
U.S. Congressman Paul Ryan, the Republican nominee for vice president,waves to the crowd at the conclusion of his speech in Oldsmar, Fla. on Saturday, Sept. 15, 2012. (Photo: AP)
(TheBlaze/AP) — Republican Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan thinks the Federal Reserve is making a big mistake in its new effort to prop up the economy.
Ryan spoke to a rally along Tampa Bay’s shore Saturday, saying the Federal Reserve’s plan to spend $40 billion a month to buy mortgage bonds in an effort to keep interest rates low will have a damaging impact on the country.
Labeling the action “insidious,” according to CNN, Ryan explained that the new round of quantitative easing will help banks and Wall Street– but not people.
“One of the most insidious things a government can do to its people is to debase its currency,” Ryan explained. “We want honest money; that means we want honest government. It’s one and the same…the secret to prosperity is not more money printing.”
Ryan continued to call the policy “sugar high economics” in a speech that, according to the Associated Press, was critical of President Obama’s policies.
“We don’t need sugar high economics; we don’t need synthetic money creation,” Ryan told the crowd of about 3,000 people. “We need economic growth. We want wealth creation. We don’t want to print money. We want opportunity and growth. And when they do this to our money, it undermines the credibility of our money.”
The Wisconsin congressman and top budget writer in the House said Obama did inherit bad situation, but made it worse.
The Obama campaign rejected Ryan’s criticisms, however, asserting that the Republican “has no credibility when it comes to helping the middle class.”
–
Related:
























































































































Comments (117)
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:45pmWhy does Glenn Beck hate the ideas pushed by Joseph Smith Jr. & the Book of Mormon regarding gold hording & wealth worship? God warned you against burrying your gold in the ground, Mr. Beck.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:12pmyou’re an interesting cat. But you just joined today. Were you previously operating under a different name?
Report this comment
RepentYe
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:21pmOk VonBenjamin, lets first dump the straw men. Joseph Smith Jr. is not worshiped as a god in the Mormon faith. He is considered a prophet, but a fallible human being. In the Mormon faith there is what is considered divine scripture and then what is considered personal opinion. I would venture that Joseph smiths opinions on finance would have been colored by the failure of the bank of Kirtland. However this is not a history lesson or a lesson on the theology of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
I have two main questions I would rather discuss, 1. Since I have read a number of your posts I have gathered that you would consider yourself a Keynesian, that is you support massive government deficit spending during economic down turns. If I am wrong then I am not sure what your arguments are. As a Keynesian you must admit that John Maynard Keynes taught that after the crises was averted the central authority government must cease the deficit spending so that it did not spend itself into oblivion. My question is how? As we saw in September of 2008, 500 billion was extracted from the money markets, touching off the financial crisis. How does a government in turn, pump 1 trillion of deficits into the economy, and then just stop? Would that not also touch off a depression? Once the government starts down that road, there is NO political will to stop. If a politician tries they will be called a vampire or worse. So that is question 1
Report this comment
RepentYe
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:29pmQuestion 2: If the Federal reserve can print its own money and purchase into the private sector, who owns all of those stocks and bonds? You were correct in stating that the Federal Reserve buying 40 billion a month into the private sector is not the same thing as the Treasure borrowing money. This is an entity that answers to no one, printing as much money as it likes, purchasing stocks and bonds in the private market. Who “holds the title” as it were of all those purchases. If it was the United States Government, we would all technically have a stake. But this is not the US Gov. this is the same as a private equity firm with limitless resources, going on a shopping spree with 40 billion a month at its disposal, as long as it likes. Inflation in the commodities market is already real, so I do not understand how a Keynesian can sit back and say we need to cause more inflation. Inflation is cruel mistress who will stab you where it hurts the most before you even see the knife. Gas prices are pushing food prices. You can try and inflate at a constant rate goods that are not wanted nor needed to benefit the upper echelons of society, however when bread is $10,000 a loaf no one is going to buy an iPad. I would suggest that what you advocate is not investment or economic growth, Don’t take this the wrong way, but what you advocate is FASCISM. I am not calling you Hitler or Mousilini, I am just stating the fact that you advocate the intertwining of gov with private industry.
Report this comment
DarkJello
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:40pm@hayek:
LMBO! Your declaration of ignorance is kinda funny.
Report this comment
dirtypolitics
Sep. 16, 2012 at 12:18amDon’t feed this troll.
Report this comment
MCDAVE
Sep. 16, 2012 at 4:40pmObama is waging his jihad against the American middle class,,QE3 is the weapon of mass economic destruction…6 months of QE3 and our economy will be finished..watch the other hand,while we look to the middle east,they have unleashed QE3 on our fragile economy,,most of Americans just do not understand the magnitude of this threat,, http://www.trendsresearch.com/SubscriberArea/gerald-celente-alex-jones-info-wars-september-14-2012
Report this comment
DeniseR55
Sep. 16, 2012 at 6:31pmI, say that the Obama Adm. doesn’t have credibility helping the Middle Class either. Obama IS the Executive (CEO) of the US. We MUST stop the on the job training of Barack Hussein Obama.
Report this comment
scrudge
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:44pmAh Yes…. the state of KANSAS may not allow obama to be on the ballots for 2012 for reelection.. it is suspected that his birth certificate is a fake… check it out
Report this comment
noland
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:39pmwere just tryin to repay our debt to our great nation for lettin ole kat in the front, thank ya very much!
Report this comment
Magyar
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:42pmI figure it this way:
If Ovomit loses the election–he wants to leave the country in the worst possible condition for Romney.
If he wins re-election, he’s more than 1/2 way to his goal of complete destruction of America.
Report this comment
Stab_friendly
Sep. 17, 2012 at 6:12amYou’re about 4 years late to that event…
Report this comment
votemallout
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:38pmreject Ron Paul at your own peril. hahahaha he’s ALWAYS right! Just look at the middle east. that’s working out well don’t you think? how bout the war on drugs? got it won right? and the FED? great idea! sorry sheep reep what they sow.
Report this comment
Bot
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:39pmMitt understands the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood, you won’t find him sending billions to Muslim Brotherhood countries. Mitt is a better role model for youth regarding drugs; Obama celebrates his “choom gang” and dedicates his yearbook to his drug dealer. Mitt has called for auditing the Fed, and recognizes that QE 1,2,3 simply debases the value of our currency, and that hits the middle class hardest, because the poor and the rich find ways to retain their purchasing power.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:13pmI have never heard Mitt Romney say anything about not giving money to foreign countries
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:21pm@BOT Paul Ryan just voted on Thursday to spend 1 TRILLION dollars in the next six months. Included in that 1 TRILLION dollars was BILLIONS of dollars for MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD countries. Nice try but some of us are paying attention and not swallowing republican or democratic kool-aid.
Report this comment
wlshow
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:35pmWhooo hooooo… look, its someone that IS NOT Joe Biden! Let’s vote for him! THEN, stop being lazy and stay focused on local and state election. maybe we can build a farm team of candidates that are constitution focused. OR, we can just whine and complain like little girls. I am thinking that for some of us the “heavy lifting” or doing the work in our communities is just too much. It seems that pontificating and “educating” is as far some of us can go. The running for office, or supporting others in LOCAL elections is not glamorous enough for some of us. How about this… let’s elect the Romney/Ryan folks AND make sure the R’s rule the roost. THEN, let them ALL know that we are continuously auditioning their replacements. Let them know that there is NO LOYALTY to party of persons only to the Constitution. AND ( hope this is not too much ), cultivate, develop, support, and elect candidates on EVERY LOCAL LEVEL! WHY? Because hoping that the current congress critters will change colors is STUPID!!! Good luck!
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:17pmYeah lets elect Ryan so he can vote to spend another TRILLION dollars to fund big government like he did on Thursday. Then we can hold his feet to the fire like all the TEA PARTY people who were elected in 2010 that also voted to spend another TRILLION dollars. Republicans are worse than democrats!
Report this comment
DarkJello
Sep. 15, 2012 at 8:46pm@jadams:
The government has many obligations to meet, all require money.
R&R, if they win, will have a powerful opportunity to effect real change. Too many from each party want to push us towards a police state. Many republicans and many democrats are to blame. As they willfully push away from the constitution, America spirals towards the abyss. They are equally guilty. There are also relatively good politicians on both sides. Focusing on “R” and “D” is superficial.
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 16, 2012 at 8:47am@DARKJELLO The only thing worse than democratic lies are republican excuses!
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:11pmPaul ryan votes to spend another 1 trillion,big surprise!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
13Lena
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:01pmRyan’s right it’s like putting a band-aid on an amputated limb. The housing loans or mortgages will be low people will buy and in two years lose their houses because they can’t afford the mortgage. It has happened numerous time. Bernanke is a moron Krugman is brain dead and cutting taxes across the board will help more small businesses hire and the jobs are usually created by the rich any way. Regan did it and Romney will do it.
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:58pmEndTheFREAKINGFed
These people have dominated us for FAR TO LONG.
“The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered”
THOMAS JEFFERSON
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho
Report this comment
BasketFullOfPuppies
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:45pmso, ask yourself who a currency devaluation will hurt most…
the rich people? no.
the middle class? they’ll hurt more than the rich. but, no.
the poor? ding ding ding. we have a winner.
Report this comment
jzs
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:53pmHey I have an idea, let’s cut taxes for rich people! Now the US knows from experience that won’t improve the economy, but it will keep the money coming in for Republican campaigns.
Report this comment
colascguy
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:05pmWhy dont you link to some unbiased proof on that. We dont have an income problem we have a spending problem. I would be fine we leaving the tax structure alone if we would simply remove the teat from americas mouth.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:33pmHow again does devaluing dollars hurt poor people who don’t own any of them? LOL.
Report this comment
drs1969
Sep. 15, 2012 at 10:37pmTo Hayek:
If my welfare check stays the same and all the prices at Wal-Mart double, then I may lose my fat ass.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:37pmGlenn Beck sensored my comment quoting Joseph Smith Jr. disagreeing with his gold lust/anti-printing tirade. Why would Glenn Beck sensor the words of his prophet?
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:54pmHayekFranklin
Its not hard to see, you are a paid shill. Working for the centeral banks that have hijacked this country. The Fed is a private bank, it is no more federal than federal express. You are the modern day ameriKan VICI FRENCH. You will be defeated in the battlefield of public discussion, you are of the idea that this country should be held hostage by a cartel who wants nothing more than to destroy this country. They are doing a good job at that. We must and will beat you people.
Thomas Jefferson said “A standing army is not as dangerous as a private centeral bank issusing currencey”
So you twisted collaborator gtho of this country.
http://endthefedusa.ning.com/
http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/milton-friedman-end-the-fed/
http://www.infowars.com/stockman-our-problem-is-the-federal-reserve/
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:31pmMr. Glenn Beck,
Have you ever asked yourself why the following individuals support this type of easing?
Joseph Smith Jr.
Benjamin Franklin
Milton Friedman
Frederich Hayek
Please tell me Mr. Beck, why did Joseph Smith Jr. warn us that scarcity of money would tear the bonds of the union asunder? Why does the Book of Mormon warn CONSTANTLY about the downfalls of hoarding gold? Bury it in the ground and it will slip away from you. Isn’t that how it’s written? Don’t worship golden idols or posessions? Use your wealth to better humanity as opposed to worshipping a store of value?
Why exactly do you disagree with this interpratation of scripture?
Report this comment
RLTW
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:46pmSo Beck can’t invest in gold, but your dear leaders puppet master can hoard 25 million in gold over the last 12 months
Based on your logic Obama is hoarding taxpayer money until he wants to invest it in yet another BS social experiment
Report this comment
RepentYe
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:29pmOk VonBenjamin, lets first dump the straw men. Joseph Smith Jr. is not worshiped as a god in the Mormon faith. He is considered a prophet, but a fallible human being. In the Mormon faith there is what is considered divine scripture and then what is considered personal opinion. I would venture that Joseph smiths opinions on finance would have been colored by the failure of the bank of Kirtland. However this is not a history lesson or a lesson on the theology of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
I have two main questions I would rather discuss, 1. Since I have read a number of your posts I have gathered that you would consider yourself a Keynesian, that is you support massive government deficit spending during economic down turns. If I am wrong then I am not sure what your arguments are. As a Keynesian you must admit that John Maynard Keynes taught that after the crises was averted the central authority government must cease the deficit spending so that it did not spend itself into oblivion. My question is how? As we saw in September of 2008, 500 billion was extracted from the money markets, touching off the financial crisis. How does a government in turn, pump 1 trillion of deficits into the economy, and then just stop? Would that not also touch off a depression? Once the government starts down that road, there is NO political will to stop. If a politician tries they will be called a vampire or worse. So that is question 1
Report this comment
RepentYe
Sep. 15, 2012 at 9:30pmQuestion 2: If the Federal reserve can print its own money and purchase into the private sector, who owns all of those stocks and bonds? You were correct in stating that the Federal Reserve buying 40 billion a month into the private sector is not the same thing as the Treasure borrowing money. This is an entity that answers to no one, printing as much money as it likes, purchasing stocks and bonds in the private market. Who “holds the title” as it were of all those purchases. If it was the United States Government, we would all technically have a stake. But this is not the US Gov. this is the same as a private equity firm with limitless resources, going on a shopping spree with 40 billion a month at its disposal, as long as it likes. Inflation in the commodities market is already real, so I do not understand how a Keynesian can sit back and say we need to cause more inflation. Inflation is cruel mistress who will stab you where it hurts the most before you even see the knife. Gas prices are pushing food prices. You can try and inflate at a constant rate goods that are not wanted nor needed to benefit the upper echelons of society, however when bread is $10,000 a loaf no one is going to buy an iPad. I would suggest that what you advocate is not investment or economic growth, Don’t take this the wrong way, but what you advocate is FASCISM. I am not calling you Hitler or Mousilini, I am just stating the fact that you advocate the intertwining of gov with private industry.
Report this comment
Venustus
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:20pmI was looking for coupons earlier today and on the Sam’s Club website the number one selling grocery item for the day is an Emergency Food Storage Kit. http://www.samsclub.com/sams/grocery/1444.cp?navAction=jump&iid=Header|All_Products|Grocery
I wonder how often this is the case? People are sensing that something is up. The game is up. It’s that feeling you got when you were little and you played hide and seek, and you crouched as low as you could behind the tree but the seeker got closer and closer, and then…
Report this comment
MFHorn3
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:15pmWhen QE3 fails to accomplish anything but higher gas and food prices…Paul Krugman will say which of the following?
A.) $40 Billion per month was not enough, should have been $400 Billion each week.
B.) I’ve been horribly mistaken my whole life about economics and am now a complete and total convert to Austrian economics.
C.) This Olde Brooklyn Lantern really does a nice job of illuminating the rubber room I live in.
D.) Why yes, I did have macaroni and cheese for lunch, how did you know? Oh…there’s some in my beard? Why didn’t you tell me BEFORE we went on the air?!!
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:23pmQE3 is too small to push inflation on its own. We actually want it to spur inflation, which is another way of saying spur private business activity. Why should we be scared of higher private sector activities and more Americans working?
Report this comment
MFHorn3
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:33pmHAYEKFRANKLIN….from your reply I am going to say you chose A in the above pop quiz. YOU ARE CORRECT!!!!
I would have also accepted C and D as well.
Well done!
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:34pmNo critical thinking going on here…
Report this comment
MFHorn3
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:24pmI agree.
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:03pmWell how does Paul Ryan think we are going to pay for the 1 TRILLION he voted to spend on thursday. In typical Paul Ryan fashion he says one thing then votes another and the republican sheeple continue to tout this guy as a fiscal conservative. He is the biggest fraud perpetrated on the American people since Obama himself. Any excuses for this vote Ryan supporters?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:08pmlol
The masses do love their puffery. And when a candidate comes along who talks softly and carries an amazing voting record – he is dismissed.
We arent going to get any change unless we start electing people who have a record of doing what they say they are going to do
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:22pmFederal Reserve printing is not defecit spending. Yes, it can support defecit spending, but this one does not target Treasuries.
In reality, this will increase Treasury receipts and help the federal defecit problem.
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:37pm@ HAYEKFRANKLIN The vote on Thursday was a spending bill to fund government and had nothing to do with QE3. The only thing worse than democratic lies are republican excuses.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:36pmOh. I had no idea you were ranting about something that nothing to do with the QE3 article we’re commenting below. Sorry.
Report this comment
Banter
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:01pmYea Soy, we tried like he!! In 2010 but almost all of them are now assimilated into DC think. In other words they pi$$ on the Constitution at will.
Who is left to vote for?
Report this comment
this1can
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:59pmObummer won’t even help his own half brother so why would he care about the middle class Love/pray
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:59pmThe party needs to calm down with this fringe anti-Federal Reserve stuff. When did we become so paranoid about using the system as we built it? Printing money is absolutely necessary in deflationary times & Bernanke is doing an awesome job. Why have we forgotten the lessens learned by Benjamin Franklin & taught to us so astutely? I say let the academics do what Benjamin Franklin thought they should, & take the politics out of calculating the correct amount of liquidity to provide.
Report this comment
U.N.hater
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:13pmYour post is the most stupid thing ive ever read on hear. Do you even no american history?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:18pmWe can talk all day long about how bad Obama is but as long as people like HayekFranklin control the republican party, nothing will change and things will continue to get worse.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:19pmI’m always open to hearing why you think Benjamin Franklin was wrong. Calling people stupid is a sign of mental weakness & lack of knowledge. Can’t you be a little more specific than that? And POLITE?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:30pm1st point of discussion:
Do you acknowledge the difference between a national bank versus the federal reserve system?
Also, before we go any further i would ask you to prove that Franklin supported a national bank. He may have, but as we all know – no person is infallable….Just because Franklin wanted it does not make it great. For instance, Thomas Jefferson was vehemently against it.
I’m off to dinner, sorry i cannot continue this but i will check back later
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:09pmPOOR RICHARD was DEAD WRONG on the PRIVATE Fed. Thomas Jefferson was 100% right.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:43pmNo I don’t. & I’m too skeptical of congress to grant them unilateral power to spend at will. Can you imagine what they would do? I side with 1913 America & Ben Franklin in a system of checks and balances that minimizes corruption.
I can see why you might want congress to print and spend money to their hearts desires, but my vote will be in opposition. Power to the people!
Report this comment
Doc_Slammin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:43pmLiquidity? What liquidity? Liquidity assumes there is an asset or security attached to a currency.
What physical asset or security is our currency tied to?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:22pm@HayekFranklin
Government currently spends as much money as they want. And they are not curtailed by the Federal Reserve – they are ENABLED!!! The Federal Reserve is not a check against government spending, they are actually doing everything possible to make sure that govt can continue to spend unlimited money. That hardly sounds like a good thing.
Just so you know, 1913 was the era of Woodrow Wilson – one of the first progressive socialist presidents. Woodrow Wilson wanted one world government. The federal reserve system pushes us in that direction (did you follow the bailouts?).
If you are concerned about who is controlling and printing what money – then you should support a gold standard since it is the only way to prevent excess money printing.
Report this comment
drs1969
Sep. 15, 2012 at 10:30pmMoney Printing=Hgher Taxes.
New Slogan,
Higher Taxes for All. Mondale tried it in ’84.
Artificially low interest rates benefit large Corporates vs. small business and large government vs. limited gov. at everyone elses expense. Prices must come down for the market to reset, see Japan’s 20yr doldrums. Bernanke is a thief stealing from future production to keep the banksters propped up.
End the Fed and find the real market prices, of everything, again.
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:59pmWell
Report this comment
techengineer11
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:55pmBush senior begged Greenspan to cut rates at the end of his 4 years but the FED refused. Remember back at the end of 2008 rates were almost 6% and Bernanke said everything was fine.. There was no housing crisis which again was caused by liberal politics forcing loans on people that clearly couldn’t afford them but calling all those who wouldn’t make the loans racist… Anyway what did the FED do for the republicans? lol But under Obama we have 0% rates and QE to infinity?? lol
Yet the FED is non political.. They only control the money… lol
END THE freaking FED NOW!!!! No institution ever on American soil has been so diabolical! It is the premier problem in this country.. It is the place from which all evil flows… And obviously its Jewish controlled.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:27pmDid you just slight Jews? Really? I think if you calmed down a bit and took the time to learn how our monetary system works (i.e. the medium of exchange) then you’d appreciate the beauty in our system that has supported the greatest & most dynamic economy the world has ever seen! Let us forget this Fedspeek and focus our efforts where they truly belong–on congress.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:04pmHayekFranklin: But it’s the end game… Fiat money has never worked.. It ends the same way each and evey time.. Indeed we have seen an uprescedented era of riches due to unlimited credit but now it’s over.. It’s completely over and even the moron Glenn Beck is right about this.. Our money has been destroyed.. Yes it can go on for another couple of years but we are cooked.. It’s all hype fraude and maniuplation and yes it’s Jewish..
Now they will need War.. That’s the only thing that they can use to cover their ass.. And it’s probably world war 3… Watch the propaganda.. At the same time America is being converted to a Police State because they know this is all a ruse and it’s about to collapse.
And you support the FED? lol I bet you really think that you are smart don’t you? Probably made a little money in the stock market the past few years thinking how great every thing is???
FIAT money always ends in the same way.. It will be deflated then inflated then it collapses.. .Our Founders cried screamed and warned over and over but we didn’t listen… We took the bait in 1913.
Report this comment
drs1969
Sep. 15, 2012 at 10:44pmTo Hayek:
Congress has more Christians than the New York banks, so that’s our only hope.
End the Fed.
Report this comment
blackyb
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:51pmPaul is a perfect running mate for Mitt. He has it down right.
Report this comment
American Soldier (Separated)
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:59pmSaying it and doing it are two different things. Republicans control Congress, end the fed!
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:04pm@ American Soldier
Republicans do NOT control the congress in its whole. The Senate is still in the possession of the Libbies, and there is no way in hell that a bill to flatten the Fed would survive Harry Reid.
Win The Senate, win the process by which the Fed can be shrunk, then eliminated.
Report this comment
gregjackie1
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:06pmEnd the federal reserve, End Dept. of Education and return it back to the states. Why should the states send money to Washington for the Education in hopes they get some of it back. End Dept. of Labor, and end EPA’s Nazi like rule.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:12pmso the idea is that the republican party should not do anything until they have control of both???
The house controls spending. Republicans can turn of the spending spigot overnight. Do you think Obama would be pissed if all his deficit spending dried up?
All it takes is a little courage. If the republicans were going to do what they say they are going to do – they would have already put it in motion….But they havent
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:40pmSugar High Economics is not quite the right words, “Major Death Sentence” is the ones he should have used.
We are seeing the beginning moves of an Obamian ‘scorched economic earth’ campaign for when he takes the final fall from office in November.
Report this comment
U.N.hater
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:59pmWell over have my nieghbors and friends say their not going to vote this year. They don’t like obama or romney. I was all for the tea party in 2010. But after you see how those people have voted in congress since then i can’t no more. Obama say’s one thing and then does the opposite. So did those tea party congressman/woman. Now you want people to vote for another admited progressive.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:04pmYou are chastising the great Benjamin Franklin without even knowing it. Not only would he support this if he were alive today, but he spent a lifetime campaigning for sound fiat currency policy.
The mistakes were made before the bubble burst. Let us send the complaints at the right target. What Bernanke is doing is cleaning up a huge mess, and doing an excellent job!
Report this comment
drs1969
Sep. 15, 2012 at 11:42pmNo, actually, Bernanke is stealing from me to bailout NY bankers who made terrible investments. Bernanke is also stealing from me to feed the bloated and ever growing Welfare/Warfare State. Would Ryan and his cohorts keep voting for larger and larger spending bills if they couldn’t borrow in the debt market at nearly 0% interest while having Bernanke buy said debt with counterfeit money? Try passing off fake 20′s and see where it gets you.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:38pmMitt’s campaign is such a wind sock. Remember just a year or so ago when Mitt Romney felt the job Ben Bernanke was doing at crashing the value your savings, your assets, and 401K was alright with him?
Report this comment
resme
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:02pmWon’t be long now before the “usual” come in to attack you,lol.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:09pmthats ok, i got my garlic on
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:24pmResme, i am shocked they didnt show up.
They usually dont when the headline involves something high brow and doesnt include the word “Obama” or “Biden”
Report this comment
resme
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:45pmThey usually don’t weigh in on serious issues. They usually stay on Gay articles and Muslim Articles. (or the headline OBAMA)
Report this comment
WindyDualism
Sep. 16, 2012 at 10:15amWait, these weren’t gay posts?
Report this comment
U.N.hater
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:33pmThe government collects on average 2.2T a year. So why are we 16T in debt and don’t have a surplus of 16T. 500B on infrastructure 500B on deffence 1.2T a year to the debt. After 14 years we could cut taxes to 1.2T a year with 200M a year surplus. Just a quick thought… But nothing like this is going to happen. We need a reset button…
Report this comment
Verceofreason
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:51pmUnending wars don’t come cheap/
Take it up with Bush/Cheney.
Report this comment
U.N.hater
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:44pmWe will spend more on foodstamps/Welfare/Section 8 houseing/medicaid/medicare/S.S. all the things government should not do, but deffending the country is rong? go occupy something.
Report this comment
crusaderx9
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:32pmMitt Romney and Paul Ryan are the right leaders for our difficult times. They will provide a solid foundation and stable load bearing walls for rebuilding America instead of the shaky obama shack we are all currently living in…
Everything is unraveling for the obama regime – as the liberal media and their corrupt progressive masters attempt to lie, deceive, distort, and distract voters from choosing real leaders in favor of an artificially enhanced obama – THE worst President in our nation’s history.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:40pmSO PROUD OF YOU PAUL!!! SO PROUD OF ROMNEY!!! We are praying for you DAILY !
FIGHT HARD ! DON’T PULL ANY PUNCHES. WE, the PEOPLE, are adults and we LOVE
AMERICA TOO !! We can take it. AND
WE
CAN
DISH
IT
OUT
TOO.
WE built this COUNTRY and we love it with a passion that can’t be described , third only to GOD and our Families !! WE are not about to let these smarmy, sleaze bags steal it from us. WE are what they
didn’t anticipate!! WORK HARD PATRIOTS!! Start first with your prayers to GOD. WORK locally or where you can, 50 more days!
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 6:13pmRyan voted to spend another 1 TRILLION dollars to fund big government for the next six months and he is the right leader?
Report this comment
Verceofreason
Sep. 16, 2012 at 3:25pmPaul Ryan voted FOR every budget busting,
deficit increasing bill Bush proposed during the last 8 years.
PLUS increases to the debt ceiling.
You REALLY should do some homework before posting such twaddle?
Republican hypocrites are only deficit hawks when a Democrat is in the WH.
Report this comment
*********
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:28pmQE3 IS the final nail in our coffin. IT MUST BE REVERSED
Report this comment
db321
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:43pmAgree – QE3 this is the straw that will break America’s back. I was so glad to hear Romney and Ryan come out against it. This is really bad news.
Report this comment
HayekFranklin
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:02pmDo you have any data to support your notion that this recent liquidity infusion is excessive?
Report this comment
AmazingGrace8
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:08pmMichelle Bachmann voted no and she did say she understands why some Republicans…Paul Ryan…said yes to QE3. Ryan kicked the can down the cobbled-stone street with his “left-foot” and I “sorta understand” why he did vote for a 6 month extension….Why? My guy, Charlie, this morning on the panel with Cavuto made sense and I am closing my eyes and crossing my fingers that Romney & Ryan will be elected Nov. 6th. This QE3 will be “alittle-sour-spilled-milk” if Romney & Ryan are elected. It will take a large sheet of “Bounty” to wipe up this spill but in the long run it will be okay. Paul Ryan…good vote….and now “onward-&-forward” to win this election!!!
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:14pmyou are glad Ryan voted to continue the terrible spending?
wow – you are twisting logic in order to suit your perceptions
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:21pm@SOY The only thing worse than democratic lies are republican excuses.
Report this comment
jadams1214
Sep. 15, 2012 at 5:51pm@AMAZINGGRACE The vote Bachman was talking about was a 1 TRILLION dollar spending bill to fund big government for another six months. QE3 does not get voted on. I am sure there will be many republican excuses to spend more money but the truth is they are frauds. They say one thing then vote another. I suspect they are trying to spend as much money as they can while Obama is president so if Romney gets elected he can blame it all on Obama. Looks like a familiar tactic.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Sep. 15, 2012 at 7:25pm“The only thing worse than democratic lies are republican excuses”
GREAT point. We expect that from the democrats – but the republicans should stand for something better
Report this comment
drs1969
Sep. 15, 2012 at 11:54pm@Hayek
It’s excessive because it’s going to prop up zombie banks who should be killed. If it was 1 dollar it would be excessive, because it’s still theft. Property rights are what used to separate us from the 3rd world. These banks must die. They were saved in the 30′s by the Fed and the war in the 40′s. If we don’t stop them this time, they may get us all killed.
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:27pmWhere again has the President helped the middle class?
Report this comment
sgtbrown01
Sep. 15, 2012 at 4:42pmthis “middle class argument that Obama keeps bring up really ERKS me this clown helps his elete buddies and claims he helps the middle class….people fall for this crap from Dems all the time….not because they are the middle clas but because they are trueley the stupid class for supporting Obama and his thugs
Report this comment