Part V of a series on Romney’s potential cabinet appointments.
Over the past two weeks, we have looked at a President Romney’s potential cabinet appointments, and undertaken the difficult task of reading the tea leaves, sorting the chaff from the wheat, and naming potential rising stars. Now as this process draws to a close, we take a look at the superstar cabinet positions that usually are filled by close presidential confidantes.
With this entry, we take a look at the highest legal enforcer in the land and the position with the most powerful fiscal authority (with the possible exception of the Federal Reserve Chairman): The attorney general and the treasury secretary.
The people chosen for these positions will have the advantage of coming into office with relatively low expectations on the personal level. The treasury secretary essentially needs to prove he can file his taxes correctly in order to exceed the record of Timothy Geithner, and the attorney general needs to avoid any serious scandals. However, it is likely that Mitt Romney will look for people with further qualifications than that. He will probably draw these people from within the ranks of his closest advisers, and to that end, we have constrained ourselves mostly to Romney’s inner circle in selecting candidates.
Though typically, the candidates have been broken down according to whether they are “Safe choices,” “Exciting choices” and “Wild Cards,” in this case, those distinctions frequently only exist by a hair. The odds of Romney picking a genuine wild card for Attorney General are likely minuscule, and the odds of him picking an unknown commodity for Treasury Secretary are even lower. As such, there is not a single candidate on either of these lists who is not a “safe choice,” however they might be qualified. The only question is, how safe?
Attorney General
The safe choice: Richard Wiley, partner at Wiley-Rein
Why? Wiley is a co-chair of Romney’s Justice Advisory Committee, and a Washington veteran on most legal issues. With a distinguished legal career as a corporate attorney that has allowed him to represent companies such as Verizon and JP Morgan, Wiley has the sort of pro-corporate, Washington insider resume that Romney would probably look for in selecting an attorney general. As an executive at his law firm, Wiley also has the executive management bona fides that Romney is known to prefer among his closest advisers. He also has a relatively noncontroversial Washington legal career, focusing mostly on issues related to information technology, rather than something more controversial.
Why not? Wiley has not served in the Justice Department, and his area of expertise is not a major area of controversy for the Justice Department. Romney might opt for someone more outspoken, and more experienced with policy wars.
The exciting choice: Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
Why? Glendon is another co-chair of Romney’s Justice Advisory Committee, and unlike Wiley, her experience is deeply relevant to current controversies. Specifically, Glendon is an aggressive defender of religious freedom, and has served as United States Ambassador to the Holy See (IE the Vatican). Her experience as a Harvard academic puts her comfortably in the judicial “monastery” that usually supplies appointments like this.
Why not? Glendon is only an academic, and has also not served in the Justice Department. This means she has scant management experience, and is a relatively unknown commodity in Washington. Romney might save her for a Supreme Court nomination.
The wild card: Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey
Why? Christie might be known as a scourge of teachers’ unions today, but he has a distinguished record as a prosecutor, and unlike the other people on this list, he has served as a US attorney for the District of Columbia. His closeness with Romney is well-documented, and his executive mettle is proven. He would be a celebrity appointment, but a justified one.
Why not? Christie might not want to leave New Jersey, and Romney could make the executive decision that Christie is more useful as an education secretary than in this post.
Secretary of the Treasury
The safe choice: Mike Leavitt
Why? Leavitt is considered a lock for one of the top White House positions, with this and White House chief of staff being his two main potential appointments. Given that Leavitt is apparently drafting the list of people Romney ought to appoint, it’s entirely up to him whether he’ll want this job or the chief’s position, but as the former head of two cabinet departments, and one of Romney’s closest advisers, if he wants this job, it’s his.
Why not? He might want to be White House chief of staff. Beyond that, there is no reason he won’t be nominated for this position if he wants it.
The exciting choice: Rob Portman, Senator from Ohio
Why? The difficulty of picking someone to hold this position is that both the president and vice president would themselves be strong contenders to hold it. Portman was on the short list to be Romney’s vice president at one point, and is known to have a cordial relationship with the candidate, suggesting that they would have minimal bureaucratic skirmishes. His name has been mentioned in connection with this position, and he has the resume for it. He is a former Office of Management and Budget director for President George W. Bush, a major voice on fiscal issues in the U.S. Senate, and a popular figure back in Ohio. Nominating him would also allow Ohio Governor John Kasich to create a new incumbent.
Why not? Portman’s background as a Bush appointee could taint him in the eyes of Romney’s advisers. His lack of executive experience in the private sector could also hurt him.
The wild card: Glenn Hubbard, Dean of Columbia Business School
Why? Hubbard’s name has also been mentioned in connection with his job, though he’s also being considered for Federal Reserve chairman. He’s a major Romney adviser on economic issues, though unlike Portman, his background is more academic than practical. With that said, he used to chair the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush, so his Washington experience isn’t negligible, and as an executive at a school quite literally devoted to teaching people to run their businesses well, he would be a steady hand at this job. He also lacks Portman’s paper trail, and would be an easier confirmation.
Why not? Like Portman, the Bush connection might hurt him, and his academic background might be seen as too theoretical for Romney’s business-oriented administration.
Next time: The final entry in this series, covering the two most powerful foreign policy-oriented positions in America: The Secretaries of Defense and State, along with a potential fiscal bonus.
RELATED:
Romney’s Possible Cabinet, Part IV: Energy and Homeland Security
Romney’s Possible Cabinet, Part III: Education, Health and Human Services and Labor
Romney’s Possible Cabinet, Part II: Commerce, Interior, Transportation
Romney’s Possible Cabinet, Part I: Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, and Veterans’ Affairs




























































































































voting-for-romney
Sep. 11, 2012 at 11:58pmRichard Wiley as Attorney General has appeal bringing conflicting parties together to common sense solutions?
Mike Leavitt as Chief of Staff could add a good sense of flow?
Chris Christie resents being tapped on the shoulder, and is happier when he succeeds in positions he applies for?
Report this comment
Rumrunner3
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:02pmRon Paul for all positions and crossing guard too.
Report this comment
Gavinwcaf
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:41pmKlayman as attorney general.
Ron Paul treasury secatary
Report this comment
Confederate Abolitionist
Sep. 6, 2012 at 8:40pmRon Paul for Fed chairman.
Sarah Palin Energy.
Andrew Napolitano for Attorney General.
Report this comment
huufarted
Sep. 7, 2012 at 7:06am2 Thumbs up on those proposals and John Huntsman (either) for Commerce Secy. Ron Paul would be sheer GENIUS for either Fed Chairman or Sec Treasury!
Report this comment
suz
Sep. 6, 2012 at 7:08pmwhere’s allen west? he’s essential.
Report this comment
Grand design
Sep. 6, 2012 at 5:51pmHerman Cain, John Bolton, Art Laffer, Gen. Petraus! Mark Levin for Attorney General.
Report this comment
yosemitefan
Sep. 6, 2012 at 4:53pmAttorney General – Guilliani or Christie
Treasury – Dr. Thomas Sowell or Art Laffer
Report this comment
jblovesAmerica
Sep. 6, 2012 at 4:40pmAll nominees need to be seen on TV-for all to see-
No Czars
Everyone must be accountable to the Public
Report this comment
udt1719
Sep. 6, 2012 at 3:36pmWow…..frightening choices.Richard Wiley?He defends the JP Morgan crooks?This is the last thing we need-more liberals and bank defenders.
Report this comment
hidden_lion
Sep. 6, 2012 at 4:17pmPlus, anyone from Harvard should be eliminated on the spot. Maybe that should be expanded to any ivy league school. Nothing worse than “educated” morons. These schools are the pits from which the liberal disease is spewed.
Report this comment
kat747
Sep. 6, 2012 at 1:17pmI do NOT think that Mitt Romney will be able to pick a new AG or Sec of the Treasury…….neither
Eric Holder or Tim Geithner will EVER leave those posts.
If ANYONE thinks that those two men would ever let anyone see those memos, the books, the truth or the damage they have done in the last four years,
YOU ARE INSANE.
If Barry loses the election, there will be a major fire in both those offices !
Report this comment
californiapatriotmom
Sep. 6, 2012 at 1:11pmAttorney General – Rudy Guiliani
Energy Secretary – Palin
Education (if we can’t abolish the department) – Jeb Bush
Defense Secretary – David Petraeus
Secretary of State or DHS – John Bolton
Report this comment
Ironz
Sep. 6, 2012 at 3:25pmI agree with Californizpatriotmom, I for one are tried of people from Harvard and Columbia, what practical experience do they have in the real world. I do exempt Christie and Portman, however I don’t think Gov.Christie would take the position. Portman would.
Report this comment
resme
Sep. 6, 2012 at 3:37pm“Secretary of State or DHS – John Bolton”
Wow, Just wow. Bolton is a huge POS.
Report this comment
whereareyourbrains
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:48pm@clive……….Obummer will deliver a well prepared speech that will only convince the drones he is the God and King in your minds. The sane people that have not been fooled by the Paparazzi coverage by the left wing media and the left wing union people, and the left wing brain washed liberal college students. So you go ahead a bow down to him. He couldn’t get enough people to fill his building, but you go ahead and keep supporting him. He has conned you to no end. You are a hopeless drone with no mind of your own. You have been brainwashed. He will deliver a great speech and will only be able to get his drones to agree. Can’t wait till you make a golden thrown for him…may in the movies.
Report this comment
NeverFalterNeverQuit
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:30pmThe two best cabinet picks ever:
1) Jack Bauer for Secretary of Defense
2) Chuck Norris for Secretary of State
I dare you to come up with two better ones. Also, just as a disclaimer up front, I don’t want Keifer Sutherland for SecDef, I want JACK FRIGGIN’ BAUER!
Report this comment
mdbd
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:17pmJohn Bolton for Secretary of State ~~~~Allen West for Secretary of Defense ~~~both honest and knowledgeable Men ~~
Report this comment
bobad
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:49pmHome Run!
Also Andrew Nepolitano at AG, Herman Cain at Treasury, Palin at Energy, Mike Baker at CIA.
I nominate crickets for Education and EPA. They need to disappear.
Report this comment
Fred
Sep. 6, 2012 at 2:04pmDefinitely would be my choice also, lots of experience and are real patriots..
Report this comment
facilitiesmgr
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:11pmThe critical thing for any administration, is to surround himself with people of high character to start with. After that comes the superb technical skills of those people. This is especially critcical with this administration because the stakes are so high and the need for broad change and reversal of programs that have been instituted by this current inept administration. Once people have a taste of “free stuff” from the government trough it will be hard to wean them from that and you need people who have tough skin. They need to be able to let the “chips” fall where they may and take the heat for it.
We certainly need to be praying for discernment as the new Cabinet Members are chosen.
You also don’t want people who all are uniform in their thinking. You want lots of innovative ideas coming to the table. “Iron sharpens iron.” President Lincoln brought many people to new administrative positions and with his leadership skills was able to fashion a governmemt that was able to hold the Union together in very perilous times. The need for a common philosophy is necessary though, that of making government smaller and less intrusive. How that happens has much room for variance in thinking.
Report this comment
mdbd
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:54amJohn Bolton for Secretay of State~~~Allen West for Secretary of Defense
Report this comment
Magyar
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:02pmYou betchya! My picks as well…. Probably won’t happen though!….Damn!
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:05pmI’ll go with you on that too.
Report this comment
Clive
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:24pmhe might as well pick a fairy and a unicorn. mitt isn’t winning anything.
watch barry deliver the knockout blow tonight.
pardon me, but im still upset that this clown is our nominee.
Report this comment
CFL Tea Party
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:25amWRONG. The exciting and safe choice for Treasury: Rand Paul.
Report this comment
justangry
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:48amWhy would you want Rand out of the Senate?
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:52amStrongly agree! And no more damn Havard graduates as Attorney Generals, in fact, no more Harvard graduates, PERIOD.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 6, 2012 at 12:04pmI have to agree that Rand Paul needs to stay in the Senate. That constituency if I am not mistaken is rather iffy when it comes to electing Republicans. We just cannot loose another seat in the Senate.
Report this comment
justangry
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:21amCan we please keep Harvard Law school out of Washington? Pretty please, with sugar on top.
Report this comment
code green
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:35amI agree Harvard is a rats nest of anti American,liberal garbage. I don’t trust anyone there.
Report this comment
wildwood
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:18amPortman would be ideal, after all Bush had some great acheivments!!!!!
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:54amSure, if he would audit the Fed. We need someone with the ****** to audit the Fed.
Report this comment
Wildblue3
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:18amCain would be interesting pick but now that he is following Glenn’s footstep in CainTV, he might be inellegiable
Report this comment
SamIamTwo
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:17amBetter get someone who knows “they system”…knows how to work it. Knows how to get rid of dead wood!
Report this comment
waresite
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:07amIf Romney wants to truly get us back on track he needs to ditch ANY connections/leftovers from Bush. Especially anyone associated with “The Architect”
Report this comment
TEXASGRANNY73
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:28amI would not dare to assume or presume who Mr. Romney would choose. An uneducated guess? Nah.
As per Karl Rove, the architect I would totally trust him as a patriotic American and he has the super pac for Romney. Money and numbers, the guy is a genius.
Report this comment
watashbuddyfriend
Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:06amMe no see any mention of one from the Conservative South? Better load up with ALL positions from the Conservative South! Gotta balance out the liberal yankee choices! Grin
Report this comment
Wango
Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:57amNo stains of Cain yet. Hmm.
Report this comment