Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

Government

Mystery: Declassified Document Shows the U.S. ‘Stockpiling’ a Secret Weapon in 1981, But What Is It?

Sep. 20, 2012 8:47am

A document declassified in the last few years is getting now getting attention for showing that the National Security Council under former President Ronald Reagan authorized stockpiling of a certain weapon. One item in the memo that was not declassified though is just what weapon the National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 7 was allowed to load up on.

The Federation of American Scientists is bringing attention to this document called “Production of [Deleted] Weapons, 1981,” which was partially declassified in 2008, and even offers some speculation as to what would fit into the brackets.

The document itself states:

“The production and stockpiling of [deleted] weapons is authorized with stockpiling being restricted to the United States [deleted].”

FAS Speculates Redacted Weapon in Declassified 1981 Document Is Enhanced Radiation Weapons

(Image via UTexas.edu)

Hans Kristensen with FAS is reported as speculating the redacted term is “enhanced radiation.” Why? Not only does FAS point out that two enhanced radiation weapons began production in 1981 — the W70 (Lance warhead) and the W79 (artillery shell) — but it also notes when former President George Bush declassified the title of the NSDD7 in 1996, “enhanced radiation weapons” was left unredacted.

If this stockpile does in fact indicate enhanced radiation weapons, what does this mean? This is another term for the weapon of mass destruction known as a neutron bomb. According to Global Security, a neutron bomb would have a total energy that was 30 percent blast, 20 percent thermal and 50 percent nuclear radiation. “Thus, a 3-kiloton ER weapon will produce the nuclear radiation of a 10-kiloton fission weapon and the blast and thermal radiation of a 1-kiloton fission device,” Global Security writes.

A study published by the National Institute of Health a couple years ago stated that the purpose of a neutron bomb, compared to other nuclear weapons, is to “enhance radiation casualties while reducing blast and thermal damage to the infrastructure.”

The study states that since the Cold War, there have been no threats for use of such a weapon. Still, given that five nations were reported to have developed enhanced radiation weapons at the time, the report recommends medical personnel know the difference in health implications compared to a fission weapon.

Here is a look at the one-page document:

nsdd-7

(H/T: Gizmodo)

 

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (141)

1 2 3
  • crash-test-dhimmi
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:27am

    Everyone here is completely naive and incapable of figuring out the obvious. The answer is obvious and no one has figured it out yet. The United States did extensive experiments back in the eighties and maintained a stockpile of nearly a dozen Enhanced Kardashian weapons to this day.There were agreements with Russia that we would limit the amount of Kardashians readily available in our stockpiles. The Russians are as afraid of the Kardashians use as much as we are.

    Report this comment

    crash-test-dhimmi  
  • The_Pointy_End
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:23am

    My guess is the anti-missile program of the Reagan and the first Bush administrations Brilliant Pebbles:
    http://www.missilethreat.com/missiledefensesystems/id.13/system_detail.asp

    Report this comment

    The_Pointy_End  
    • nkawtg
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:49am

      Ah good point, the Safeguard system of the ’70′s used Enhanced Radiation Warheads on the Spartan and Sprint ABM missiles. When the Safeguard sites were deactivated they had to stockpile (store) upwards of 90 or so ER Warheads.

      Report this comment

      nkawtg  
  • BloodSweatandTears
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:05am

    Seems to me they’d be working on HARRP….

    Report this comment

    BloodSweatandTears  
    • King4wd
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:52am

      Better send Remo in to check it out.

      Report this comment

      King4wd  
    • pdw
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 2:16pm

      They have a couple beside HARRP. which can cause some to heart attacks. Another one just causes the skin a strong heat reaction which makes even those who knew before the test what it was going to be like and they said that the only thing they wanted to do was get as far away from the weapon as soon as possible.

      Report this comment

      pdw  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 4:27pm

      KING4WD, LOL, now he can meet with Admiral Janeway this time.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
  • tracer51250
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:57am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SFHM0rd9cX8

    Report this comment

    tracer51250  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:50am

    The greatest weapon we had in 1981 was Ronald Wilson Reagan… and he wasn’t a secret.

    Report this comment

    Gonzo  
  • rockymtngal
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:37am

    Our gov’t “hides” a lot from us and will con’t to do so until SHTF. By then, it will be too late for most people who bury their heads in the sand, calling people like Beck a “fear monger.” We have Obama telling the entire world that we will be destroying our nuclear weapons. If Obama doesn’t know what the debt is as stated on Letterman, we’re in serious trouble. This administration is corrupt. Obama has Islamic Brotherhood in his administration. Just who is Obama getting his information from, if he’s not attending crucial briefings? Makes you wonder what he IS doing, doesn’t it?

    Report this comment

    rockymtngal  
  • NOT A CRAZY
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:35am

    The biggest weapon they have is propaganda.

    Report this comment

    NOT A CRAZY  
  • Thinking Man
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:30am

    Maybe it’s nutron bombs. The US built 6 of them. We later entered into an agreement with the USSR not to make any more bombs. Clearification, the radiation that is used to kill is only a momentary radiation. It does not linger.

    If this is tied to nutron bombs, then I suspect it is stockpiling of the components and marterials to build more bombs when needed, quickly.

    Report this comment

    Thinking Man  
    • RedManWalking
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 3:56pm

      From the web:
      But Cohen promoted his weapon relentlessly through his work at RAND, and continued once he was forced into an early retirement from the think tank in 1969, after his superiors grew annoyed with his incessant attempts to bring nuclear weapons to the battlefield. Only in 1981 did Reagan take Cohen on as a policy adviser early in his presidency and agree to develop 700 neutron bombs. But, according to Cohen’s memoir, they were designed in such a way that they undermined his purpose, exploding close enough to the ground to cause more damage than he intended. The weapon was never integrated into America’s arsenal and was eventually scraped completely by George H.W. Bush. By then, Cohen had retired.

      Read more: http://forward.com/articles/134967/creator-of-neutron-bomb-leaves-an-explosive-legacy/#ixzz272e1WgSD

      Report this comment

      RedManWalking  
  • VRW Conspirator
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:22am

    THIS IS AWESOME!! Neutron Bombs are the ultimate weapon..all organic life goes away…people, plants, animals, insects…complete localized annihilation…EMP takes out all electrical devices and machines in the surrounding area…you wait 2-3 weeks instead of 2-3 decades and you can move your army into a completely build fortification, town, or city…rebuild the power plants, move in the maachinery, and POOF…instant population center…

    they are a great way to demoralize an opponent without destroying the culture, architecture, or infrastructure of the country or territory you wish to invade and conquer. Then you can just absorb the region into your own country and expand your borders and not have all the complications of rebuilding a society, you just have to move in the population to house and work in the existing infrastructure…

    PERFECT weapon for those that wish to reclaim territory they say was stolen from them or belonged to them before a treaty or war that caused them to lose it..

    UTTERLY EXCELLENT….I want one…

    Report this comment

    VRW Conspirator  
    • Big Media Bias
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:01am

      I admire your enthusiasm. I will email you the activation codes shortly.

      Report this comment

      Big Media Bias  
    • V-MindMeld
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:54am

      You did a good job at explaining the neutron bomb. Saved me a lot of typing ty….lol really its a very cool bomb concept,,,,just glad we have it.

      Report this comment

      V-MindMeld  
    • BetterDay
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 1:22pm

      This is REALLY scarey. I’ve felt for a long time that almost the entire globe thinks Americans have obtained our wealth from them and that we OWE them what was stolen (my God, there are a lot of U.S. citizens that feel that way). I’ve also been wondering when and how we are to “pay up”. Also, talk about genocide (think Hitler only no bodies to clean up)…who do these people think they are? A weapon that could get rid of us, or anyone else and leave the STUFF!!?!!. May God have mercy on us all.

      Report this comment

      BetterDay  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 2:47pm

      they are a great way to demoralize an opponent without destroying the culture, architecture, or infrastructure of the country or territory you wish to invade and conquer
      ***
      Or to reconquer territory that you lost to invaders. The people most affected by this would have been the Germans followed by people in the low countries & maybe France.

      I think potential German refugees would much rather move back home after 2 or 3 years than 2 or 3 decades.

      Of course the least costly option is to have enough of a military that aggressors don’t consider invading.

      The Soviet Union invaded Hungary, East Germany & Czechoslovakia. Those neutron bombs were meant for the Soviet aggressors as most of us know.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • Mil-Dot
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 6:37pm

      While the neutron bomb may be an effective weapon , it is not something to get all giddy about and to cheer and be happy that it exists. Only a naive young punk would gleefully ring his hands and exalt about other human beings being subjected to its horror. Grow the frick up. All of you .

      Report this comment

      Mil-Dot  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 7:52pm

      Mil-Dot
      Giddy. Yes, certainly. If someone wrongs you (like invading your country), you want to see them die.
      Better yet I would rather see the old men die instead of conscripted young men. But we are told by liberals that assassinating old men, who force or propagandize young men into doing battle is wrong.

      I have relatives on 3 continents. I don’t want a war. But sometimes war is better than a bad peace. Like when your country is invaded. You can capitulate & have peace again the very next day. Would it be worth it?

      There is a formula for victory speeches. It is an ancient formula. Exult in victory, thank the Gods, & finally a warning to not get cocky.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
  • janedough1
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:07am

    Duh, nerve gas. Its right up the road from me, and it gets put in the budget every year to destroy it, and never gets destroyed.

    Report this comment

    janedough1  
  • IHateIgnorance
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:01am

    This is just one of many things the goverment doesnt want us to know they have. Just like no one knew about the F22 raptor until a few years ago even though the project to build it began in the mid 1980′s! Now that is the most technologically advanced jet in the world. Whoi knows, with todays tech, what they are working on now.

    Report this comment

    IHateIgnorance  
    • Thinking Man
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:40am

      That has been known for all that time. The original program was the ATF program that was later to become the YF-22. That was not held secrete all this time.

      Report this comment

      Thinking Man  
  • Master.Debater
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:54am

    The length of the third redaction and context suggests United States “Air Force”.

    Report this comment

    Master.Debater  
    • Eric Window
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:05am

      Agree

      Report this comment

      Eric Window  
    • LETSBEABOUTIT
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:39am

      It’s a mono-spaced font, probably and IBM selectric. Number of characters would actually match “Marine Corps”, not “Air Force”. That would support the theory of artillery shells.

      Report this comment

      LETSBEABOUTIT  
  • ldonnell
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:53am

    so,you can kill thousands of people and keep all their stuff.what have we come to.

    Report this comment

    ldonnell  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:07am

      Gee, do you hate Europeans. I must assume that you hate Europeans or that you are not thinking this thru.

      If the Soviet Union comes through Fulda Gap & across the Northern European plain where they had advantages in number of tanks, artillery & planes, etc. , chances are not good that you will stop them with conventional forces.
      If you use conventional nukes because conventional forces are not enough, you don’t want to obliterate all the cities (housing stock & other facilities) that refugees need when the came back.

      Neutron bombs are better for civilian that flee their homes in advance of an invading army. It is not friendly to an invading army. Do you want to be FRIENDLY to an invading army?

      Did the Soviets have provocateurs in the Nuclear Freeze movement?

      Are you John Kerry (Nuclear Freeze dupe) or Louis Farahkhan (Hates white people)?

      Have you read the book, “RED STORM RISING”, on what a Soviet invasion of Europe would be like?

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • OhioRifleman
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:08am

      @ Walkabout

      Advice section: cut about half the Blazers here a ration of slack. They are idealists that think everything in Existence is sunshine and rainbows. The rest of us know better.

      I have read Red Storm Rising, and am thinking about picking it up again for another go. You are right about the Soviet machine of the time, though nowadays the only sides with the resources to pull that kind of invasion or defensive plan is us and China. Everyone else has drawn down too far.

      If anything like that happens in the here-and-now, the Lefties would fold under, grab their ankles, spread the cheeks and wait for it. Hell, a lot of Righties would do the same. There is a lack of people in this country with any notable hardness of honor to try and fight for their homeland.

      Report this comment

      OhioRifleman  
    • Diego Roswell
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 12:09pm

      At this stage in our history there is not much homeland left to fight for. I see a further Balkanization of this nation only hastened by war, regional conflicts or world war. The United States is anything BUT united and with liberalism/marxism/socialism/globalist one world government mentalities and beliefs trumping traditional american values, don’t count on too many “patriotic americans” showing up to defend the millions of regulations and trillions in debt that this country now represents. The future is indeed grim and if we continue down this path (as all indicators are pointing) the good old USA will be reduced to several regions of concentrated populations of like minded people, or one huge FEMA camp held at gun point.

      Report this comment

      Diego Roswell  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 2:54pm

      I will probably re-read Red Storm Rising at some point. It will be sooner rather than later if I can get one of my kids to read it.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 4:37pm

      At the time of it’s design the Cold War was in full swing, and seemed like it might just spill over into a full war first rolling into Germany. The weapon could be used to annihilate a massive attacking force, then the refugees from that area could move back in within a short time. The design originally was defensive in nature. I remember getting my first briefings on the weapon while sitting in the Fulda Gap in the early ’80s.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 8:06pm

      Well RJ said it better than I (more succinctly).

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
  • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:52am

    Pink SLIME!

    Report this comment

    Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
  • saneromeo
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:46am

    Aren’t these also capable of EMPs? Does anyone know (I’m too lazy to look it up)
    http://saneromeo.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/nuclear-war-in-the-old-testament-2/

    Report this comment

    saneromeo  
    • RLTW
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:58am

      Not sure either, but I would think it would require a higher blast % being a high altitude det.

      Report this comment

      RLTW  
    • Pro-Palin
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:47am

      EMP or not I would rather die than to suffer radiation poisoning but that being said. I am also a survivor of many horrible things and have fought subconsciously through many a horrible thing that would make most crack I for lack of better terms refer to the last Rocky movie. It is not how hard you hit or get hit but the will to fight on. That is me, I do not give in if I go in a blast it is gods will, but if I live it is as well.
      Why worry seen the cold war lived it and prefer it vs the Islamic crap of uncertainty. It is not an if but a where and when .

      Report this comment

      Pro-Palin  
  • cause_glen_said_so
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:41am

    Probably just the weapons he sold to his pals in Iran during a certain little scandal

    Report this comment

    cause_glen_said_so  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:58am

      The point of the Iran Arm sales wast two fold.

      The 1st was to get money to get around defeatist, leftists Congress & defeat Communist hegemony.
      1979 was the high water mark of Communism. If you look at the Soviet union & its allies the map was very red.

      The 2nd was to stalemate the Iran-Iraq War. That meant to make sure neither side won.

      Let’s consider the 2nd point is the newby troll (Member Since: August 16, 2012) going to argue an Iranian victory over Iraq would be in the best interest of Saudi Arabia, Europe, U.S., Japan, or many other countries?

      Step 1 install Shiite government on Iraq.
      Step 2 Lean on Syria if necessary.
      Step 3 link up Iran, Iraq, Syria (current Iranian ally) & Lebanon (Hezbollah)
      Step 4 Attack Israel
      Step 5 lean on Jordan & Saudi Arabia
      Step 6 Control all Middle East oil
      Step 7 Eff’n troll does not have computer or the money or the time to troll.

      An Iraqi hegemony would be no better.

      Saudi Arabia & Kuwait were afraid of Iranian hegemony. They supported Iraq & not because they thought the Iraqi cause was good, but because they were afraid of Iran. Would their support been enough top keep Iraq from collapsing?

      You can critique, & snipe from the Peanut gallery, but if you were ever in power, you wouldn’t last a year.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:10am

      Soros must be offering a bonus to ALL Trolls to come bother us here at TheBlaze, today.

      Report this comment

      Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • grimmster
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:25am

      @Walkabout.
      That “newbie troll” as you call him, is encinom,who uses so many na,es and accounts on here its pathetic.He is not hard to spot,there are many “tells” that let me know its him, and if i can figure it out, the rest of you should be able to as well, well, maybe not…..

      Report this comment

      grimmster  
    • cause_glen_said_so
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:31am

      hey walk
      I believe the purpose of the sales of weapons to Iran was merely to free hostages, then the creativity came and we know the rest…how exactly does selling arms to Iran for it’s war with Iraq help Iran NOT succeed?
      I believe Iran was also considered by the USA to be a terrorist state yet we sold weapons to them

      Report this comment

      cause_glen_said_so  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:04am

      cause_glen_said_so
      how exactly does selling arms to Iran for it’s war with Iraq help Iran NOT succeed?
      ***
      How?
      The proof that the help we gave Iran was not enough for it to succeed in conquering Iraq is that the Iraqi government stayed in power & Iraq retained its territorial integrity. That is how.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • HuskerDave
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 11:12am

      Let’s just hope that 2012 is the high water mark of Islamist extremist influence, as 1979 was the high water mark of Soviet expansion. We needed Ronald Reagan to stem the tide of that evil; perhaps Mitt Romney can stem the tide of this evil.

      Report this comment

      HuskerDave  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 12:00pm

      I remember reading the issue of Time magazine (when it wasn’t a rag) about the Soviet Invasion & I remember being very depressed.

      The Soviets & their proxies were everywhere: Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Angola, Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador, …

      The Democrat Congress was tying the hands of the CIA. The military was weak & still suffering from Vietnam syndrome inflicted on us by a Democrat Congress after President Nixon had won the War.

      Imagine it, the Soviet Union had good relationships with both Ethiopia & Somalia at the same time.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
  • Disavowed 1
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:41am

    HAARP receivers. Old yet destructive technology.

    Report this comment

    Disavowed 1  
    • Maxim Crux
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:55am

      The most destructive thing known to man is HARRP and other transmitter stations that the are in the hands of all major powers.

      Report this comment

      Maxim Crux  
    • Disavowed 1
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 10:17am

      I don’t usually quote myself, but this is important to be told. These receivers are about the size of a coffee table, Search: Japan say’s America has an “Earthquake machine” and watch the Black Mail video on an old youtube interview with the former ambassador on this subject.

      A lowered frequency version of this Technology is used by every Gas and Oil company in the world to “vibrate” substrate to interrogate it for gas pockets, oil or coal or whatever there looking for. Nicola Tesla was the father of this technology but our DOD et al has versions of it that will project a vibration miles beneath the surface and can slip fault plates at will, just add a sattelite and a little power.

      This is what I believe it may be for what it’s worth. Silent weapons for quiet wars..

      Report this comment

      Disavowed 1  
  • airportengineer
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:39am

    The spike in cancer rates makes sense now!

    Report this comment

    airportengineer  
  • PeteOH
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:36am

    AKA… Neutron

    Report this comment

    PeteOH  
  • ares338
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:23am

    First, let me say I love my country. That being said….we and other super powers have flirted for 50 or so years with the technology to end mankind. We have been on the brink probably more times than we will ever know. Nuclear, viral, biological weapons, etc……..he11, we’ll probably all go poof when a giant asteroid slams into us. The rest of the universe will most lively breathe a collective sigh of relief.

    Report this comment

    ares338  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:48am

      If there is intelligent life on other planets, there will most likely be a co petition for resources & all that entails.

      Any life that has a REPLICATION CODE at the chemical level (RNA DNA et al) most likely will have a self preservation routines in the brains/ neural network. Those same routines will figure “If I take their sh/t, I will live.” And at times those same routines will tell them “If I take their stuff, I will thrive”
      There are different studies or books that show this from the Vikings to the Mongols (pre-Genghis).

      Point is life elsewhere in the universe are not likely to be ANGELS. But you can go on believing human kinds is the worst thing that came down the pike.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
  • noslave
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:20am

    i agree it may be a form of neutron bomb(destroys enemies but preserves infrastructures) what would be comical? SHOVELS,BROOMS,ETC.??MAKING THE LAZY WORK FOR THEIR FREEBIES?? while telling unions shove the PREVAILING WAGE CRAP??

    Report this comment

    noslave  
  • starman70
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:11am

    There was much discussion back then about the “Neutron Bomb”. It does little damage to the infrastructure but kills people with intense neutron exposure. Does such a device exist? I don’t know but if it does, maybe one well placed shot over Tehran might solve a lot of problems.

    Report this comment

    starman70  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:19am

      Zech chapter 14, verse 12 sure sounds like a neutron bomb explosion.

      Report this comment

      BOMUSTGO  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:20am

      Zech 14:12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the Lord will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

      Report this comment

      BOMUSTGO  
    • LadyLibertykicksASS
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 3:25pm

      Yup…..Just what I was thinking. !

      Report this comment

      LadyLibertykicksASS  
    • SadButTrue
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 3:55pm

      If Israel doesn’t have any, we should share.

      Report this comment

      SadButTrue  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:05am

    Enhanced radiological weapons can mean one of two things: neutron bomb, or a special purpose EMP weapons system. I figure the neutron bomb is more likely.

    Report this comment

    Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
  • Rickfromillinois
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 8:55am

    I think that they are stockpiling weaponized spam and other pork products. Now is the time to break out the bacon bombs.

    Report this comment

    Rickfromillinois  
  • Landon410
    Posted on September 20, 2012 at 8:55am

    so is Obama gonig to send these off to egypt with the blind shiek?

    Report this comment

    Landon410  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:06am

      Probably, along with the codes to ensure they can be used against us.

      Report this comment

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • sndrman
      Posted on September 20, 2012 at 9:49am

      just a thought the blind sheikh,the blind leading the blind………..wait until this blind guy sues the AMERICAN gov’t for wrongful imprisonment………wonder how much money, his bowingness HUSSAIN o. will send to egypt with this guy? and better yet how long before ISRAEL bombs the crap outta this guy?

      Report this comment

      sndrman  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love