Death Toll Revised Down to 24 After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…100+ Injured…Children Among the Dead…Some Drowned…Heartbreaking Pictures…Reporter Struggles to Share Terrible News

Beck Broadcasts Live from Impact Zone in Oklahoma

Government

Guess How Much the Dress in That Glam Debbie Wasserman Schultz Photo Shoot Costs

Oct. 8, 2012 12:41pm
Debbie Wasserman Schultzs Vogue Dress Cost $2,000 at Bergdorf Goodman

(Marcus Mam/Vogue)

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz made waves after appearing in a recent special for Vogue Magazine, so heavily made up (or perhaps Photoshopped) that she appeared “almost unrecognizable,” to use the words of The Hill.

Schultz stunned in a modest blue dress, gazing off into the distance from the clean, polished exterior of a government building.  In another image, the woman’s characteristically tight ringlets were transformed into loose waves, her normally displeased-looking demeanor transformed into a light smile.

But how much did one of the dresses seen in the Vogue shoot cost?

New York City fashion designer Bradley Scott told TheBlaze in an email that gray dress Wasserman Schultz is seen wearing retails for $2,000 at Bergdorf Goodman.

Debbie Wasserman Schultzs Vogue Dress Cost $2,000 at Bergdorf Goodman

(Photo Credit: The Mad Jewess)

The dress is described on the Bergdorf website as a “Roland Mouret Eliza Harlequin-Wool Dress”:

Debbie Wasserman Schultzs Vogue Dress Cost $2,000 at Bergdorf Goodman

(Photo: Bergdorf Goodman Screen Shot)

According to Scott, the dress selection says a lot about the DNC head.

After highlighting Democratic talking points that vilify the rich– whether it’s “millionaires and billionaires” and their corporate jets, or the tax rate of those making over $250,000 being responsible for the national debt– the designer reminded that Schultz herself once said: “We must expose the stark difference between the Democrats fighting for the middle class and Republicans fighting for the elite and the ultra-wealthy.”

He continued in an email:

It is for the aforementioned that I am now baffled as I look to the current issue of Vogue magazine, with a story spread on this modern day “crusader for the poor”. Herein lies an extraordinary display of hypocrisy as [the] Congresswoman is seen decked out in a $2000 Roland Mouret in one picture. Also not surprising is the magazine that did this article in the first place, as its Editor in Chief, Anna Wintour is a notable Democratic Party operative, supporter of President Obama, hosting several fundraisers at her own private townhouse in Manhattan…

We emailed Wasserman Schultz’s spokesperson to see if the dress is hers or if it was something Vogue provided for the shoot, but he has not yet responded.  We’re also working on determining the cost of the blue Derek Lam dress.

Either way, as Scott says, the wardrobe selection is interesting considering the congresswoman regularly criticizes Mitt Romney’s wealth and “Swiss bank accounts” (when she, too, invests money overseas).  She has also embraced the envious Occupy Wall Street movement, blasting the rich by saying the protesters were “symbolic of the frustration that middle class folks and working people feel that the wealthy always seem to have the wind at their backs.”

So why is it that Democrat politicians are able to wear clothes that retail for thousands of dollars after blasting the rich, but Republicans are deemed “out of touch” when they do the same?

Blaze readers will recall that Ann Romney was slammed by the media for her $990 shirt back in May, but Michelle Obama looked “fit for a queen” in her $6,800 short-sleeved “jacket” in July.

Scott speculated: “I’d be willing to hedge my bet that this will be overlooked, much like Mrs. Obama’s $550 Louis Vuitton sneakers she wore to a soup kitchen or thousand dollar outfits worn on campaign trails as the same talking points harpoon the wealthy in return for votes.”

–

Related:

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (289)

1 2 3 … 9
  • Eastinfection
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:10pm

    I bet the value of the dress pales in comparison to the fortune they paid this obviously extremely talented photographer…..

    He/ she photog earned every penny for these images of he/ she DWS.

    Report this comment

    Eastinfection  
    • LibertyPhysics
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 1:17am

      You beat me to it. Not to mention the makeup artist, art director etc.

      Report this comment

      LibertyPhysics  
    • Bill Rowland
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 6:06am

      Pity the poor photographer – how many cameras did Debbie break during the shoot.

      OMG Nov 6, 2012

      Report this comment

      Bill Rowland  
    • Zipit
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 9:00am

      You can dress her up, but you can’t,,,,,, take the sty out of the pig!

      Report this comment

      Zipit  
    • sbenard
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 10:22am

      You can photoshop the face, but not the idiocy of her ideology!

      Report this comment

      sbenard  
    • sbenard
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 10:24am

      THAT’S Ditzy Debbie? Those aren’t photos! They’re ART! And they’re not human, either!

      Report this comment

      sbenard  
    • Americanius
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 11:05am

      Free campaign photos and publicity for the DNC chair during an election. Bet these glamos appear in DWS campaign ads gratis along with the dresses if not already.

      Report this comment

      Americanius  
    • AZRACISTBIGOT
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 11:07am

      I wonder if they could make Helen Thomas or Janet Napalitono look Hot?
      Just Askin

      Report this comment

      AZRACISTBIGOT  
    • Pontiaku
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 2:04pm

      “Guess How Much the Dress in That Glam Debbie Wasserman Schultz Photo Shoot Costs”
      Don’t know how much it cost but the one she wore isn’t worth anything now.

      Report this comment

      Pontiaku  
    • Secret Squirrel
      Posted on October 10, 2012 at 6:59pm

      .
      “Herein lies an extraordinary display of hypocrisy”
      Extraordinary? Not at all. Hypocrisy is rather ordinary among liberals.
      Democrats only want others to have some “skin in the game.” or
      “pay their fair share.”,

      That’s for the “little people” in “fly over country”.

      Report this comment

      Secret Squirrel  
  • betsyyoung
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:09pm

    Photoshopped??? Sandblasted is more like it!!

    Report this comment

    betsyyoung  
  • bornagaincowgirl
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:08pm

    Dem lefties are hypocrits and talk from both sides of their very large mouths and their only desire is to get their hands on more of my family’s hard-earned money and to make more laws for me and my household because we are obviously not as elite as them and we need someone to tell us how to live and behave. The arrogance of this snotty, upper-class group of people who purport to be friends of lower and middle class. LIARS.

    Report this comment

    bornagaincowgirl  
    • Texan4ever
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 2:56pm

      I’m with you. Just like with their boy odumbo, it’s all smoke and mirrors, nothing to see here, move along. They rely on stupid people who are content with appearance and superficial photoshopping. As long as it hides what is on the inside which would make most people run screaming in horror.

      Report this comment

      Texan4ever  
    • borderbully
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 10:43pm

      If she bought the dress(es) she may have paid with money from one of her Swiss or Indonesian offshore accounts. Yes, you heard right – offshore accounts. Check it out on line.

      Report this comment

      borderbully  
  • JOE
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:08pm

    LOOK in future she wont be able to lie for obama ………………..she will need the new getup to walk the streets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Report this comment

    JOE  
  • GrumpyCat
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:06pm

    $2000 is cheap if only it would fix what is wrong with Wasserman Schultz.

    Will Obamacare pay for her dress? :-)

    Report this comment

    GrumpyCat  
  • Detroit paperboy
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:04pm

    One word;;;;;;;;;;;;;;TRANSVESTITE;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    Report this comment

    Detroit paperboy  
  • AngryDwarf
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:03pm

    They must have brought in Speilberg for the photo shoot. He’s great at making the unnatural look normal.

    Report this comment

    AngryDwarf  
  • thx1138v2
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:02pm

    While gasoline in CA is $5.00+ a gallon and people cannot fill their tanks Obama goes to CA to reassure contributors using 1 747 Air Force One, 2 C17 Globemaster planes to transport ground vehicles, and 5 helicopters for security. Put this video next to a CA gas price sign and title it “Let Them Eat Cake”

    Please help this video (not mine) go viral: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxWWAYlWiSY

    Report this comment

    thx1138v2  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:01pm

    Okay, I guess I would have to agree with one of the statements in the story about the photos being photoshoped. Would be far easier that an actual make up job.

    Report this comment

    RJJinGadsden  
    • Eastinfection
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:13pm

      @RJJ…

      Photoshopped
      Compressed
      Airbrushed
      Color- enhanced
      and
      a little Witchcraft to boot..

      No expense spared.

      Report this comment

      Eastinfection  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:14pm

      Not even Sephora, Universal Studios, and the makeup department at Nordstrom combined have enough makeup to make THAT look presentable to polite company.

      However, they could probably get her to pass for a ghoul at Halloween Horror Nights this year.

      Report this comment

       
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:20pm

      EASTINFECTION, Too bad that Alberto Vargas passed away back in 1982. He could have done a far better job with the airbrush. Most readers of Playboy probably don’t pay that much attention to politics anyway, so it wouldn’t have bothered his followers.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:24pm

      BIOHAZARD23, LOL, her real likeness as a mask would make for a great Medusa Halloween costume.
      I also still think a still shot of 0bama’s snarling glaring face when Jim Lehrer interrupted him would make one of the all time best ever Halloween masks.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • Eastinfection
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:41pm

      RJJ….

      I’m familiar with his work ;D …R.I.P.

      Too bad DWS ‘s dad wasn’t Ron Vogel or he could’ve taken the pics ala Lexi.

      Report this comment

      Eastinfection  
    • Cavallo
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 2:35pm

      No amount of CGI enhancement can change the ugliness of her fascist philosophies.

      Report this comment

      Cavallo  
  • republic2011
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:59pm

    That woman repulses me. Says a lot for why the government really doesn’t need to pay for birth control. Just adopt her personality and demeanor and you are good to go. I haven’t met a Dem politician that isn’t a hypocrite. There are quite a few Repub’s that are in the same boat. No matter what happens in this next election, we need to stay awake and keep cleaning house. Or we will lose the Republic for good to these elitist/communists snobs.

    Report this comment

    republic2011  
    • DesertRose1960
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 2:36pm

      Actually, the article says that she is very motherly and worries about her staffers and always remembers birthdays with cake. I know she has a Mezzuzah on her office door, I’ve been there and seen it. I also watched her tenderly escourt and assist her very dear friend, Gabby Giffords at the Democratic Convention and when she returned to the House before her resignation. You can say she’s a snob and an elitist, but her actions don’t show it.

      Report this comment

      DesertRose1960  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 2:49pm

      She’s still a hypocritical witch.

      Report this comment

       
    • Verceofreason
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 5:29pm

      You hate her – because she’s smart.
      Something neither Palin or Michele Beard-mann will ever be accused of.

      Report this comment

      Verceofreason  
    • pissantno.10
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 7:34pm

      verc ya smarter the you but so is a road killed toad frog

      Report this comment

      pissantno.10  
    • Eastinfection
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 8:54pm

      @VERCE..
      How smart do you have to be to read the same damned bumper stickers over and over again?
      I’m no fan of Palin and Bachman but at least they look good sounding stupid.

      Report this comment

      Eastinfection  
  • Watermain
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:58pm

    Is that a silk purse the sow is carrying? Let’s see those ears Debbie…

    Report this comment

    Watermain  
  • Zurich
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:57pm

    Not the best photoshop nor the most expensive dress will cover up her betray to Israel.

    Report this comment

    Zurich  
  • walnutportconservative
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:57pm

    It’s about time they do something to boost her self esteem. She has been looking like a used dish rag lately. Couldn’t have anything to do with her shoddy alliances.

    Report this comment

    walnutportconservative  
  • biohazard23
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:57pm

    Lipstick on a boar. She’s uglier and way nastier than a pig.

    Report this comment

     
  • Swimming-with-the-Sharks
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:56pm

    And now that she’s worn them their value is now roughly 1/4 of the original. The cost of cleaning and delousing them saw to that.

    Report this comment

    Swimming-with-the-Sharks  
  • BradleyScott
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:56pm

    I think she should be ashamed of herself…

    Report this comment

    Bradley Scott  
  • momrules
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:54pm

    I saw DWS on Fox this weekend and was reminded of this photo of her. Well supposedly of her. On Fox she was her same old unattractive self with the same old frizzy **** so if the above photo is of her she didn’t learn any beauty tips from the photo shoot.

    As to the hypocrisy of the left………it is well established, it will never change and somehow they still sleep well at night. Go figure.

    Report this comment

    momrules  
  • hi
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:52pm

    “Let ME lord over you, little people!”

    Report this comment

    hi  
  • Cabo King
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:49pm

    what a waste of a great dress……

    Report this comment

    Cabo King  
  • elosogrande
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:49pm

    Pigs want it all for themselves, without working for it. They just want someone who works for a living to keep the trough full. Democrats and their fellow travelers are all pigs.

    Report this comment

    elosogrande  
    • DesertRose1960
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 2:09pm

      Doesn’t the Bible say something about judging other people as you want to be judged? I wouldn’t say Conservatives are pigs and don’t want to work for anything. I am a Democrat, but I’ve worked for everything I have.

      Report this comment

      DesertRose1960  
    • ZaphodsPlanet
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 4:35pm

      @DESERTPROSE

      It doesn’t say that. Maybe you should pick up a bible and read it instead of trolling sites to prove your ignorance time and time again. Love how liberals pick and choose statements that they have not read nor bother trying to understand in order to bash Christians and conservatives.

      So from this Christian conservative to you, the mentally challenged liberal…. “Get Bent” :)

      Report this comment

      ZaphodsPlanet  
    • DesertRose1960
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 8:28pm

      @Zaphod, Really, Elosogrande didn’t say “Democrats and their fellow travelers are all pigs.” Or did you mean that the Bible doesn’t say “For as you judge, so will you be judged, and the measure with which you measure will be measured out to you.”? This is a direct quote from the New American Bible, Matthew 7:1. And it also says “Do to others whatever you would have them do to you. This is the law and the prophets. “ Matthew 7:12 Now, as a Conservative and a Christian, I ask you, would you like it if I spoke to you with the same malice and hatred? I would never speak to you that way, because in my Liberal, Catholic moral view, that would be very un-Christlike. I do my best to treat others as I would wish to be treated. Had I written all Conservative Christians off as lazy pigs, I would hope that someone would remind me that this not something Jesus would do. Jesus told us to love our enemies. I would never wish you ill.

      Report this comment

      DesertRose1960  
    • ApolloLou
      Posted on October 9, 2012 at 2:23pm

      @DesertRose1960..why are you here? You don’t know any conservatives, so you have to flex your all knowing muscle somewhere. Cry when you feel anyone in your world is… as you said in an earlier post….smeared. I offered it then, I’ll offer it again, can I get you a box of kleenex? Pacifier? If you really get that upset by what is said here, once again, why are you here? It’s a really easy thing to fix. Pick your dirty kleenex up, tie the pacifier around your neck, and LEAVE.

      Report this comment

      ApolloLou  
  • cntrlwiz
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:48pm

    I guess I never rrealized how expensive pig lipstick really is…

    Report this comment

    cntrlwiz  
  • RightUnite
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:47pm

    Yeah, has to have been photoshopped….. It would take a ton of makeup to cover up the whole pig.

    Report this comment

    RightUnite  
  • HKS
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:47pm

    Those government jobs must pay much better than mine.

    Report this comment

    HKS  
    • AmericanStrega
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:54pm

      You said it HKS! It’s a splurge for me to go buy a new pair of Levi’s for

      Report this comment

      AmericanStrega  
    • IMCHRISTIAN
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:58pm

      I wonder how much the “ladies” are spending on clothes, etc that are now under ObamaCare thatl have their contraceptives paid for.

      Report this comment

      IMCHRISTIAN  
  • ONLY4UANDME
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:44pm

    She only looks like that in her dreams.

    Report this comment

    ONLY4UANDME  
  • bannedfromCNN
    Posted on October 8, 2012 at 12:43pm

    This is photoshop abuse and should be outlawed.

    Report this comment

    bannedfromCNN  
    • Brizz
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:14pm

      It’s actually an exceptional selling point for Adobe. Hats off to the AD and Photog at Vogue.

      Report this comment

      Brizz  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 1:14pm

      LOL, but at least they don’t have to actually pull up a cement truck full of makeup along with a crew of professionals that have to put up with her in person.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • Annapurna
      Posted on October 8, 2012 at 8:36pm

      Check the handrail behind “Debbie”….draw a line to the one in front of her, it doesn’t match up. She’s been strategically reduced.

      Report this comment

      Annapurna  
1 2 3 … 9

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love