Quick-Thinking Hero Saves Children by Pulling Hummer in Front of Speeding Car
The “environmentally friendly” have targeted Hummers for years. The gas-guzzling vehicles are too loud, use too much energy, and produce too many emissions– but they also make pretty effective roadblocks.
At least that’s what Darrell Krushelnicki of Alberta, Canada thought last month after seeing a man speeding towards a group of children in a crosswalk.
After he realized there was a strong possibility of disaster, Krushelnicki risked his life by pulling his 2006 Hummer in front of the speeding car, which was estimated to be going roughly 50 mph in a 30 mph zone.
“I could just see…I just had the feeling that something bad was going to happen if something wasn’t [done] to stop that vehicle,” he explained. “There was really no one else, I just had to do it. I had to do what I did.”
Here is a news report of the incident, which also shows how the other vehicle fared:
The Huffington Post has the latest:
Krushelnicki made the front page of the Edmonton Sun this week and already has a fan page on Facebook: “Hummer Hero.”
Surprised by the attention his quick thinking has earned him, Krushelnicki told CBC that he doesn’t think he did anything extraordinary. “I don’t feel like a hero at all,” he said, “I believe anyone would have done that.”
The Edmonton Journal is reporting that in recognition of Krushelnicki’s actions, his insurance company will not hold him liable, even though he instigated the collision.
Police in Edmonton have since recommended Krushelnicki for an award, CBC reports, with police spokesperson Scott Pattison remarking that if not for the Good Samaritan, “We could have been talking about a very different story today, that involved potentially the serious injury or death of four children.”
MSN Now summarizes: “Forget the Batmobile: Apparently, real heroes drive Hummers.”
–
Related:
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

















































































































Comments (91)
Rent A Yenta
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 6:53amWho knew guardian angels drive Hummers?
Report this comment
Macman1138
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 7:18amThe Hummer, a glorified Tahoe, was a loner.
Guardian angels really drive Jeep Wrangler Call of Duty!
routnom23
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 7:45amMacman, your jeep would have been flattened like a tin can.
Report this comment
Macman1138
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 8:05amROUTNOM23,
You keep telling yourself that.
Have an interesting day!
Report this comment
bobdog19006
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 9:17amThank God he wasn’t driving a Smart Car. It would have been totalled when it hit those paint stripes, and we’d be reading about an entirely different story today.
Report this comment
TexasHunter
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 11:58amBOB The smart car would have gone up in flames before it even got hit. That is the volt in action.
Report this comment
UBKidding
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 3:56pmNothing like a Hummer. The lives it has saved.
Hope we vote Obama out and GM will get out from under Government control and can create the Hummer again as there is nothing else like it.
Imagine if this was a Jeep? Would have been torn in 2 and still would have killed the kids.
Thank you to the driver and to Hummer.
Report this comment
Captain Crunch
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 7:42pmLets see what his insurance company thinks of guardian angels crashing Hummers into other vehicles. And lets see what the other drivers lawyers have to say about the guardian angel going off the rails to prevent something that he “thinks” “could have” “maybe” happen. Following the rational of the story, I could punch you in the face and say ” I had this gut feeling that you were going to attack and maybe kill me as you walk in my direction on the street.
I believe the man took the correct action, but the lawyers are going to have a great time in court with this one.
Report this comment
slade37
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 9:02pm@Captain Crunch
If you read the article, you’d know that his insurance is NOT holding him liable and will not increase his rates.
Also, it’s fairly easy to tell if someone is driving too fast and showing no signs of slowing down. The reckless driver was going 50 when the posted speed limit is 30. There would have been less damage if the other driver had started to slow down. Follow the link about the insurance and there is a photo of the front of the Hummer – head-on. That bumper was moved to the side more than a few inches.
Your analogy of punching someone would apply if you saw the person’s arm going up and back.
It helps to read the entire article before writing comments. At this moment, I didn’t see anything about the other driver’s lawyers so you may still be right about that, but it will be like defending a drunk driver with an almost empty bottle of whiskey in his hand when he was pulled over and he offered a sip to the officer writing the ticket.
I’m curious if he was texting or on the phone. …or did I miss that?
Report this comment
slade37
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 9:06pmOK… Video said he was on the phone.
Report this comment
sasquatch08
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 12:57amPfft. Pontiac Vs. Jeep at this speed? The Jeep wins in most cases. A Wrangler might get flipped, but it’s not going to get “crushed”.
My Rubicon would sustain severe damage and would probably be totaled out by my insurance but I would be alive as would the kids, my 1991 Cherokee Laredo survived a worse accident than this and was back on the road in weeks.
Talk trash about Jeeps all you want, just don’t expect me to break out my recovery kit when you need help.
Report this comment
Mickeyd
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 3:19amGood to know there are still real men out there who give a flip. Thank you, Mr. K!
Report this comment
valleyfever
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 1:58amA Californian would have whipped out his cell phone and videoed the car hitting the kids.
Report this comment
Wilahelm
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 11:36amI am a born and raised Californian, and I would have done no such thing. Your assumptions make you look like an ASS! :)
Report this comment
laserblast92
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 11:45amThe driver of the Hummer would have charged with assault in Kalifornia.
Report this comment
kindling
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 2:29pmValleyfever has been cooking in his or her own sweat for a bit to long. When you talk about Californian’s acting like idoits please direct your comments to the Liberals that have moved to our beautiful state and turned it ugly. Those of us that are true Californians are the best. We want our state back from the whack jobs that have taken over Silicon Valley, LA and SF. I am thinking we need something like the electorial college here so every county gets a vote and not the coolaid drinking majority in 3 or 4 counties. We pray for a big quake that will shake the skum into the ocean and we can get back to farming and producing most of the oil and food for the country.
Report this comment
WardMD
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 3:23pmPROOF Obama ISN’T from California!
He’d STILL be trying to figure out how the iPhone CAMERA APP works (while the kids got killed)!
At least Obamacare would have covered their funerals!
Report this comment
audiemurphy
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:43pmGotta love Albertans ! Canada’s version of Texans !
And he was probably insured by either wawaneessa or the cooperators and Canada is not nearly as litigious as The states so I would highly doubt any law suit other than the one his insurance company might file against the distracted driver who is really at fault .
Report this comment
gosutag
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:48pmYou’re kidding right? A nice guy in Canada is considered like a Texan, and not just flat-out American?
Report this comment
dont_drive_slow_in_the_left_lane_obliviot
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 10:05pm“American” can mean a lot of things now, so you have to be more specific. Not many people in deep blue states would have done this, they would have blamed authorities for not stopping the disaster.
Report this comment
Hickory
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:23pmSometimes ordinary people do extraordinary things.
Report this comment
Cosmos102
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:20pmMay God Bless the Hummer Hero for his quick thinking, courage and sacrifice for others.
Report this comment
swimologist
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:15pmWell, sorry, Mike, not just ANYONE would have done it. Most likely it would have been a male– males who are better at judging speed, coordinating that to spatial relationship, don’t dither, and take immediate action. That’s why you don’t see women being successful at flying high speed fighter aircraft, racing cars or hitting homeruns in professional baseball.
Report this comment
addie
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 10:45pmDude, it is NOT a male verses female thing! If you want to talk about dithering, the current MALE president is the king of dithering! Boys grow up dreaming of race cars and jets, girls dream of ponies and princesses, its only natural boys would gravitate towards those careers but it certainly doesnt mean they are better. Not enough female professioal to even render a scientific study. In this case, It IS however more about who is paying attention to thier suroundings, male or female!
Report this comment
trinklefinder
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 1:07amwomen dont play professional baseball….so HOW could they possibly hit a homerun? non-sequitur. does not compute! INCONGRUENT!!! try again swim.
Report this comment
trinklefinder
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 1:15amalso, my female cousin races cars at the local track….she can also rebuild an engine. so what do YOU do? my cousin is a paramedic who DRIVES an ambulance. WHAT do YOU offer society swim?
Report this comment
Threeve_Texas_With_A_Dollar_Sign
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 8:16amWow…women have been shown to be exceptional at flying military, both attack and lift, aircraft. Not only are their synapses nanoseconds faster than in men because of the general body build difference, but women have been shown to withstand g-forces as well or better than men.
Report this comment
DoubleThrowDown
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:00pmAfter all thee years I thought Bill Clinton was the “hummer hero”
Report this comment
Shasta
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 10:17pmnice
Report this comment
Panix
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 8:50pmThe Pontiac was going faster than 80 km/h, Pattison said. When a crosswalk’s lights are flashing the maximum speed allowed is 30 km/h.
Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Police+praise+drove+Hummer+into+speeding+toward+kids+crosswalk/7188254/story.html#ixzz261Wc39Ho
Report this comment
perry1980
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 8:26pmgood job hummer man
Report this comment
TerryDo
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 8:01pmBravo to you Darrell Krushelnicki and a great demonstration of your innate knowledge, of the value of life over material goods. And another person you safed was the inattentive driver, who would have had the death of one, if not all four of those children..
And ‘Intact Insurance’ the postive advertisement from your action of a no charges to the repair on Krushelnicki’s hummer was a valuable move in many ways also!
Report this comment
anOpinion
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:37pm“The Edmonton Journal is reporting that in recognition of Krushelnicki’s actions, his insurance company will not hold him liable, even though he instigated the collision.”
He must not have Progressive Insurance,
Report this comment
Impudence
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 10:44pmMost, if not all, insurance policies exclude “intentional acts.”
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:23pmoops.. wrong thread. i saw “hummer” in the title and though it was the sandra fluke story. my bad.
Report this comment
FstEti
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:35pmHee, hee……..
Report this comment
REVerse
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 9:47pm*snickers* :-)
Report this comment
Yeah_Buddy
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 11:19amSandra would need less free contraception if she drove more hummers :)
Report this comment
Enough is Enough__Oath_Keeper
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 12:25pmROFL, That was great!
Report this comment
DragoonChris
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:14pmDarrell Krushelnicki, You didn’t save those kids…The government did. Without the government funded road you would not have been able to pull your hummer into the path of that distracted driver. Now to give you local bureaucrat the credit.
Report this comment
FstEti
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:22pmGod, I love sarcasm……….
Report this comment
C.S.Patriot
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 10:00pmAre you sure that hummer was not built by Government Motors??
lol
Report this comment
hades3
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:20pmAny red blooded guy would rather have a Hummer !
Report this comment
ScreaminEagle
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:47pmYou can’t do that with an Aprius. Aprius, is that spelled right?
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 12:34pm@ Screaming Eagle
Prius is the Toy(ota) green vehicle. And I’d be afraid to drive one out of my driveway, lest the potholes in rural Ohio cripple it.
Oldsmobile: 4-wheel tanks FTW!
Report this comment
RickTheLDSRocker
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:07pmHe is a quick thinking HERO!!! I’m not sure I would have thought that fast.
I salute him.
Report this comment
Sirfoldallot
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:00pmChevy Volt would have burned up 1st.
Report this comment
Sparhawk
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:04pmAnd that would just be from hitting the gas pedal. The impact would have caused a battery explosion that may have hurt the kids anyway. j/k. This dude deserves an award.
Report this comment
Thedadde
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:53pmHummers Smummers… did you know that the Earth, Yeah, you actually live on one of the planets, creates oil natually? They told US it was from dinosours. Really? How much oil would we get from a dino dying here,… or there… Really? Lies. Pretty much everything you know is a lie. Google everything you know is a lie.
Report this comment
Zipit
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:04pmYeah boy, I tell ya! Them dang Chinese cars come in handy fer sumthin!!!!!
Report this comment
grayling646
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:27pmHoly Cow Dadde. You’re not one of those who think Google is a truthful and honest search engine are you?
Report this comment
DragoonChris
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:08pmYou didn’t pay much attention in science class, did you?? So here’s the skinny on oil. Over the course of hundreds of millions of years tiny sea creatures known as phytoplankton and zooplankton die and fall the to ocean floor…an oxygen deprived environment, so they do not decay in the same way that a terrestrial organism would. Next, as a result of plate tectonics, the ocean floor where these dead critters are resting gets subducted into the lowest portion of the earths crust, here they are exposed to high heat and enormous amounts of pressure…A process not all that unlike the production of charcoal. After several millions of years of this “cooking” the result is what we know of as crude petroleum, being a lightweight substance this stuff slowly filters into the upper reaches of the earths crust there humans can then extract it and make all sorts of awesome stuff.
Report this comment
TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 8:39pmIs that the “abiotic” theory of oil? I know the russians have taught it for years. They’ll go back to wells that were left down to 20 percents after a few decades, and they’ll be full again. Damn soviets.
Report this comment
C.S.Patriot
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 10:03pmDidn’t Al Gore invent oil?
Report this comment
Kupo
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:48pmBlaze metric system fail. He was going 80 kph in a 30 kph zone. Or 50 mph in an 18 mph zone.
Report this comment
Treaty
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:52pm18 mph zone? I mean, who even has those?
Report this comment
82dAirborne
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:08pmApparently Canada.
Report this comment
Kupo
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:42pmWell, it was also technically closer to a 49.5 mph zone than a 50.
Report this comment
bikerr
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 6:53pmIt was the video that used metric. Blaze used English.Because several of you missed it here is the wording.—-After he realized there was a strong possibility of disaster, Krushelnicki risked his life by pulling his 2006 Hummer in front of the speeding car, which was estimated to be going roughly 50 mph in a 30 mph zone.
Report this comment
the_truth_or_not
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:04pm@ treaty,
Really???… I dont know if you watched the news report, you may not have. They said that the distracted driver was doing 80 kilometers per hour in a 30 kilometer per hour zone. There probably was no sign that said 18 miles per hour, as in Canada, they use the better math scale of metrics. When you calculate 30 km into ASE, it is roughly 18 mph. If your car is one that is sold on both sides of the Canadian boarder and has an analog speedometer, look on the inside. there are numbers that dont reflect MPH, it is KMPH.
And now for my comment.
The Edmonton Journal is reporting that in recognition of Krushelnicki’s actions, his insurance company will not hold him liable, even though he instigated the collision.
WOW!!! where do I get me some? An insurance company that understands in certain rare situations, you might need to create a crash for the better good? I bet they take care of their clients in much smaller more typical crashes as well.
Report this comment
cdcats8
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:30pmGod’s blessings to this hero.
Report this comment
762x51
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:07pmGood thing he was in Canada, here the Marxist fascists in our government would have prosecuted him, unless he was here illegally.
That took some serious stones.
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:22pmLofe Hummers…. SOMEDAY……
Kudos to the driver of the Hummer! He is a brave man on many levels.
Report this comment
Sirfoldallot
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:33pmRight on , a hero .
Report this comment
Kevin M
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:04pm*CLAP CLAP* Thanks. Needed a good news story.
Report this comment
Angel_light
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 4:59pm“Forget the Batmobile: Apparently, real heroes drive Hummers.”
Amen to that! I wish I had one….
Report this comment
Angel_light
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:10pmok Obummy give up your Nobel prize for doing nothing to earn it and give it to someone who actually deserves it…he probably just uses it as a paper weight for those strong headwinds; that’s why he never gets any work done….
Report this comment
COFemale
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 4:52pmSo the guy he hit will probably sue him for deliberately hitting him even though he was speeding and possible would have killed all four children while talking on his cell phone.
I think I would have laid on the horn first before putting my vehicle in his path or as I was putting my vehicle in his path in hopes of getting the idiots attention.
Glad the kids are fine and hopefully this will be a lesson learned by the idiot cell phone driver.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 4:56pmSadly your right, the idiot driving the other car will probably sue him and win. However given the choice between what might have happened to the kids, and the choice to sacrifice my vehicle; I would tale the lawsuit and the lost vehicle any time.
Report this comment
HisNameWasRobertPaulson
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:00pmIt was in Canada. They have a different tort system than we do. As the authorities found the Hummer Driver in the right, and the other driver in the wrong, there can be no suit.
Report this comment
FstEti
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:21pmSNOWLEPORD, not only that, but the parents of the children would sue the Hummer driver for causing stress to their children because of the ensuing collision, AND his insurance carrier would refuse coverage because he intentionally caused the accident.
Great story, though.
Report this comment
FstEti
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 7:27pmSorry, that would be snowlepArd………
Report this comment
hi
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 4:45pmHe wouldn’t have been able to do that in a Prius.
Report this comment
COFemale
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 4:53pmYou mean hit the other vehicle, of course he could, but his outcome would have been different.
Report this comment
zenothestoic
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 4:57pmActually, with 4000lbs. of batteries in it the Prius would probably make an excellent roadblock.
Report this comment
chips1
Posted on September 9, 2012 at 5:20pmZENO:
The toxic smoke from the huge fire would probable sent people to the hospital. Those green cars are the governments way of reducing the population.
Report this comment
pamela kay
Posted on September 10, 2012 at 3:46amLOL! Good one!
Report this comment