The 2012 election is not over yet, and judging by the polls, it won’t even be truly predictable for months. The polls have tightened to a dead heat, the mathematical models for predicting elections are undecided, and the convention season hasn’t even concluded. However, whatever the outcome, two facts are inescapable: The Democrats will field a new candidate in 2016, and the primaries leading up to that election will showcase a full bench of ambitious leaders within the party.
Some of the potential contenders — Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, especially — are known commodities. Others, such as Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley or New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, are less well-known. All, however, are credible threats, either as challengers to a reigning President Romney, or as people looking to preserve President Obama’s legacy after a second term.
So while it may seem premature, TheBlaze decided to take a closer look at the Democratic men and women who may be getting showcased at this year’s Democratic National Convention as a prelude to a future run for president, with an eye toward figuring out which are the most formidable contenders for the highest office in the land.
#1. Vice President Joe Biden
Why? Biden is easily the most experienced, known commodity on the Democratic bench, both in terms of legislative experience and in terms of experience at the highest levels of the executive branch. Having been technically qualified for the job for at least 20 years, his ideal selling point would be his status as an elder statesman with ties to blue collar Delaware workers – a far cry from his aloof, relatively inexperienced current superior. If Obama’s second term is a success, Biden might be tapped as a “third term” custodian of his legacy.
Why not? Biden may be an elder statesman, but he doesn’t act like one, being gaffe-prone and irascible at the best of times. His favorability ratings are worse than President Obama’s by a wide margin, and his presence in so many primaries in the past could leave him looking like a has-been. He would also be even older than Ronald Reagan was upon assuming his first term, making him the oldest first-term president in history.
#2. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
Why? For many Democrats — especially those with a fresh memory of 2008 — Hillary Clinton is “the one that got away.” Aside from managing to be respected on a bipartisan basis in Washington for her work as Secretary of State during one of the most polarizing periods in American history, Clinton will have had four years to reinvent herself by 2016, given that she’s leaving the administration in 2012.
Why not? Clinton faces exactly the same problem she faced in 2008 — namely, the question of whether the Democrats want to re-litigate the battles of the Clinton years. However, given the nostalgia with which even Republicans are beginning to look on those years, a lot of the fiery anti-Clinton opposition that existed in 2008 may have flamed out by 2016. Clinton also would face an age question, given that she would be 69 while running — precisely the same age that Reagan was when he first ran.
#3. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel
Why? It’s admittedly unusual for people to jump from being mayor of a city to President of the United States. However, Emanuel is no ordinary mayor. As a former White House chief of staff, one of the most infamously ruthless leaders ever to grace Congress, and a man who still remains a close confidante of the current President, Emanuel could easily parlay his connections into a plausible run. If he does run and loses, look for him to crop up at the bottom of the ticket.
Why not? Emanuel is still only a mayor, and as Rudy Giuliani’s run for president shows, that’s not necessarily enough to win. It’s also unclear how he would be able to call in favors if Joe Biden is running, given that the latter would probably inherit a good chunk of President Obama’s campaign staff. Emanuel might make the calculation to wait until 2020, when he will still be only 61.
#4. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo
Why? Cuomo is something of a dark horse relative to his competition. However, in the event that President Obama loses this year, Cuomo would come into the 2016 race with a serious edge – namely, he is the polar opposite of Obama governance-wise. Despite running one of the most reliably blue states in the nation, Cuomo has been leery of cozying up to Democratic liberal ideology. He held off raising taxes for almost an entire year in New York, has slashed spending, and cracked down on unions. His one liberal accomplishment — getting gay marriage legalized in New York — was accomplished with Republican votes. In a Democratic party seeking to return to its Clintonian glory days, Cuomo might be just the man. His father, erstwhile liberal hero and former New York Governor Mario Cuomo, could also provide some ideological cover if necessary.
Why not? Cuomo’s election prospects are somewhat tied to the success (or failure) of Mitt Romney. If Obama wins a second term, Cuomo will come off weaker. If Obama’s second term isn’t a disaster, Cuomo is much weaker, since you don’t fix what isn’t broken. On the other hand, if Romney wins and has a good first term, Cuomo becomes plausible, though even then, Democrats might be too wounded and angry to pick a compromiser.
#5. Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley
Why? O’Malley is the ultimate generic Democrat, and if the party’s image seems damaged in 2016, or if they want to pick a nominee with comparatively few risks, he would be an easy choice. His convention speech, despite being lackluster, showed a man ready to run for office, even if the party wasn’t ready for him. His hardball approach could also endear him to a Democratic party sick of compromise.
Why not? O’Malley’s convention speech was underwhelming, and he lacks the starpower of Biden or Clinton, while also not possessing the reformer’s spirit of Cuomo. In short, barring some extraordinary developments in the next four years, he’s a second tier candidate waiting to happen.
Bonus: President Barack Obama
Why? Some readers are probably confused at this point. How could Obama run in 2016? Isn’t he term-limited? Yes, he is, assuming he wins this year. However, if Mitt Romney wins, Obama could still have a case to make four years down the road, especially if Romney’s first term turns out poorly. He wouldn’t be the first Democrat to do this — Grover Cleveland managed it in 1892 — but he would be the first modern Democrat to try. Then again, being historic has never seemed to pose a problem to President Obama.
Why not? He may be term limited out of office, or he may decide it’s not worth trying to get the job back, or the Democrats may decide they don’t want to run the same horse twice after he lost. They didn’t run Jimmy Carter in 1984, and unless Romney’s first term is a disaster, Obama would probably prefer to lay low.



























































































































Comments (65)
Freedom.Fighter
Sep. 7, 2012 at 3:18pmCalling President Grover Cleveland a democrat is a bit of a misnomer. He was a “bourbon democrat” meaning he was a bit old fashioned. He was great at routing out corruption within BOTH parties. Today he would most likely be considered a libertarian, closer to Ron Paul’s views.
Report this comment
Shiroi Raion
Sep. 7, 2012 at 2:09pmAren’t these all the worst of the worst? Do they have anyone good that might run?
Report this comment
LameLiberals
Sep. 7, 2012 at 3:07pmAdd Chris Christy to that list.
He is as left as any of them on everything from climate change, pandering to illegals and muslims to nixing coal/oil/shale digging/drilling in New Jersey. The guy is a democrat though and through except for fiscal policy.
Report this comment
jackact
Sep. 7, 2012 at 1:23pmI know this one….
1.) Andrew Cuomo, housing market collapse conspirator.
2.) Andrew Cuomo’s ego.
3.) Andrew Cuomo, union thug supporter.
4.) Andrew Cuomo, failed governor of NY.
5.) Andrew Cuomo, the anti-Hillary
Report this comment
Eric_The_Red_State
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:59pmWe’re screwed… . . . .
just sayin’
Report this comment
sbenard
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:31pmYou forgot one — Satan!
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Sep. 7, 2012 at 1:04pmThat would be my first choice–I hope he decides to run.
Report this comment
VotersOfNY
Sep. 7, 2012 at 1:05pmNo he didn’t he mentioned him by his other name, Obama.
Report this comment
00100111
Sep. 7, 2012 at 1:24pmThat’s because he is running in 2012, he accepted the democrat nomination last night.
Report this comment
jmgair
Sep. 7, 2012 at 2:35pmThey also forgot to mention that if Obama wins in 2012 somehow, he would give himself another Executive Order to run for a third term which is NOT beyond his narcasistic mind.
Report this comment
prhdr
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:05pmGuys, guys, I am a R&R supporter, but you have to keep your eye on the electoral college. For Romney to win, we’ll need a miracle. I am hopeful, but that’s reality.
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:00pmNone are worthy of being Allen West’s court jester….
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:57amThe democrap 5 look like the bar scene in the first Star Wars movie. They would be about as effective.
Report this comment
babylonvi
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:11pmOnly not as cute and cuddly.
Report this comment
Cataclysm
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:47amWonder how hard Obama surrogates will try to change the constitution to allow Obama to stay in for a third term if he does get reelected? It happened with New York City and its dictator Bloomberg.
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:58amYou just better hope he doesn’t try a Coup and declare martial law after he loses in November. Don’t under estimate this Communist – He will stop at nothing to retain power!
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:04pmThat is exactly what he will try to do. Most people do not realize that a coup is always just a headshot away. Threaten those who waver with the ultimate choice– you will already have their families hostage..
Report this comment
welovetheUSA
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:10amIt will be 8 years of Romney……..the media will be put on the back burnners..new news media stations will be brought to the American people and we no longer will be exposed to lies from the news media.
Report this comment
Truth4SureNuff
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:16amLet’s hope so
Report this comment
Real Freedom
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:31amI sure hope so, “President Romney” sounds really good
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:59amI pray you are correct my friend!
Report this comment
red_white_blue2
Sep. 7, 2012 at 1:37pmI so pray you are right!!
Report this comment
sb36695
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:03amThe only good that can come from the election of Obama is the destruction of the democrat/communist party.
Report this comment
hard.right
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:47amThat’s been a thought on my mind lately as well. Go ahead and vote for Obama for the explicit purpose of making things so bad we seal the DNC’s doom for all times. But then again, it may also usher in a full reset of the system, but that might also be a good thing.
Report this comment
DoctorRon
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:47amI am looking forward to eight years of Romney/Ryan and then eight years of Ryan/Rubio.
Report this comment
DeVain
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:01amThis.
Followed by Rubio/Rand Paul
Report this comment
oneshiner
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:19amNow, you guys are thinking my thoughts.
Who in their right mind could every accept those 5 they named as President???????OMG
Pleeze: Let’s get rid of the communist leaning people who are ruining America.
Report this comment
teddrunk
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:37amHillary has the old crone vote locked up. The entire group is as appealing as a steaming pile left by your dog.
Report this comment
Bum thrower
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:59amPick your leftist!! “Forward” in 2016!! “Lets finish the job”……just trying out slogans for 2016!
Report this comment
HOOT_OWL
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:33amWhat 2016..? This is not the time to be concerned about possible future events .
If this path we are on is not changed their will not be an election. We need to stay
focused on THIS election. the fight is right NOW and it for all the marbles. The
future of our republic is at stake ,all the ground work has been laid to change the
U.S. and all that has to be done is to remove the veil . I think there are three kinds
of people …The ones that deny the emergency and refuse to see what’s coming ..
The ones that are perpetuating this lie to keep the masses from panicking .and the
rest of us that are saying what the hell is wrong with rest of you people ..are you blind…?
If Obama wins the good news is ..In a very short time frame we will all know what
kind of country we live in.. there will be no denying it. There will be no more debate ..
and then there will be only 2 kinds of people…The ones that love a dictatorship..
and the others that are still alive… that hates it.
Report this comment
BetterInformed
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:01amThe sky isn’t falling. This is a blog, it isn’t an RNC strategy meeting. We’re having a conversation much like “did you like the Batman Movie ?”. Speculation is enjoyable, loosen up.
Report this comment
HOOT_OWL
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:15amTake another toke and go back to sleep.
Report this comment
nobull14
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:26amNot a one of them are worth the time of day .
Report this comment
floridareader
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:25amBiden? He cannot even control his tongue. Will he ever find the Oval Office?
Clinton? She has tried already to stab Americans in the back. She won’t stop trying.
Emanuel? We have seen what he is capable of. It would be like having Vito Corleone on steroids in the Oval Office.
Cuomo? He has been acting in a conservative manner so to speak. But he is more like a Troyan horse.
O’Malley? Who?
Obama: He is likable (is he?), but running for President is not the same as trying to be Mr. Popularity.
Report this comment
atechgeek
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:39amOmalley is the guy who caused taxes in MD to go through the roof. The cost of living in MD is RIDICULOUS. He is a tax and spend democrat.
Report this comment
floridareader
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:45amThanks Athec. Not a chance for him.
Report this comment
grams09
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:20amBiden as President? That literally makes me laugh.
Report this comment
hersey10
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:16amThe only 1 , with a shot is Hillary . Put them side by side , with the future of the Republican party , it’s not even close .
Report this comment
Landon410
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:14amsorry, meant to say *neither
Report this comment
Landon410
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:13amOR…… Obama makes executive order that he can run again, don’t put it past this weasel….. although that wouldn’t be legal, either is most of the stuff the left is doing today.
Report this comment
JeffJ1985
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:53amWouldn’t happen. It’s not Obama’s style. He wants to be liked. There would be civil war if he tried that.
Report this comment
lefty5005
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:42amJeff,
It might be civil war if he gets re-elected.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:13amIf Romney wins, is the Tea Party going to run a candidate against Romney in 2016?
Report this comment
flipper1073
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:24amPalin / West 2016
Hi Soy,
Report this comment
JeffJ1985
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:34amIf the Tea Party becomes a separate party. Not if you mean Tea Party Republicans.
Report this comment
atechgeek
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:40amRyan / Rand Paul 2016
Report this comment
Wildblue3
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:45amI think that depends on Romney. If he fufills his words, I don’t think they will if he’s fufilling Tea Party principals. Ryan will help to keep his honest.
Report this comment
Lordcsmith
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:12amGee, Biden was elected into the Senate in ’72. Nothing says “Change” like a 44 year tenure.
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:11am2016 elections? Any takers on a bet those don’t happen?
Report this comment
Popp40
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:25amI’m wondering if the 2012 elections will even take place….I’m just waiting for that “State of Emergency” aka Marshall Law to be put into place.
Report this comment
JeffJ1985
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:31am@POPP40 You mean Martial Law?
Report this comment
FundamentalistChristian
Sep. 7, 2012 at 11:24amChange is comin!? Will we choose the Marxist or Leftist? Henry Kissinger and other elites have already endorsed, elections will be fine either way.
Report this comment
grayling646
Sep. 7, 2012 at 12:57pmIf they don’t how would you collect on your bet?
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:10amThe 2016 candidate for the Democratic Communist community will be Van Jones.
Report this comment
Popp40
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:29am@Snowleopard….I have to agree with you on that….sad thing is people will flock to him even more than they do Obama….
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:56am@PopP
Sad but true; I think even Glenn has missed this probability, even though he mentioned that the MSM is vetting Van Jones as a hero and reforming his image for the positive. This has been going on for some time since he was let go by Obama; and since his Project Storm is funded and directed in part by old Soros…
There is the connection; Soros has prepared in Van Jones a backup puppet to take the place of Obama in the event it was needed. May God open the eyes of the nation to the extreme communist bent of Van Jones in time to keep him out of power.
Report this comment
carpee
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:09amIF there is even an election in 2016…
Report this comment
writemem
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:25amI am still not convinced that there will be 2012 elections.
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Sep. 7, 2012 at 10:55amThere will be an election. Now the inauguration and the seating of the new congress are in serious jeopardy if the vote on returning God to the Communist platform is any predictor.
But if change does not come from the ballot box we still have the cartridge box. Be ready.
Report this comment