At Least 91 People Reported Dead After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…120+ Injured…Many Children Among Dead…Some Children Drowned…Heartbreaking Pictures…Reporter Struggles to Share Terrible News…

Watch Live: Continuing Coverage of Oklahoma Tornado Aftermath

Media

MSNBC Panelist Asks: ‘Who Is More Dangerous…The Supreme Leader in Tehran or Bibi Netanyahu?’

Sep. 12, 2012 3:27pm Jason Howerton

MSNBC Host Mike Barnicle: Is Benjamin Netanyahu More Dangerous Than Ayatollah Khamenei?

Mike Barnicle (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images for Meet the Press/Deadspin)

On Wednesday morning’s edition of “Morning Joe,” regular MSNBC contributor Mike Barnicle presented a bizarre question to the show’s panel, asking if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is more dangerous than Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“Who is the more dangerous player on the world stage right now, the supreme leader in Tehran or Bibi Netanyahu,” Barnicle asked.

“Don’t answer that,” one of the panelists shot back.

Time magazine political columnist Joe Klein slammed the question and insinuation, calling Khamenei a “fascist.”

“It’s not Netanyahu,” he said. “The supreme leader is a fascist and he, right now, is causing great pain to his people in a way that Bibi Netanyahu never would.”

Watch the clip here via the Washington Free Beacon:

Almost the entire panel agreed, and proceeded to criticize Barnicle for even asking the question at all.

“I understand the point of your question, but that was a silly question,” CNBC’s Donny Deutsch said.

“That was a clown question, bro,” someone off camera quipped, making a pop culture reference.

However, MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell slightly broke from his co-panelists and slammed Netanyahu as a stubborn world leader who only gets along with people that “agree with every single word he says.” He did not clarify whether he thought Netanyahu was more dangerous than Iran’s supreme leader.

“One point we know with Netanyahu, as Joe can tell you, anybody’s who’s who’s been in the room with Netanyahu, you don’t have to be with him long to know that there’s only one way, only one way, to get along with him and that is to agree with every single word he says, which Mitt Romney apparently does,” O’Donnell said.

As TheBlaze reported earlier today, Barnicle also suggested that the U.S. Department of Justice consider charging anti-Muslim Pastor Terry Jones as an accessory to murder in the attacks on the U.S. embassy in Libya, where a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed.

(H/T: Drudge)

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (144)

cristo52
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:02pm
It’s amazing, you can’t embarrass these turds.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jcldwl
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:10pm
  Off of what hull did they scrape this barnicle guy. Never heard of him and today two stupid comments made by him reported on The Blaze. He needs to reattach himself to that hull and sail away to one of his beloved fascist countries.
  
  Report this comment
- Gold Coin & Economic News
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:13pm
  What a ridiculous question. At least someone called him out on it, but it’s time MSNBC gets rid of some of these fools. They can start with Chris Matthews:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd37bOo13Jc
  
  Report this comment
- Dr.LithiumDouchebag
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:19pm
  Seen it before said it before…. JINO’s ,Journalist In Name Only
  SHAMELESS
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:46pm
  Results of a poll commissioned by the European Commission show that Israel is believed by Europeans in 15 countries to be the greatest threat to world peace, greater than North Korea, Iran or Afghanistan.
  
  It is factually a valid question. It appears to Americans not to be, because our media, and most of the talking heads, are excuse makers for Israel’s bad behavior. They are also well versed in the art of omission.
  
  Report this comment
- TAXEVERYONE
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:58pm
  Obama and Hillary Clinton are more dangerous, and incompetent.
  
  Report this comment
- Yeah_Buddy
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:08pm
  Hey Jack_hoff: I hope your back to post your enlightening, troll-like comments after a terrorist pops off an Iranian nuke where you live.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:15pm
  Yeah_Buddy, correct me if I’m wrong, but, weren’t the lies about WMD’s used to start the unneeded Iraq war? Guess you guys, warmongers, never quit. Da, worked last time, let’s try it again.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:17pm
  P.S. Yeah_Buddy, tell me that you’re not from Pittsburgh.
  
  Report this comment
- shakedowncrews
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 6:25pm
  These kinds of comments by the MSNBC crowd just reveal that they are so smug in their liberalism, so arrogant in their world view, so ignorant of reality, that they can just throw out the most insane comments without any fear.
  
  But maybe they should check themselves, considering current events with the embassy attacks, Obama stabbing the Israelis in the back, the DNC leaving Jerusalem out of the platform, and an election coming up, and try to act like professionals instead of high schoolers.
  
  Report this comment
- muffythetuffy
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 6:54pm
  The TEA PARTY is more dangerous. That is why the Government has purchased over 50 million rounds of deadly hollow point ammunition, ammunition that is in violation of the Geneva Convention and International Law.
  
  Report this comment
- Stelex
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 7:52pm
  Muffy, I’m with you but your #’s are off. DHS has ordered 1.2 BILLION rounds of ammo, NOAA 73,000 rounds of ammo, and the Social Security Service 45,000 rounds of ammo. More than enough to put 5 rounds in every American citizen. Lock and load, good luck
  
  Report this comment
- muffythetuffy
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 8:01pm
  I guess they keep increasing their orders. That is a lot of ammo. How can we find out where its being stored?
  
  Report this comment
- WindyDualism
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 8:53pm
  Jerky
  How many converts to your flavor of hate do you get on any given day? A paulbot or two? When really was the last time we needed euro trash to light the way? Was it a flawed diamond for your partner? You have zealot blinders on, and the crap really gets old. Go fight with the Hezbos if you feel that strongly about eradicating Jews, Zionists, and Israelis. Walk some of your talk. Go, be free to hate with like minds. You cannot post without some hatred seeping out, and you are sad to behold. Don’t hate the messenger. It is historical fact, you suck.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 9:02pm
  @Jerk
  Really? They found not one but multiple European in not one but several countries on a continent that is extremely close to being full blown socialists who think Israel is worse than Iran? Exactly why should we trust the Europeans again? Oh and let’s not forget that they’ve been overrun by Muslims.
  
  By the way, last I checked we did find WMDs in Iraq. They were chemical weapons as opposed to nukes but they were WMDs just the same. We knew he had them because he had used them in the past. To say Saddam didn’t have any chemical weapons would be like saying the US doesn’t have any nukes.
  
  Report this comment
- grimmster
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 6:14am
  @the_jerkoff aka encinom.
  So you live in Pittsburgh huh? Excellent………..
  
  Report this comment
- KURT1010
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 7:27am
  How do such people with low IQ’s get on TV in the first place ?
  
  Report this comment
- John1863
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 8:40am
  The_Jerk, I’d say you are great at ommission yourself. Making a statement about a poll that the Europeon Commission conducted reflect they find Israel so dangerous but failing to state that at least 11 member nations are Muslim leaning or completely Muslim is a very misleading way to try and make a point. It’s like asking a group of 5 year olds if ice cream is good. I guess your name truely fits.
  
  Report this comment
- woodyl1011fl
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 9:00am
  Liberals, democrats have no shame, honor, integrity and rarely do they come across with mind that is actually rational or in touch with reality.more and more evidence is piling up that liberalism/progressivism is a mental and emotional disorder.
  
  Report this comment
- BuckarooBanzai
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 11:18am
  To anyone inquiring about Mike Barnicle. He is a “journalist” at the Boston Globe (could be “was” since I don’t read that rag anymore) who was caught plagarizing others. He plagarized George Carlin for crying out loud and didn’t think he’d get caught, so you know how stupid he is.
  
  Report this comment
- Balpit
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 1:44pm
  What a Barnicle head!
  
  Report this comment
Atilla
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:59pm
Barnicle is the guy ostrasized for plagerism years ago. Typical Boston bloviator who is more Marxist than any other ideology.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Wayner
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 6:41pm
  Jerkoff… Were you in diapers when the videos of the victims of Chemical Ali’s nerve gas attacks were shown? Is nerve gas not considered a wmd??? Or are you just an ignorant A**??
  
  Report this comment
- AMENDMENT
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 10:52am
  Hey Wayner, i remember seeing photos of the 5000+ kurds killed by the Iraqi monsters. One photo i cant seem to wipe from my mind is the dead farther holding his dead baby in a door way of a shop.
  
  People like the Jerk leave me speechless when they flaunt their stupidity for the world to see.
  Here ya go Jerk http://www.kdp.se/old/2604.jpg
  
  Report this comment
kalli
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:58pm
When the evil empire falls, one of the first moves our nation should make is to ban forever these degraded, anti-American broadcasters from sending their filthy, imbecile, mindless hatred across the airwaves. They have shown their true colors, and they are not red, white and blue!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:47pm
  Anti-Zionism is not anti-American. Don’t confuse the two.
  
  Report this comment
- shakedowncrews
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 6:27pm
  It would take restraint to not line up them up against the firing wall.
  
  to JERK: no, anti-zionism is not necessarily anti-Americanism, but anti-semitism is UN-American, and you sound like yet another loony left anti-semite.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 9:11pm
  @Jerk
  So wait, are you actually DEFENDING MSNBC commentators just so you can bash Israel and the Jews some more. You really are obsessed with blaming Jews for everything if you’re willing to stand up for these crazies. At no point did Kalli even imply that anti-Zionism is anti-Americanism and yet you felt the need to assume s/he did based solely on the fact that the ones being criticized were attacking Israel. You accuse Jews of overplaying the antisemite card when you yourself are far too eager to attack anyone who even implies that Israel is a US ally. If you were any more of a hypocrite you’d be John Kerry.
  
  Report this comment
Centralsville
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:56pm
Traitors. Is there any doubt that these leftists want to destroy our country. Isn’t it odd that Satan has brought together what would seem to be two groups at odds with each other, radical Islam and American liberals. American liberals would be the first ones killed by these Muslims. What unites them is a shared hatred of American freedom, Christianity, and Judaism. Some day soon that smirk will be wiped off their faces. It won’t be long until a radical Muslim detonates a nuclear bomb somewhere on the earth. Life as we know it will change the next day. New York City, where most of these idiots live, would be a likely target since they have repeatedly hit it in the past.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:50pm
  Who’s destroying the country, Bush who invaded Iraq for no reason to the tune of 1.5 trillion dollars, or someone that says slow down… stop the killing? The economy will take down this country.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:00pm
  Joseph Stiglitz, former chief economist of the World Bank and winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, has stated the total costs of the Iraq War on the US economy will be three trillion dollars in a moderate scenario, and possibly more in the most recent published study, published in March 2008.[12] Stiglitz has stated: “The figure we arrive at is more than $3 trillion. Our calculations are based on conservative assumptions…Needless to say, this number represents the cost only to the United States. It does not reflect the enormous cost to the rest of the world, or to Iraq.
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_cost_of_the_Iraq_War
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 9:17pm
  @Jerk
  Wait, who are you comparing Bush to here? Bush had failed economic policies for sure but are you implying Obama is better on foreign policy? Obama, the one who tells our enemies when we plan to pull out? Obama, under whom we have lost twice as many members of our military in half the time than those that dies while Bush was in office? You reek of desperation to Jew-bash. And you claim not to be an antisemite.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Cabrito_Goat
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 3:04pm
  The_Jerk, are you sure you’re not secretly a nazi?
  
  Report this comment
scrudge
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:53pm
Ah Yes… msnbc.. clean your self up…. its dripping down your leg

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Atilla
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:02pm
  The third option would be Obama. I vote for OBama.
  
  Report this comment
Dave In Arizona
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:50pm
Barack Hussein Obama.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
v15
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:50pm
“One point we know with Netanyahu, as Joe can tell you, anybody’s who’s who’s been in the room with Netanyahu, you don’t have to be with him long to know that there’s only one way, only one way, to get along with him and that is to agree with every single word he says, which Mitt Romney apparently does,” O’Donnell said

Translation: Obama is bipartisan but Netanyahu, the GOP, and Romney are so irrational that they slap Obama’s hand away and focus only on partisan rhetoric.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Popp40
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:19pm
  @V15….I get your sarcasm. However, for those that don’t and truly believe that Obama is not the problem….then please look at the common factor between Netanyahu, the GOP, and Romney….that would be Obama….
  
  Report this comment
- CWPrequired
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:22pm
  “Obama bipartisan” ?? Your drug dealer taking your welfare debit card for payment now?
  
  Report this comment
tothepoint
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:49pm
Barnicle should be ashamed of himself. He is recklessly hyping anger towards Netanyahu.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
atrain
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:48pm
Are the real anti-semites those who supported Hitler or MSNBC? “Don’t answer that”, one of the panelists shot back.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Puckrock
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:47pm
Just five minutes Worm Your Honor, him and me, ALONE……….!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- v15
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:53pm
  craaazyyyyy over the rainbow he is craazyyyyyy :)
  
  Report this comment
justangry
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:46pm
Netanyahu is a hawk, and the folks in Tehran seem to be whack jobs so who knows. Netanyahu has the better military, but I imagine I can go to Israel without getting my head chopped off, but Bibi is the one calling for the preemptive strike, which will probably escalate into something none of us have ever seen before. I wish they’d both take a chill pill. With all that’s wrong these days, all we need are zealots from the big three religions trying to make their silly prophesies come true.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- THENANNY
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:57pm
  Bibi isn’t trying to get his religion on top, he is just trying to save his people and survive. Also Mr. O of MSNBC is an avowed socialist and I’m am tired of letting things like he said pass…..
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:30pm
  Maybe you should write an angry letter.
  
  Report this comment
- resme
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 6:28pm
  @just
  ‘The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.
  
  ‘They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business.
  
  ‘These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.” ~ John Francis Hylan, New York Mayor 1922
  
  War is debt, The bankers loveeeeeeee debt. There’s a reason we’ve been at constant war since the federal rese
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 7:17pm
  @Resme, Seems that way. I still like the way George Carlin says it.
  
  Report this comment
amerbur
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:43pm
Dumb a…es.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
john vincent
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:43pm
Actually, they both are dangerous, but with a caveat:

The Ayatollah is dangerous for the wrong reasons,
Netanyahu is dangerous for the right reasons.

Iran kills at a wholesale level, and does not value life.
Bibi would kill as a last resort, with precision, stealth, speed, with a regard for innocent life.

The Iranians leader is dangerous because of a weak mind.
Netanyahu is dangerous because he is brilliant, knowing that a false move by him is detrimental to Israel’s existence.

But hte question was really absurd, meant to embarrass Israel; sorry will not work her.
God bless Israel.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DBlo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:50pm
  +1
  
  Comparing these two is disingenuous.
  
  Report this comment
- john vincent
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:20pm
  d-
  good point
  
  also a correction: will not work here
  
  Report this comment
- DIR
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 5:47pm
  Who’s the most dangerous. The supreme leader of Tehran! They are on the way to having the ‘bomb’ and have treatened to wip out Israel. Netanyahu is dangerous because he knows he’ll have to take out Tehran to protect Israel. They are both dangerous because their interaction could embroil the world into a major conflict. Get rid of the ‘bomb’ and the arabs threatening talk, that would eliminate the danger. The chance for pigs flying under their own power has a greater chance. If evolutionary theory is correct though there is a chance.
  
  Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:42pm
The most dangerous world leader for us is obama.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- FREEDOMoverFEAR
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:54pm
  Aint that a fact.
  
  Report this comment
- ambrosia
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:23pm
  World “LOSER” is more appropriate.
  Oblameo is NOT a leader of anything-
  well, maybe misguided social justice.
  
  Netanyahu & Israel don’t wake every morning,
  threatening to “drive anyone into the sea”,
  even though they are taunted daily with that very threat.
  
  Israel wants to live in peace, the radicals will not leave them be,
  they are not out to harm anyone
  but they WILL defend their small country against aggressors
  when pushed
  & God knows, they have been pushed to the brink.
  Imagine living like that, every second of every day ?
  
  Why does Oblameo hate Netanyahu ?
  Just look at his body language & smarmy face
  when posed with Bibi.
  If anyone has the dirt on the “Boy-Dunder-Wonder”,
  it’s Netanyahu,
  he’s got the Mossad on his side & they can
  dig & unravel anyone & anything.
  Trust, that they know ALL about Oblameo’s past connections,
  his unsavory history, his unsavory intention.
  
  Netanyahu is holding all of this close to his chest,
  but you better believe,
  that Oblameo & his hoodlums know Netanyahu knows
  & that alone,
  leaves Oblameo in an unnerving, uneasy, undesirable position
  to extend any diplomaticy or support to Netanyahu & Israel.
  
  Netanyahu has the Boy-King’s number-
  someday soon, he will expose him.
  Nobody has more patience than the Mossad & Israel-
  except when a very real nuclear attack
  threatens their existence.
  
  For the nincompoops,
  at MSMBS to joke about this.
  is about as juvenile, as shooting spitballs in 3rd grade.
  
  Report this comment
- ambrosia
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 8:47pm
  oops…
  typographical error-
  reading glasses M.I.A…….meant to type “nincompoops at MSNBC”.
  
  Report this comment
NILAP
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:41pm
At MSNBC they all agree that Romney is the most dangerous followed by Bush. It is their mantra.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Sirfoldallot
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:39pm
MSNBC = a bunch of idiots on the TV.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
The_Jerk
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:39pm
‘Who Is More Dangerous…The Supreme Leader in Tehran or Bibi Netanyahu?’

This is a legitimate question.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Gonzo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:42pm
  …if you’re an anti semite.
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:51pm
  You are unbelievable. Muslims drag our ambassador out and kill him and the Jews are our enemy? Did some Jewish kid beat you up and take your lunch money when you were little or what?
  
  Report this comment
- dutchy
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:52pm
  legitimate question for Jerks!
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:43pm
  No, if you are a realest. Results of a poll commissioned by the European Commission show that Israel is believed by Europeans in 15 countries to be the greatest threat to world peace, greater than North Korea, Iran or Afghanistan.
  
  Now, if one is a name calling propagandist with no substantive point, he/she must engage in name calling; for there is nothing else that the fool can do.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:54pm
  Gonzo: “You are unbelievable.”
  
  No, I deal in reason, logic and reality. I stay away from emotions and fundamentalism. All of these acts are the result of decades of stupid, foolish policies. Very predictable outcome.
  
  Look, if you beat a dog every morning, he will eventually bite. This requires commonsense, for it is not a complex concept.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 9:23pm
  @Jerk
  I notice you merely said “Europeans in 15 countries” not “majority of…”. Was that a mistype or is that the actual result? Moreover, even with a majority, actual poll numbers are important, as is information on how it was obtained. You provided neither, as is your custom. You only present limited facts and half-truths in order to argue your points by filling in the blanks you yourself left with invented narrative.
  
  Report this comment
- CHUBADAMS
  Posted on September 13, 2012 at 1:41pm
  Jerk
  I like your beating a dog analogy, I liken it to the constant terrorism and bomb lobbing that Israel endures on a daily basis from Hamas and other radical factions. That dog in your words is going to bite.
  
  Report this comment
elosogrande
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:38pm
Barnicle has always been a little left of Karl Marx, so this isn’t a surprising comment. Crap like this from a far left, not-so-bright buffoon on MSNBC, is getting to be a regular thing. Comcast must like their far-left, totally pro Obama – pro Democrat format, or they would fix it. Maybe the MSNBC anchors, as stupid as they are, are smarter than the Comcast brass.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Gonzo
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:38pm
You’re not asking the right question again MSNBC. “Who is the more dangerous player on the world stage right now, the supreme leader in Tehran or Barack Hussein Obama?” That’s the righ question.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Chinishque
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:52pm
  The problem is that it isnt even a real contest when you look at impact…Obama is not only driving the US economy over the cliff, but the rest of the world as well as they are dependent on the US to create stability. He is also placing the US at risk with a weak foreign policy which the Islamists see as an opening to gain power. Obama wins hands down!
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:57pm
  I agree whole heartedly Chin. Not only that, but a militarily weakened America is bad for the entire globe. Obama can’t wait to slash the military if he wins. Who benefits if he does? The ‘supreme leader’, Putin, China. Ready for a world ruled by them?
  
  Report this comment
- Wes Hardin
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:08pm
  I’ll bet that if Obama had been the President fighting Hitler some folks would have supported Hitler because Obama is black.
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:19pm
  Brilliant observation once again Wes. The old liberal fall back position, racism. You old dogs need to learn a new trick.
  
  Report this comment
- TexasCommonSense
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:27pm
  I bet Obama would have loved Hilter’s totalitarian endeavors and anti-semitism and would have tried to emulate him.
  
  Report this comment
- Chinishque
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:51pm
  @WES and following Gonzo…that dog just dont hunt anymore. The policies that Obama has put in place are what is driving voters and support away from him. Remember…the majority of white folks voted for Obama in 08, believing in Hope and Change, but what the got was division and collapse. And as far a racist voting is concerned, that is on the black community who are supporting Obama not because his policies are better for them (they definately are not) but because of the color of his skin…and NOTHING else. MLK must be rolling over in his grave so fast that he must be shredded to dust by now.
  
  Report this comment
- hayesstephen
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 7:44pm
  I was waiting for someone to ask that! Thank you.
  
  Report this comment
TexasCommonSense
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:38pm
If Iran put down its weapons there would be peace. If Israel put down its weapons there would be no more Israel.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:41pm
  That’s because from the beginning Israel brought weapons. Israel was born out of terrorism, Irgun, Stern Gang, Haganah. Israel brought modern day terrorism to thew Middle East.
  
  Report this comment
- TexasCommonSense
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:52pm
  Israel has existed for more than 3,000 and has been under attack from the beginning. Israel fights for its survival while others fight to destroy Israel.
  
  Report this comment
- dutchy
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:56pm
  @Texascommonsense, Amen to that!
  
  Report this comment
- SITDOWNANDSHUTUP
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:09pm
  Hey Jerk
  
  Israel has always been reactionary. you have no clue as to what you are spewing. If Israel becomes pro-active when threatened over, and over, and over, and over, and over again……now they are the terrorists???????? You are such a fool.
  
  Report this comment
barber2
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:37pm
What MSNBC is really asking is ” who is more damaging to our Dear Leader, Barack Obama’ s chances for re-election ?” That is ALL that matters 24 / 7…..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
13th Imam
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:36pm
I scrape the barnicles off the bottom of my sailboat every year. They are a drag on society. And they stink when rot.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Wes Hardin
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:35pm
Netanyahu is the greatest threat to world peace of all the world’s current leaders. We need to kick him to the curb for our own well-being.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TexasCommonSense
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:44pm
  In which country would you rather live, Iran or Israel?
  
  Report this comment
- FREEDOMoverFEAR
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:46pm
  Please explain how Netanyahu is the most dangerous world leader I need a good laugh today.
  
  Report this comment
- Wes Hardin
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:01pm
  Iran has better scenery and the people don’t spit on Christians like the Israelis do.
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:06pm
  No, they just kill them, genius.
  
  Report this comment
- TexasCommonSense
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:13pm
  Iran is about 90% Muslim; Israel is about 75% Jewish and 20% Arabic. The numbers don’t support what you’re saying, Hardin.
  
  Report this comment
- TexasCommonSense
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 4:20pm
  Wes, your name implies you idolize criminals. Why don’t you move to Iran and enjoy the scenery. I’m sure your anti-semitic self would fit right in with the Mullahs.
  
  Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:33pm
Larry O’D – projecting yet again

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Derek01
Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:31pm
That’s an easy one, Obama is

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Wes Hardin
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:36pm
  Anti-American, anyone?
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 3:48pm
  News flash Wes, anti Obama = pro America.
  
  Report this comment
- DenisWTexas
  Posted on September 12, 2012 at 7:54pm
  Yeah, gotta go with Gonzo on this one, Wes… If your president is anti-American, then being anti-Obama is anti-anti-American, which is pro-American.
  
  It’s really simple. Either you’re for America, or you’re apologizing for it and trying to take it down. I think Obama fits into that last category fairly well…
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.