
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (Credit: AP)
Want to take action? Check out the new FreedomWorks Action Center here.
–
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge has struck down nearly all of the state law championed by Gov. Scott Walker that effectively ended collective bargaining rights for most public workers.
Walker’s administration immediately vowed to appeal the Friday ruling, while unions, which have vigorously fought the law, declared victory. But what the ruling meant for existing public contracts was murky: Unions claimed the ruling meant they could negotiate again, but Walker could seek to keep the law in effect while the legal drama plays out.
The law, a crowning achievement for Walker that made him a national conservative star, took away nearly all collective bargaining rights from most workers and has been in effect for more than a year.
Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas ruled that the law violates both the state and U.S. Constitution and is null and void.
In his 27-page ruling, the judge said sections of the law “single out and encumber the rights of those employees who choose union membership and representation solely because of that association and therefore infringe upon the rights of free speech and association guaranteed by both the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions.”
Colas also said the law violates the equal protection clause by creating separate classes of workers who are treated differently and unequally.
The ruling applies to all local public workers affected by the law, including teachers and city and county government employees, but not those who work for the state. They were not a party to the lawsuit, which was brought by a Madison teachers union and a Milwaukee public workers union.
Walker issued a statement accusing the judge of being a “liberal activist” who “wants to go backwards and take away the lawmaking responsibilities of the legislature and the governor. We are confident that the state will ultimately prevail in the appeals process.”
Wisconsin Department of Justice spokeswoman Dana Brueck said DOJ believes the law is constitutional.
The ruling throws into question changes that have been made in pay, benefits and other work rules in place across the state for city, county and school district workers.
Walker’s law, passed in March 2011, only allowed for collective bargaining on wage increases no greater than the rate of inflation. All other issues, including workplace safety, vacation, health benefits, could no longer be bargained for.
The ruling means that local government and schools now must once again bargain over those issues, said Lester Pines, an attorney for Madison Teachers Inc. that brought the case.
“We’re back to where we were before the law was enacted,” he said.
Pines predicted the case would ultimately be resolved by the state Supreme Court.
“What’s going to happen in the interim is unknown,” he said.
The state Supreme Court in June 2011 ruled that the law was constitutional after it had been blocked by a different Dane County judge on a challenge over its passage being a violation of open meetings law.
Walker introduced the proposal in February 2011, six weeks after he took office. It resulted in a firestorm of opposition and led to huge protests at the state Capitol that lasted for weeks. All 14 Democratic state senators fled the state to Illinois for three weeks in an ultimately failed attempt to stop the law’s passage from the Republican-controlled Legislature.
The law required public workers to pay more for their health insurance and pension benefits at the same time it took away their ability to collectively bargain over those issues. Walker argued the changes were needed to help state and local governments save money at a time Wisconsin faced a $3 billion budget shortfall.
Anger over the law’s passage led to an effort to recall Walker from office. More than 930,000 signatures were collected triggering the June recall election. Walker won and became the first governor in U.S. history to survive a recall.
The lawsuit was among several filed against the law.
A coalition of unions filed a federal lawsuit in Madison in June 2011, arguing that the law violated the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause because it exempted firefighters and police officers. A federal just upheld most of the law in March, but the rulings are under appeal.
Another lawsuit was filed in July 2011 by two unions representing about 2,700 public workers in Madison and Dane County. They also challenged the law on equal protection grounds. The case is pending.
Democrats and unions were ecstatic with Friday’s ruling.
“As we have said from day one, Scott Walker’s attempt to silence the union men and women of Wisconsin’s public sector was an immoral, unjust and illegal power grab,” said Phil Neuenfeldt, president of the Wisconsin State AFL-CIO.
The Democratic minority leader in the state Assembly called the ruling a huge victory for workers and free speech.
“This decision will help re-establish the balance between employees and their employers,” said Rep. Peter Barca.
Republican Rep. Robin Vos, a staunch supporter of the law and the presumptive next speaker of the Assembly, called the ruling an example of the “arrogance of the judiciary.”
“I’m confident it’s a single judge out of step with the mainstream,” Vos said. He said the law is working “and we’ll continue to implement it.”
























































































































Comments (502)
drrgb
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:08pmTypical liberal brain melt down. Walker who has the support of the voters and the constitution is a tyrant while a single two bit local hack judge is a hero. Give me a break.
forthepeople
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:33pmSame behavior goes on in washungton dc everyday !
Report this comment
V-MindMeld
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:42pmya its not right,,,,,majority says so in wisconsin,,,,,just like the majority voted for obama and now we’re stuck with him,,,,,
Report this comment
13th Imam
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:00pmA county judge?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:05pmon what grounds was this law struck down??? Was it because of the procedural manner in which it was passed – or the content of the law?
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:22pm@drrgb
“Walker who has the support of the…the constitution”
Apparently not.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:22pmCourts are losing legitimacy.
Report this comment
drrgb
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:23pmThe most fundamental worker right is the right to work. Forcing someone to pay third party thugs in order to get a job is unAmerican and agaist everything this country was founded on. The founders believed judges would be selected based on their judical knowledge and commitment to enforcing the intent of the constitution to protect the citizens. Unfortunately, Democrats have flooded the judiciary with political hacks and liberal operatives who bow to secularism and dispise the constitution. How about a recall for this judge for gross malfeasance.
Report this comment
woodyl1011fl
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:00pmIf this judge is an elected official then check the county demographics if it is a democrat judicial voting area. Then this judge is nothing more than Wisconsin County democrat party hack judge on the bench. The have to realize that any democrat of today is unfit to be judge; for the party and it’s ideology are supreme over everything. Sen. Schumer at the federal level supports this type of judge at the federal level.
Report this comment
otoko
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:29pmFirst Hispanic Judge in Dane County
Madison: Dane County’s newest judge is sworn in, and he is the first person of Hispanic descent to assume the bench in this county.
Juan Colas says he is honored to be a judge for both professional and personal reasons.
Juan Colas doesn’t want to be known as Dane County’s Hispanic judge, but rather as a judge who is Hispanic. “I bring to being a judge everything that I am, and a part of what I am is an Hispanic person.”
But Colas is not downplaying the significance of a man named Juan presiding over a courtroom. “It is an honor to the Hispanic community that their presence and importance in Dane County is now recognized by the appointment of a Hispanic to the bench.”
Colas was born in Columbia. His family moved to the U.S. when he was five. His ethnicity has influenced his career. Fluent in Spanish, Colas started as a court interpreter, and as a public defender he tried to take as many Hispanic clients as possible.
He spent the last 15 years working at the Department of Justice, most recently prosecuting sexual predators.
He was appointed by Governor Doyle, whom he worked under when Doyle was Attorney General. The two are also friends. “He and I actually for a time played basketball together at the shell.”
In his remarks Colas says he understands the challenges Hispanics face, even though he has not always faced them. “I am very much aware that though I am Hispanic,
Report this comment
000degrees
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:33pmRecall juan….Let’s see if he can hold his position like Walker did……
Report this comment
Pat-Riot
Sep. 14, 2012 at 10:00pmWait, Walker does his legislative duty, gets the right amount of votes to get his law passed, then he faces a recall over it, he confirms his election and then some creepball judge overrules the whole enchilada? One person overturns the whole deal? W…T…F!!!
No wonder people are ready to go nuts. This stuff makes me crazy!
Report this comment
just the facts
Sep. 14, 2012 at 10:08pmThey got to keep it going… they just can’t let it rest.
Well here’s one for them – we, our country, has just been downgraded to a AA-.
Report this comment
develdog84
Sep. 14, 2012 at 10:12pmthis judge is as dirty as they get. a quick search finds several charges of mortgage forecloser fraud aganst him
Report this comment
kennyg933
Sep. 14, 2012 at 10:21pmHeavy sarcasm warning: A communist Cuban boat person judge in Ho Chi Madison City in the People’s Republic of Wisconsin upheld the Marxist thuggery of Unionism by hiding behind a Constitution he is actively working to destroy? GET OUT. I canNOT believe it. Judges of the world, unite!
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Sep. 14, 2012 at 10:45pmI have never understood how a county judge could over-rule a governor and a law passed by the state legislature. I mean, maybe a judge in a higher court, but a COUNTY judge? How does that happen? If that is possible, how does anyone get anything done?
Report this comment
Conservative2
Sep. 15, 2012 at 12:17amIf he looses the courts battles to come, he should sponsor the Wisconsin right to work state law, that’ll chew on those Union thugs
Report this comment
SimpleTruths
Sep. 15, 2012 at 12:41am@ANONYMOUS T. IRRELEVANT
He made a ruling, that is what judges do. That disagree doesn’t make it not his job. His ruling will be eventually raise to the level of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, don’t get you panties in a bunch.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:14amSimplelies – You’re not smart enough to realize that it’s not you union goons who control the Wisconsin State Supreme Court.
Report this comment
TomBond
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:52amSame behavior goes on daily in California by the dumbest court on earth, the 9th Federal District Court. A shame upon the rights of our constitution. It should be disbanded like Gingrich has said. A shame on America.
Report this comment
jzs
Sep. 15, 2012 at 2:19amThe Supreme Court ruled that corporations have the right as people. Or as Mitt says, “Corporations are people friend.” Don’t cha love how he added the “my friend” to that statement? In any case it looks like this judge ruled that unions were people too.
That’s a joke, partly. In this country, under the Constitution, people have right act collectively for a common purpose. That’s what Democracy is all about.
Report this comment
nkrancher
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:25am“If the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court…the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.” – Abraham Lincoln
Report this comment
grimmster
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:23amHmmm, it violates the constitution, how, i dont remember reading about collective bargining in it?!
Sure would like that so called judge to justify his ruling……not going to happen though…
Report this comment
decendentof56
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:38amJuan Cloas……Hispanic! This is for the Blacks and Hispanics, who are in large numbers in the public sector work force.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:44amJZS, I see that you are quoting the information that I gave you some time back. Thank you.
But it seems that many of us need to continue to inform you that we do not live in a democracy. We have a Constitutional Republic. The old cliche that democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting to decide what is for lunch fits you last paragraph to a T.
“That’s a joke, partly. In this country, under the Constitution, people have (the) right (to) act collectively for a common purpose. That’s what Democracy is all about.”
I still feel that even FDR was right about being against unions when it comes to government jobs. This runaway madness to vote themselves deeper and deeper into the taxpayers pockets is insidious. Governor Walker and the state’s congress did what they could to correct their budget and here we go again now with a judge’s politically based decision that can again wreck the state’s fragile economy. I suppose the next time they need to correct their budget they can consider folding his jurisdiction into another and do away with his court. That would save a hefty sum obviously.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:52amANONYMOUS T. IRRELEVANT, It is a state court. It is a circuit court and it’s district is Dane County. Of course, being that Madison is the county seat of Dane County there will be enough liberal leaning judges. As I responded to JZS above, the next financial cut should be accomplished by folding that circuit into another and do away with this judges position.
Report this comment
Zipit
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:59amJZS! You are correct. People do have the right to act collectively for a common purpose. Do you agree then, that they should not be forced to belong to the collective (as a condition of employment), if they do not wish? The right not to be forced to pay dues to a group of so called “representatives” that they do not agree with? To Not have those dues pay for a candidate that they individually would not support? HUH!
Report this comment
decendentof56
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:01am@JZS……..”That’s a joke, partly. In this country, under the Constitution, people have right act collectively for a common purpose. That’s what Democracy is all about.”
The problem, JZS, is that we are a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy. There are democratic elements in our Republic, but a Democracy is majority rule. 50-1/2% beats 49-1/2%. How do you like THOSE numbers?
We elect representatives to pass (or not pass) legislation based on it meeting US Constitutional stanards. If you don’t like following a Constitution, then you could have different rules for diffferent areas and different demographic groups. What type of a country would you have?
Since the taxpayers pay for the public sector jobs, the Representatives should decide if those public sector employees deserve a raise and how much.
You are witnessing “democracy” (mob rule) in action in the mid east! You are witnessing the same thing in Chicago with the teachers strike. I think the average pay for those teachers is $75,000 for 10 months of work. I was a highly skilled worker, and only made that wage working 12 months.
Report this comment
TEXASGRANNY73
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:10am@NKRancher Supreme Court Justice John Roberts
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:17amZIPIT, While I do actually have some respect for JZS, he is still a liberal. And, the pro-choice they believe in, is for the choice to kill a child in the womb. What a choice that is?
Report this comment
MadinIllinois
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:52amI’m wondering HOW MUCH did the UNIONS – PAY – this liberal JUDGE ?? Walker has the support of the Wisconsin voters, and considering he won the repeal vote, this judge has to be in a brain melt-down….
Report this comment
Zipit
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:52amRJJ! Could not have put it better!!!
Report this comment
The Giver
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:57amI hope the appeal is heard quickly. This was obviously a judge with an agenda.
Report this comment
Jim in Houston
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:20amLiberal government in DC, liberal media nationwide and now liberal judges making law rather than interpreting law. We are doomed!
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:24amZIPIT, Thanks and you gave me pause to go back and read my post. Left out the fact that Pro Choice to infanticide is the only CHOICE they believe in.
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Sep. 15, 2012 at 10:45amWHO THINKS WE ARE STILL A FREE NATION? WHO?
In many states the Democrats run to their openly gay judges who declare laws void. This is coming in October over the voter ID laws. Obama will issue a Executive order two weeks before the election voiding all voter ID laws. How do you think it can be stopped?
Report this comment
stablepar
Sep. 15, 2012 at 11:04amthese liberal judges can and should be voted out
Report this comment
jeff1158
Sep. 15, 2012 at 11:32amIn Oklahoma, we had a question on the state ballot about allowing Sharia law in the state. OVERWHELMINGLY voted down. I think it was 85% against. I have no idea what the other 15% were thinking. A judge struck down the law. Against the majority of the people in Oklahoma. I just don’t understand.
Report this comment
Look4DBigPicture
Sep. 15, 2012 at 12:02pmWhat the hell is wrong with these people? Only a complete imbecile thinks public employees deserve bigger salaries and better benefits than those of us in the private sector who employ them.
Report this comment
bannedfromCNN
Sep. 15, 2012 at 12:15pmLet’s make this ‘judge’ next in line for the ambassadorship to Libya.
Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Sep. 15, 2012 at 12:43pmOne the MOST important things Newt Gingrich spoke about in the RNC primary debates was ACTIVIST JUDGES at all levels of the government. This law is the will of the people of of Wisconsin and should NOT be able to be overturned by judges. It is time people of America to make it unlawful to have ANY Unions in Public employment…City, County, State and Federal. They are bankrupting the entire country and are nothing but Communist Thugs..Like the Mafia used to Shakedown business for “Protection”. Protection against who? The very same Mafia that was shaking them down. Only now it’s even worse they are infiltrated with Communists and corrupting everything they touch. Wake Up Union People…you are giving money to fund the end of freedom in our country.
Report this comment
BadDog40
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:42pmNext step for the judge is declaring the results of the recall election void, and declaring himself to be the new Governor.
Report this comment
jzs
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:10pmRJJinGadsden syas, “JZS, I see that you are quoting the information that I gave you some time back. Thank you.” I think maybe your suffering from delusions of grandeur. But if not, thanks for the information you’ve imparted to me, whatever that might be. In general I’m inclined to believe that the more you read this website, the stupider you get (at least if you believe this stuff), so I’m glad there might be exceptions.
I find it incongruous that people here make the legitimate distinction between a democracy and a constitutional republic, and yet don’t have a clue of the definitions of the economic systems of capitalism, socialism and communism. If only people could acquire a little knowledge in that area, people would see how ridiculous half the statements here are.
I know, a judges decision is always “political” if you don’t agree with it. But the judge simply said that all people have equal rights. That doesn’t sound to radical to me.
Actually the reason Walker tried to eliminate collective bargaining was to reduce the potential for teachers getting raises, and attracting the best teachers, so that he could cut taxes for corporations. I know people think that cutting corporate taxes improves job creation, but of course it never has and certainly hasn’t in Wisconsin.
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:14pmI’m not that familiar with UNIONS except in the 20′s they helped keep owners from enslaving kids under 10, or 12, or 16 or foreigners/women etc. and that was a good thing. Then in the 50′s they got really corrupt and everyone was afraid of the bosses and that seems to persist.
HOW is it any type of AMERICAN FREEDOM to 1) be told you have to join something? 2) to have anyone take your dues money automatically without your permission? 3) say you can’t work unless you are in a UNION? 4) Spend Union dues the way the union bosses want it?
I say do away with ALL UNIONS. I say offer a NEGOTIATIONS STAFF at “$X” price and when contract time comes, let the NEGOTIATIONS STAFF negotiate the contract in front of them; I say let them have a COMPLAINTS DEPARTMENT whereby any employee can have a voice as needed.
Let these NEGOTIATIONS STAFF people PROVE their worth. NOT BY FORCE but by RESULTS. AND totally deny any (UNION) “Negotiations Staff or Complaint Department” DONATE to any political Campaign. WOULDN’T THIS SOLVE A zillion problems? Or should I say a TRILLION!!? UNIONS have not ALWAYS been with us!!! REMEMBER this!!! SKILL IS WHAT get’s people jobs…not UNIONS and if it’s UNIONS then we have bigger problems than we can address here!
THINK AMERICANS!!! WISCONSIN has already spoken and will speak again. The only people fighting for the Unions are the THUGS in CHARGE!!
Report this comment
Hanner
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:31pmKeep your eyes on that devil Soros and his ilk. That wicked bunch have been trying to get a “Merit Selection” system installed to rob us of our votes to elect or fire these judges. The Merit Selection system would allow lawyers and judges to pick other lawyers and judges to fill these judicial seats WITHOUT our votes getting in the way!!! This is the ultimate power grab by the liberals. If they can pick and choose their own judges, then they will be unstoppable.
Report this comment
Al J Zira
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:24pm@13thman: I thought the same thing. What weight does a county judge have if a state judge ruled the law is legal?
Report this comment
tucanofulano
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:38pmBest judge union money can buy!
Report this comment
judiab
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:29pmAdd your comments
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:48pmJZS, Geez Bud, you are slipping. Back when you kept railing on and on about stupid and wrong Romney was for calling corporations people. I explained on one of your posts how the Supreme Court had declared corporations are considered people in the eyes of the law. The case was in the very early 1800s, and I explained why they did this. Also shortly after the 16th Amendment was ratified and federal law was written and signed into law under the Woodrow Wilson Administration also declaring corporations to be a person so as to ease the ability to tax them for annual income. Anyway, I was somewhat flattered that you are now using that info. No delusions of grandeur on my part.
I’ve read The Communist Manifesto, Mein Kampf, Socialism Utopian and Scientific, The Zinn Reader: Writings on Disobedience and Democracy, and even Anton LeVay’s Satanic Bible. it does help to educate and inform yourself. But, I guess you are the high and mighty within your mind, and we must all be wrong. Don’t hurt your arm patting yourself on the back, okay?
This particular judge is politically left. Just look him up and so some reading. But, having finally found some information on his written decision, I can see where he was trying to take this. Some of the decision I find intriguing while some I do disagree with.
Now, you are putting yourself in Walker’s mind. I believe they got the ball rolling to save the state from bankruptcy. But, you refuse to see that.
Report this comment
ltb
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:15pmWalker shoul Ignore the judge, let the teachers go on strike and then do what Reagan did with the air traffic controllers. In this economy, for each teacher fired there probably would be 3 well qualified candidates ready to step in.
Report this comment
roagie1
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:17pmwhat could ya expect
Report this comment
SimpleTruths
Sep. 16, 2012 at 12:29amMight be your hero, he’s my tyrant.
Report this comment
jzs
Sep. 16, 2012 at 12:45amRJ, actually I was just quoting Romney – take credit if you like! – but thanks for the historical information and I’ll defer to your superior knowledge on that. And I liked your post by the way.
The Citizens United decision invalidated decades of federal and state laws designed to limit the influence of corporate money on elections, something that didn’t happen during Woodrow Wilson’s administration (Imagine that, activist judges tossing out laws passed by the People). Do understand the reason that state and federal laws were passed to prevent corporations or rich individuals from anonymously pumping unlimited amounts of money into political campaigns? Laws that Citizens United invalidated?
The reason was, simply, that without those laws CEOs (not employees of their company) or the billionaires could decide elections. No longer is it “one man one vote” it is “one dollar one vote.” It’s a corruption of the democratic process. Candidates no longer support their constituency, they are beholden to the people who bought their election for them.
That’s a plutocracy, not a “constitutional republic” as you like to say. Seriously, do you understand the threat to democracy by allowing the rich to have so much influence over who is elected? Is that your ideal for our country, a country governed by the rich and for the rich?
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Sep. 16, 2012 at 1:16amNobody has a ‘right’ to collectively bargain. Individuals have a right to freedom of association. But if you compel people to belong to your group, you’ve violated that right.
Not that the Left cares. Bunch of smug, snarling demons.
Report this comment
jzs
Sep. 16, 2012 at 3:37amGHOST, you’re falsely conflating two ideas: collective bargaining and forced membership a union.
Of course people can form a group and bargain collectively! Is your idea that one person can threaten to quit a job if his demands aren’t met, but that the Constitution prohibits two people from doing so in concert? Aren’t you a self-described expert on the Constitution? Are you saying people can’t band together with a common purpose and collectively make demands? Of course they can. This isn’t China, this is the United States of America.
Do you hate freedom Ghost? Of course people can form groups and express a collective opinion and exert whatever influence they have. As Mitt says, “corporations are people my friend.” Except that, you know, the employees of those corporations don’t have any say about what the CEO wants to demand. If that is the law of the land, then certainly American citizens – like Churches, neighborhood associations, the NRC and so on – can band together and exert power as a group, which they couldn’t as individuals.
If corporation are people I say people who join together with a common cause are people too. You can’t give a CEO more rights than you or me.
Ghost, why do you hate freedom?
Report this comment
Haasbola
Sep. 16, 2012 at 4:24amTwo bit hack judge. Is this not the biggest and most glaring example to how our
rights and the most basic of all rights and freedoms your VOTE are being absolutely crapped on, Where the hell are we, I must be in the twilight zone…..
Report this comment
maggieBP
Sep. 16, 2012 at 12:06pmWalker has it right and he will prevail. The judge just wants some job security, shame, shame.
Go Governor Walker.
Report this comment
turkey13
Sep. 16, 2012 at 4:01pmSome one needs to check the judges freezer! There is probably $300,000 to a half million in cold cash in it. The judges have to rule this way even if they don’t take the cash, When Walker reduces the size of government the judges will have to support their deadbeat family members.
Report this comment
bunkerramos
Sep. 17, 2012 at 4:19pmThe rural teachers don’t mind losing their rights.
Report this comment
ThoreauHD
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:03pmApparently Democracy only matters when you win.
Report this comment
AlmostaCowboy
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:15pm…only matters when DEMOCRATS win.
Report this comment
taxpro4u03
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:29pmWe’ve seen ‘democracy’ in action a few times recently — It means, supposedly, that the ‘majority rule…’ When ‘applied,’ those in ‘power’ decide what is, and what is not… i.e. Affordable Care Act RAMMED down the throats of Americans (twice – ‘pass it to see what’s in it’; ROBERTS upheld it — in the face of the ‘majority’ against it) – and again at the DNC via ‘voice vote’ — no ‘clear’ 2/3 majority to put Jerusalem and God back on the platform; and…. Fast and Furious — these are just ‘examples.’ — By the way, under ‘rule of law’ as we understood it has just been ‘redefined.’ Courts HAD by and large followed the LANGUAGE of the law. We have seen ‘prosecutorial discretion,’ and ‘selective enforcement,’ even outright nullification – “Penalty” REALLY means ‘tax’ (synonyms ‘work’, see…) — which now means the word, ‘must,’ is and can be interpreted to mean, ‘should.’ — which implies, “if you FEEL like obeying the law…” — makes PERFECT sense in a world that ‘makes no sense.’ Baal/Tower of BABBLE – Understand? (yes really means no — EVERYday is ‘opposites’ day, depending on agenda and how we feel that day…Our LEADERS said so…)
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:20amTHOREAUHD, That is what worries me about Spanish company that will be counting the votes in November. It is owned by an 0bama contributor who gave him the max amount. Apparently the definition of job security both ways.
Report this comment
smokeyridgerunner
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:01pmJust do not bargain with them, by the time all is well and good Obama will be gone.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:11pmHere’s a photo of Juan for anyone interested.
http://www.countyofdane.com/court/judge/archive.aspx?id=70
Report this comment
FREEDOMoverFEAR
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:05pmI’m not a fan of unions but who is the Government to say you can’t collectively bargain. Is this for state employees only?
Report this comment
pissantno.10
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:57pmone thing there free they did not lose there right to bargain it is just done on a state wide base instead of school district base or some thing close to that they can still bargan
Report this comment
Exrepublisheep
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:38pm@FREEDOMOVERFEAR. That is the problem.For a party so interested in smaller govt. and rights of the people they sure are quick to deny these to political foes.
Report this comment
endthemindlessspending
Sep. 14, 2012 at 11:43pm@Sheep,
All the law said was people have a right to work without paying union dues. He wasn’t taking away rights he was giving people back their rights.
Report this comment
endthemindlessspending
Sep. 14, 2012 at 11:51pmBy the way, I worked for a union company that you may have heard of called UPS. I hated having no choice but to pay union dues when I worked my ass off and had no need for the union. While others were standing around not doing jack and the company couldn’t fire them. Unions only promote laziness cause you get the same pay not matter how little you do. Maybe if people would work harder they wouldn’t be getting fired or need to pay somebody to protect them.
Report this comment
Exrepublisheep
Sep. 15, 2012 at 2:07amI know about unions. Typically they are just a money making gimmick for the higher ups. But saying people can’t get together to try and improve their work place, pay. or benefits is wrong. I tried looking up the law itself but wasn’t able to find it, so I don’t know if you’re right or wrong about what it entails. I could be wrong also though…
Report this comment
sWampy
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:55pmDamn lying liberals or uneducated liberals, they didn’t deny their right to collusion, if such a thing can even weakly argued as a right. They said the unions couldn’t refuse to hire some that refused to join the corrupt union and pay the illegal extrusion frees.
Report this comment
endthemindlessspending
Sep. 16, 2012 at 12:37amThank you Swamp for backing me up, unions are just pissed they won’t get as much money.
Report this comment
drrgb
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:01pmHow long are we going to tolerate this type of judical dictatorship? A single liberal county judge can overturn the will of the voters. For aliberal, anything they don’t like is labeled as “unconstitutional” while they at the same time run roughshod over the actual Constitution.
Anyone who votes Democrat should go start their own country and leave this one to those that value the constitution and rule of law instead of a judical dictatorship.
If this judge insists on immediate implementation of his ruling, Walker should simply fire the excess teachers and let the blame fall on this upstart judge.
Report this comment
Sosorryforyou
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:16pm@DRRGB
In regards to your comment, “A single liberal county judge can overturn the will of the voters.”, the voters voted for Walker, not on getting rid of public unions. Union Busting was not part of his campaign, but as soon as he was elected he made it his #1 priority. His lack of disclosure on what his true intents were angered many, many from Wisconsin.
Report this comment
Lord_Frostwind
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:24pmAnd yet, on the recall vote, he won by an even larger margin than the vote that got him into office in the first place. Your argument is invalid.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:25pmsosorry-
you full of it. Union busting and reducing the spending was his campaign. Unions should all be forcibly dismantled as the mafia organizations they are.
Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:28pmVery well said, sir. I salute your unimpaired vision.
Report this comment
Popp40
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:30pm@Sososorryforyou…..did you forget that Walker was re-elected after he passed this law? Sorry but your comment is pointless. Walker may not have run on breaking up the unions but he did pass this law and the people still supported him. Matter of fact he won be an even larger margin the second time. So he may have angered a lot of people….but more people supported him and this law.
Report this comment
pissantno.10
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:32pmsosorry why did he beat the recall oh darn ummmmmm well cause darn people wanted what he did but cause ummmm were gona get them people we going to do what we do all the time like not teach nothing . but union songs yea thats it you dirty birdies
Report this comment
aldojon
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:36pmfunny…if the people of communist wisconsin didn’t like what Walker did then why did the recall election fail? liberals love to legislate from the bench. the only recourse is to impeach them.
Report this comment
DeathRattle
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:42pm@Sosorry
You are a moron…… end transmission.
The man did not hide what he stood for, prior to, during nor after his re-election.
Report this comment
Wartface
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:02pmSomeone needs to teach this communist judge that collective bargaining rights don’t exist in the Constitution. Someone should also inform them that the unions fought for years to get FDR and all of the presidents since him to help them get that law passed. They also petitioned every Congress since FDR to give them that right. Congress always said NO! And then along comes JFK. JFK tried to get Congress to give Federal workers collective bargaining rights but… Congress like always before said NO! But… JFK owed the unions for helping him get elected so he said screw congress and signed Executive Order #10988. That gave the federal workers the right to organize and… Workers and elected officials decided if the Feds can do it, so can we, and they did. Now here we are 50 years later and now government employees make more in wages and benefits than private sector workers do, that do the same job. The government worker is almost unfireable. The private sector worker in most states can be laid off or fired without cause. That dynamic was the complete opposite before EO #10988. What has it cost us the taxpayer? Trillions and trillions of dollars! Currently between the State’s and Federal government we have a total of $4,000,000,000,000 in unfunded liabilities regarding their healthcare and retirement benefits. Then if you factor in the extremely high wages and the legal expenses of firing a Governemnt worker over the last 50 years… Figure 10x the current debt.
Report this comment
Bdotson
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:07pmHow about we privatize the schools?? Then we wouldn’t have to worry about the unions.
Report this comment
BetYouCanHearUsNow
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:00pmHey Sorry, apparently he didn’t anger enough to be recalled. In fact, he’s the first Governor to defeat such an effort. So, the people voted for him, the people voted to keep him, even after he passed that union busting law. Get real, liberals and unions are losing enough to force them into using alternative means to overturn voters wishes. Disgusting.
Report this comment
M1A2_Tanker
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:11pm“RE: Executive Order #10988″
Does this mean that every POTUS since JFK has signed a renewal E.O.? Does this also mean the first POTUS to NOT renew it, will become a hero to the Republic? Or is it more complicated than that?
Thanks in advance.
I say bust ALL the unions apart and then use The RICO Act to ensure that anyone of Communist affiliated DNA will never attempt to claim that unions are good for the Country in modern society. We have the Federal Labor Laws that they claim to stand for, therefore we don’t need Labor (u)nions any longer. (whether or not these laws are too far reaching, is a another issue)
Report this comment
term limits for congress
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:01pmCan the public workers go on strike now?
Report this comment
justangry
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:00pmUm, why did the judge say the bill was unconstitutional? That would probably be a good thing for a reporter to ask.
Report this comment
beekeeper
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:08pmAgreed.
The reality is it doesn’t matter – it is most likely a minor technicality that can be corrected legislatively while the lawyers have their endless ‘charge by the hour’ debate.
Report this comment
elation22
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:09pmSilly! No need to question . . . not when unions are favored.. . and curry favor for ‘bama votes
Report this comment
Steverino
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:12pmGood point.
Report this comment
grayling646
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:17pmWhen was this reporter you mention supposed to ask? The Judge didn’t hold a press conference or have an interview (yet). He just issued the ruling.
Report this comment
mrspeedwagon
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:28pmI am still trying to find the words “a womens right to privacy” in the Constitution, and the words, “separation of church and state” in the Constitution. Hmmm been looking, looking, looking. It’s GOTTA be there SOMEWHERE. MUST be there, liberal judges SAID it was.?????
Report this comment
Chuck7884
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:29pmGoes against Freedom of Assembly, just to name one.You know the first amendment.
Report this comment
justangry
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:37pm@Grayling, I know you like picking fights with the Libertarians, so I’ll spell it out for you. If I wrote a story about this, I’d READ THE CASE before I wrote the stupid story. I’m sure if I were in the mood I could find it online in a few minutes. I was just pointing out lazy ass journalism. If want to argue that isn’t the case go for it…. dipsh*t.
Report this comment
justangry
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:55pm@Chuck, You’re probably right, and considering how courts have been, I’m guessing they’ll uphold the ruling if it goes that far. Just a hunch.
Report this comment
grams09
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:00pmNone of us will have any money soon, so it really won’t matter one way or the other.
Report this comment
justangry
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:17pmI believe you’re right. Peter Schiff on unlimited QE… (17 minute video)
http://www.infowars.com/schiff-qe-is-final-nail-in-dollars-coffin/
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:14pmWe’ll still have money it’ll just be worthless,hyperinflation will see to that.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:14amPROGRESSIVESLAYER, I suspect that the paper it is printed on will be more valuable than the face amount.
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:59pmAnother ******* liberal judge playing God and giving the American people and our Constitution the finger. These people’s souls are so corrupt and filthy they cheapen and soil everything around them. Pure ******* evil, I swear.
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:25pm@DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
If you want to talk about evil, let’s talk about Scott Walker, a man who publicly denied that he was trying to bust unions, and then was caught on tape telling a rich supporter that he was indeed trying to bust unions. I guess a Governor who lies outright to the public is all right as long as his lies will achieve something you agree with.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:34pmVance – And here you hypocritical Marxists claim that the terms good and evil are simple minded terms. But only when they’re used against your side.
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:13amVANCEUPPERCUT – that was lame. Comparing a liberal judge to Scott Walker is like comparing gonorrhea to a cold. Walker is the good guy here, the judge is a liberal virus out to soil and destroy anything good – like yourself. How do you people even look in the mirror?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:47amVANCEUPPERCUT, Our last Democrat Governor who took office in ’99 is still in Federal Prison, where he belongs. He was given a short furlough though to attend the DNC in Charlotte. He planned to ask 0bama for a pardon. When 0bama failed to pardon him, that has to mean he is truly evil.
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:21pm@RJJinGadsden
Because no Republican politicians have ever been convicted of a crime???
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:22pm@DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIl
“Walker is the good guy here”
The good guy who lies openly to the public?
Report this comment
just the facts
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:42pmUnions should be completely done away with. They serve no purpose any more.
This judge is a moron. Just looking for votes the next election.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:50pmVANCEUPPERCUT, Of course they have, and rightfully so. But you failed to see the gist of my comment to be that when 0bama will not pardon the man, he has to be evil.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:59pmI did not know that Unions could be Incorporated.
Anyone know if this is true or just a misprint?
“The ruling comes after a lawsuit brought by the _”Madison teachers union”_ and a union for Milwaukee city employees.”
“Lester Pines, an attorney for _”Madison Teachers Inc”_….”
Report this comment
Steverino
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:16pmIf they CAN be incorporated, you can be fairly certain they’re not the “evil” type of corporation, right?
Pfffft.
Their corporation WOULD be “people”, of course. Special exemption, y’know.
Harrrumphh.
Steve
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Sep. 14, 2012 at 11:34pm@MONK.. they incorporate to protect the gym teacher from losing his house after he gets caught spying on 8th grade girls changing in the locker room.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:51amHi MONK, No, they cannot be incorporated. See the following:
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/labor-unions-incorporated-12768.html
Report this comment
listeninginVT
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:59pmexpected and predicted move.
Report this comment
psadie
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:58pmI think the majority of problems concerning the law lie with the judges. They do not follow the rule of law and the Constitution. Just look at some of the stupid decisions that are made. BUT, we continue to waste millions of dollars going back and forth in court and for what?
Report this comment
FiveFreedoms
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:58pmThe Unions are parasites in companies and government. The people spoke three times but that isn’t good enough. The people of the state should run the unions out of the state.
Report this comment
1TrueOne55
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:38pmEven the leader of the Progressive Party in 1935 declined to Unionize Public/Gov’t workers, saying it would be a conflict of interest and it was not done until a Presidential Executive Order was signed. Any Congress can make it illegal to Unionize Gov’t workers since E/O are not law and can be recinded by any following President… Remember the abortion clause in Obamacare was made an E/O and all the noise when it was signed and paraded out in front of the cameras…
Report this comment
NHwinter
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:57pmEvil is relentless, it never gives up. They are being paid by tax payer money. I think it is up to the tax payers to decide whether they get pay raises, if they are actually good teachers or not, if they should be fired, if they should contribute more to the HC and pensions. Enough of this being raped by unions. Sometimes I wonder if these judges even know what the heck the Constitution even says.
Report this comment
catwilli
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:57pmHow much did this judge get paid?
Report this comment
GumRock
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:34pmFollow the Money
Report this comment
hades3
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:57pmThe three biggest enemies of our Republic Unions, Lawyers and Hudges. They support our Constitution when it benefits them, and denegrate it when it doesn’t.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:04pmGotta watch those hudges they’re jorrible!
Report this comment
Slipstick
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:19pmWhatsa hudge?
Report this comment
LLoryck
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:16pmDumbDora has dislexic fingers
Report this comment
barber2
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:50pmDORA- MARILYN – GEORGE is just suffering the after effects of his avatar sex change ….
Report this comment
mtcountrygrl
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:56pmMy response would be to put a special vote together to ammend state constitution to make public unions illegal. Push back.
Report this comment
grayling646
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:08pmGood idea girl but I doubt it would get enough support in Wisconsin.
Report this comment
encinom
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:56pmAnother nail in Der Walker’s political coffin. The tyranny is being taken down.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:01pmAnother Tea Party/Koch brothers lose.
The ‘Party’s’ over.
Give me regards to Ben Quayle.
Report this comment
NHwinter
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:06pmencinom – if you want to see tyranny, look no farther than Obama. Why do you waste your time on the Blaze. We only laugh at your stupidity.
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:06pmThe ends justify the means with you vermin, right ENCINOM? You people make me sick. You spread like a deadly virus, attacking the weakest among us, soiling and destroying everything you touch and everything that gets in your way. No one’s children are safe from you people.
Report this comment
pissantno.10
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:08pmya if you cant win at the ballot box cheat
Report this comment
frust@ted
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:09pmMore like the death rattle of the public union in Wisconsin. Their own greed was their demise.
It always amazes me that Corporations can be greedy but Unions are never greedy even when their benifits cripple the state and are fare better than the public sector.
Report this comment
TRONINTHEMORNING
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:17pmGood grief, you libs are ignorant. Really, read a book, read the Constitution, listen to Levin or Rush; get educated. It’s sad to see such tripe from you people.
Report this comment
FstEti
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:24pmHey ENCINOM, buy a newspaper, will ya? FLASH! Walker WON the bogus Recall Vote DESPITE the efforts of the unions.
So much for “the nail in the coffin”.
Moron……..
Report this comment
Lord_Frostwind
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:28pm“Another nail in the coffin,” really? He gets the law passed, Walker and the Republican majority endure a recall election in the case of Governor Walker winning by an even more significant margin than the one that got him elected in the first place, and now the only path that works is a desperate plea to a judge to wield his ungodly power to block what the people seem to be content with? That is not a “nail in the coffin” that is a desperation move by someone who is rapidly running out of ammunition.
Report this comment
Bowlz
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:40pmEnicom: Can you explain to me why ‘open minded, diverse, big tent’ people like you do not like America? Why can’t America be different from all of the other failed political systems in the world? If injustice is your cause, that’s great. Go to other countries and fight real injustice like slavery, starvation, brutality etc. You won’t do it because you’ll end up dead and at heart, you’re really too much of puss to stand for what you believe. You and all the other libs/complainers/marxists can hop on a very nice boat (unlike the boats real people stuff themselves into to come to America for the hope of freedom), and be as self righteous in the face of the warlords and murderers as you can muster. Put YOUR life on the line for YOUR beliefs. What is so hard about that????????????? Shut up or put up! (I know you and your ilk won’t do it because you are cowards at best). It would be nice; even inspirational to actually see one of you put their butts on the line when it’s deadly serious and really matters.
Report this comment
getourcountryback
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:03pmDon’t feed the troll……
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:37pm@NHwinter
Name one right that the “tyrant” Obama has taken away from you. Name one thing that you could do the day before he took office that you can’t do now. You, personally.
Report this comment
encinom
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:28pm@Bowlz
How is standing up for the rights of working Americans hatred for America. The better question is why do you and others hate your fellow Americans so much that you applaud when their right to collective bargain a fair contract is stripped by a corporate puppet?
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:16amVance – The Obama regime is trying to force companies to pay for birth control against their will.
Encinom – You Marxists don’t represent working Americans. You just represent lazy bums who want to force those with money to pay for you losers from cradle to grave. Us working Americans want to get to keep what we earn instead of being forced to pay taxes for all of these worthless welfare programs.
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:22amENCINOM – another lame argument. Government becomes completely corrupted when public employees gain the ability to vote themselves a pay raise. From that point on they control who gets elected, and only those who deliver what the unions want will get elected. It destroys the business climate and cronyism becomes the law of the land. Public employee unions should be outlawed.
Of course, you’re a liberal. Your soul is corrupted. A corrupt government is what pleases you. You bleed corruption.
Report this comment
Al J Zira
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:34pm@Encinom: The even better question is do you even know what is collective bargaining? Apparently, you don’t. I suggest you read what CB is and how it effects the common taxpayer before you go off half-cocked with your party lines.
Read what that far right wacko conservative FDR thought about CB and why he was dead set against it ‘s bargaining with governments. I would also suggest you read how CB was instituted. Through an executive order by Kennedy to pay off his union supporters. Sounds just like Obama, doesn’t it? But I guess if it’s something the democrats are for then you’re for it too regardless of the harm it causes the average taxpayer. Twit!
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:24pm@Git-R-Done
“The Obama regime is trying to force companies to pay for birth control against their will.”
And what right has this taken from you personally?
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 10:47pmVance – That is my right as a business owner to get to decide what benefits I want to provide and how I want to run the company. Business owner rights are personal rights in case you missed it.
Report this comment
mr. parker
Sep. 16, 2012 at 5:05pmThe craziness of the extreme left in WI has cost this state untold jobs. They’re not doing it for the kids, they’re doing it because they’re too damn cheap to pay their “fair share” towards own health care and pensions.
It’s already won in the WI Supreme court once. There’s no reason to think it will lose. More money having to be wasted because on the insanely corrupt democrat judges in Dane county,Madison trying to control the whole state.
Walker’s revenge is going to be sweet.
I do want to thank the extremists for pushing WI into the Romney column.
Report this comment
seanscythe
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:55pmYay! More unelected Judges doing whatever they want. Geez
Report this comment
FSM_47
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:55pmA county circuit judge. Give me a break.
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:02pmThe next thing they will get is a beauty pagent judge, those trump everything. Judge Dredd should have final sayso.
Report this comment
beedub
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:55pmThe article states the law is unconstitutional but does not state why it is unconstitutional. Could you go into more depth on this and give a full explanation for the judge’s ruling?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:22amIt took me a while this morning to find anything that gave the actual ruling statement, or at least parts of it. At first I was thinking that much like the Roe v Wade ruling, the court manufactured that “privacy” thing that exists in the U.S. Constitution, but is not actually written in the Constitution. Oh yeah, that privacy thing that also does not apply to celebrities and people in the constant public eye. So much for that equal protection thing. Anyway, this ruling gives me a reason to do more research. If the law was written the way this article makes it seem, there may well be a hole in it.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/judge-throws-out-walkers-union-bargaining-law-3h6s8fp-169834626.html
Report this comment
BDL1980
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:53pmOn what grounds and reasons did the judge rule as they did? Why is the most important point of something like this never in the story.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:05pmAlthough I am not familiar with Wisconsin law or the intricacies of their judicial code, I can tell you that most decisions made at the trial court level do not come with an explanation. You will not typically see any explanation or reasoning for a decision until you reach the appellate level.
Report this comment
FstEti
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:27pm2MINUTES, that, and there IS no viable legal explanation!
Report this comment
Steve Martin
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:53pmIt is time to get rid of all unions.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:03pmI know. There is nothing wrong with working 14 hrs a day,
7 days a week for $2 an hour!
The Chinese ‘middle class’ doesn’t mind.
Report this comment
barber2
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:25pmDORA -GEORGE : That avatar sex change operation meds did bad things to your mind…
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:35pm@DOra Glasberg
Two dollars is a dollar too much. If some CEO has to pay his workers two whole dollars an hour, he might have to settle for a smaller yacht. Oh, the horror!
Report this comment
Stelex
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:46pmDora, sweetie, no…..no. Your under the impression that unions are important. They make up 9% of the workforce. They will be squashed like bugs eventually because they are parasitic bugs. What species are you Dora……cockroach, earwig, leach?????
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Sep. 15, 2012 at 12:14amDon’t y’all recognize Mitt?
Who gives a fig about WAllace at this point.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:17amVance – What right do you Marxists get to say on how much CEOs should be allowed to make? None of you bums own the company nor will you invest your own money in the company. You don’t get to have your cake and eat it too.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:22amDumb Dora – Better than not having a job and collecting welfare benefits that pay for your housing, health care, food, education, etc. the way that you Marxists bums want to do.
Report this comment
Diego Roswell
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:53pmDo you see a pattern emerging here? The people elect representatives, as they do in a representative republic, the representatives write the laws, the executive vetoes or signs legalization into law.
.
ACTIVIST JUDGES, INCLUDING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, REWRITE THE LAWS TO FIT THE PROGRESSIVE AGENDA. TIME AND TIME AGAIN.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:59pmScott lied to get elected.
Said NOTHING about union busting.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:06pmWow…
Doh’ra Gasborg changed his/its avatar to a picture of George Wallace on a piece of toast.
Nice going Doh’ra…..
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:20pmDORA GLASBERG – you mother lied when she told your father she was on birth control. Ever meet the man? Probably not. I’ll bet Mom is a big fan of abortion now.
Report this comment
barber2
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:23pmMONK: Dora-Marilyn Monroe got tired of being mocked for his old avatar. Thus, the change. Now we just need to remind him that Wallace was a bigoted DEMOCRAT ! He represented the old Democrats – before they morphed into the New Party of Karl Marx !
Report this comment
LLoryck
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:13pm@ DumbDora The Union can negotiate everything but wages and benefits… just like in the Federal Gov’t. Dora did you know that Obama doesn’t allow the Federal Unions to negotiate wages and benefits? Is Obama a Union buster????
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:33pm@Diego Roswell
The Conservative definition of an activist judge is any judge who makes a ruling that they don’t like. Why they don’t consider Conservative judges who rules 100% Conservatively without question to be activist judges as well, I don’t know.
Report this comment
barber2
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:53pmVANCE: and the Lefty definition of a “conservative ” judge is one who adheres to the Constitution and who also ” makes a decision that they don’t like.”
Report this comment
The-Monk
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:29pmHi Barber2,
Thanks for the reply. : )
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:28amHi MONK, LOL, good catch on that avatar. One of our worst governors!
Report this comment
seanscythe
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:29am@Dora, wait if he lied then how did he win the recall? Oh wait he didn’t lie everyone knew what he was going to do and wanted him to do it. So I guess you missed that entire recall awhile back, maybe you should pay more attention you can start by removing your lips off Barry’s rear end.
Report this comment
gbfreak
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:52pmAppeal!!!! This is a fight to the Supreme Court.
Report this comment
U.N.hater
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:18pmLMFAO the supreme court you joker…
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:19amEncinom – Only a retarded Marxist would believe the crap that you do. And government workers are NOT the backbone of this country. It’s us taxpayers who are the backbone of this country and we’re sick and tired of being forced to pay your over inflated salaries and benefits.
Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Sep. 14, 2012 at 6:50pmAre the Koch brothers going to be asking Walker for their money back?
Another overstepping Republican, like Rick Scott.
Report this comment
NHwinter
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:00pmDOra Glasberg – You must be a Soros lover. He has more fingers in every pie than the Koch Brothers ever have. What a baffoon you are Dora.
Report this comment
catwilli
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:01pmDora, go explore somewhere eles
Report this comment
term limits for congress
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:04pmTo be fair, if the Koch brothers get their money back, the SEIU should get their money back, too.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:07pmAnd change your picture. The new one sucks.
Report this comment
kangaroo
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:10pm@gasbag
Anyone supporting this admin is a commie pure and simple, you want that life move to cuba, north korea, if you can even find them on a map. Rick Scott has got Florida at a surplus starting next financial year, and so far 10% fraudsters off the voting polls. So put that in your pipe and smoke it pass it to our choom prez and watch the middle east burn through your blurry eyes.
Report this comment
grayling646
Sep. 14, 2012 at 7:10pmHi, Dora.
Report this comment
LLoryck
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:09pmAnd people like Soros Never over step? Tool!
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:13pmGray, I think you mean “High Dora.” As in just a little too much bong action.
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:29pm@NHwinter
“You must be a Soros lover. He has more fingers in every pie than the Koch Brothers ever have.”
The Koch brothers have more money and undue influence than George Soros could ever dream of. Follow the money–they have nearly single-handedly funded the supposed “grass roots” Tea Party through several different organizations with different names, every one of which leads back to the Koch brothers.
Report this comment
barber2
Sep. 14, 2012 at 8:56pmVANCE: Your parroted Lefty Troll about the Koch brothers is such a typical ” 99% ” Far Left Democrat Big Lie. Soros is the wizard behind the entire Obama Administration and his official enforcer of policy : the Center For American ” Progress .” ( wink, wink on that last word )
Report this comment
encinom
Sep. 14, 2012 at 9:14pmNah, the Koch’s will be looking at how they can by judges next.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Sep. 15, 2012 at 1:20amEncinom – You’re not smart enough to realize that your precious union goons don’t control the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Excuse me if those who own the company should get to determine how to run it and us taxpayers get to determine how taxpayer money is spent.
Report this comment