Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

Media

‘No Holds Barred’: Jon Stewart and Bill O’Reilly Debate Everything From Big Bird to Libya During Epic ‘Rumble’

Oct. 7, 2012 1:09am Erica Ritz

Jon Stewart and Bill OReilly Debate in Rumble In The Air Conditioned Auditorium

E.D. Hill, Bill O’Reilly and Jon Stewart attend O'Reilly Vs. Stewart 2012: The Rumble In The Air-Conditioned Auditorium at Lisner Auditorium at George Washington University on October 6, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Getty Images)

(TheBlaze/AP) — There were all the trappings of a high-octane presidential debate: the over-the-top declarations, the pre-practiced zingers and the schmaltzy appeals to America’s truest values. But the presidential candidates were nowhere to be found.

In their place Saturday were two celebrity gabbers who have staked their claims at the polar opposite ends of the political spectrum: Bill O’Reilly and Jon Stewart. The political odd-couple came to Washington ready to tangle in an event mockingly dubbed “The Rumble in the Air-Conditioned Auditorium,” hosted by E.D. Hill.

(Photo: Getty Images)

Choice words not suitable for the faint of heart dotted the 90-minute exchange between the Fox News anchor and the star of Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show,” who bantered aggressively but good-naturedly over birth control, President George W. Bush, and the “War on Christmas.”

Stewart came prepped with a mechanical pedestal he used to elevate himself in the air, making the height-challenged comedian appear taller than the lanky O’Reilly when he wanted to drive a point home.

“I like you much better that way,” O’Reilly quipped at one point as he gazed up at his ideological foe.

The political feud between the two caffeinated TV personalities dates back more than a decade. Much like family members who just can’t resist pushing each other’s buttons over Thanksgiving stuffing, Stewart and O’Reilly love to disagree, but appear to hold nothing against each other once the latest spat has run its course. The two have appeared on each other’s programs since 2001, but the face-off Saturday at The George Washington University marked their first head-to-head debate.

Appearing wholly presidential in dark jackets and face makeup under a sign reading “Yum, this banner tastes like freedom,” the two quickly turned to talk of government spending and the 47 percent of Americans that Republican Mitt Romney said in a video are dependent on government.

Here is a clip of the debate, where the two joke over taxes and “Big Bird” (content warning for language):

Stewart, defending government involvement in health care and social programs, said the U.S. has always been an entitlement nation.

“We are a people that went to another country, saw other people on it and said, `Yea, we want that,” Stewart said. “Have you ever seen `Oprah’s favorite things’ episode?”

Asked who he’d like to see as president, O’Reilly dead-panned: “I’d have to say Clint Eastwood.”

“Well why don’t we ask him,” said Stewart, mocking the Hollywood actor’s widely analyzed speech in August at the Republican National Convention by getting out of his chair and staring at it while the crowd erupted in laughter.

Here is a foreign policy clip where O’Reilly mocks those who are vehemently opposed to waterboarding, but fail to protest the increased use of drones (content warning for language):

In an apparent show of bipartisanship, Stewart even got on O’Reilly’s lap at one point. “And what would you like for Christmas, little boy?” O’Reilly said slyly.

“The display that you saw tonight is why America is America. Robust, creative, no holds barred,” O’Reilly told reporters after the debate. “You can call it whatever you want, but you wouldn’t see this in a lot of other countries. That’s for sure.”

Organizers said about 1,500 people attended the event, but the main audience was intended to be online, where the event was live-streamed for $4.95. On Twitter, viewers complained they missed the event when the video servers crashed. Organizers said video will be available for download and that those who experienced errors will be eligible for a refund.

–

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (136)

LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 7:29am
I cant watch stewart, I have no respect for ANYONE who thinks its fine to drop f bombs in an auditorium full of people. Thats the leftist mentality, lower the values. Stewart is nothing more than a socialist imbecile, plain and simple.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- americansfightingforcommonsense
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 8:52am
  Agreed. This was nothing more than a comedic review of our political landscape. But, the F bombs are not funny and they add nothing to the conversation.
  
  Report this comment
- turkey13
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:27pm
  They can banter back & forth untill frogs grow wings and fly south for the winter. There wiil be a National Emergency an there will be no elections held. Thats why Obama refused to give up his golf to study crib notes. Both of these guys need to read “The Last Election” by Kevin Carrigan.
  
  Report this comment
- slowrider
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:06am
  Poor Stewart is an idiot. Only in America.
  
  Report this comment
- LuvsYeshua
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:28am
  These two multi millionaires are good friends and made a killing off of this. They also contributed a lot to that super-scam known as the Wounded Warrior Project. Don’t be surprised if they go on tour together.
  
  Report this comment
- GETLIFE
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 4:34am
  Stewart didn’t know the difference between yearly deficits and national debt.
  Stewart’s humor is for those who never want their college days to end.
  Now I have nothing against blind idealism, but I sure saw a truly ignorant/uneducated side of Stewart.
  
  Report this comment
- kadster01
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 9:23am
  Oh look, two liberal yucking it up with each other. How….unusual.
  
  Report this comment
- saranda
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:30pm
  Luvsyeshua – what did i miss about the Wounded Warior Project? I hope you are mistaken as much money has been directed to them and some celeb talking heads have used them to enrich themselves.
  
  Report this comment
- Rowgue
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 2:00pm
  You didn’t miss anything about the wounded warrior project. There has been a lot of fraud and embezzling in wounded soldier/returning vet charities as a whole, but there isn’t even a single accusation of that in the wounded warrior project. Somebody is just trying to associate the scam artists with all the charities in order to attempt to impune someone they apparently can’t impune directly.
  
  Report this comment
- nevergofullpotato
  Posted on October 9, 2012 at 1:00pm
  OH NO!! NOT WORDS!!! THEY HURT THEY HURT!!!!!!! MY FRAGILE LITTLE PSYCHE CAN’T HANDLE THE WORD!!!!!!
  
  meanwhile in Afghanistan a 14 year old girl is shot in the head cause she wanted an education……….Americans….
  
  Report this comment
steve-in-pa
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 7:20am
It’s funny how soon liberals forget that they voted to go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SolitudeBliss
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 9:33am
  Excuse ME???????
  
  Who voted on going to war?
  
  Report this comment
- woodyee
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 9:43am
  If you think that’s fast, you should compare it to how fast they forget their oath of office and the words to the Pledge of Allegiance…
  
  Report this comment
- johnjamison
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 7:35am
  Bliss,
  98% of Congress voted fpr both wars…….a large number of congress being liberal democrats must of which still had their office until 2010 when the Tea Party orginized a congressional take over.
  
  Report this comment
ming70415
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:58am
The closest the U.S. has ever come to wiping out the national debt was in 1835 when the national debt was at $33,733.05.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ming70415
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:54am
Jon Stewart is WRONG! the National Debt was not wiped out under Clinton, here are some factual stats from the government itself:

Clinton Administration
(January 20, 1993 – January 20, 2001)

National debt on January 20, 1993 = 4,188,092,107,183.60 (inauguration day)
National debt on January 20, 2001 = 5,727,776,738,304.64 (last day in office)

Bush Administration
(January 20, 2001 – January 20, 2009)

National debt on January 20, 2001 = 5,727,776,738,304.64 (inauguration day)
National debt on January 20, 2009 = 10,626,877,048,913.08 (last day in office)

Obama Administration
(January 20, 2009 – Present)

National debt on January 20, 2009 = 10,626,877,048,913.08 (inauguration day)
National debt on October 07, 2012 = 16,154,905,088,589.25 (and counting)

Reference: http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- oneshiner
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 10:41am
  @MING70……..Thanks for the refresher course. That’s more in line with what I remembered and that obama is close to having a SIX TRILLION national Debt. Woopee, we can all be on the streets begging.
  
  Report this comment
- JBT48
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:46pm
  I was screaming at the screen when Stewart was trying to say the first ten trillion was due to Pres. Bush. Most people hear it the same way as he understood it though. Budget surplus vs deficit spending vs national debt can be spun infinitely by the media.
  
  Report this comment
- Inlightofthings
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 9:02pm
  The morons don’t know the difference between debt and deficit. The old joke about men was actually about liberals. You know the one: “I can’t be out of money, I still have checks left!!!” Fiscal fools they are…
  
  Report this comment
- fraumj
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 9:41pm
  Stewart does not know the difference between debt and deficit. Debt is the amount of money borrowed. Deficit is the shortage of funds at a given time. The govt borrows in order to cover the deficit. I want to know if the surplus after Clinton was because the country brought in more revenue or because we borrowed a lot of money.
  
  Report this comment
- USALOVER2011
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:20am
  What the BLEEP just happened!?!?!?! Bill let Stewart and host interrupted him not once, not twice, but more than 3 times? Seems like every time he opens his mouth he was interrupted. Where was the Bill O’Reilly that debated Barney Frank and other people during his show!!! What the BLEEP!
  
  Report this comment
- DrIvey
  Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:28pm
  It’s amazing how people think Stewart is smart. The deficit isn’t the debt. And Washington’s voodoo accounting can show anything (e.g. increasing spending less than you planned to increase spending is a cut, and unemployed people who have been unemployed so long they lose their benefits are somehow no longer unemployed, according to the gov’t.).
  
  Report this comment
Magyar
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:15am
It was stupid. In my mind, there were TWO empty chairs on the stage!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Histrees
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 9:02am
  Amen!!!
  
  Report this comment
- Itchn2go
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 10:35am
  Ditto x2
  
  I don’t expect much from Steward except twisted statements to be made funny but O’Rielly – the genius who is never wrong – please this was a joke and he showed how uninformed he is and what a Progressive he really is.
  
  Stewart won just because he was a populist – wrong but a populist anyway.
  
  Report this comment
- ddg7
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 3:31pm
  More like two empty suits!
  
  Report this comment
AJAYW
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:09am
Very poor judgement by both-

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
apgreco
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:07am
I watched 4 minutes of the video and that was just plenty for me. The room was full of college wingnuts who get their ‘information’ from Jon Stewart, a left winger. To save everyone’s time and money…let me sum up the rest of the 90 minutes. It is Bush’s fault, Obama is great, the war was not paid for, time to invest (ie tax us more) in our country, it is Bush’s fault. OK? Now I can use the other 86 minutes that I saved not watching the rest of this fiasco to listen to the unbiased NPR (which I pay for). Please, please save me from the madness and get Obama out of office so that America can be America once again.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jadams1214
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 8:14am
  I don’t know how getting Obama out of office is going to change anything. Republicans on several occasions have had a chance to defund NPR and voted every single time to fund it. The only thing worse than democrats lies are republicans lies!
  
  Report this comment
fastfacts
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 5:27am
The whole thing was quite funny, would I have paid the full $5, well I didn’t but I would see the replay for free ( http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2012/oct/oreilly_stewart_rumble.html ). Take a look it is quite amusing and shows the difference between the right and left… well, you will just have to see it.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- sethklinefelter
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 8:44pm
  I have watched it and at times it is funny, but it does not show the difference between the right and left. Stuart is honest in his position and for that i respect him (even though i disagree). On the other hand, O’Reilly is horribly inconsistent in his beliefs. He wants government to do some things and not others, but there is no clear line. The best example from the debate is when Stuart cleaned his clock on wealth redistribution. Stuart is right that Social Security is wealth redistribution now. It may not have been intended to be that way originally, but it is now. So in the end we had a debate between some one that was on the left and a some one representing the RINO Republicans (even if he is not a republican, he acted like one).
  We need consistency in our arguments on the right let’s examine our own beliefs then have a real debate.
  
  Report this comment
GreenSicko
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 5:03am
This is a joke that is not funny. what a waste of time.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Hiswill
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 7:33am
  Come on folks………this was a charity event. It wasn’t meant to be a serious hard hitting debate..
  “One-half of the net profits from “The Rumble 2012″ will be donated by Jon and Bill to benefit charitable causes such as: New York Collaborates for Autism, Wounded Warrior Project, Fisher House Foundation, Alzheimer’s Association, Boomer Esiason Foundation, Doctors Without Borders, Tuesday’s Children, Portrait Project, NYC Coalition for the Homeless, Project A.L.S., Bob Woodruff Foundation, Haitian Health Foundation, The USO, Responsibility, Childcare, Best Friends Foundation and FealGood Foundation.”
  
  Report this comment
- ambrosia
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 10:46am
  @ HISWILL
  
  Agreed !
  
  Very, funny evening-
  benefiting terrific charities !
  
  Everybody needs to take a breath
  and allow their funny bone to be tripped & tickled,
  every now & then
  to lighten & dissipate all the heavy fog & malaise.
  C’mon, tickle, tickle ?
  
  That same light-hearted feeling, after the Romney rumble
  should permeate everything else.
  
  Yes, there’s lots of work to be done
  and yes, we can never be too confident of the outcome
  but a joyous heart will sweeten the anticipation
  and quell the anger coming from the other side.
  
  Nothing was lost on this bipartisan rumble,
  if one feels nothing was gained-
  then everyone’s even.
  
  Don’t be a Party-Pooper !
  
  For those who want to get their DIAPERS-in-a-TWIST,
  over a silly event like this,
  which actually covered MORE topics & facts,
  than the Boy-King & his Royal Press have, during his whole administration-
  remember, you are the ones walking around in them-
  your self-inflicted discomfort is your own.
  
  Solution-
  Change your drawers and get a life !
  
  Report this comment
13Lena
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 4:50am
It is just two egomaniacs needing to be in the spotlight. Half the money was suppose to go to charity, I hope they collected enough. O’Reilly has been very liberal leaning lately. I am not that impressed by him. Oh well it’s over and done with. I would have loved to see Dennis Miller against Stewart or Glen Beck.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KyleD
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:22am
  O’Reilley has always been liberal leaning, it just took a while for people to notice because they weren’t used to seeing anything but complete communists on network news.
  
  It’s why Stewart sets him up as the pinnacle of Conservatism…conservatism always beats liberalism in a debate but when you set up a liberal as conservative you can beat him.
  
  Report this comment
spikebu
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 4:35am
I honestly can’t see a difference between the two. Maybe Stewart is funnier, but he’s just as wrong. As far as the audience is concerned, they could have been talking about putting down their children, or their pets. Actually, I think it was discussed. I think the audience laughed.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
coizinho
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 3:08am
Add your comments

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- john141714
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 4:25am
  why dont they choose someone like Willkow to go up against stewart? O’Reillyand so many others cant call BS when it so needs to be. One in this debate stewart says something about why should we be able to decide what our tax money is spent on. Easy answer the constitution says what the gov. can and cant spend our tax $$ for. The second one I heard was subsidies for oil company’s well we dont give oil company’s oil subsidies we give them tax breaks….. Willkow would have mopped the floor with him…
  
  Report this comment
- Kevin The Elder
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:33am
  How sad for those of us that remember the debates between William F Buckley and anyone else on the left crazy enough to get on stage with him. Stewart wouldn’t have dared. Heck, O’Reilly wouldn’t have, either.
  
  Report this comment
coizinho
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:59am
Now I know why we are a such big trouble. My father used to said, as long the stupid’s agreed, the smarts going to be rich and enjoy a long life. If these BOZOS today depend of me to live, they end up die with hunger tomorrow.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- thetreyman
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 4:08am
  What the h*ll are you babbling about? If your father said those things and you understood them, you are some kind of idiot savant. I am very conservative and I can’t make heads or tails about anything you just said.
  
  Report this comment
- GO-FOR-LIBERTY
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:25am
  If you read between the lines it sayes O, aka Brrick, Sucks!
  
  Report this comment
Diego Roswell
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:23am
Self promoting pompous asses.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RLTW
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 3:37am
  Four words that perfectly describe these two pompous asses who are not connected to real Americans in any way.
  
  well except only the thier pompous minds.
  
  Report this comment
TreeTrimmerJim
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:21am
The last time our national budget was able to pay down on the national debt was 1957.

If the national debt is going up each year which of those years has a balanced budget?

If the national debt is increasing how can there be surplus?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
voodoolife
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:10am
I’d love to see Beck VS. Stewart. I like (not love) O’Reilly, but Beck would mop the floor with Stewart’s one liners…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- tuffterf
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 10:32am
  Glenn has been invited to go on Jon’s show… I wonder why he won’t accept. Glenn is afraid to have an intelligent conversation. I’d like to see them debate, but I know Glenn feels safer on his frat boy show.
  
  Report this comment
- PurrrpleMtnMajesty
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:14pm
  @tuffterf
  Says the one who hides behind a computer screen
  There is no point in going on lib shows.
  Nothing there but lies, degradation and distortion..
  There is enough of that in this world.
  
  Report this comment
BIGWUN
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:06am
Bill is a very fine, good and nice man. I am in disagrement with him that “fair and balanced” coverage means that we do not call out and identify the people who wish to destroy Americans and America like our State Socialist President. I have recently switched to Hannity and Glenn.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ModerationIsBest
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:28am
  Hannity is the biggest partisan hack on TV.
  
  Report this comment
- Lord_Frostwind
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:41am
  No Moderation, Chris Matthews runs circles around Hannity. You could say Hannity is the biggest “Conservative Hack” but he isn’t even in the same class as mister “Thrill up his leg when Obama speaks.”
  
  Report this comment
- mamapajamas
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 5:01am
  Modernisbest… in what way is Hannity a “partisan hack”? He isn’t a Republican, you know. He is a registered as a Conservative in New York.
  
  Further, Hannity says up front he is a conservative. He doesn’t even pretend to be “neutral” as so many of the partisan hacks on the alphabet networks claim to be.
  
  Report this comment
- grimmster
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:22am
  @moderation aka encinom
  Really? hannity has never said he wasnt a conservative,he his show has always leaned left.This is all you do moron, “partizan hack” are the only words you know to describe someone on the right,and exposes the f-n idiot that you are!But i guess since media matters pays you .50 cents a post, you dont care how stupid you look……
  
  Report this comment
- jadams1214
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 8:24am
  @MAMA Hannity is a registered conservative who has probably never voted for a conservative in his life and won’t in this election either. Actions speak louder than words. Voting for a republican is not voting for a conservative.
  
  Report this comment
- edmundburk
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:52pm
  I never thought I would agree with MODERATION IS BEST, but Hannity is a rebulican hack.
  
  Report this comment
Gary S
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:02am
Wow! I saved $4.95.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Teufel Hunden
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:55am
They should have showed more of ED Hill!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
KevINtampa
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:39am
Both these clowns are morons.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Smokey_Bojangles
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 2:02am
  I would not consider either one a friend of the Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- Huguenot Descendant
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 3:28am
  Agreed, Stewart was a loud mouth comedian proving how uninformed he is about anything related to common sense in the economy and how the government works, I mean seriously he doesn’t know the difference between debt and deficit? That is just sad.
  
  O’Reilly on the other hand was also a joke but in a different way, for one he kept laughing at Stewart’s unfunny jokes, and two he let the moron talk over him most of the time. O’Reilly could’ve defended a lot of Stewart’s points but instead he just stood there looking like a fool laughing it up at Stewart’s childish behavior, just like the teenagers who watch him.
  
  Seriously, O’Reilly let Stewart jab at the constitution and bible claiming that because the words Union and Welfare are in them means that the founding fathers were socialist! Is that not the most ridiculous thing anyone has ever heard!? That was Stewart’s argument as if that is intelligent and O’Reilly said NOTHING! What a major let down.
  
  As far I am concerned they are both idiots and I don’t want to watch either of their shows as this debate just proves how childish they both really are. Literally, Stewart acted like a loud mouth child on stage and people fine that “funny” and “intelligent” which proves just what has America come to and why Obama was elected.
  
  Report this comment
Live Slowly
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:34am
For real? Stewart really didn’t know there was a difference between the debt and deficit? He thought that when Clinton left office the US was debt free and had a Positive balance sheet? What an F’ING idiot! And he sat there and tried to defend his ignorance. That by itself should disqualify anything else he said as uninformed.

No wonder the left doesn’t make any sense to me. This guy is there GURU and he doesn’t even understand the most basic difference between these two words. If he can’t take the time to learn that tidbit then how can anyone believe he has a CLUE about anything more complicated?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jman-6
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:57am
  I think it was part of the Act. Hope so or were in Bigger trouble then we thought! Its cool these guys got together an raised a bunch of money for Wounded Warriors!
  
  Report this comment
SPOT_OF_TEA
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:34am
I paid the $4.95 to listen to Stewart use vulgar language for an hour and a half and for O’Reilly seeming uninterested,waiting for the opportunity to plug his books……..I wont make that mistake again..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
CatB
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:33am
Talk about a snooze fest … glad I didn’t pay for that .

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
JERRIO
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:21am
speaking as an o’reilly fan, from the clips I saw, he seemed as unprepared and unpolished as obama did. maybe he’s getting too old and lacking the mental agility needed. dennis miller may have been a better match. kudos to stewart. fortunately romney took the time to prepare for his debate.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- lisalake
  Posted on October 7, 2012 at 6:36am
  O’Rielly always sounds unprepared and unpolished! He ALWAYS leaves so much on the table, and usually the most important points… like the PBS/Big Bird discussion!!! Simple answer…Government IS NOT charged to FUND PUBLIC TELEVISION per OUR CONSTITUTION!!! Is IS NOT their job.
  
  Report this comment
ARealCharliesAngel
Posted on October 7, 2012 at 1:17am
Stewart tends to be a challenge to Bill’s balance…….flaming liberal & moderate for ratings nervertheless.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.