Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live Now on TheBlaze Radio: ‘The Buck Sexton Show’

Government

Yes, This Is a 2012 Presidential Candidate Crowd Surfing

Oct. 3, 2012 11:03am Becket Adams

A lot of things can be said about libertarians, some good and some bad, but no one, and we mean no one, can accuse them of being an unenthusiastic bunch.

“As long as I’m relevant, I will continue this through 2016,” Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson said of his bid for the presidency during a town hall meeting on Tuesday.

“Waste your vote!” he jokingly told his audience, referring to those who claim a third party vote is a vote wasted, “Vote for me!”

At the conclusion of the meeting, Johnson crowd surfed. Yes, crowd surfed:

Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (88)

ProudInfidel
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 2:50pm
I too have been known to vote 3rd party.
I IMPLORE you not to do it this election. I agree with you about the fact that the founders did not intend for us to choose between the lesser of two evils but, voting this guy OUT is the ONLY way you will continue to HAVE a voice. If he is not stopped NOW he never will be stopped.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- pitboss711
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 3:14pm
  I totally agree, ProudInfidel! I would love to see a third-party take-over, but this is not the time. Our main priority this election is getting Obama out of the oval office. Voting for a third-party or write-in candidate is a suicide pact with Obama.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 6:56pm
  Let me guess… 2016 will not be “the time”, either, because we’ll have to keep Mo’Money in office, because the Democrat the Establishment has raised against him is a Godless COMMIE even WORSE than Barry, right?
  
  If not you, whom? If not now, when?
  
  Forget it. Mitt lost.
  
  Report this comment
- pinostabaum
  Posted on October 4, 2012 at 1:40am
  sorry. love gary too much… must vote for him.
  
  Report this comment
- Classical Liberal
  Posted on October 4, 2012 at 3:36am
  I don’t see how any man of firm principles could vote for Barack Obama or especially not mitt Romney. We cast our vote for these men who lack principle, and that vote may elevate them to the most powerful leader in the free world. We always come to this point, where we must choose between the better of two men who would both tell you anything to get elected. There sole desire is the power and position of the elected office and then supporting the interests of those that helped them reach that goal.
  
  People, in their stupidity and cowardice, refuse to vote outside the mainstream parties for men of principle who are not tolerated by the money men who control the parties. Like stupid sheep, we keep choosing parties which are different sides of the same coin, and that coin is held by the same powerful men who truly hold the power.
  
  Sorry my fellow republicans, but I am willing to chance another 4 more years of Obama. I would rather be known as a man who chooses than a slave that can only obey.
  
  If you really are convinced that America can not survive 4 more years of Obama than the man holding the coin is also holding you in his rigid grasp. I pray for you who would sacrifice the liberty of your principles for some small security from the fears that men like beck has struck in your hearts.
  
  Report this comment
sbenard
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 2:11pm
So Gary Johnson and his LITERAL “supporters” — are too busy playing games to take seriously the perilous plight of freedom in America! Figures! It says something fundamental about their character and complacency toward liberty!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- manandwolf
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 4:22pm
  give me a break, 30 seconds at a rally, its not like he can implement any changes yet, so is he just supposed to cry in the corner like the rest of us, grow up drone
  
  Report this comment
- jmockone
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 6:29pm
  I am POSITIVE GJ is more focused on liberty than the Bert and Ernie you are choosing between. That is if you define liberty the same as I do.
  
  Report this comment
sbenard
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 2:08pm
I’ve voted for third parties in the past. Not this year! It’s time to step back from the brink of destruction that Emperor Obama represents. If the country reelects His Unholy Unctuousness, I blame those who wasted not only their votes, but the COUNTRY, in this election. Blame them for the tyranny of a lame duck 2nd-term Kim Jon Obama!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 6:57pm
  Stalin called people like you by a certain term.
  
  “Useful Idiots”, I believe it was.
  
  Report this comment
Grannie4news
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 1:51pm
In my humble opinion Johnson is a selfish power hungry fool. People who throw away their votes to save our nation will have blood on their hands. Most who will vote for this man(?) want nothing more than to legally smoke a joint or isolation of the country. This idea of more parties is ridiculous too. The people who suggest it need to go back to school and learn division again. 51 percent of a pie is a whole lot more than 34 percent. Get real just change for the better, one of the two parties and get over yourselves.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- circleDwagons
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 2:36pm
  @grannie. Most if not all politicions are selfish and power hungry. Choice is good and what makes capitalism work. Sounds like you would like the soviet union, are islamic rule. Keep voting for the dame thing and you get the same thing. Liberty and Love
  
  Report this comment
- jsciai
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 3:56pm
  Johnson–maybe a good guy, a possible president, who knows? But this is a stunt that is not presidential in any way shape or form. When I first saw the picture I was thinking obama was trying to rally the young folks by being “hip” with the crowd. Folks, we don’t need another popularity president. We need someone who will take the presidency seriously and with honor and dignity. Think Ronald Reagan who would never go into the Oval Office improperly dressed–only suits and ties here boys! Time to RESTORE the honor and dignity to the presidency and Romney has been the most presidential of any and all candidates this year, and in a long time.
  
  Report this comment
- jmockone
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 6:32pm
  Thank you CIRCLEDWAGONS. If all we ever have to choose from are the same 2 ‘parties’, that not much of a democracy. (Maybe someone needs to go back to school, or at least get a dictionary and learn what that means.)
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 6:59pm
  Why is it “presidential” to want to damage our Constitutional rights? I can’t image supporting indefinite detention, for instance, being anything but “tyrannical”. Certainly not “presidential”.
  
  You were saying?
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 7:02pm
  @Grannie:
  
  Hmm… maybe it’s The Big O and Willard McBain and those who surround them that are power-hungry madmen?
  
  Might it be that Gary Johnson, Virgil Goode and Jill Stein actually have the good of our country at heart, while the Goldman-Sachs boys (you know, The Big O and Willard McBain?) are playing a different game?
  
  Tell me … why do you hate America so much?
  
  Report this comment
valleyfever
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 1:35pm
Don’t waste a single vote. We have to get the commies out of the govt first. If we don’t do it this time there won’t be a next time in our lifetime.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Eastinfection
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:45pm
I was hoping it would be Roseanne Barr.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
KidCharlemagne
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:41pm
It’s pretty obvious by now that we need more competition in our political process…

It’s gotten to the point that both Republicans and Democrats stand for the same things (federal takeover of healthcare, adding trillions of dollars to the national debt, etc., etc.)

I’ve gotten tired of it and that’s why I have decided to take my business elsewhere (via a 3rd party vote) ’cause I don’t see an inkling of difference between Republicans & Democrats these days.

This is why I just can’t plausibly understand why people would want to limit themselves to only 2 choices…..if we had more competition in our political process like we have more competition in things like restaurants, automobiles, refrigerators, blenders, etc., etc. then Republicans and Democrats wouldn’t keep serving us up a big plate of crap every 2 to 4 years.

Imagine living in a world in which your only two choices of automobile were GM and Chrysler and that’s all that you had to choose from….

Of course, that would actually happen if the majority of the population around the world decided that they would only patronize GM and Chrysler…..it would drive the other car makers (Mercedes, Toyota, etc., etc.) out of business…

It’s just too bad that our political system isn’t as competitive as the car business is presently…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- walnutportconservative
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 1:01pm
  I don’t think your car analysis hits the level of importance in this election. With Rummy we get a car, Barak we get a shaft.
  
  Report this comment
- jmockone
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 6:37pm
  THANK YOU KIDCHARLAMAGNE!!! You are not alone.
  
  Report this comment
- pamela kay
  Posted on October 15, 2012 at 9:23am
  Has it ever occurred to any of you Paul or Johnson supporters that there might not even be an election in 2016 is Obama stays in office. So let me get this straight. You would rather throw away your vote to Paul or Johnson based on principals than have 4 yrs to actually form a third party that could perhaps be successful? I must ask you this …Where are your principals concerning saving our republic? Where do your loyalties lie? Throw away any chance to save America, or guarantee to bring her to her knees? That is what you will accomplish. You have seen the last four years and witnessed the loss of many of our rights, you have heard the lies, felt the pain, seen the destruction, and yet you are ready to allow four more years with irreversible damage? Global governess is knocking on our door. The end of America as we know it, and that’s ok with all of you? You destroy any chance to gain the opportunities you hold so dear by voting for Paul or Johnson. For what? your ego? None of you have no more values or love for their country than the rest of us. There are simply some things that we have to accept in order to stop what is happening. Your first concern should be to get Obama out of office, then we can work on the other issues. Now is not the time to let your pride get in the way. I intend to watch and pay attention to Romney if he gets elected just as I have Obama.Our work will not be done regardless of who wins. Please reconsider what is at stake before it is to late,
  
  Report this comment
blackyb
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:08pm
I will be so glad if I never have to hear Obama’s name again. May they will put him out of the country after they imprison that bunch. I am so sick of him and his lies, his slimy character, that if I never heard his name again, it would be too soon.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Nuncle
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:04pm
Listening to Glenn’s show yesterday, he kept reffering to himself as libertarian even using Penn Jillette as a wonderful example. Though listening to his show through the election season I hear fundementalism in his support for Santorum, I hear repubicanism standing the party line for Rommney (well at least he’s not a commie). I have heard no support or even acknowledgement and exposure of the Libertarian party or Candidate!

When do we see a principled stand, Glenn? When do you support a candidate who will do the right thing, rather than one who might not be as bad as the other? We could have really used your help, but you’ve held back. Why?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- blackyb
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:10pm
  I would vote for Santorum or West in a NY minute.
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:40pm
  This is probably the last election where a third party has no chance of winning. Glenn knows that. If you want Mr. Oh? to win again, then vote for a third party.
  
  Report this comment
- PlowMan
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:49pm
  So we vote for someone who does the right thing, then he looses and make the Republican loose. Obama is in until 2016. So in 2016 we vote for another candidate who does the right thing and someone like Obama gets in. We got to this point an inch at a time why don’t people like you see that we will have to go back an inch at a time?
  This video is cool though. I’d like to see Mitt do that. lol
  
  Report this comment
- ChrisDiamond
  Posted on October 4, 2012 at 8:57am
  I can’t help but laugh hysterically when Glenn says he’s a libertarian. In what freakin’ universe? It’s painfully obvious that he knows nothing about libertarianism, hence his early endorsement of Rick Santorum. Glenn heavily favors the military industrial complex and corporatism, despite his in-depth discussions into the Federal Reserve. I can state this emphatically because if he were truly concerned about the Fed, then we all know whom he would have backed. If he wasn’t for the military industrial complex, evidenced by his constant warnings of radical Islam and how they hate us for our freedom and status as a Christian nation, he might have pondered aloud whether or not all of our bombing for peace over there was a lot like screwing for virginity. Glenn is articulate, passionate and draws an audience, but ultimately he is a charlatan… a mouthpiece for the status quo. It’s too bad, really. When he started exposing the Fed and reading Austrian economists like Hayek, I thought he really might make a stand for freedom… but he stood with the evangelical neoconservatives. That isn’t libertarian at all.
  
  Report this comment
- Ballot_Box_Revolution
  Posted on October 4, 2012 at 11:06am
  @giver
  “This is probably the last election where a third party has no chance of winning. ”
  
  You are joking right?? This is THE election where a 3rd party has a chance at winning. If libertarian views were made truly public 3rd party would win in a heartbeat…Most people would vote for liberty if they actually knew what it was, and believed it to be possible. Which it is, but the mind of America has been dumbed down and people don’t understand the intent of America.
  
  Report this comment
toomuchgovt
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:58am
Can you now run the GREEN PARTY Candidate for President Jill Stein. If you are going to take votes away from Romney by this article, isn’t it your duty to also take votes away from Obama by informing pple their is another choice for the enviro freaks.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:55am
Just what we DON’T need…another gay president!!!

What Romney NEEDS to do to WIN: “It’s time for Conservatives and Republicans to tell the truth about what Bush and his brain, Karl Rove, did to this country ! More importantly, if Mitt Romney stands any chance of winning, HE MUST disavow Bush and acknowledge the wreckage of the Bush Presidency.”
http://www.getresponse.com/archive/asinews/ASI-what-romney-must-do-to-win-9815057.html

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- blackyb
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:07pm
  Now why would we do that? You seem to have a corner on it.
  
  Report this comment
- tifosa
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 2:51pm
  Most of Romney’s policies, and a healthy bulk of his political, economic, and foreign policy advisers are former Bushies….but nice try, and totally understandable as at least 6/10 of the electorate pin the economy on Bush.
  
  Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:52am
I like Gary Johnson. I would vote for Gary Johnson. But not when obama is a threat to the office of, and the entirety of the United States. In the end I hope Johnson is wise enough to offer up a coalition of support against this threat of progressivism – the antithesis of liberty! The rise of Libertarianism is in response of the rise of liberalism/progressivism/Big government intrusion from alinsky radicals. It serves no purpose to assist progressivism in any way, and in the end it will drive Libertarianism forward as a force to be reckoned with. I think that would serve the United States quite well at this point in time. After all- if Obama wins- the tip of the sword he has embedded will be plunged deeply into the heart and Soul of America.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- blackyb
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:09pm
  I will never vote for anyone who is inclined towards legalizing pot or any other kind of illegal drug or substance.
  
  Report this comment
- Kupo
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:52pm
  Yeah Blackyb, pot is SOOOOOO scary! LOL
  
  You probably would have been one of the people in the 30′s who was against ratifying the 21st Amendment too, right?
  
  Report this comment
- ChrisDiamond
  Posted on October 4, 2012 at 11:39am
  @BlackyB
  “I will never vote for anyone who is inclined towards legalizing pot or any other kind of illegal drug or substance.”
  
  I want to sincerely/humbly suggest that you get educated on cannabis, hemp, their importance in the founding/development of our nation, and how the Hearst paper company combined with other textile industries (cotton, for example) to bribe the government into making hemp and cannabis illegal in order to eliminate hemp as a competitor to them… why the alcohol & tobacco industries lobby against legalization of cannabis (when cigarettes and alcohol are statistically and verifiably much more dangerous and deadly than cannabis could ever be), and what the illegal status of these 2 substances does to our economy, both in deprivation of millions of jobs, and keeping roughly 1 million people incarcerated at our expense for daring use or sell cannabis. This is a double negative of course: they are a drain on tax payer dollars, and their being out of the work force is loss of $ in tax revenue and the purchase of goods & services in their local areas. Now that I’ve kindly asked you to educate yourself…
  
  Wake the **** UP! Who is the gov to tell us what we can/cannot put into our own bodies?!? So long as a person does not harm someone else or their property, or steal from them in the process of smoking pot, what the hell does it matter? You are a statist; a control freak hell bent on inflicting your morals on all of us through gov whores!
  
  Report this comment
republitarian
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:50am
Good for him. Crowd surfing is ballsy. I think Paul Ryan has been tempted, but is more prudent.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:58am
  That is why they fail. Not gutsy enough. Milquetoast. Jesus would spit him and Romney out of his mouth.
  
  Report this comment
wuggly ump
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:45am
Really this is the story you chose to point out about a Presidential Candidate a month before the election?
It’s about time we heard about other candidates, candidates that can win the Electoral Collage, but have not been invited to debate the vanilla and chocolate candidates.
Besides Govenor Gary Johnson there is Professor Jill Stien. Both candidates deserve an honest look. The media including The Blaze has ignored them an their ideas.
Do we want to discuss ideas here or not?
It”s time for every candidate with the possibility of winning to be allowed to debate with the Democarts and Republicans. I for one am tired of chocolate and vanilla.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:52am
  Check out Virgil Goode of the Constitution Party.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:52am
  No ideas are to be discussed on the Blaze. Only these things which make non-Republican candidates look somehow irrelevant, goofy or crazy shall be given air here.
  
  That is all.
  
  Report this comment
- Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:57am
  We can look all we want. Job #1 is to destroy progressivism by any means possible. Progressivism is a war on America. We must not be divided in any way in any precinct. This is a war the progs have waged for decades (see ‘soros. pelosi, reid, obama and their court jesters) to get this far. It’s all or nothing time.
  
  Report this comment
- Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:01pm
  @Ghandi,
  
  So don’t vote for a progressive this election. Good luck on that one.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 7:08pm
  @Gandhi:
  
  Hah. Ha ha. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
  
  Mitt “I’m to the left of Ted Kennedy” Romney?
  
  Really?
  
  Mitt “I am a progressive” Romney?
  
  Willard Mc-Freakin’-Bain?!
  
  Hoo, boy… best get back on your meds, friend.
  
  Report this comment
paperpushermj
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:40am
This Just In:
.
A Reward of $250 is being offered for the Return of My Missing Wallet
.
Thank You.
Gary Johnson

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KickinBack
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 5:52pm
  P.S.
  
  And the bag of weed in my pocket…
  
  GJ
  
  Report this comment
denkat56
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:35am
he went on a diet, jenny craig youve done yourself proud.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Individualism
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:31am
a vote for romney is a wasted vote because your essentially voting for Obamas platform with a white mormon car salesmen smile.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- QuincySmith
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:36am
  And the down side is?
  
  Report this comment
- LLATPOH
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:42am
  I hear ya, Individualism. I don’t see us as voting for someone who is going to reverse the direction of the country; rather someone who will *at least* put the brakes on, even a small bit.
  
  All we’re buying with this election is time. But that’s better than absolutely nothing.
  
  We’ll see what happens. Most of us can use this time to further prepare.
  
  Report this comment
- Man-On-A-Mission
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:56am
  Quincy doesn’t mind as long as a Black man doesn’t win!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- netmarcos
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 1:05pm
  If you cannot identify any differnces between Obama and Romney other than color, then you probabaly should do us all a favor and sit this one out.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 7:11pm
  Sitting out the election… let’s see…
  
  If I sit out, then Willard McBain doesn’t get my vote. And nothing changes.
  
  If I vote for Johnson, then Willard McBain doesn’t get my vote. But something might change, because the Libertarian party might have easier ballot access in the future, and might be able to crack into the debates.
  
  Lessee… which to choose?
  
  God, you Romney-ites are stupid.
  
  Report this comment
Individualism
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:30am
Ill take him only one of the three i will comply with and do anything for. the other two can jump off a bridge and splat themselves. rommie and obammie the commies are anti american and traitors to this nation.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- LovethisWonderfulCountry
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:37am
  If you can’t see the difference between the two, you don’t have a clue what you are talking about.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:54am
  The differences between Obama and Romney are apparent.
  
  But that’s all they are.
  
  Substantively? Look at their records yourself.
  
  (Hint: NDAA, TARP, HR347, USA PATRIOT Act)
  
  Report this comment
- Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:59am
  @Love,
  
  It all depends on your perspective really. For me it boils down to four main issues.
  1. Economic Policy
  2. Civil Liberties
  3. Wars
  4. Constitutional Constraint.
  
  Regarding economic policy both candidates will run massive deficits and grow government. Romney won’t even articulate a detailed plan beyond platitudes so we are left with the Ryan plan as a model. It adds 18Tr in debt over 28 years to balance a budget. No thanks. Owebama? Same but worse.
  
  Regarding civil liberties both are fans of the police state and have no intentions of rolling back anything that Bush started after 9/11. Both see us as sheep in this regard.
  
  Regarding wars, both are hawks. Owebomba is droning anybody he can and blowing up American citizens without due process. We still have kids dying in Afghanistan for no freaking reason and he’s arming any jihadi he come’s across. Romney seems like he can’t wait to start blowing people up like Iran and Syria.
  
  Regarding the Constitution both have demonstrated that they will not respect it but only when it suits their needs to do so. We know BHO’s transgressions, but Romney has had issues with gun control and civil liberties as well as the role of government beyond the enumerated powers. Replace with Romneycare? Seriously?
  
  Y’all argue over who eats dogs and who’s a racist and who mows who’s lawn and on and on. They don’t really matter. At the core, they are the same.
  
  Report this comment
- ChrisDiamond
  Posted on October 4, 2012 at 11:49am
  My Rothbardian friend has done a fantastic job summing up the sameness of Obamney. You have a choice of fire engine red, or ‘hot rod’ red… there’s about that much difference between these men, and that the majority of you either don’t see it, or are just jumping on board with ‘the party’ under ‘anyone but Obama’ illustrates your lack of clarity, insight, your depth of knowledge and your willful ignorance, which is, of course, precisely what the opinion makers who work to maintain the status quo counted on you doing, and new you would do. Well done!
  
  Report this comment
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:30am
I mean more than a couple sentences…

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:29am
Would be nice to know what he said prior to this…..

This is the “crazy man” perception being fed to the dumb masses…

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Slowman101
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:16am
At least he’s enthusiastic.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Tigress1
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:14am
Glenn, on your radio show you just said you didn’t know anybody who says Romney will kick butt tonight. Well, you don’t know me, but I’m saying it: Romney is going to KICK BUTT tonight! I scored every one of Romney’s debates, and in my opinion he won most of them. That’s a major reason why he is our nominee today! Tonight, people need to LISTEN to him!!!!!
I have 100% confidence in him.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- godlovinmom
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:28am
  Hopefully Romney WON’T be so nice tonight…and give Obama what every American out there would like to do :)
  
  Report this comment
- QuincySmith
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:39am
  tigress1;
  
  I hope you are right. It is said that those watching the Nixon/Kennedy debate thought Kennedy won, those listening on radio thought Nixon won.
  
  Report this comment
- PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:06pm
  For Mitt Romney to WIN he NEEDS to Disavow Bush and Karl Rove and admit the WRECKAGE of Both of the Bush Presidencies. We need to flush the toilet on the Elite Republicans. He needs to prove he is a true Conservative and not a RINO. Independent Libertarian voters are looking for Truth as much as Conservatives are looking for Values and Truth. 0 keeps saying “we can’t go back to Bush year” ROMNEY Must make it CLEAR that he is NOTHING like either of the BUSH – World Government Stooges and that he is a True Conservative Business Man with a Plan to Restore the American Constitution and Unite us in Prosperity for ALL.
  
  Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:10am
Too bad he’s irrelevant in this election; too bad this isn’t an election in which there are TWO pro-Americans taking top-billing; too bad this is one election cycle we CANNOT AFFORD to throw a vote away on…

…because I’d rather have crowd-surfing libertarian than a bath-house surfing commie for president anyday!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Individualism
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:34am
  look what happened in Iceland and that overthrow and revolution. if enough people are in, it can happen in America to.
  
  Report this comment
LLATPOH
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:07am
Um, so?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
kickagrandma
Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:07am
Oh, brother. We need no more clowns, guys.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Nuncle
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:54am
  A president of the people… that would be horrible. One more like a banker or college professor showing true decorum is so much better because image makes the man, right?
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 11:56am
  How about someone with serious philosophical and policy ideas, that you won’t hear from Mitt Romney or Barack Obama?
  
  Let him in the debate, and find out for yourself.
  
  Or are you, like Romney and Obama, too chicken?
  
  Report this comment
- republitarian
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 12:41pm
  We’ve already seen his debating skills.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 7:16pm
  As I recall, he lit up Obama pretty well…
  
  “My dog makes more shovel-ready projects than this President.”
  
  What you saw in the debates, was the media shutting him out just like Ron Paul. And he didn’t have all the money backing him that Paul did, so he couldn’t afford to stick in with the Republicans and dilute Paul’s chances.
  
  In a debate where equal time was given to each candidate, Johnson would knock The Big O’s and Willard McBain’s heads together.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 3, 2012 at 7:22pm
  Grr. Stupid Blaze.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.