Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live BlazeCast at 2pm ET: All the fireworks from the IRS Hearing!

Government

Hillary Aide Goes Off on BuzzFeed Reporter, Calls Him an ‘Unmitigated A**hole,’ Tells him to ‘F**k Off’

Sep. 24, 2012 1:54pm

BuzzFeed correspondent Michael Hastings on Sunday got into a major war of (curse) words with Hillary Clinton’s longtime aide and personal spokesman Philippe Reines over the State Department’s handling of the total disaster known as the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

The foul-mouthed email exchange starts with Hastings challenging Reines for attacking CNN after the news agency reported that it had obtained murdered Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens’ journal (which the State Department now admits it didn’t even know existed).

Here is the full email exchange [via BuzzFeed, WARNING: Coarse language]:

From: Michael Hastings 
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:32 AM
To: Reines, Philippe I 
Subject: Request for comment

Hey Philippe:

A few quick questions for you. Why didn’t the State Department search the consulate and find AMB Steven’s diary first? What other potential valuable intelligence was left behind that could have been picked up by apparently anyone searching the grounds? Was any classified or top secret material also left? Do you still feel that there was adequate security at the compound, considering it was not only overrun but sensitive personal effects and possibly other intelligence remained out for anyone passing through to pick up? Your statement on CNN sounded pretty defensive — do you think it’s the media’s responsibility to help secure State Department assets overseas after they’ve been attacked?

Let me know if you have a second.Michael

______________________________________On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Reines, Philippe I wrote:


Good morning Michael

I’m adding my colleague Toria Nuland who I believe you know. She has addressed much of your questions below during her daily press briefings, so I’ll let her weigh in to remind you of what’s already been thoroughly answered. As far as the tone of my email, I think you’re misreading mine as much as I’m misreading yours as being needlessly antagonistic.

But on your questions pertaining to CNN’s handling of the diary:

• You know that all USG personnel were evacuated from Benghazi after the attack. So I’m not sure why you’re asking why State didn’t find the diary first.

• On material, I’ll let Toria reiterate, but the answer is no. Though you might want to ask CNN if they took anything else from the crime scene that they haven’t yet told anyone about.

• In terms of the media’s responsibility, I’ll start with the outlandish statement that I believe the media does have responsibilities. Your question seems to imply they have none and any expectation of responsible behavior is too much to ask. To be specific:I believe CNN had the responsibility to act as human beings and be sensitive to their loss when they first approached the family.

I believe CNN had a responsibility to not make promises to the family it would not keep.

If that’s too much to ask, I believe CNN had at the very least a responsibility to make their intentions on the use of Chris’s diary clear to the family from the outset.

I believe CNN had a responsibility to not deceive its own viewers for more than 48 hours on the source of their reporting, using convoluted attribution they themselves had to clarify, before admitting it was the diary they were relying on.

I believe that when they finally did admit to using Chris’s diary, they had a responsibility to their viewers and to the family to explain why they broke their pledge.

I believe that many within CNN agree with everything I’m saying.

More than anything else, I believe that CNN – since they had already read every word of the diary before calling the family on Friday the 14th, the day Chris’s remains were returned home – had all the information they needed at that point to make an editorial decision on whether the contents of the diary compelled them to report on it. I believe the time to invoke their standards to justify using the diary came six days late. I believe that CNN, if they felt strongly that they had an obligation to use the diary should never have presented the family with a choice in the first place that they’d later disregard.

I don’t believe that CNN should get credit for issuing a flimsy confession only when caught with their hands in the cookie jar. I believe the statement CNN issued late last night, 24 hours after Anderson Cooper’s ill-conceived statement on air, basically says they agreed not to use it until they didn’t feel like it anymore, and only admitted to it when they were about to be caught. I don’t believe that’s much of a profile in courage.

Lastly, I believe that you of all people, after famously being accused of violating agreed upon ground rules and questionable sourcing, would agree that it’s important for a news organization to maintain its own integrity if it is to be trusted. That begins with keeping its word. If you can’t manage that, then don’t give it.

I realize that the way this works is that you only you get to ask me questions, but I have one for you: if you were in Benghazi, went to the scene of the attack, found the ambassador’s diary, read every word of it, would you have called them and asked their permission to use it, then when you weren’t granted that permission agree that you wouldn’t use it in any way, and then a few days later just change your mind?

If the answer is yes, then you obviously agree that CNN handled this perfectly fine.

If the answer is no, if you would have decided its contents demanded reporting immediately, how would you have handled this differently then CNN?

And you should feel free to use every word above, in its entirety. Though I suspect you won’t.

Philippe

______________________________________From: Michael Hastings 
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:04 PM
To: Reines, Philippe I 
Cc: Nuland, Victoria J 
Subject: Re: Request for comment

Philippe:

Thanks for getting back to me. No, you read my email correctly–I found your statement to CNN offensive.

From my perspective, the scandal here is that the State Department had such inadequate security procedures in place that four Americans were killed. And then the Ambassador’s diary–and who knows what else–was left behind for anyone to pick up. Thankfully, it was CNN–and not Al Qaeda or some other militia–that found it and was able to return it to the family. That CNN used portions of the material in the diary they found at the scene–material that appears to contradict the official version of events that State/WH has been putting out–is completely in line with practices of good journalism.

I don’t know how involved Arwa Damon has been in this. But for what it’s worth, Arwa is one of the best war correspondents working today. She’s consistently risked her life to get these stories, and to find out what actually happens in these conflict zones.I do agree that the media has lots of responsibilities, and CNN fulfilled its responsibility by returning the diary while still managing to inform the American public of newsworthy information. So it’s unfortunate that you are trying to make a scapegoat out of CNN. That State was forced to flee Benghazi–again, because of such inadequate security, leaving behind all sorts of sensitive information–tells us more about DoS than CNN.

The misinformation here seems largely to be coming from State and the administration. The defense that the administration has offered that there was no intelligence warning of an attack is weak. If there was no intel, then clearly the CIA and other intel agents stationed in Benghazi weren’t doing their jobs well. If there was intel, then we have some kind of cover-up–whether out of incompetence or ass covering before the election or just the trauma of losing four good men, it’s hard for me to say at this point.

All the best,

Michael

______________________________________On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Reines, Philippe I wrote:

Why do you bother to ask questions you’ve already decided you know the answers to?

______________________________________From: Michael HastingsSent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:50 PM
To: Reines, Philippe I 
Cc: Nuland, Victoria J 
Subject: Re: Request for comment 



Why don’t you give answers that aren’t bullshit for a change?

______________________________________On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reines, Philippe I wrote:
I now understand why the official investigation by the Department of the Defense as reported by The Army Times The Washington Post concluded beyond a doubt that you’re an unmitigated asshole.

How’s that for a non-bullshit response?

Now that we’ve gotten that out of our systems, have a good day.

And by good day, I mean Fuck Off

______________________________________From: Michael HastingsSent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 01:40 PM
To: Reines, Philippe I 
Cc: Nuland, Victoria J 
Subject: Re: Request for comment

Hah–I now understand what women say about you, too!
Any new complaints against you lately?

______________________________________On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Reines, Philippe I wrote:

Talk about bullshit – answer me this: Do you only traffic in lies, or are you on the ground floor of creating them?

And since Fuck Off wasn’t clear enough, I’m done with you. Inside of 5 minutes when I can log into my desktop, you’ll be designated as Junk Mail.

Have a good life Michael.

______________________________________From: Michael Hastings 
Date: Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Request for comment
To: “Reines, Philippe I” 
Cc: “Nuland, Victoria J”


I’ll take that as a non-denial denial.

All the best,

Michael

As BuzzFeed’s own Ben Smith would say: whoa.

Exit Question: How does that old saying go? “Don’t get into fights with people who buy ink by the barrel?”

We’re pretty sure the same applies for extraordinarily proactive and prolific online news organizations who have practically unlimited space on this thing called the Internet.

Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter

Front page photo source courtesy the AP. This story has been updated.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (211)

1 2 3 … 6
  • WINNEBAGOMAN
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:47pm

    Strait forward questions by the journalist. From the jump Clinton’s State Department and the Obama administration could have simply NOT answered questions and stated something like “This is under investigation, and is a national security concern, blah, blah, blah.” Instead, what they chose to do was violate at least one American’s first amendment rigths, and LIED to the American people about what had originally happened.

    These egg-heads we got running things are so arrogant in their thinking that their theories, which they developed on manicured, steril university campuses, were so correct- that when something happens- they actually think they can explain why it happened without getting any physical evidence or even questioning a single real-world person about it. Then they’re shocked when it turns out they were wrong!

    Report this comment

    WINNEBAGOMAN  
    • DarkJello
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:09pm

      Respect for Michael Hastings.

      It has been self-evident from the FIRST second that terrorists DID attack in Benghazi! These games by STATE and WH are beyond dangerous. Good and evil exist. Lying is just another sin.

      Report this comment

      DarkJello  
    • jthirteen
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 5:38pm

      The death of the middle class.

      http://j13sanityexperiment.blogspot.com/

      Report this comment

      jthirteen  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 6:30pm

      Really, who do you imagine he learned these words from? Come on, guess?

      Report this comment

      Bluebonnet  
    • Obama_Forward_Over_The_Cliff
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 8:25pm

      As Liberal legal analyst Tamara Holder once said (about another Fox News female contributor), “probably needs to get laid”. And probably because Bill doesn’t visit there anymore.

      Report this comment

      Obama_Forward_Over_The_Cliff  
    • lessoneleg
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 9:11pm

      the problem is, these are social activist driven people with a Higher Than Thou attitudes. If you question — them—. They get this how dare you question ME, I’m in the drivers seat, you are the subservent. You media people are OUR’S, and don’t forget it.
      There is nothing more vengful than an uppity liberal social activist who just screwed up and is under the gun to answer questions.
      I’m more concerned of the professionalism of the Government person in Hilliary’s Department using such crass decorum in speaking with the public, in this case the Press. He clearly is out of his league when dealing with Department Security issues.
      To be quite honest, we’ve seen this before. Every time this Saturday Night Not Ready For Prime Time Players get into the White House, like Clinton or Jimmie Carter. The Crazies get the car keys and screw up miserably test driving the equipment.
      When Obama is gone, wait for the releases of comments dealing with Obama’s miss use of the White House and Her Royal Highness. It’s gunna be outrageous how White House and Department Senior Government employees pretty well went mental trying to figure out these bozo’s.

      Report this comment

      lessoneleg  
  • UpholderOftheConstitution
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:45pm

    What gets on my nerves is the fact that The Blaze uses profanity in their stories (i.e. not omitting the vulgar words – adults can deduce what they are) but yet stops those from commenting them. To me that is *********. Whoops this comment is going to be released now.

    Report this comment

    UpholderOftheConstitution  
    • Sirfoldallot
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:14pm

      What gets my nerves is the thought of Hillary taking her pants off. Buuuurrrr ughhhhhhhh

      Report this comment

      Sirfoldallot  
    • SLAPTHELEFT
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 5:30pm

      That’s what chaps your a$$? Really?

      Damn dude, I can think of a million other things that bother me than the blaze omitting words they deem offensive or questionable.

      Guess you just checked the box that said you agreed to the terms of use instead of reading it.

      Report this comment

      SLAPTHELEFT  
    • SocialistSlayer
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 6:13pm

      Sure your is not Eric Holder of the Constitution? If you don’t like the Blaze get the He$$ off of it.

      Report this comment

      SocialistSlayer  
    • DIR
      Posted on September 25, 2012 at 3:58am

      @SIRFOLDALLOT: “What gets my nerves is the thought of Hillary taking her pants off. Buuuurrrr ughhhhhhhh”

      If she doesn’t, how is she going to dazzle Bill with her loins? It’s better than a industrial strength dose of saltpeter (a male sexual inhibiter). A picture of her face is also used in prisons to control men’s sexual desires, it also contols their appetite. In the Mideast, though, she’s considered a delicacy. She’s more appetizing than a camel, well, almost.

      Report this comment

      DIR  
  • ReddenBlack
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:36pm

    What do you mean we do nothing? We’ve arrested 6 people in Libya

    Honestly, Tell me what YOU want us to do? Invade Libya? Start another war?

    We arrested those that are resposible, and pulled people out of danger. It’s taken care of

    Report this comment

    ReddenBlack  
  • oldduffer
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:30pm

    Sounds like hissy fits from Democrat Queens and their hissy Dem. defenders on here.

    Report this comment

    oldduffer  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:54pm

      Hillary has her TI* in a wringer and they all know it..that’s what
      obamas tools get for getting a three month old video and
      sending it to the Middle East endangering countless American
      lives.. This Administration is Disgusting !!!!! Fast and Furious
      and now this BULLSHI**………..

      Report this comment

      MIBUGNU2  
    • DarkJello
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Less disgusting, and MUCH more naive and incompetent.

      If they get 4 more years… It truly is the era of “shiny coin” > real truth!

      Report this comment

      DarkJello  
    • easyed598
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:57pm

      Is CNN going to give FOX a run for being fair and balanced ? Perhaps MSNBC will be the only cable news station to be in the bag for Obama. I think Hillary just withdrew from the 2016 Presidential run.

      Report this comment

      easyed598  
  • OniKaze
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:28pm

    Man, if CNN loses its ties as being part of the political machine, then where will they have left to turn???

    We all know that no-one but extreme lefties listen to them, so why are they trying to lose their last audience base??? Unless, CNN has changed it stripes lately (which honestly, I am not sure since I have not watched CNN in a long time….)

    Have they changed and I missed it?

    Report this comment

    OniKaze  
    • Female
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:47pm

      The Admin is just biting the liberal media hand of CNN that feeds them. Best not to piss off or demonize our buddy media, right?

      Gee, I can only hope the O’s flunkies enrage all the leftie media elites.

      Hell, hath no furor like a Media with a Microphone which has been scorned!

      Report this comment

      Female  
  • hierge
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:28pm

    When can we just start b-slapping these people? Or taking them out on “hunting” trips…

    Report this comment

    hierge  
    • ReddenBlack
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:37pm

      Ill go out on a “hunting trip” with you. you lead the way, ill follow

      Report this comment

      ReddenBlack  
    • Stelex
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 7:19pm

      And I’ll be right behind you…..Red and Black ……nice contrast….easy target. Turn around fool

      Report this comment

      Stelex  
    • Puddle Duck
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 8:45pm

      Leftists are good followers…incapable of leading…….at least the Commie is honest about being a follower even if he/she or it does not realize it.

      Red n Black you aren’t called “useful idiots” for nothing you know, the day is coming where Dear Leader expects you to work for that taxpayer money you and other OWS losers have taken.

      Report this comment

      Puddle Duck  
  • freenj
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:27pm

    From that picture of Hillary, she sure is looking worn out. Hanging around Wild Bill and 0, probably does that to a gal.

    Report this comment

    freenj  
    • oldguy77
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:02pm

      You put into words my exact feelings.She looks bad.Sorta like the wicked witch of the west.

      Report this comment

      oldguy77  
    • 65Mustang
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 4:00pm

      Why doesn’t Hillary and DWS do something with their hair…Democrat women don’t have a lot going for them, they are liars and ugly.

      Report this comment

      65Mustang  
  • SquidVetOhio
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:26pm

    HOLY CRAP! There IS a real reporter at CNN!

    The end is nigh……

    Report this comment

    SquidVetOhio  
    • Totally Domestic
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 9:30pm

      The media is the dam holding the truth fm. getting out.
      The pressure is mounting reaching critical mass.. There are cracks in the dam and the truth is leaking out. That is why there is frenzy at state/WH. Had nothing to do with the family, just CYA.
      Anderson did the right thing letting ppl know how Amb. Stevens feared for his life.
      Noone cared at state. He was a sitting duck perhaps on purpose. Probably much more in
      journal that was not revealed.

      Report this comment

      Totally Domestic  
  • RayOne
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:26pm

    The Obama/Hil State Department is a failure.

    Report this comment

    RayOne  
    • Stelex
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 7:25pm

      Failure is dependent on the goal, I think they are being quite successful. Americas status is falling all over the globe.

      Report this comment

      Stelex  
  • floridareader
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:25pm

    And they are supposed to handle USA diplomatic affairs?
    Pretty diplomatic communication.

    Report this comment

    floridareader  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:38pm

      Every one of 0bama’s cabinet members were issued a broom and large rug from the very beginning. Their job is to constantly sweep the truth under the rug, then support only the concoctions from the administration.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • floridareader
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:59pm

      @ RJJI
      Yours is a perfect assessment of the disaster the Obama administration really is. But, what else can you expect from a guy who wanted to sit with terrorists so he could reach world peace, and he got the Nobel Prize in advance!
      And now, since that strategy didn’t work, he plays this down as “as bump in the road”.
      In this case, let’s say “bumps under the rug”. LOL

      Report this comment

      floridareader  
    • tipofthespear42
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 5:11pm

      At least THIS was an HONEST and PASSIONATE debate………….verrrrry,… verrry,…Refreshing,..for a change!!

      Report this comment

      tipofthespear42  
  • Larry E
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:24pm

    As they say it takes one to know one so the conclusion that can be drawn is that little Phillippe is one as well. Not to mention being a liar, but then he works for Hillary so that’s pretty much a foregone conclusion.

    Report this comment

    Larry E  
  • Sirfoldallot
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:21pm

    Election day can’t get here fast enough.

    Report this comment

    Sirfoldallot  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:21pm

    The ambassador and three CIA operatives were sacrificed for the ‘one’s’ re-election bid because if word got out about their mission ole Barry would have a tough time explaining what they were doing.
    Dead men tell no tales and four bodies means nothing to the Marxist POS and his retaining power.

    Report this comment

    progressiveslayer  
    • OniKaze
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:30pm

      Four bodies is just the tip of the LARGE iceburg that Obama is willing to sacrifice to keep his dictatorial power..

      Report this comment

      OniKaze  
    • Thevoice
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:42pm

      four bodies means nothing to the Marxist POS and his retaining power. Boy if that isn’t the truth…On the 60 minutes interview . The most telling statement the closet quasi commie Obama made was when he was talking about “big things ” happening during a presidency or lack of them…When the going to the moon was brought up…Obama says that it happened because we had a “fair” economy at the time ..And he wants the same today….If that isn’t the most telling statement I don’t know what is…His thought process that he can control …His broken ideology that of a “New age progressive Communist” which has created a government web which is choking the life out of our economy and liberties at the same time…What a Obama fails to realize and ideology is so destructive to this wonderful gift of a Republic where the job of governments simple job was to protect the individual and his or her freedom so the Individual can build,create, invent, explore and prosper in peace . No rather a Obama wants to control that sprit of individual freedom…Just amazing…And the real cause to our upcoming destruction.. In November for starters Obama has to go …

      Report this comment

      Thevoice  
  • jblaze
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:20pm

    This is off topic, but does anyone else think Hilary is looking more and more hideous every day. I mean she is acturally getting hard to look at without cringing! Yuk!

    Report this comment

    jblaze  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:28pm

      I thought that back in ’92.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • whatthecrazy
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:38pm

      agree lol

      Report this comment

      whatthecrazy  
    • floridareader
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:07pm

      @jblaze
      Agree. That happens to people that have their minds and souls foul of hatred, selfishness, wickedness and envy, and who live their life in constant concern of when, where and who will take their masks off to expose their never-ending lies.

      Report this comment

      floridareader  
    • oldguy77
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:09pm

      Wonder what would happen if someone splashed water on her,like in the wizard of oz?

      Report this comment

      oldguy77  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:10pm

      She’s more of a man than Bill

      Report this comment

      progressiveslayer  
    • truthseekerusa
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:44pm

      Maybe Hillary learned that good ole sexy Bill had knocked up one of the groupies at the Democratic convention?

      Report this comment

      truthseekerusa  
    • JSnake
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 5:12pm

      Miss Piggy

      Report this comment

      JSnake  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 6:34pm

      Hey, hey, watch it. She doesn’t stay home to bake cookies for anyone, let alone Bill.

      Report this comment

      Bluebonnet  
    • Puddle Duck
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 8:39pm

      Hillary’s wife Bill is starting to look a lot like a slimmed down version of W.C. Fields….The Clintons are just as much to blame for the state of things as Obama, Pelosi or Reid. All of them have this in common…they are frauds with corrupt ( I would say criminal) backgrounds.

      Report this comment

      Puddle Duck  
  • banjarmon
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:19pm

    A WAR of Words and SPIN…I want the TRUTH to be Told!!!

    Report this comment

    banjarmon  
    • jblaze
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:38pm

      Sounds like Michael was the adult here. Philippe, on the other hand needs to resign and take a longgggggggggggggggg vacation!

      Report this comment

      jblaze  
    • BuzzardSays
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 4:04pm

      If you are looking for truth to be told in Washington DC you’ll be waiting for ever and a day for hell to freeze over.

      Report this comment

      BuzzardSays  
  • doomytram
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:15pm

    You have witnessed the death of the political careers of Hillary, this ridiculous aide of her’s, and of course Obozo.

    The hapless, helpless, ridiculous, clueless Leftist Media are still puking the Hillary 2016 narrative. That narrative is squashed. Hillary, Obozo, and this pathetic aide are done.. These three report to the muslim brotherhood. It’s over Obozo, yet the media is talking like it’s over for Romney. It’s so funny how pathetic Obozo and Hillary have been. Laughable Lying Patsy Shills.

    Report this comment

    doomytram  
  • huey6367
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:12pm

    Sunds like someone (State Department) made a boo boo and is quite ready to be called out on the carpet. So….

    ….they can dish it out but they can’t take it.

    Report this comment

    huey6367  
  • AJAYW
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:09pm

    I heard that Hillary Clinton is obama’s liberal slut and Philippe Reines is one of his gay lovers?

    Report this comment

    AJAYW  
  • Debra1776
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:08pm

    This is classic–two groups that are usually best friends telling it like it really is today. You are a great news source as long as it is favorable to us. I have always heard that politics are dirty–thank you for the illustration Obama Administration and aboveboard and always factual, CNN “news.” This is like a Roadrunner and Wile Coyote cartoon. When both have stooped so low, cursing each other is all that is left.

    Report this comment

    Debra1776  
  • term limits for congress
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:05pm

    Refreshing

    Report this comment

    term limits for congress  
  • badgesjacksonSOUNDEDcool
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:05pm

    So, that’s how the world works.

    Report this comment

    badgesjacksonSOUNDEDcool  
  • freedomnetworker
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:05pm

    The answer is in education. Our country use to teach the correct education and critical thinking. Now they only teach liberal white wash. This video was created in , I believe 1951; Please get this video out there so people can learn and remember: Just remember folks.. Everything that is done is all about control. When you look at history and look at today you will see Mountains of control in place: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceVBroKj6W4&feature=share&list=UUoraMikfXRAM1iETaLFPEsQ

    Report this comment

    freedomnetworker  
    • DMANFLA
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:28pm

      This should be shown in all schools at the begining and end of the school year. If we lose our freedoms, our children will not get them back. Notice all the points made in the vid about what I believe this admin. has been doing. Class warfare, promises of security and the rest of the socialist crap. The format will make it easier for all the useful idiots to understand.

      Report this comment

      DMANFLA  
  • nocomment
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:04pm

    Beeeyotch!

    Report this comment

    nocomment  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:03pm

    Hillary Clinton must be arrested and tried for treason.

    Report this comment

    Tri-ox  
    • ReddenBlack
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:06pm

      Please, if you have evidence, share it here!

      Report this comment

      ReddenBlack  
    • copatriots
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:07pm

      The entire administration is traitorous but working for 0bama and Hillary can get ya killed.

      Report this comment

       
    • ReddenBlack
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:11pm

      @copatriots

      Really? Like who?, give some information….

      Report this comment

      ReddenBlack  
    • huey6367
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:13pm

      Can hrow BO into the mix, as well?

      Report this comment

      huey6367  
    • Sosorryforyou
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:37pm

      Yes – I’d like to know, too, what treasonous acts Secretary Clinton and President Obama have done. Specifics please – real, confirmed treason, not fabricated falsehoods.

      Report this comment

      Sosorryforyou  
    • copatriots
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:38pm

      @ REDDEN

      Did your shift just start? You are clearly indoctrinated and I know this will fall on deaf ears…….

      Vince Foster, Bill Gwatney, Chris Stevens, just to name a few. Strange how people end up dead when they know too much or stray too far from the talking points.

      Report this comment

       
    • copatriots
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:52pm

      Oh look, the “gamer” now signed in as SOSORRY. Gives new meaning to talking to yourself.

      Fast & Furious, the murder of Agent Brian Terry, not protecting Americans by not protecting our border. But again, the troll(s) just wants to flood the board…..not necessarily learn anything.

      You know, life isn’t actually a game. I weep for your future.

      Report this comment

       
    • Sosorryforyou
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:31pm

      Nope COPATRIOT, no treason here. Fast & Furious was an operation done under a gun-running program that Pres. Bush’s Administration started and so far has not been confirmed a treasonous act. If F&F is found treasonous, then most likely the entire Bush program will be too. The border agent’s death although tragic, it was not treasonous, nor is it the first death of a border agent doing his job in such a volitile and hostile region. And lastly, the billions of dollars spent each year by this administration on border control would counter your argument that this Administration has been treasonous in this regard. Just because this administration hasn’t done things the way you’d like them to, doesn’t mean they are treasonous.

      Report this comment

      Sosorryforyou  
    • DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 3:57pm

      SOSORRYFORYOU – Fast & Furious had nothing to do with the Bush Administration. Obama lied – not even his own administration is trying to sell that bag of manure.

      Report this comment

      DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL  
  • ReddenBlack
    Posted on September 24, 2012 at 1:58pm

    Oh… you mean kind of like how a Romney Aide did this?:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYEkbaDAQ_s

    Report this comment

    ReddenBlack  
    • gerardtn
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:11pm

      How you can even compare this to the Romney aide thing is quite insane.

      Report this comment

      gerardtn  
    • jthirteen
      Posted on September 24, 2012 at 2:40pm

      Reddenblack, are you kidding me? Sure the aide said A$$, maybe he could have watched his mouth when asking someone else to be respectful of their current location, but these situations are far from having anything in common. Did you read the article? I am convinced that you did not, just the headline, otherwise you would not have made such a comparison.

      Report this comment

      jthirteen  
1 2 3 … 6

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love