Read the 21-Page Debate Agreement Between Romney and Obama Campaigns
Photo credit: AFP/Getty Images
Veteran political reporter Mark Halperin reported on Monday that the Obama and Romney campaigns had both voiced concerns about Tuesday night’s debate moderator Candy Crowley of CNN. Halperin made reference to an “early October memorandum of understanding” signed by both campaigns that set some ground rules for the three presidential debates.
Now, Halperin has made the entire 21-page document public, and the provisions found in the agreement will undoubtedly raise some eyebrows.
The deal was reportedly struck on October 3, the day of the first presidential debate in Denver. Halperin writes the “negotiators and signers were veteran Washington campaign lawyers Bob Bauer (for the president) and Ben Ginsberg (for Mitt Romney).”
As a part of the restrictive deal, the two candidates are not allowed to ask each other “direct questions” or walk outside a “predesignated area.” Further, for Tuesday’s town hall style debate, no audience members or the moderator will be allowed to ask follow-up questions. This appears to be where Crowley strayed away from the terms of the agreement as she said she may ask her own follow up questions.
The Commission on Presidential Debates and the debate moderators are not parties to the agreement, Halperin writes.
Gawker has more analysis:
Most bizarrely, given the way the debates have played out, the rules actually appear to forbid television coverage from showing reaction shots of the candidates: “To the best of the Commission’s abilities, there will be no TV cut-aways to any candidate who is not responding to a question while another candidate is answering a question or to a candidate who is not giving a closing statement while another candidate is doing so.” The “best of the Commission’s abilities” must be rather feable, seeing as how almost every moment of the two debates so far was televised in split-screen, clearly showing shots of a “candidate who is not responding to a question while another candidate is answering a question.”
Here are some of the highlights found in the memorandum of understanding:
• Each debate shall begin at 9 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time
• The parties agree that they “will not (1) issue any challenge for additional debates, (2) appear at any other debate or adversarial forums except as agreed to by the parties, or (3) accept any television or radio air time offers that involve a debate format”
• Candidates aren’t allowed to cite anyone in the audience other than family members during debates.
• Candidates aren’t allowed to address questions to each other or ask the other candidate to take a pledge.
• Moderators are not allowed to ask “show of hands” questions.
Even without the discovery of the agreement, Town halls have undoubtedly lost some of their spontaneity. The 80 or so undecided voters chosen for Tuesday’s debate must submit their questions in advance and Crowley will decide which people to call on.
Read the entire 21-page agreement:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
- Shock Video Surfaces: Meat Cleaver-Wielding Man Shouts ‘You People Will Never Be Safe!’ Moments After Gruesome London Attack 488 Comments
- Why Were DHS Agents Seemingly Monitoring Multiple Tea Party IRS Protests Across the Country on Tuesday? 475 Comments
- Confusion Erupts in IRS Hearing After Lois Lerner Tries to Plead the 5th — Watch It All Unfold 466 Comments
- The Tense Exchange Between Rep. Trey Gowdy and the Former IRS Head You’ve Been Waiting for…and It Doesn’t Disappoint 374 Comments
- Anti-Gay Bias or Fair Punishment? New Details Emerge About High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor 302 Comments
- ‘We…Aren’t Going to Take S**t From Homophobes’: Mysterious Pro-Firearm Ads Use Gays, Seemingly Topless Lesbians to Rail Against Gun Control 125 Comments
- Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’ 227 Comments
- Beck Issues Challenge to People of Faith in Wake of Okla. Tornado: ‘What Have You Done?’ Read More
- ‘Islamic Jihad, Islamic Jihad!: Michelle Malkin Rips Progressives, Clashes With Lib Radio Host Over Islamic Terrorism and the London Machete Attack 108 Comments
- Ariz. Lawmaker Surprises Colleagues, Comes Out as an Atheist While Delivering Daily Prayer 109 Comments
- Trey Gowdy at It Again — This Time with a Jack Bauer Reference! Read More
- Emails Released: Congress Was Asking for Updates on IG’s IRS Audit Before 2012 Election Read More
- Weekly Unemployment Benefits Tumble Read More
- Why Is This German Company Recruiting Tech Staff With Autism? Read More
- House Votes to Speed up Keystone Pipeline: Here’s Everyone Who Voted for and Against It Read More
- The Incredible Role Facebook Played in the Aftermath of Devastating Okla. Tornado Read More
- Tech Company Demonstrates Remote Disabling of a ‘Smart Gun’ 120 Comments
- Meet the Blind Man Nicknamed ‘Midnight Gunslinger’ Who Has 80% Shot Accuracy Read More
- How a $4.5 Million Network of 181 Sirens Helped Save Lives in Oklahoma Twister Read More
- See the Record-Setting Python a Man Caught With His Bare Hands (and Guess How Much It Weighed) Read More
- Permit requirements shut down another kid’s lemonade stand — but it’s not what you think
- Video: Introducing ‘ConservoTax,’ the first tax software made for Republicans
- Watch the other hand: Immigration reform advances under cover of scandals
- Bill O’Reilly counts calories, orders salad at fried-food restaurant
- ‘Middle class champion’ Elizabeth Warren joins Senate Millionaires Club
- Muslim hardliners ID London terror suspect
- Cannes crime: 2nd jewel theft during film festival
- James, Bryant voted to All-NBA first team
- Coded goal: RG3 still aiming for Redskins' opener
- Tea party storm largely inside IRS _ so far
- Israel says Iran unaffected by world pressure
- House backs variable rate student loans
- Obama condemns 'appalling attack' on UK soldier