Former Susan G. Komen Exec: Karl Rove Advised Us to Restore Planned Parenthood’s Funding
It has been over six months since the controversy surrounding Susan G. Komen for the Cure deciding to pull its funding from Planned Parenthood, only to be besieged on all sides, and decide to reverse course. Yet as something of a miniature, pro-Life Chick-fil-A-style event that was cut short by circumstance, it may still leave a bad taste in some peoples’ mouths.
It certainly left a bad taste in the mouth of Karen Handel, the former Komen senior vice president who spearheaded the defunding and resigned in the wake of its being restored. And Handel isn’t going quietly. In her new book “Planned Bullyhood,” Handel casts blame not merely on Leftist sympathizers with Planned Parenthood for forcing the decision, but even on people who many conservatives would expect to be reliable allies.
Specifically, and most notably, Handel fingers former Bush adviser Karl Rove as having advised Komen to restore its funding, believing that the whole affair had gone too far and damaged their brand. The Daily Caller reports:
Rove’s advice, according to “Planned Bullyhood,” came as Susan G. Komen for the Cure found itself embroiled in a public relations fiasco after announcing it would stop giving money to Planned Parenthood, which has clinics that perform abortions.[...]
In the book, Handel recalls Susan G. Komen for the Cure CEO Nancy Brinker telling her that “I’ve talked to a lot of people. And even Karl says we have to backtrack.”
Handel, who said she didn’t know who “Karl” was at first, recalls Brinker clarifying that she was talking about Rove.
LifeNews originally reported the excerpts, which readers – especially those smarting over Rove’s decision to savage Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin – may find rather galling:
I just said, “You don’t have to apologize to me. But I have to say again that it is a huge mistake. Wait through the weekend. It’s Super Bowl weekend. We know there are op-eds teed up about how outrageous Planned Parenthood is being, that private organizations have the right to make the decisions they believe are best. If we blink now, it’s over and no one will know that Komen stands for,” I implored.
Nancy’s reply stunned me. “Karen, I’ve talked to a lot of people. And even Karl says we have to backtrack. There’s just no other way.”
“Karl? Who’s Karl?”
She looked at me strangely as if I should know exactly who she was talking about. She said, “Karl Rove!”
I started laughing. Just when I thought things could not get more bizarre. What in the world did Karl Rove have to do with anything?
Rove’s status as an in-demand strategy consulting guru would explain his influence on Brinker – and indeed, his opinion on what is and is not a good public relations policy is something many people would probably take to heart.
Granted, Rove has a fairly decent pro-Life record, at least when it comes to public statements, so this act is arguably out of character. It’s also possible that Handel might have spruced up her book by throwing in this sort of reference to a famous GOP consultant, or that Rove might have been misquoted or misunderstood, given that he himself never appears in the book.
Nevertheless, accurate or not, Handel’s accusation may strike some as prophetic.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
















































































































Comments (122)
repairsea
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:53amThe only funding our federal government should be giving is to defense. Want to see what a lousy job they are doing on that? Go to http://www.anysoldier.com/ and see what our beloved vets are asking for.
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 2:53pmMany people hold the opposite view of yours, Repairsea. Funding everything besides defense.
I have news for these folks, if you don’t have a defense, well, it doesn’t really matter how good your education or healthcare supposedly is.
It’s hard for the people of (the country) Georgia to focus on their studies when Russian tanks are barreling down the street.
Report this comment
Hanner
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 5:58pmI have to admit, I was a little surprised about the Rove stuff. The bible still holds true about people though, “You will know a tree by its fruit.” How did a cancer oriented group devolve into supporting the murder of babies? A group dedicated to preserving life is now the chief funding mechanism for murder of the unborn. You can’t have it both ways. According to God’s word, “when a righteous man sins, none of his righteousness will be remembered, but he will die for his sin.” The Komen Group will burn for their murderous ways. They are covered in an ocean of innocent blood.
Report this comment
luckey
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 12:05amAmen to that
Report this comment
NeoFan
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 12:50amMost people still haven’t found out that Karl Rove is on Team Obama.
Report this comment
RaydocX
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:53amKomen has been hamemred by the MSM for taking a stand to keep their donation monies from taking unborn lives.
Funny, it would seem they have every right to make their own choices regarding to whom to contribute.
and Rove sadly was correct… instead of the sharp drop in contributions that HELP WOMEN FIGHT BREAST CANCER (you two faced women’s rights ‘advocates out there… fight for FREE contraception [not 'just contraception'] but not for women’s lives?) if they had stayed true to their beliefs the MSM would have happily continued to drum them out of existence, HURTING ALL WOMEN.
Remember, MSM is in league with the BHO idea that only the government should ‘donate’ to everyone.
But i’ve decided to get on the bandwagon… i want to be able to drive fast, irregardless of the risk of being ticketed or getting in an accident, so instead of guaranteeing me the opportunity to take the test, buy insurance, and drive by the rules of the road, I insist the government give me a free sports car and the funds to cover my insurance and any traffic citations… a Moronic arguement? it’s what Fluke et al are espousing… what Kerry Washington endorses (last time i checked nobody running for office was trying to outlaw contraception, Kerry, Sandra, and all you other leftist loons)
Susan Komen’s memory and foundation DO good for women.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:49amLet’s not forget Karl “Marx” Rove actively campaigned against Sharon Angel in Nevada helping to re-elect Harry Reid. And destroyed the GOP candidate in Delaware. He is currently wussifying the Romney campaign. Romney’s commercials here in Ohio are pathetic and weak.
Report this comment
Big Media Bias
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 1:47pmEveryone in former GW Bush’s administration are a F-Up. Rove kept the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan going without a plan to win decisively. He ALLOWED Iraq and Afghanistan to create MUSLIM based governments. Women are still abused and murdered in the name of Islam. Thanks Karl Rove. If what I see with Romney turns out to be another Bush, we are doomed.
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 2:55pmThat is upsetting to me, I’m from Ohio, and it has been the swing vote state that has handed victory to every candidate since the 50s.
Looks like I’ll have to roll up my sleeves and do campaigning myself down here….sigh
Report this comment
sizzlinsexybeckster
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:49amSo tell him No. Stop being a puppet and blaming someone else. That Planned Parenthood should be out of business. It’s a rude prostitution ring that supports abortion and uses Girl Scouts money from cookie selling. The little girl scouts set up their booths outside Victorias Secret and other naked displayed porn shops. How classy. Ugh. Unfortunately most mothers today are really really really stupid. Stop funding and supporting garbage……. SIMPLY TELL THE MAN WHO YOU ARE BLAMING… NO!! Ugh..people are so dumb.
Report this comment
TriforcePlayer
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:33am“conservatives would expect to be reliable allies” WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HE’S A CHUMP!
Report this comment
samtree
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:46amYou misspelled chimp.
Report this comment
edmundburk
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 11:30pmkarl rove is a RINO hack period.
Report this comment
boykinnc3
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:32amBefore making judgements, remember Regan’s words – trust but verify. The Truth Lives Here, lets make sure we have it first, then make a judgement.
Report this comment
encinom
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:31amKaren Handel brought about the downfall of Susan G. Komen when she attempted to interject her right wing agenda and negate the goals of the organization. Komen had funded breast screen and outreach programs through Planned Parenthood, not abortions. Yet a zealot, Handel cared little for women helped, she care only about her misguided agenda.
Report this comment
mtcountrygrl
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:39amHa Ha. Christians statistically give more to charity than any other group of people. And guess what I was not aware when I donated to Koman that they were supporting killing children. I will never give them another dime. My money now goes to St. Jude, saving children not killing them.
Report this comment
mtcountrygrl
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:43amBesides this partnership is idiotic. Abortion INCREASES the odds of getting breast cancer. I generally do not support boycotts, but I will not knowingly give money to anyone of anything that supports Planned Parenthood. Their main mission is killing children, they provide “healthcare” as an afterthought.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:43am“Yet a zealot, Handel cared little for women helped, she care only about her misguided agenda.”
The misguided agenda of keeping women from being slaughtered in the womb? Oh yea, that’s radical. She should be more mainstream and support murdering the living, breathing baby if the abortion didn’t “take” like your President argued for.
Report this comment
baptist_deacon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:46amMy guess is that if Komen had more contributors like MTCOUNTRYGIRL, they would have chosen to stand up the Planned Parenthood. They probably don’t, so they caved.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:53am@BAPTIST_DEACON
Your guess would be unspeakably wrong. They were not hurting for money. If fact, there are stories about their contributions being less since this all went down. Baptist deacon huh? You seem to be defending Komen/Planned Abortion in all your posts. Must be from Reverend Al’s church.
Report this comment
baptist_deacon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 12:07pmSQUIDVETOHIO – I am offended that you would accuse me of being pro-choice. I am a rabid pro lifer. I also am not defending Komen. I am mearly stating why that did what they did, and why Rove gave the advice he allegedly gave. Please read my posts before commenting on them.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 6:47pmYou are 100% correct.
Her zealotry killed the organization, then again
Komen’s sister KNEW what she was getting when she hired her,
Report this comment
mcmueller
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 11:07amUhhhh, excuse me STUPID – She FOUNDED the Susan G. Komen Foundation because it was her SISTER who died from breast cancer. She was also one of the Bush Administrations’ ambassadors and is as conservative as they come. it was HER foundation and if she decided to defund donations to planned parenthood, it was her right to do so, PERIOD. The organization was then co-opted by others and she resigned over the funding flap, so I certainly hope they suffer from it because I for one will not donate or support them any longer………
Report this comment
encinom
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 12:57pmmcmueller
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 11:07am
Uhhhh, excuse me STUPID – She FOUNDED the Susan G. Komen Foundation because it was her SISTER who died from breast cancer. She was also one of the Bush Administrations’ ambassadors and is as conservative as they come. it was HER foundation and if she decided to defund donations to planned parenthood, it was her right to do so, PERIOD. The organization was then co-opted by others and she resigned over the funding flap, so I certainly hope they suffer from it because I for one will not donate or support them any longer………
____________________
Idiot, Karen Handel was hired by the Foundation she didn’t found. Mrs. Handel than interjected her politics into the Organization and changed policies that lead to several board members quieting. At least get the basic facts right you fool.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:43pmEncinom – And you Marxists didn’t interject your politics into the organization by supporting Planned Parenthood in the first place?
Report this comment
baptist_deacon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:18amKarl Rove understood the situation Komen was in, and gave advice that was beneficial to Komen, not to the conservative cause. We may have wanted to see Komen stand up to Planned Parenthood, but Komen’s purpose is to fight breast cancer, not fight pro choice people. Sometimes you have to ignore the alligators and continue draining the swamp.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:27amMaybe you missed the logic. What you said is true, but no one forced the pretend conservative, Rove, to offer any advice. You see, if you are grounded in principle, you don’t give that kind of advice.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:28amBy the way, it is exactly that type of logic that has taken churches away from the truth.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:39amWell, I guess you can fight breast cancer by preemptively killing the woman before she’s born.
Karl Rove is a progressive Benedict Arnold to the Republican party. He is responsible for Harry Reid getting re-elected to the Senate and destroyed the Republican nominee in Delaware. I suspect he is advising Romney to not attack Obama now thus, ensuring an Obama re-election. You can defend him if you like. But, the bottom line is that Planned Parenthood ultimately ended up with more funding and either that funding went towards aborting children or kept money from being diverted away from aborting children. Apparently, Karl Rove is partially responsible for that.
Report this comment
baptist_deacon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:55amYou said: “By the way, it is exactly that type of logic that has taken churches away from the truth.” Churches by nature do not have to compromise to exist. In fact, they do better when they don’t. That is why it is such a crime when they compromise the truth anyway. Non church charities are different type of organization. They have to please their contributors, otherwise they cannot exist. You cannot compare apples and oranges, it is illogical.
Report this comment
TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 4:38pm@The Jerk Is this the gossip page of the Blaze? What became of facts before posting a story? Maybe Karl Rove, she said Karl Rove, Karl Rove guilty of whatever. Karl Rove and wars, Karl Rove, blah blah. Either you want the government to use your money Planned Parenthood or you don’t. Either you believe Koman made the right decision or you don’t. Send your money elsewhere if you protest them. Surely you would ask Karl Rove first. One would think. And just who do you think voted for war? Our congress, that’s who. Have you forgotten? We voted for those representatives thus logical we voted for war. And the hypocrite keeps them there along with his own one man band drone killing non war peace loving again hypocrite for lack of a better word ( I do know those words but nope not this day).
Report this comment
team1blazer
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:17amAny person who stands without principals, will fall for anything. Make up your own mind and stand by your decision. Accept the blame when you make a bad decision. Point to your team when credited with a good decision. Be a leader.
Report this comment
sndrman
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:11amhow does the left get their tentacles into everything…….how do you go from breast cancer research to abortion? in the end i realize you’re killing both,but come on one is bad(cancer) the other is a gift from GOD(baby)…..oh yea take GOD out and you can do anything then……..in ’64 you take prayer and GOD outta the schools then in the early 70′s you have roe-v-wade…slow decline but a decline non the less.
Report this comment
mcmueller
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 12:44pmAt least a woman with Breast Cancer had lived some life; in the latter it was terminated before the child had a chance to start……
Report this comment
bobbyjoe
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:11amNEVER never back down, never stop the destruction of this killing factory.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:14amRove is a disaster.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:19amAMEN indeed.
Report this comment
jonarata
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:10amJust asking, but why should most conservatives expect Karl Rove to be a reliable ally?
Report this comment
Wango
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:06amAh, conservatives – relentlessly pushed around by everyone on both sides.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 3:22pmAnd we’ll still fight back and win against you Marxists.
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:04amNot really surprising–it’s not because Rove is pro-choice, but rather for PR reasons, which makes total sense why he would advise as much given his background is EXTENSIVELY about managing PR, specifically with regards to political issues. Of course, once the damage was done, it’s not clear that from Rove’s perspective (i.e. the Right) that it was necessarily the smartest move to backtrack (although from the perspective of the public good it was, as it was a stupid decision with respect to the public utility, from the beginning).
Report this comment
thibx
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:02ami would have to hear him say it. she might be deborah wassaman schultz.
Report this comment
Sirfoldallot
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:01amRove works with Fox News so he now has more exposure as a RINO .
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 1:34pmFOX news is becoming the sounding board for RINOs and the ilk of Rove. They let them spew their talking points and spin the truth without calling them out for the liars they are. All they are concerned with is trying to create controversy for a headline. They are not fair and balanced, they are all about sensationalism. There is very little truth there.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 1:14amFOX recognizes the Tea PArty is dead and most TP members like Ben Quayle WILL be voted out.
Bachmann is struggling and Walsh will lose to Duckworth.
Report this comment
Simonne
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:31amI like seeing Rove on tv as this guy is an expert when it comes to politics. I can see why he was so helpful to Bush.
Report this comment
Apple Bite
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:01amKarl Rove is a Progressive of the highest order. The difference between him and Gingrich is, nobody calls Rove out on his B.S. often enough for anyone to care. At least that’s how I see it….
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:05amRove, Progressive? HA! That’s rich–I guess everyone who isn’t goose-stepping to Glenn Beck’s conspiratorial nonsense is progressive Marxist communist liberal socialist fascist Nazi communist anarchist in your world.
Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:08amOver the past few years, I’ve grown significantly less fond of Karl Rove. Obviously, he is sharp and knows politics, but I always wanted to believe “our side” always had the best intentions when “strategerizing”.
Rove makes it such a zero-sum game, but he has to remember the fundamentalist on our side don’t want to win if winning means compromising some pretty core beliefs. Guys like Rove will always respond to that with, “Hey, let’s be flexible and get a guy that can win in….”, but as we’ve seen over the past 20 years, this strategy comes is purely and solely short-term in nature; it destroys long range goals.
Report this comment
drattastic
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:09amRove is all politics with no core beliefs.
Report this comment
henryKnox
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:11amNo doubt. Unfortunately, GWB was doomed to be a Progressive because of his background, education and wealth. He spent like a Progressive and he added gov’t programs like a Progressive. He therefore surrounded himself with Progressives like Rove.
Report this comment
encinom
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:25amBeckerheads have a funny definition of what a Progressive is. I guess by Henry Knox’s definition both Romney and Ryan, both coming from wealthy families and both educated means that they are Progressives.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 3:23pmEncinom – You Marxists are stupid people.. Just b/c you’re wealthy doesn’t make you a conservative.
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:00am“In her new book ‘Planned Bullyhood,’” LOL–yeah, that title doesn’t sound whiny and pedantic AT ALL.
Git-R-Done
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 3:23pmThe truth hurts, doesn’t it.
Report this comment
cannon12pdr
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:56amI didn’t like Rove when he was with the Bush’s administration and the same holds true now. He is a slime ball.
Report this comment
starman70
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:04amBush was no more than a Yale educated “Progressive” Republican. Same game, different ballparks. Rove, having worked for Bush would have had the same ideas as his boss. Nuff said.
Report this comment
TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 4:57pmI adore Karl Rove. He is the architect. He has raised more money with the super pacs for Romney and knows the numbers. And I do appreciate the truth rather than a bunch of whiney gossipers. You can faunch at the bit about Karl Rove all you want but you voted Bush into office the same as Obama and you got Valerie Jarrett (whoo hoo). The entire Congress with some exceptions voted for war. and your man Obama hasn’t stopped it. One half of Congress voted behind closed doors for Obamacare. And we are now in deep doodoo. Is that how you spell doodoo? Never wrote it before. Have a good day.
Report this comment
tothepoint
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:56amI will never give anything to this foundation nor will I ever purchase anything associated with this abortion-supporting foundation. It was found to be a fraud as people believed the money was going to support cancer-fighting causes.
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:54amI’ll admit it. I fell for the Rove game in the GWB years. I bought it.
Never again. He’s a political charlatan and I can smell him and his ilk miles away now. I let the disgust I feel for having bought that crap motivate me to be ever more politically diligent.
Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:14amBingo.
I had such high expectations during those years, too. I look back on how I saw it back then and just cringe.
There is no substitute for experience. I realized not too long ago that just when you think things are going “our” way politically (end of Reagan years, beginning of old man Bush years), there is another generation that is completely and utterly naive and wet behind the ears which lends itself to the political landscape drifting back left. However, the way it is now is shockingly left and central-planning in nature. The real problem here is that a person essentially starts out left and moves right as they gain wisdom and experience, so we’ll always be fighting that element.
Interesting and frustrating at the same time.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:52amMr. Rush Limbaugh has a credibility factor surpassed by none in the “main”stream media and politics (if you dispute that, please cite your example).
He probably has Rove’s phone number. I can’t wait to hear what he has to say about this –
http://streamingradioguide.com/radio-show.php?showid=422
Report this comment
chips1
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:21amI have your mothers phone number, but that doesn’t prove anything.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:51amNo surprise. The Right would do well to examine its ranks and some of its history. The things many correctly stand against are in fact endorsed or encouraged by their “leadership”. One need look no further than researching who instituted No Fault Divorce first in California, way back when. Sorry folks, but the leadership isn’t where we should be looking, since they only lead us into chains, time and time again (no matter the political ideology).
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:50amBut the decision was Komen’s .. pure and simple .. I don’t care who “advised” them … they could do what was right … or what they did.
btw.. any proof that it was Rove? … I’m not defending him … but in this day and age .. I think we need proof.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:53amNice kitty! (good post!)
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:55amYou are absolutely right about the decision. What is unfortunate is that most people have no idea about what happened and more than likely wouldn’t change anything about their behavior if they did. Rove was right (if indeed he was there) in his advice. Most people are sheep.
Report this comment
tothepoint
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:57amAmen. What does Rove say about this?
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:46amRove gave us the failed Bush administration. He is an unprincipled man, a complete political animal.
Report this comment
contkmi
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:55amLie.
You characterize it as failed. Were we attacked again? Were we in better shape than Obama has us in?
Go ahead. Keep lying. You don’t fool anyone, however.
That said, I don’t think Rove is a conservative. He does what he does for political expediency. He has no core or center. No belief system. Whatever promotes him or his candidate.
Report this comment
Marine25
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 10:56amyou didn’t need the second sentence.
Report this comment
henryKnox
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:13amThe easy way to explain it is that he is a Progressive. That explains most everything. If you look at the things he does through the prism of Progressivism then it makes sense.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 11:13amReally. The unpaid expansion of the Medicare prescription drugs was a result of an attack? Did Iraq attack? Did Bush say that he would not nation build when a candidate? Didn’t he say that he would not commit troops without an exit strategy?
Truth hurts, no?
Report this comment
TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on September 11, 2012 at 6:15pmHe sure is and thank God, we may be able to keep our freedoms. Hallelujah Karl Rove, and carry on.
Keep those dollars rolling in for Romney the next President of the USA with divine providence, of course. I am so glad you are on our side, that is the winning side. Keep them desperados desperate. Viva Karl.
They sure are hot and bothered about you so you must be doing something right. A lot right.
Report this comment