
VIENNA (TheBlaze/AP) – Iran now could produce enough weapons-grade uranium to arm a nuclear bomb within two to four months but would still face serious “engineering challenges” – and much longer delays – before it would be able to use the material in an atomic warhead, a respected U.S. think tank said Monday.
While Iran denies any interest in possessing nuclear arms, the international community fears it may turn its peaceful uranium enrichment program toward weapons making – a concern that is growing as Tehran expands the number of machines it uses to enrich as well as its stockpile of enriched uranium. And as apprehension increases, so does anxiety that Israel will make good on threats to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities before that nation reaches the bomb-making threshold.
In a strident call for an internationally drawn “red line” on what he said was Iran’s move toward nuclear arms, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sept. 28 the world has until next summer at the latest to stop Tehran before it can build an atomic bomb. Flashing a diagram of a cartoon-like bomb before the U.N. General Assembly, he said Iran was ready to move to the “final stage” of making such a weapon by then.
For now, U.S. military and intelligence officials say they don’t believe Iran’s leadership has made the decision to build a bomb, while also warning that the country is moving closer to the ability to do so.
The Institute for Science and International Security did not make a judgment on whether Iran plans to turn its enrichment capabilities toward weapons making. But in its report made available to The Associated Press ahead of publication Monday, it drew a clear distinction between Tehran’s ability to make the fissile core of warhead by producing 25 kilograms (55 pounds) weapons-grade uranium from its lower enriched stockpiles and the warhead itself.
“Despite work it may have done in the past,” Iran would need “many additional months to manufacture a nuclear device suitable for underground testing and even longer to make a reliable warhead for a ballistic missile,” the report said.
Additionally, ISIS – which often advises Congress and other branches of U.S. government on Iran’s nuclear program – said any attempt to “break out” into weapons-grade uranium enrichment would be quickly detected by the United States and the International Atomic Energy, which monitors Tehran’s known enrichment sites. With Washington likely to “respond forcefully to any “break-out” attempt, Iran is unlikely to take such a risk “during the next year or so,” said the report.
Still, the report suggested a narrowing window as Iran positions itself to increase enrichment.
Iran now has more than 10,000 centrifuges enriching uranium at its main plant at Natanz, about 225 kilometers (140 miles) southeast of Tehran, making low-level material. Additionally it has about 800 machines turning out 20-percent enriched uranium at Fordo, a bunkered structure fortified against air attack near the holy city of Qom, as well as about 2,000 more installed but not yet running.
Uranium enriched to 20 percent can be turned into weapons-grade material much more quickly than low-enriched uranium. If the centrifuges at Fordo that now are idle also start operating and are used to make 20 percent material, Iran – using its total enrichment output of low and higher grade uranium – could produce enough weapons grade uranium for a warhead within three or four weeks, said the summary.
Olli Heinonen, who stepped down as the IAEA’s deputy director general in charge of the Iran file in 2010, said the ISIS report contained “good and technically sound estimates.”
He said Fordo will nearly double its production capacity of 20 percent enriched uranium to up to 30 kilograms (more than 60 pounds) a month, if an when all machines there are operating.





















































































































Gary_K
Oct. 8, 2012 at 8:22pmhttp://www.wnd.com/2012/10/irans-secret-nuclear-bomb-plant-revealed/
tick … tick … tick
Report this comment
Redfor
Oct. 8, 2012 at 6:10pmHas anyone really thought about WHO they would use a nuke against? Isreal? I dont think so… If you nuke the holy land.. No body gets the Holy land.. They’ve been fighting for the territory for ever.. Now… The US? give a nuke or 3 to some terrorists, sneak one over out non-existant border… Boom! and they can still claim they had nothing to do with it and we cant retaliate until we can prove where the nuke came from.
When you’re fighting a Super power nation you cant fight them directly (Sound familiar?) it’s just a big @ss IED.
Report this comment
MeteoricLimbo
Oct. 8, 2012 at 3:46pmSoo is Iran above dealing with N. Korea for some of theirs? All this talk is based on Iran going nuclear, what about bio and chem? Those dont seem to count now
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Oct. 8, 2012 at 4:13pmIsrael can defend themselves. They are big boys with their own cache of weapons, including nuclear.
Report this comment
FatFreedom
Oct. 8, 2012 at 5:19pmBe aware of the Boogie Man..
The Soviet “lost” thousands of nuclear warheads?
Iran has been wanting to develop nuclear power for years, as I wish we would do more of here at home as well as it is the best most efficient source of energy. Now our military industrial complex will use this as an excuse to kill a few more million Arabs…
Some facts that we are not told here or anywhere in the main stream media:
1. There are churches in Iran, and many former Muslims have been turing to Christ : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IDdpL7lwas&list=PLF93F0BFC6A8FF188&index=2&feature=plpp_video
2. There are many Jews living in Iran, in fact Mahmoud Ahmadinejad met with Orthodox Jews last time he was in NY. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7SPzBPSDPQ
I just listen to his address that he gave a couple of years ago that caused the Americans to pack up and leave. That is the only thing we were told. Here you can hear from his own mouth what he says, I dare you to listen to it in full. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4phNuwx8Hs
I for one was surprised.
I am a Christian and view Islam only a step above Mormonism, as they at least only believe in one god. Though they are completely lost, and the Jihadist are the ones that are obedient to the Koran as far as I am concerned. I do think that most Muslims don’t hold to a literal view of their book and tend to me more secularized, as we did not have any terrorist attacks in the west before the 70′s
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Oct. 8, 2012 at 3:44pmHow gullible are y’all? They’ve been playing this card since the 90′s. For 15-20 years “Iran is going to have a nuke in no time”. Don’t you have the slightest inclining that you might be getting played?
You know why Iran is the bogeyman? They threaten the dollar hegemony. Period. They will sell oil for SDR’s, Renembi, Rial, etc. THAT get’s you “tomahawked”. How dare they not use dollars that Helicopter Ben prints? So what if it’s inflationary. Do it or we’ll lie to make you look like a pariah and we’ll bomb the heck out of you.
Sooner or later the BRIC’s are going to stand up for one of the resource producers in the middle east or Africa and the US is going to have a real problem.
Wake up people.
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Oct. 8, 2012 at 4:19pmI agree, I’m so sick of hearing “the sky is falling” about Iran. One week it’s “they already have a nuclear weapon” then the next week I hear “they are 3 to 4 YEARS away from having a nuclear weapon” then the next week it’s “Iran is 6 months away from a nuclear weapon” then next week it’s “Iran is 2 years away from a nuclear weapon.” Bottom line is they don’t know. I don’t trust the “chosen people” controlled Marxist Media either. They lied and used propaganda to justify an invasion of Iraq because they too had “weapons of mass destruction” yet not one single one was every found. And even if Iran does have a nuclear weapon, Israel has them too and can defend themselves on their own.
I don’t need “chosen people” American journalists trying to convince me to send American kids to die for “chosen people” over in Israel. They can defend themselves.
Report this comment
dimitrisokolov
Oct. 8, 2012 at 4:28pmIran’s nuclear program actually started in the 1950s with the help of the Eisenhower administration and the US gave Iran help right up until the Shah was overthrown. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran
Iran has been 2-3 months away from the bomb for over 20 years now, so if they were pursuing it, then they should have it by now.
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Oct. 8, 2012 at 2:17pmA lot of people don’t seem to realize one key thought about a nuclear Iran. The point below is not necessarily about Iran, which is why it is so critical…and so grossly overlooked.
When the UN was formed in ’46, it was chartered with the task of preventing global wars like WW2. Part of this charter was to do so by economic means, as well as political and military. Economic is the engine by which the UN controls the larger nations, who could care less about political ramifications and rightly would scoff at UN military intervention.
The mechanism is simple: create global trade and economic interdependence. Through free trade agreements, wealth redistribution, and similar pursuits, the UN has created a scenario whereby all nations on planet are more or less globally economically interdependent. Look at how much a fart in the desert winds can cause oil to spike. You know this fact to be true.
The problem with this issue is that the economy is presently fear-centric. Anything that scares, will cripple. This is where Iran comes in. If they have a nuke, it will put fear into the system. If they use a nuke, it causes an instant global panic in economies everywhere. Iran wants to deliver fear, it is required for their worldview and belief in the Mahdi.
It doesn’t matter where, who, how many killed, if Iran nukes a city, the whole world goes to hell in less than 48 hours.
Hope you all have a GOTH plan, because you will need it.
Report this comment
Mutiny
Oct. 8, 2012 at 2:10pmYa know these types of things are thrown around a lot and it rarely seems to come true. If we act and this “think tank” is wrong they should be charged criminally for the war. Any loss of Americans should be on their head. The cost of the bombs, fuel, and repair on equipment should be on them. Its time for these people to held accountable for their predictions.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Oct. 8, 2012 at 2:20pmThese guys never paid for their last war:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/white-man-s-burden-1.14110
Report this comment
Yakov-Yurovsky
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:59pmSo if what they think is true, then Iran already has an arsenal of nuclear grade dirty bombs! Now I understand what those Iranian military leaders were talking about when they claimed Israel will be destroyed in 24 hours if attacked. And I thought the Iranian military leaders were crazy! lol Nuclear contamination is a mother f*cker! lol
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Oct. 8, 2012 at 2:13pmThe sky is falling, the sky is falling, the sky is falling. We’ve heard it all before. WMD’s were the last excuse to start an illegal war.
Report this comment
SREGN
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:22pmI think the Think Tank can’t think as quickly as the rest of us.
Report this comment
Zurich
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:00pmAnd who cares about this? The communist in chief is too busy collecting money in Hollywood for his retirement…….
Report this comment
Walkabout
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:13pmHe has to pay for his $ 35 million dollar home in Hawaii somehow.
He’ll pay for the humongous property taxes by his friends hooking him up with speaking engagements
Report this comment
U.N.hater
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:22pmClinton gave us a nuclear N.Korea. Obama will give us a nuclear Iran.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:44pmIf a ‘think tank’ projects an Iranian ‘bomb’ in 2 to 4 months, then it will probably be more like 6 weeks before one is ready. Obama will set by and do nothing at all because he is a Muslim. He was raised muslim from two different angles,…from his father’s people and from his adopted father in Indonesia. Make no mistake about it……he is muslim. He may cover it up to an extent by claiming he is Christian and goes to the radical black liberation church, he is muslim.
Report this comment
rockymtngal
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:34pmObama would prefer to join hands with Ahmadinejad & sing kumbaya, than stand with Isreal. He was eager to help out with Eygpt because he knew who would take over that country. (IBH) What was in it for Obama to stand with Libya? Why isn’t Obama helping the Syrian people get rid of Bashar Hafez al-Assad? You’d think that a dictator who has killed 30,000 of his own people would warrant some consideration, wouldn’t you? The fact of the matter is, unless it benefits Obama in some way, he won’t do anything until it’s too late. Both Russia & China have been helping Iran achieve nuclear technology & it’s not just for “energy.” Who is kidding whom? Sigh SOSDD.
Report this comment
Nepenthe
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:04pm“The fact of the matter is, unless it benefits Obama in some way…”
Uh, this has been true for the executive branch for quite awhile. That is why murderous dictators have always been on our friends list.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:25pmNpenthe
Try Mobuto Seko of Zaire. We would not help that regime.
Try Central African Republic. Very brutal with allegations of cannibalism.Definielty qualifies as ruthless & muderous.
Try Etheopia where a governement was overthrow & by a junta of 3 people which was soon whittled down to one thug. Ethopia was an ally but not after that. We desperately needed an ally in the Horn of Africa& yet did not have one. So obviously we don;t support everyone. Somalia was a Russian ally & for a short while Somalia & Ethopia both were.
I don’t remember us supporting Franco.
We did support the colonels in Greece. But Greece was a long time target of the Soviet Union from 1848 or slightly before & on.
The Soviet Union entered into the game a good 15 years or more than the United States.
Many future leaders were trained in Mother Russia & were lucky to escape with their lives before the Great Purges started in the 1930s (like Nkomo & Ho Chi Minh).
Report this comment
Walkabout
Oct. 8, 2012 at 1:27pmne·pen·the
1. a drug or drink, or the plant yielding it, mentioned by ancient writers as having the power to bring forgetfulness of sorrow or trouble.
2. anything inducing a pleasurable sensation of forgetfulness, especially of sorrow or trouble.
Definilety colours your posts. Why?!
Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:24pmIt’s nice to know how long we have left to live. I believe Iran will strike US first. Russia/Iran/China all are against us. If we are gone, who will defend Israel?
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:32pmIf we are gone, who’s going to feed the world?
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:24pmOnce the material is made it can be transported to a million possible locations. It will be far too late after that.
Israel doesn’t have the luxury to wait, and will have to make a decision soon. If they strike before our election, Obama will mute his response in fear of losing the Jewish vote. If they strike after the election and Obama wins it, then his administration will go all in against Israel. Count on it.
Report this comment
smokeysmoke
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:08pmgood thing we all know its only for medical research… the time to strike is 30 days… funny, the hit is probbly going to be a day or two after our election
Report this comment
JUSTANOTHEROPINION
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:04pmAs if by fire! Think about it hard, not long for time is running out.
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Oct. 8, 2012 at 12:01pmWell slather me with bacon grease and fry me up in a pan. In other words, DUH!
Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Oct. 8, 2012 at 11:56am“Think Tank: Iran 2-4 Months From Weapons-Grade Uranium”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reality: Think Tanks are probably more than 6 months behind the curve.
Report this comment