Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

TheBlaze TV

Beck Walks Through Libya Timeline and Describes ‘Massive Cover-Up…Bigger Than Watergate’

Oct. 11, 2012 11:29am Tiffany Gabbay

On Wednesday evening, Glenn Beck delved into a laundry list of evidence revealing that the White House and President Obama have been far from honest when it comes to the recent embassy attacks in Libya and in Cairo.

The latest in a string of damning information now indicates that the State Department even rejected embassy staff’s request for additional security prior to the attack and that security threats were present in Libya for months prior to September 11, when U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, two Navy SEALs and another American civil servant were killed.

The coup de grace for the Obama administration, however, was in blaming a YouTube video for the attacks on U.S. embassies in Cairo and Benghazi when they were in fact premeditated. Watch below as Beck goes point for point through a powerful timeline of events — both in the administration and across the Middle East — that remove any shred of doubt that, as Beck put it, a cover-up far exceeding the Watergate scandal is at play.

A chronology of crucial moments leading up to and in the aftermath of the attacks is provided below courtesy of the Heritage Foundation:

April 6: IED thrown over the fence of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

April 11: Gun battle erupts between armed groups two-and-a-half miles from the U.S. Consulate, including rocket-propelled grenades.

April 27: Two South African contractors are kidnapped by armed men, released unharmed.

May 1: Deputy Commander of U.S. Embassy Tripoli’s Local Guard Force is carjacked, beaten, and detained by armed youth.

May 1: British Embassy in Tripoli is attacked by a violent mob and set on fire. Other NATO embassies attacked as well.

May 3: The State Department declines a request from personnel concerned about security at the U.S. Embassy in Libya for a DC-3 plane to take them around the country.

May 22: Two rocket-propelled grenades are fired at the Benghazi office of the International Committee of the Red Cross, less than 1 mile from the U.S. Consulate.

June 6: A large IED destroys part of the security perimeter of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Creates hole “big enough for 40 men to go through.”

June 10: A car carrying the British ambassador is attacked in Tripoli. Two bodyguards injured.

Late June: The building of the International Red Cross attacked again and closed down, leaving the U.S. flag as the only international one still flying in Benghazi, an obvious target.

August 6: Armed assailants carjack a vehicle with diplomatic plates operated by U.S. personnel.

September 8: A local security officer in Benghazi warns American officials about deteriorating security.

September 11: Protesters attack the U.S. Cairo embassy. U.S. Embassy releases statement and tweets sympathizing with Muslim protesters/attackers.

September 11: U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya is attacked, Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans are killed.

September 12: Secretary Clinton and President Obama issue statements condemning both the video and the attacks.

September 12: U.S. intelligence agencies have enough evidence to conclude a terrorist attackwas involved.

September 13: Press Secretary Jay Carney condemns video and violence at a news conference.

September 14: Carney denies Administration had “actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.”

September 14: The bodies of slain Americans return to Andrews Air Force Base. President Obama again blames the YouTube video.

September 16: U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appears on Sunday talk shows and says the attacks were provoked by the video, exclusively.

September 16: Libyan President Mohamed Magarief says, “no doubt that this [attack] was preplanned, predetermined.”

September 17: State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland refuses to call attacks an act of terror.

September 19: CNN reports having found Ambassador Stevens’s diary, which indicates concern about security threats in Benghazi.

September 19: Director of the National Counterterrorism Center Matthew Olsen tells Congressthe attack in Libya was “terrorism.”

September 20: Carney tries to back up Olsen, says it was “self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.”

September 20: Obama refuses to call attack terrorism, citing insufficient information.

September 21: Secretary of State Clinton, at meeting with Pakistani Foreign Minister, says, “What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.”

September 25: On ABC’s “The View,” Obama says, “we don’t have all of the information yet so we are still gathering.”

September 25: To the U.N. assembly, Obama blames “A crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.”

September 26: Libya’s Magarief on the “Today” show says, “It was a preplanned act of terrorism directed against American citizens.”

September 26: Published reports show U.S. Intel agencies and the Obama Administration knew within 24 hours that al-Qaeda affiliated terrorist were involved.

September 27: Innocence of Muslims filmmaker Mark Basseley Youseff (aka Nakoula Basseley Nakoula) is arrested and denied bail on the charges of “probation violation.”

September 28: Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, Jr., issues a statement backing the Obama Administration’s changing story about the Libyan attack. Says facts are evolving.

October 2: Carney declines to comment on reported requests from diplomats in Libya for additional security, citing the State Department’s internal investigation.

Beck went on to ask why the embassy was denied their repeated requests for additional security and why Stevens was even still present in Benghazi when the British embassy and Red Cross were “smart enough to leave.” He also wondered why the FBI were not deployed to the scene until last week and spent a mere “three hours” on the ground there.

“Whose idea was it to make up the video excuse?” Beck asked. He added his theory that Stevens “was our broker tasked with arming the Libyan rebels” and that eventually, when he “needed to get the weapons back,” the deal “went bad.”

“This is a massive institutional cover-up bigger than Watergate,” he slammed. It may be just “massive incompetence but you have been lied to in a massive and coordinated fashion.”

Beck suggested that the reason Obama is so focused on “Big Bird” currently is to detract attention away from this scandal and that the president is pandering to the Muslim Brotherhood by condemning the “slander of Islam.”

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (73)

Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 3:43pm
thegreatcarnac
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:33pm
RIGHTUNITE…..
Give up arguing with Nevermind…..he said he was black. That means he would take up for Obama and his positions if obama walked into to Nevermind’ home and shot his wife and screwed his dog right in front of him. I wrote that reversal on purpose because obama would never touch a women…he is gay. Michelle is some transgendered thing there for show.
***********

Didnt take long for a racist to appear. So said yet expected on this site.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 7:37pm
  Don’t expect the “chosen people” Marxist Media to enlighten anyone.
  
  “Of the sixty-four(64) senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines, forty-two(42) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 66%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 33 times(3,300 percent).”
  
  That sums up our problem with this country and the Marxist Media they control.
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 3:20pm
mastice

First and foremost – if you really are a US vet (I will take your word on that) and not pulling anyone’s leg here – then I personally thank you for your service.

I understand where you are coming from concerning the covert nature of what these men might have been doing. (again – questioning CIA station versus Embassy is a valid question and point that you raise, which I am not debating with you)
***************

First , you are welcome and it was my pleasure to serve as much as it was my duty to serve. #rd gen war vet so i am following the line of men in my family. I agree with you that the handling of this by the Obama administraion was awful but what do you expect them to say? Walk up to the podium and say ” our ambassador and a few former seals got killed while selling weapons to Libyans?” . Romney actually screwed this up by making it a political attack that night against Obama, perhaps he cousdl have checked first to see if there was more to it?

We all have a right to question things but when those questions can leak sensative national security information its best to leave it alone. Just as it happened in the GOP house hearings on this yesterday. It is CIA that was invloved just go watch the hearings

.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- louie louie
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 3:44pm
  So you want to protect a CIA facility that has been abandoned and burned down? We should just leave it alone rather than expose secret information the terrorists already know? It sounds like you’re more interested in protecting the Obama administration during an election than in protecting secrets. I guess Congress should stop investigating Fast and Furious, too, because Obama has stamped it Top Secret. Is there anything the American people have a right to know in your world?
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:50pm
AvengerK
yes of course NEVERMIND..your heartfelt sincerity is noted.

However…when the embassy in Benghazi was asking for more security weeks before the assault and even on the day of the assualt perhaps the state department should have acted on the credible threat?

********
Get your facts straight, the embassy is in Tripoli and there is only one. If you can get the basic facts right on the story the rest isnt worth a response.

AS far as thhe CIA angle, did you see the hearings yesterday? It was a CIA front which was confirmed already and there are others still there that coudl be put in harms way.

As far as the SEALS, my buddy is a former seal and trainer at Blackwater. Do you know how many SEAL have been killed in the past decade? Alot and more than you will ever know and all are proud to do so serving thier country. DOnt speak of these men when you dont know them and what they knowingly sign up for

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
thegreatcarnac
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:47pm
I have noticed that the closer we come to the election we have more obmanites on line here. Is that a coincidence? No! The left is getting really nervous and they stupidly think they can come on this conservative site and convince a few of us to change sides. As if we would say…..”hmmmmm…that leftist lying piece of feces taking up for that fake, racist, marxist, Kenyan, traitor……………has a point”. It doesn’t matter if the attack that killed our ambassador was on a Consulate or an embassy. It was an attack on our flag and our people and people were killed;…and the blood is on the hands of obama and hillary.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TheHalfrican
  Posted on October 12, 2012 at 7:36pm
  Well said !
  
  Report this comment
voting-for-romney
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:29pm
When it is clear that state department personnel had to beg for personnel protection, and were denied ammunition, denied arms, denied protective personnel, we owe to the mother of the slain SEAL this simple explanation, when you fail to do things that are preventable, we call that negligence, I am sorry to inform you, that your son died because of the negligence of the President of the United States?

When the newspaper reporter was raped by the crowd nobody wanted blame anyone, and the media does not say, we don’t negotiate with terrorists, and now we discover this? Is this the pattern of the next four years? If President Obama can not resign in shame, then anyone who votes for President Obama should hold their head in shame when they learn what happened?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
JEANNIEMAC
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:11pm
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/
ARMY COLONEL’S LETTER TO ADMINISTRATION

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:05pm
mastice
@Nevermind

A good question/point on if it was an embassy or a CIA station, but still irrelevant to the situation. What is relevant is that we have 4 dead US citizens, one the official Ambassador to Libya, and an administration that – at best – shot from the hip with a knee-jerk reaction that turned out to be completely false.
*************

They shot form the hip due to trying to cover up government activities form the public as we always do but Romeny jumped the gun and made a statement to turn this into more than it should be. I am a war vet so i feel for the loss of any US life but what stevens and the ex seals were doing was covert and not to be disclosed. People on those type of missions are aware of the risk and while we mourn their loss they knew what the worst case scenario would be.

An Embassy is in the capital , Benghazi is not the capital. An embassy is secured by marines not former seals. As soon as i heard these pieces of info i knew it was a CIA front and was proven correct. Use common sense guys. Talking about this attack and the office will only put those who are still there , and there are many covertly there, in harms way. If you are upset about this loss of like you shoudl be but you shoudl also be mindful that moer talk will only casue more harm

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- AvengerK
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:36pm
  yes of course NEVERMIND..your heartfelt sincerity is noted.
  
  However…when the embassy in Benghazi was asking for more security weeks before the assault and even on the day of the assualt perhaps the state department should have acted on the credible threat? Oh wait it did..it pulled the security to give the appearance that all is well in Benghazi and “al Qaeda is on it’s heels today”..because..well..because it’s an election year. On the other hand..the embassy in Vienna got some new Chevy Volts so that’s some good budget allocation from the state department and the Obama administration yes?
  
  Oh and Chris Stevens was a career diplomat and asked for the post in Benghazi. Nice try with the “it was a CIA front and you guys just outed them” routine.
  
  But speaking of outing our covert operatives…what happened to SEAL Team 6 (which officially doesnt’ even exist) after they took out OBL? Oh yeah..Biden and Obama couldn’t keep their mouths shut and they lost many members of that team in an attack on their helicopter just over a month later. But hey..spiking the football is more important..after all “bin laden is dead and GM is alive”..right NEVERMIND? Right?
  
  Get better material clownshoes.
  
  Report this comment
- ConstitunalAmerican
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:40pm
  If this is true what you say, then soon as their cover was blown or suspected, they should have been air lifted out of there. They had several prior notices of the impending attacks and still they refused to help these men.
  
  Report this comment
- mastice
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:43pm
  First and foremost – if you really are a US vet (I will take your word on that) and not pulling anyone’s leg here – then I personally thank you for your service.
  
  I understand where you are coming from concerning the covert nature of what these men might have been doing. (again – questioning CIA station versus Embassy is a valid question and point that you raise, which I am not debating with you)
  
  What I do not agree with you on, and find absolutely no valid excuse behind, is how this got handled by the current administration. To come out and blame, or use, a YouTube video as cover for what was really going on? That is thin, easily debunked, and irresponsible on the part of this administration.
  
  I believe that those who are questing this publicly (like those in Congress and Romney) are doing the correct thing. I think, even if it was covert activities that went awry, it now needs to be brought front and center to the public because we have dead American’s in a foreign country that we do not have openly hostile relations with.
  
  Again, as I said, at best this administration “shot from the hip with a knee-jerk reaction that turned out to be completely false.” At worst, they knowingly and openly lied about it. And that is what we (everyone on all sides) needs to find out.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:57pm
  MASTICE…look at how Obama handled the OBL operation and how the embassy in Benghazi has been handled.
  An operation that genuinely involved covert operatives in SEAL Team 6 ( a team that doesn’t even officially exist) was outed by Obama and Biden barely 48 hours after the operation. As a result, many of it’s members were killed just over a month later. To rub salt into those wounds Biden turned it into a bumper sticker “bin laden is dead and GM is alive”.
  Chris Stevens was a career diplomat and asked for the job. What happened in Benghazi was political not CIA. Other international missions had left Libya because its’ just too dangerous there right now. Obama on the other hand had to back up his “al Qaeda is on it’s heels today” statement by keeping the mission open. So weeks before the attack requests for more security by the embassy were ignored because sending more troops to Benghazi would muddy the Obama administration’s assertion that all is going just splendidly over there.
  Dont’ forget..Obama re-opened the embassy in Damascus to pander to Assad before hostilities broke out in Syria and was forced to close it not too long ago. Obama has no idea what’s going on in the middle east and he filters his meager policy (can we even call it a foreign policy?) through his desire to pander to Muslims which I’m sure was instilled in him from childhood in Indonesia and may even explain what’s behind that Koranic ring he’s worn since his teens.
  
  Report this comment
pookieamos
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:42pm
ECINOM KEEPS BLAMING this on the House but any budget passed by the House has never been passed by the Senate , it’s a LIE ! The security was taken out of Libya and outsourced to the ENEMY ! ECINOM , stop your lying , go watch the Congessional hearing on CSPAN on the Internet . Not only did they take away the security , the enemy was intrusted as the protection of Ambassador Stevens . When the request was made for more security , it was DENIED ! Obama and Clinton have blood on their hands . They are criminally negligent in these deaths and are dangerously naive or are complicit with our enemy! They are knowingly allowing the border to be open to any Hamas terrorist south of the border ! HELLO , Obama is the most dangerous president we’ve EVER had.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ronin_6
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:33pm
If he wins another term he needs to be impeached.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:26pm
Fubared

Never a mind-
You just described 0, your “cnc”. Typical white guilt lefty without a clue.
************

This is what happens when you assume. ” Typical white guilt” is a poor assumption considering I am black. You guys make this too easy

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
TROLLMONGER
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:48pm
The fact that Beck tricks senior citizens aka Beckbots to buying into his cult of fear and paranoia so he can line his pockets with the money collected from his apacolyptic products is a even bigger scandal.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:06pm
  Wow. He aided and abetted the death of 4 geriatric peeps and covered it up with big bird blather? You are like mensa smarty monger.
  
  Report this comment
- charliegirl4u
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:29pm
  I am not a senior citizen and the ONLY thing I am scared and paranoid about, it your “leader s” agenda to bring about islamic destruction for Americans, I think you wondered out of your corral with the other blind sheep!….. Oh, I am sorry, troll ON ! :-).
  
  Report this comment
- G-WHIZ
  Posted on October 12, 2012 at 10:50am
  Oh…and BECK uses PRIVATE FUNDING…gubbiment-involvement=ZERO!! Go climb back into your gubbiment-assisted-basement and suck on you foodstamp-paid-booze.
  
  Report this comment
Ronko
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:39pm
Bigger then Watergate, this is worse then Watergate. I don’t remember anybody dying because of Watergate. This will be the oil can that will cause an already out of control fire to go over the top and seal Romney’s win.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ConstitunalAmerican
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:27pm
  This should be referred to as “Slaughter-gate.”
  What a reprehensible act by all those involved with the decision, and those who still continue to keep silent about the terrorists and the traitors!!!!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- texrubarts
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:39pm
  You got that right!!! Romney will WIN…. And Obama and Clinton’s hands are covered in blood and I hope it will come out in the investigation and I hope they are punished for it!
  
  God Bless Our Country!!!
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:16pm
RightUnite

Dude…. The second you start your name calling, you’ve lost your argument… No one ever tell you that?? F’ing punk.

****

You complain about name calling and end your post by name calling? Wow

Typical right winger , attack the messenger not the message. The consulate office NOT EMBASSY was a CIA office and the House GOP just outed them in a hearing yesterday and you guys stilll want to beat this drum? Go serve in the Military, you will learn a few things about the real world. Alot more from a drug addict wiht a high school education that never served like Beck

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RightUnite
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:23pm
  Azzwipe… I’m giving as good as I get… Don’t like it, step back into you closet dreamworld punk.
  
  Report this comment
- TROLLMONGER
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:53pm
  right unite hypocrisy is blinding…..LOL!
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:04pm
  Never a mind-
  You just described 0, your “cnc”. Typical white guilt lefty without a clue.
  
  Report this comment
thibx
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:10pm
check your facts state department had plenty of money to do their job. money is not the problem, policies of this adminstration is.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
cause_glen_said_so
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:05pm
Hmmmm. just who was behind cutting funds?

“Chaffetz admits that there was a vote for additional security in Libya where he and his fellow Republicans voted no, then tries to blame it on the U.S. Senate because they never got around to voting on additional security, so his vote against more security doesn’t really count he says.”

Cannot make it up when it is stright from the mouths of the responsible!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- artfromtex
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:23pm
  That is not accurate. At all.
  
  Chaffetz voted for a bill that would have reduced overall funding of US embassies in general. The Libyan embassy was not singled out. If passed, the bill would have forced funds to be funneled to where they were needed the most. Any embassy in the Middle-East should have been at the top of the list to receive the most funds.
  
  Nice try at inserting the newest lie of this Regime like Soledad O’Brien and Rachel Maddow did.
  
  Report this comment
- cause_glen_said_so
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:19pm
  Ok, so Libya may not hav been mentioned by name but money has been cut multiple years for the state dept. What exactly is our responsibility there? What is it anywhere in the world other than here at home? When we cannot take care of things here at home, why should we spend one more dime anywhere but here?
  
  Report this comment
thibx
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:01pm
sure it was a coverup. this dumbass president is going to get us all killed. they are planning attacks on US soil now. all kinds of sleeper cells in this country. saw hannity last night he had the parents of seal team 6 that their helicopter was shot down in afganstan. this helicopter he was in was not allowed to fire at the ones that was firing at them. he was saying top military people are protecting the president and going along with his policies instead of protecting the troops. damn shame they protect their jobs and let the troops die. oboma has to go we all are grave danger if another 4 years.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- encinom
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:24pm
  Its a smoke screen covering up the fact that the GOP cut funding for State Dept. Security.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:38pm
  Yeah..run with Pelosi’s line ENCIDIOT..that’s smart and convincing.
  
  Report this comment
coyote1hell
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:59am
Buh’Rack Husseine, gave Solyndra 500 million, yet when asked for addional secutity for our Ambassador, he told him to get stuffed…and 4 Americans died…this inept Clown has got to be prosecuted..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Detroit paperboy
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:50am
Just a bump in the road,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Nevermind
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:46am
Holy cow you guys are fools and i can tell you never served. Thsi isnt an embassy attack, the embassy is in Tripoli so stop calling it what it is not. I have said this since the night of the attack and proved to be right…. it wasnt a ” consulate office but a CIA office and now has been outed by the House GOP. You are all boneheads and know nothing of how our military and CIA works

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RightUnite
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:05pm
  Dude…. The second you start your name calling, you’ve lost your argument… No one ever tell you that?? F’ing punk.
  
  Report this comment
- Exrepublisheep
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:14pm
  RIGHTUNITE. Didn’t anyone tell YOU as soon as YOU start name calling YOU lose YOUR argument?
  
  Report this comment
- budahbabe
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:16pm
  Please enlighten us then Neveremind!
  
  Report this comment
- TROLLMONGER
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:52pm
  rightunite,
  
  You completely contradicted yourself in your comment. Another educated comment from a right winger. You GOP people make it too easy…LOL!
  
  Report this comment
- razhunter100
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:54pm
  american soil…does not matter if was an embassy or outhouse…was an act of war.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:09pm
  Never a mind
  Guessing we will hear bite me tonight apologize to team 6 huh? Stellar leadership we have.
  
  Report this comment
- mastice
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:53pm
  @Nevermind
  
  A good question/point on if it was an embassy or a CIA station, but still irrelevant to the situation. What is relevant is that we have 4 dead US citizens, one the official Ambassador to Libya, and an administration that – at best – shot from the hip with a knee-jerk reaction that turned out to be completely false.
  
  In other words, even if this administration didn’t knowingly lie about the attack, they still showed their ineptness in handling the situation. I personally think they saw a political opportunity in blaming the video, knowingly lied about it, and now that they have been caught in that lie they are doing damage control. (through Carney, Shultz, Rice and the rest of their lacky’s)
  
  Oh and I will repeat what others have said – you lose your argument when you start calling names – this goes for everyone on all sides.
  
  Report this comment
- thegreatcarnac
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:33pm
  RIGHTUNITE…..
  Give up arguing with Nevermind…..he said he was black. That means he would take up for Obama and his positions if obama walked into to Nevermind’ home and shot his wife and screwed his dog right in front of him. I wrote that reversal on purpose because obama would never touch a women…he is gay. Michelle is some transgendered thing there for show.
  
  Report this comment
cessna152
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:43am
…and what everyone seems to forget are the poor family members of those that died. These brave souls went in without ammo, firearms and still followed their orders knowing their outcome surely would bring death. These families need our support and prayer. Also, the rest of the troops need to come home now, even against their orders. They are being set up to fail and this administration should be doing life in prison. This administration is devious The VERY brave men and women need our prayers and backing. 2 Chronicles 7:14 comes to mind…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- encinom
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:46am
  Beck left out U.S. Representative Jason Chaffetz last year cutting the budget for the security of State Dept. Officials.
  
  Report this comment
- cause_glen_said_so
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:12pm
  Exactly enicom…they also do not tell who has cut the state dept budget years running now
  
  “For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program — well below the $2.15?billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration’s request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.”
  
  Report this comment
- rp454
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:50pm
  Well encinom, or whatever you are calling yourself today, there was enough money in the State Dept budget to supply the Vienna embassy with Chevy Volts and a $100,000 charging station, but not enough to secure the consulate in Libya. Your argument fails to pass the sanity test again. (as usual)
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:10pm
  @rp454
  
  Defending the GOP at all costs, the GOP/Tea Partiers cut the security budget for the State Department, they were warned about the risks and now are in shock that their cuts had real world consequences.
  
  Report this comment
- Veteran Patriot
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 2:21pm
  What interests me is that if this is all the result of a fund cutting exercise by republicans, when the white house had the opportunity use it as their cover, obama and co. went straight to the lie about the video instead. Then they kept pounding this lie even when the obvious truth of the situation was voice by multiple people inside and outside the intelligence community in the US and middle east.
  Seems to me that bringing this fund cutting argument after the lie has already been disseminated is just another attempt at misdirection. the original lie is still as big a lie as it ever was regardless of the back-fill with which this administration tries to cover it.
  This whole exercise is just a continuation on the administration’s central theme: misdirect, duck and cover.
  
  Report this comment
- cessna152
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 3:17pm
  Encimoron,
  State Department Cut Libyan Security While Spending on Chevy Volts
  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/11/Austrian-Embassy-Kept-Marines-and-Got-More-Budget-for-Chevy-Volts-While-State-Dept-Cut-Libyan-Security
  
  Report this comment
- celestialfire
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 3:43pm
  But when questioned, Lamb denied that budgetary concerns had influenced her decision. committee “It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
  
  “No, sir,” said Lamb.
  http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/329977/top-revelations-libya-hearing-katrina-trinko
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 3:45pm
  Cessna avoiding the truth that Ryan and the Tea Party Congressman cut the security budget of the State Department over the objections of the President and the Sec. of State.
  
  Ryan and the rest of the GOP have blood on their hands for putting Ayn Rand before the safety of Americans.
  
  Report this comment
- OIF3survivor
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 7:07pm
  enci:
  
  So we get your point about spending being cut on security (despite your deafening silence/avoidence of the issue of a ridiculous amount being spent on a lemon ‘green’ car for the State Dept). So how do you answer the REALITY of additional security being denied the Ambassador within 24 hours of the attack, as well as his hazardous duty pay being increased (paraphrasing as I’m a soldier and not a State Dept employee and don’t remember the precise name of the pay type).
  When you can honestly discuss this aspect of this tragedy maybe someone will take you seriously. The reality though is you’ve never given an indication of the personal courage required to question DNC talking points much less the intellectual capability to investigate the dishonesty of their various contradictory positions.
  
  Report this comment
kvan
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:43am
Glenn, I don’t agree 100% with everything you say but your analisys of this is 100% correct and some heads should roll over this coverup and extended lying to the American People.
Constitutionally every President has a sworn duty to not only uphold the Constitution but to protect America, Americans and American territory and the current President has failed on all counts.
We don’t need scapgoats for this we need the people at the top to be help accountable.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
doomytram
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:42am
Look! Let me be clear! Our DemonRat gov’t removes God from platform placates to intolerant, racist, misogynist, hateful America haters! and Lies for the intolerant and will burn bibles., blame terrorist on a video and cover up for the muslim brotherhood. The Obozo’s in our State, Justice, and Obozo administration are now run by PC BS intolerant Muslim placated apologists.

It’s bizzaro that we get lies, remove God from us and take away our 1st amendment and rights. To placate to these Muslim slaves of Saudi Arabia….. Oboozo is so toast…. he is such a pathetic fool. Lies, Lies, Bush and Video Tape.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
justangry
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:39am
Go back Beck! We need to start at the time when we bombed them. I believe those that had the power to fund it in Congress without opposition were R’s. But yeah, let’s just point fingers at the other guys though. Don’t you see how this lunatic is dividing us like the lunatics on the other side? It wasn’t D’s or R’s that were responsible it was Washington. Unless they voted against it, tried to stop it they were responsible. My guy tried to stop it, but this lunatic Beck said that HE was crazy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Dream33
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:56am
  hmmmm 2 billion people knew it was a premeditated terror attack 3 seconds after we heard about it.
  The white house and alll the staff think the whole world is stupid.I got news for bozo and the clowns ,we know from the very start you LIED LIED LIED.
  
  Report this comment
- budahbabe
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:11pm
  Just angry, Did the president lie to the American People or didn’t he? Yes or No? Let me give you a hint, he lied!!!!!! The State Dept Lied!!!!! The House turned down funding for Syria and by Presidential Executive Order they are getting 45 million dollars to do the same thing they did in Benghazi. Wake up!!! 938 Executive Orders since Obama has become President——————Sounds like a Dictatorship to me. This thing really smells of over-up for selling arms to the enemy. Hope someone has the balls to prove it!
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:16pm
  Yes he lied. He exhibits all the qualities of a psychopath. Most politicians do.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 12:19pm
  @budahbabe, Yes he lied. Now let me ask you this, is the piece propaganda against the left from a partisan hack that doesn’t take any responsibility for the fact that Obama has been exclusively funded by Republicans since 2010?
  
  Report this comment
- resme
  Posted on October 11, 2012 at 1:55pm
  “938 Executive Orders since Obama has become President”
  
  Where the hell do you get this number? lol…
  
  BHO: 135 Total Executive orders Issued
  GWB: 291 Total Executive orders Issued
  BC: 364 Total Executive Orders Issued
  GHWB: 166 Total Executive Orders Issued
  RR: 381 Total Executive Orders Issued
  JC: 320 Total Executive Orders Issued
  GF: 169 Total Executive Orders Issued
  RN: 346 Total Executive Orders Issued
  LBJ: 324 Total Executive Orders Issued
  JFK: 214 Total Executive Orders Issued
  DDE: 486 Total Executive Orders Issued
  HT: 896 Total Executive Orders Issued
  FDR: 3,728 Total Executive Orders Issued
  
  http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/obama.html
  
  Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:38am
If this does not bring down the House of Obama, nothing will.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
razhunter100
Posted on October 11, 2012 at 11:31am
weather and moon pics vid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Xq_hYIfEE&feature=plcp

@ 3:37sec interesting statue on moon? dont knpw what it is …is something.

what does it have to do with this…nada, just interesting.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.