MythBusters Answers Titanic’s Biggest Question: Could Jack and Rose Both Have Survived on That Board?
It’s something every teenage girl at the end of the 1990s seeing Titanic for the fifth time was thinking: Leo DiCaprio so could have fit on that wooden board instead of freezing in the water and dying. Now the popular show MythBusters has finally taken the time to weigh in on the topic with its expert reenactment skills.
In James Cameron’s 1997, 11-Academy Award winning film, the female lead Rose DeWitt Bukater (Kate Winslet) is left at the end floating on a wooden board in the freezing Atlantic after the White Star Line ship had floundered. Her lover in the film, Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio) is in the water and ultimately freezes to death. At the time, die hard Leo fans felt both Rose and Jack could have fit on the debris and survived.

Jack and Rose in the final scenes of Titanic, the 1997 film. (Image via GeekOSystem)
The Discovery Channel show has officially tested this theory to see if Jack could have floated alongside Rose who was rescued little more than an hour later. Mythbuster’s Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage — two grown men — in the episode “Titanic Survival Results” try to get on a similarly sized piece of wood in the San Francisco Bay for their test.
“When we first got on, it felt anything but stable. Just like the movie and the small scale test we did,” Mythbusters said. “It felt like we would tip at any moment.”

Mythbusters tests out whether two people could have floated on the board while awaiting rescue. (Image: MythBusters screenshot)
Naturally, the duo had an idea to “spread the buoyancy around.” They took off the life vest Rose would have been wearing and strapped it underneath the wood. This kept them as a pair out of the water for the most part.
Watch the clip:
“However noble Jack’s intentions might have been, sometimes discretion is the better part of valor,” Hyneman said. “With all we’ve learned, I think Jack’s death was needless.”
Mythbusters then goes on to inform Cameron, who was a guest on the show, of their findings. When informed that the couple both could have survived on the board — had they thought to strap the life jacket under it to add more support and propped their bodies up out of the water – Cameron says “I think you guys are missing the point here.” That point being that the script says Jack dies.
Cameron does acknowledge that maybe movie makers should have made the board a little smaller to ensure the plausibility of Jack’s required death.
Mythbusters wasn’t the first to take on this more-than-decade old question though. Earlier this year, a couple jokingly posted an image on Imgur showing all the different configurations of how Jack and Rose could have both fit on the board.

(Image: Imgur via Huffington Post)
Although less of an actual test compared to Mythbusters, the image makes its point too.
But, as Cameron said during his appearance on MythBusters, it was in the script and no matter what “the dude’s going down.”
This story has been updated to correct a typo.
(H/T: GeekOSystem)
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.













































































































SquareHead
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 9:52pmMyth busters lost all credebillity when they tried to disprove the moon hoax using a construction light as the sun. Only that they kept it 30 feet away from their model, instead of 5 miles to keep it to scale.
I supposed on silly trivial silly things like this, they have no reason to lie.
Report this comment
Cruelnunusual
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 6:41amDid those two fruits test the 69 position? They probably went with the doggy style.
Report this comment
steelpanther
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 7:25pmI remember when I was in high school my mother making me go watch this with her and my father. Seeing an annoying pretty boy jerk bite it was the only thing that made the film worthwhile to watch, do not take this away from me. Course giving them a hard time because they made me go to a movie with a naked woman in it to also helped make it worthwhile.
Well directed movie, but it tried too much to be art then entertaining. It was too long, and as a 16ish year old boy, boring as all h e double hockey sticks.
Report this comment
StargateSG1fan
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 6:54pmTo bad Mythbusters didn’t test their theory in “Sub Zero” arctic conditions in the middle of the night. Not to mention the fact of “Hypothermia!” Besides “The Princess Bride” is a far greater movie than “The Titanic” hopefully “The Princess Bride” will be released back into movie theaters too!!! (As Original Version).
Report this comment
KangarooJack
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 7:16pmAs you wish.
Report this comment
Ilikepeople
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 9:04pmI don’t watch Mythbusters, for exactly the reason you stated. In many ways they are misleading like as you pointed out the water temperatures, and they didn’t get the physical emotional beat-down the pair received either. Mythbusters didn’t just watch a ship they were on go down with hundreds of people on board either.
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 9:30pm@STARGATESG1FAN
The Princess Bride is a Great movie, I’ve seen it many times. I DO hope they don’t try to re-make it and ruin it.
Report this comment
Cosmos102
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 10:05pmInconceivable!
Report this comment
Jaycen
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 10:50pm@KangarooJack
I think what you meant to say was, “Aaas yoooou wiiiiiish!”
Report this comment
Jaycen
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 10:51pm@Cosmos102
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Report this comment
Jaycen
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 10:51pmA battle of wits? To the death? I accept!
Report this comment
trurl
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:51amThey did test the hypothermia angle as well and found that Jack could not have survived long enough to be rescued but Rose, on the board and mostly out of the water, could have…barely.
Report this comment
SilaSez
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 4:30pmHad Rose, as Jack asked her to do, stayed in the lifeboat, he would have had the board all to himself, neither one needed to die had SHE followed HIS simple request, stay in the frickin’ row boat, but no, SHE couldn’t let a MAN tell HER what to do, so in large part, SHE killed HIM…..lol
Report this comment
thetruthseeker711
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 5:30pmLmfao
Report this comment
Mapache
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 10:36pmin the end they kill us all
Report this comment
Balpit
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:45pmThat photo where “Jack” and “Rose” are playing cards…why does Strip Poker come to mind?
Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:37pmThis is worthy of discussion how? That is why MythBusters is tackling that.
Report this comment
eCharleen
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:13pmNo joke. I thought this the first time I saw her hog the entire thing! Thanks for getting to the bottom of it.
Report this comment
EXPERT ON MY OPINION
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:11pmI had always wondered why the all of other people (possibly in the hundreds) in the water desperately fighting to survive just ignored Jack & Rose & the prime piece of real estate that they had laid claim to, Finders Keepers I guess
Report this comment
762x51
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:07pmJack only survives if he has the same 21st century dry suits as the Mythbusters. Both people on the board would have died from hypothermia in minutes. In the north Atlantic you have about 5 minutes before death because of the water temperature, if you are wet you are dead only the time varies based on the amount of immersion, not the final outcome.
Report this comment
Anadara
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:48pmFantasizing about an alternate ending to a movie? My alternate ending is where BHO is on the Titanic and all the life boats are gone.
Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:38pmStop teasing. That is so exciting.
Report this comment
goahead.makemyday
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 8:54amNo, Obama would be the first person to throw the women and children overboard to make sure he was the only one in a life boat to ensure he would survive.
Report this comment
RobbieTLHughie
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 9:39amYou people are diseased.
Report this comment
Failbhe
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:41pmWho cares about the board? They spent 45minutes of the movie swimming around in the frigid water that had flooded the ship. They both would have died 5 minutes into all that drama.
Report this comment
FoxholeAtheist
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:01pmThey would have been able to use their body heat to stay alive for the next hour.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:28pmSo he wouldn’t have to edit the footage for “Full Screen TVs”, Cameron used a special camera that is now pretty standard and as a result:
The “Full Screen” version had slightly more nudity than the “Wide Screen” version.
Report this comment
Slowman101
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:16pmJack knew what was coming. He knew that Rose would be a high maintenance woman and that he would endure years of backbreaking labor to support her lifestyle so he chose to bite the bullet and go down.
Report this comment
kenboo1
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:31pmI concur…
Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:39pmI would kill myself, too.
Report this comment
midnightvelvet
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:13pmI’m sorry…when I dream of men, Leonardo DiCaprio isn’t even in the running. Can that guy even grow a beard yet? I actually preferred the “bad” guy. He was cuter. I’d let him on my floating, carved door any day. I actually snickered when Leo sank. I’m a bad person, I guess.
Report this comment
Lord_Frostwind
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:22pmI’ll give that dude props, he was smart enough to take control of that overturned lifeboat and kept people from swamping them. About is far from being noble as it comes, but he was still alive and saved a lot more people than Rose and Jack.
Report this comment
RedSpotinaBlueState
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:09pmI thought about that every time I watched that movie. if they had climbed on at the same time from opposite sides of the board, they could have both climbed on and balanced. But yes, if Jack was going down regardless, they SHOULD have made the board smaller to make it plausible
Report this comment
atechgeek
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:45pmJack was smart and could see the future nagging. He chose wisely.
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 2:19pmAgreed. Both would have been a cold watery death. He chose the faster, more painless way.
Report this comment
thetruthseeker711
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 5:32pmInsight into your marriage! lmfao
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:40pmNO…cold water …hypothermia = DEATH!!
Report this comment
coyote1hell
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:38pmReally..?..who cares..?…
Report this comment
ryesta7971
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:21pmyeah…who cares about knowledge!! Let’s all get back to listening to politicans lying to you
Report this comment
tweetybird
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:32pmUm…..this was a movie. Why is this even a question? Besides, if Jack had lived all the girls wouldn’t have been all googly eyes for him.
I agree with TSUNAMI_22.
Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 3:41pmIn this day and age,many people mistake cinema with reality.
Report this comment
IrritableGimp
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:32pmErr, it was a movie…does it really matter?
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:30pmInteresting.
Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Posted on October 10, 2012 at 1:10pmMythBusters Answers Titanic’s Biggest Question: Could Jack and Rose Both Have Survived on That Board?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFZrzg62Zj0
Report this comment