Charles Krauthammer on Tonight’s Debate: ‘In One Corner a Robot, in the Other a Cold Fish’
Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Charles Krauthammer has a way with words. And his way is to is say exactly what he thinks, without hesitation.
Appearing on Fox News’ debate preview, Krauthammer offered up a concise and blunt summary of what President Barack Obama has to do in order to win Tuesday night’s debate.
“What a debate. In one corner a robot, in the other a cold fish,” Krauthammer said, never clarifying which candidate was which.
“For Obama the bar is rather low compared to the first debate — all he has to do is string a few sentences together coherently. To make eye contact with a single sentient human, and show the slightest animation in his face. I think he can do that,” he added.
Krauthammer said Obama could “win on that basis alone.”
Watch the clip via Fox News/Mediaite below:
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.














































































































Comments (45)
Mandors
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:13amI’ve suspected for some time that the Pulitzer Prize folks who picked Dorkheimer were the same people who moved on to choose Obama for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Report this comment
philipzhao
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 6:52amA gentleman vs a crook !
Report this comment
Joel Knows
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 5:23amKrauthammer just described the moderator (autobot from the automat) and the president ( week-old dead carp) very well. Now, who wants to venture a suggestion as to Romney.
Please forgive me for not writing out BHO’s name. At this point I am disgusted at the sound and sight of his name because of all the lies, deceit, and miserable policies he has come up with since January 2009. BHO has caused great misery and suffering to millions of good Americans.
Report this comment
the gray lensman
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 4:48amI’ve never really valued Mr. Krauthammer ‘s opinion on just about everything. My view of him was doubly reinforced with his remarks on the debate.
Report this comment
RoyBaty
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 7:54amCharles K also had disparaging words for anyone who does not believe we all evolved from monkeys. But for someone inside the beltway, he is a “real” conservative.
Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 3:22am.
He only described Obama.
Obama is the robot and the cold fish.
Report this comment
AnnaK117
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:38amin one corner was a man with bold integrity, in the other corner was our president who is an arrogant and incapable man
Report this comment
CobraBill
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:06amThat coming from the ugliest man ever put in front of a camera.
Well maybe 2nd, Allen Colmes is. Well ok their tied for first.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 11:48pmHerr Krauthammer is a cross between those two adjectives himself. He is usually more on the conservative side but he apparently felt the need to make fun of both of the debators. Must be mad about something.
Report this comment
Wango
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 11:26pmheh heh heh
Report this comment
Bernice Durdan-Rowland
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 11:09pmI think Romney was too soft on the Libya debacle- his kindness was showing through, when he did begin to put pressure on Obama, the moderator cut him off – shame on her!!!! She overstepped her job…. Romney still won the debate, of course !! He had more fact and figures and professional stature. I can’t even stand to listen or watch Obama – he is a phony and a professional liar…..
Report this comment
topperj
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 10:28pmI believe the term, with regards to Obama, is yada, yada, yada. Been there, done that.
Report this comment
Jenny Lind
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:57pmI say what I think too, however, I don’t have a national audiance. I totally disagree with him. I believe one of them is a good man in a nasty envirement, and the other is an angry marxist. One loves this country, one doesn’t. One can’t say a word that won’t be dissected ad nauseum, and one who’s every word is treated as if Moses brought it from the mountain. One who is a decent human being and one who sat in Reverend Wright’s church and agreed with him.
Report this comment
Zurich
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 9:16pmI am with you Jenny!!!
Report this comment
Sharlene
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:36amBless you Jenny !!!!!!!!!!!! Very well said.
Report this comment
Jenasus
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:47pmCrowley will be feeding the candidates crow for thought tonight.
They need Crowley to lead Obama through the debate to keep him on track.
Welcome to the Greatest Hoax on America. The 2012 Presidential Rebuttal.
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:33pmForget about it. Obama the robot has already won…even if he doesn’t win. The media has already written the story.
Report this comment
Gary_K
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:30pmHmmmm…barry (father unknown) confesses?
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-confessing-ineligibility/
Report this comment
edrebber
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:30pmChris Matthews already has a thrill up his leg.
Report this comment
DIR
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 10:43pmAfter the last debate he had it running down his leg, when it overflowed from the seat of his Depends diaper.
Report this comment
thom1
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:27pmObummer already won the debate. All he had to do is show up and say aaaaah and oooooh and smile like Biden. Poor Mitt will be booed and Obummer will be cheered by this non partisan not decided bunch of liberal dicks from the second worst state New York. Just watch.
Report this comment
horsehockey
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 10:55pmThere’s a worse state than NY? Well, okay, there are CA and MA, but we may have to have tiebreakers.
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:26pmFor some reason this description of the two men cracked me up, especially the part about Obama having to string a few sentences together coherently and making eye contact with a sentient human being.
I didn’t know Charles could be funny.
Report this comment
taxpro4u03
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:55pmHubristic individuals tend to be oblivious to even acknowledge another of the same species, let alone an adversary — Mitt has him figgered out. I believe the vast majority of folks that bought that ‘hopey-changey’ thing on the heals of 9/11 thru the 2008 election cycle are on board ‘against’ as well — IF he manages 20% of the popular vote — we should all check into a ‘hotel california…’ — unreal…….
Report this comment
ImJohnGalt
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:25pmTomorrow’s headlines have already been written by the Obama campaign and email to thier operatives in the media.
Report this comment
taxpro4u03
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:59pmI’m inclined to believe the same thing — Mitt ‘should’ be able to knock this out of the park, but I believe Game 2 is going to the Home team this go-round — has to to ‘keep the stupids’ engaged and the $ flowing… ;-) — Open mic checks reveal ‘the game…’ we’ll see how it plays out Nov 7th (day after da ‘lection — maybe his 9 buddies at SCOTUS will play a role again…)
Report this comment
Mutiny
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:20pmGiant douche vs a turd sandwich is more exact.
Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:38pmVan Jones, you’re a laugh a minute.
Report this comment
Pat Alexander
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:20pmThere are more people praying for Mitt than you can possibly imagine.
I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if Obama was struck dumb on live television.
Report this comment
Want our country back
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:27pmPat, you are so right. I share your sentiment about praying.
Ck out the headlines on this site…. they are pretty frightening…. http://weaselzippers.us/
Report this comment
Slick Willie
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:18pmUNINSTALLING OBAMA…..……………. █████████████▒▒▒ 80% complete.
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:27pmNow that is clever!!
Report this comment
Stelex
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:49pmIts stuck……make it go all the way…..now!!!!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
SaturdaysWarrior76
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:50pm@SlickWilly: Very Cool my friend! LOVE IT!!
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 11:46pmGood analogy…clever!
Report this comment
Oneirishman
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:16pmAnd when Obama shows this animation you can bet MSLSD will have a massive Obamagasim.
Report this comment
Stelex
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:29pm“For Obama the bar is rather low compared to the first debate — all he has to do is string a few sentences together coherently. To make eye contact with a single sentient human, and show the slightest animation in his face. I think he can do that,” he added.
Ya gotta love him……he”s right…..thats all Obama’s gotta do for the MSM.
As for the rest of us…..the bar is set much higher.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:15pmWe shall see what happens soon enough – I expect the game has already been rigged to all but ensure, save for the divine intervention of God Himself, the “win” of Obama.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:12pmNo Charles it’s capitalist vs. communist.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:18pmGood v. Evil
Report this comment
M1A2_Tanker
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:22pmCrony Capitalist Vs. Communist.
Report this comment
M1A2_Tanker
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:24pmWOW My post won’t show up! STOP IT!
Crony Capitalist Vs. Communist.
Report this comment
Stelex
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:36pmA free peoples vs the NWO……
Report this comment