselves.
Report this comment
sndrman
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:40amthis is what happens when you have a guy come from state level to federal level and quickly to president…..along the way both the candidate and his wife have to learn proper ways of dealing with like minded and opposing views……Ronald Reagan used to say when negotiating if you can get 85% you take it and you can always fight for the rest later…………….seems obama and his ilk think they’re right and they should always get what they want………..democrats are good politicking and making each issue win or lose all into buzz words………….
Landon410
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:37amwait a second….. are you telling me the guy with no experience and all his buddies with no experience couldn’t figure out how to run stuff? no…..
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:00amI was trying to tell people that before he got elected that he had no executive experience. All I got back was “well, neither did Abe Lincoln.” I hope this clown has opened their eyes.
Report this comment
SamIamTwo
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:36amWell we had the mean and angry little man President who supposedly was a peanut farmer.
Obama, you can’t always get what you want dood!
Report this comment
Temporal
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:35amLike in most things political, no one wants to recognize that there’s a vast difference between compromising on process versus principle.
This country has a massive spending problem that no tax increase can ever fix. Any deal that doesn’t SLASH spending is indeed a compromise of principles.
Report this comment
Noah_fing-whey
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:28amLife is tough for Zerobama.
Boehner walks out and won’t take Z’s call. Can’t fill small venues in Ohio and Iowa. Has to put God and Jerusalem back into the party platform Ina demonstration of third world democracy. Has to move acceptance speech to a tiny venue. Polls plummeting. Moochelle still roaming the White House watching his every move.
At what point does the Secret Service intervene for Zerobama’s own good and place him under a 24/7 suicide watch?
Report this comment
Nevermind
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:22amWhen all else fails paint Obama as the angry black man. Nice try but it wont helt the GOP’s losing ticket.
BTW, Where is Bush? You baggers try to hide him all you like to not remind peopel how inept a party you have become. I cant wait til November, the collective rage from the silly Tea baggers will make me laugh until the end of the year.
Report this comment
Noah_fing-whey
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:30amYeah, Woodward is inclined to paint Zerobama as an angry black man.
Report this comment
WindyDualism
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:30amLast we heard he was building houses in 0 land. How about a half white rant? Would that make your koolaide more palatable? Bush, when 0 and his policy are the issues. Obfuscate is?
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:32amPaint as angry black man? Hardly. Incompetent, narcissistic, corporatist tyrant? Yes.
Report this comment
RightUnite
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:32amYo Pinhead… Bush isn’t running ya friggin closet dweller.
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:33amAnd by the way, he’s only half black.
Report this comment
Noah_fing-whey
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:35amBTW Bush left office nearly four years ago. The Bush you keep seeing is from drug induced hallucinations.
Report this comment
dblaess
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:37amWhy are you so angry? Are you an example of hate and racism?
Report this comment
aleena
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:43amYou always play the race card, yawn. And Bush isn’t running this time. It’s Obama. Trying to win an argument with ridicule only makes you look ridiculous.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:43pmIs sure doesn’t take Rembrandt to “paint Obama as the angry black man”.
Report this comment
Wango
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:16amLet’s test those vaunted conservative principles: If Romney gets elected, will you support raising the debt ceiling?
Sirfoldallot
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:25am@ wango – ur so dumb, listen 2 ur self u idiot. Try thinking 4 ur self idiot troll.
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:30amNope. Next question.
Report this comment
RightUnite
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:34amDuuuude… Step away from the bong, or Obama’s azz and take a deeeep breath!! Oxygen deprivation is making you look like a RAVING lunatic…. Oh wait…. That’s what you all on the left look like…
Report this comment
WindyDualism
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:01pmWangDang
How does hell no sound? Ax the nea, cut the IRS in quarters, nix the arts and 2/3 of the dole lifers, send the dhs to the border, and make libs wear Lil red helmets for their own good and health protection. You can have a spinner on yours and I will just use it as a write off.
Report this comment
III_percenter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 6:21amNo. That is what makes them principles. Liberals and RINOs have no principles so I can understand how this would be confusing. Let me explain: Conservatives support the following:
1) Faith: American values are Christian values. You don’t have to be a Christian to be a good American but you can’t be a good American and attack Christianity.
2) Family: The individual, not the state, is the greatest defender of freedom. Consequently the family is the greatest procreator of continued freedom and should be preserved against attack or dilution of subverting its authority in child-rearing, its responsibility in teaching morality or its sacredness by calling that which is not a family a family.
3) Freedom: Liberty is superior to equality. With liberty, everyone can be whatever they have it in themselves to be. With equality, everyone must be what the state tells them to be. This includes the three basic rights of man: Life (abortion is wrong) Liberty (allowed to do good) and Pursuit of Happiness (freedom to decide for myself)
4) Hard Work: If you are able to work and choose not to, you should go hungry until you choose to work. The principle of “separation of church and state” necessarily forbids the government from impeding on the Church’s God-given job to care for the helpless.
5) Responsibility: All freedom is subject to a responsible and moral people. Those who are immoral, will lose their freedom. This includes FISCAL responsibility or “not spending more mone
Report this comment
thindime
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:04amDebt war may be the least of our problems.
Why isn’t anyone grilling the president and government on plans to buy over 450 million rounds of hollow point 9mm ammunition for NON-MILITARY agencies? This is handgun ammunition designed to stop people .. this is enough to stop everyone in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
What is the real intent for this ammunition relative to homeland “wars?”
Report this comment
III_percenter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 6:24amNaturally, the government is concerned about civil insurrection. It will either be propogated by the Left in order to give excuse to suspend or anull the elections or it will be begun by patriotic citizens who are tired of losing their freedoms and having their country hijacked by tyrants. If the former, I believe the phrase for those people is “useful idiots” and if the latter, God help us all. R.I.P. U.S.A.
Report this comment
Wildblue3
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:04amThis so proves that he is Unable to lead!! He won’t honor his agreements unless it’s exactly what he wants. We need to get him out and now!!
Report this comment
EBL
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:02amDespite all their efforts at myth making at the DNC, the Dems only reveal they consider government the highest form of order, they booed God, and Woodward’s new book show Barack Obama as a Beta Male. Which is far worse than him losing his temper.
And Bill’s speech was not intended to re-elect Barack Obama. It was intended to elect Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Report this comment
lb6751
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:41amI agree ! “Billy” looks after himself ! I remember him wagging in finger and telling us ” I did not have sex …….” He wagged it again last night !! I have heard that he does not want Obama to win and will not be voting for him. Think about it, if Obama wins , the country will be so much more in decline that Dem’s would have NO CHANCE of winning for many,many , years !!! By making this speech , last night, it gives him coverage that he did all he could do to help Obama !!! I think Romney/Ryan will win, BY A LANDSLIDE, and then the Dem’s will STRUGGLE !! ( one of Dem’s favorite word) to defend him. They will throw him under the bus , where he can join the loser, Jimmy Carter !!!!
Report this comment
thibx
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:02amboehner said oboma was from a different planet with his plans. i agree this man is so screwed up in his thinking. most americans do not want socialism. hope and change was to change this country to socialism. the people welcomed him without asking any questions. he has made every thing worse. he wants to spend more money on unions and green energy and shut down gas and coal. if he tried this in china they would execute him. because of politians like him this country is sinking and his morals he has none he thinks he is God.
Report this comment
bikerdogred1
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:01amDon’t forget what and how the democrat congress was like selling all americans down the drain,Pelosi,at her best.as far has Boehner and what he is doing,he is not selling americans out.The democrats had a good time when they were in charge,not so funny now,screw obama.
Report this comment
MiCurmudgeon
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:57am“It was increasingly clear that no one was running Washington.” Obama is no Clinton or Reagan. Like Slick Willy or not he could even get Washington to work. Romney has never worked alone. It is always a team of competent co-workers that achieved the end results required. Obama has surrounded himself with “politcal” cronies and expected results from a herd of cats.
Report this comment
MAX0O1
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:08amAmen!
Report this comment
LTinUT
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:57amAs a narcissists he is prone to rage and lashing out when faced with any threat (real or imagined) to his grandiose self-perception as omnipotent. He feels entitled to special treatment and recognition, regardless of his actual accomplishments (or lack thereof).
Report this comment
thindime
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:07amYes, read the government’s official DSM IV definition of narcissism, he clearly fits all of the symptoms. Others that qualify include Mussolini and Hugo Chavez. Some concerning stuff.
Report this comment
III_percenter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 6:47amI am not making this up:
Characteristics of a sociopath:
1)Superficial charm–”But Obama is a likeable guy”
2)Manipulative and cunning–Obama plays on the divisions in America
3)Grandiose sense of self–’nuff said
4)Pathological lying–Climate Change, Health Care not a tax, saved auto industry etc.
5)Lack of remorse, shame or guilt–’nuff said
6)Shallow emotions–press him and his superficial charm melts away
7)Incapacity for love–???
8)Need for stimulation (verbal outbursts ect.)–this story a case in point
9)Lack of empathy–Obama’s own doctor testifies he is an extremely cold and distant person
10)Impulsive behavior (believe they are all-knowing with no regard for impact on others)–’nuff said
11)Irresponsible–like spending $5 trillion dollars?
12)Infidelity–???
13)Lack of realistic life plan/parasitic behavior–never had a real job/mooches off the tax payers
14)Versatility (changes image readily to suit the situation)–every democrat
That is scary! Granted we can’t be sure about a couple of them but 12 of 14 is some bizarre stuff. Wait, it gets better.
Report this comment
III_percenter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 6:52amOther related behavior:
–Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them–???
–Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them–”It’s Bush’s fault”
–Authoritarian–Bypasses Congress habitually
–Secretive–no transparency
–Paranoid–You don’t like me because I’m black
–Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired–where else would such behavior be best admired than politics?
–Conventional appearance–reasonable and professional in appearance
–Goal of enslavement of their victim(s)–every socialist
–Exercises despotic control over every aspect of the victim’s life–cradle to grave mentality
–Has an emotional need to justify their crimes and therefore needs their victim’s affirmation (respect, gratitude and love)–’nuff said
–Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim–he’s got millions of them
–Incapable of real human attachment to another–???
–Unable to feel remorse or guilt–he pathologically lies to the American people almost daily with no apology even when the lie is exposed
–Extreme narcissism and grandiose–’nuff said
–May state readily that their goal is to rule the world–”First world president”?
Now THAT is messed up. There are only four descriptions that are unsure if they apply to Obama or not and only because we don’t know enough about him to say for sure. We can make some strong assumptions though…
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:48amThe Chicago way will not work if you can’t send your goons to break a few kneecaps.
Report this comment
MiCurmudgeon
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:47amInteresting comment that no one was in control in Washington. What this country needs is a “LEADER!”. Obama is no “Bill Clinton.”
Report this comment
ChildOfTheKing
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:54amObama is NOBODY except EVIL INCARNATE.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:46amThe jug eared Marxist was enraged at the hapless Boehner because he couldn’t get him to go along and raise taxes,so they raise the debt ceiling instead. Government will not cut spending,they’re addicted to it just like a crack addict is addicted to crack.The dems idea of a cut is to slow the rate of growth and that won’t work,whole departments will have to be let go and raising taxes won’t work either they’ll simply waste any revenue on more spending.There isn’t enough money in the country to pay down the debt and everyone knows it,DC is just waiting until after the elections to do anything.
Report this comment
bdandsl
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:46amTemper tamtrum? Can we elect an adult? Please?
Report this comment
bdandsl
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:44amTemper tamtrum? Can we get elect an adult? Please?
Report this comment
BurntHills
Sep. 6, 2012 at 9:56amsounds like the only spoiled indulged narcissistic inexperienced [NO business experience, NO collaboration experience] child in the room was obama.
Report this comment