Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

Faith

Former SNL Star Victoria Jackson Spars With Howard Stern Over Gay Marriage & the Bible: ‘Take It Up With God’

Oct. 16, 2012 3:07pm Billy Hallowell

Former Saturday Night Live (SNL) cast-member Victoria Jackson isn’t shy about sharing her views on a plethora of social and political issues. In the not-so-distant past, the actress and comedian has warned of the Muslim Brotherhood’s alleged infiltration into the U.S. government, she’s spent time with Occupy Wall Street protesters and she’s made her views about “Glee” known.

This morning, Jackson continued sharing her sometimes-controversial views in an appearance on “The Howard Stern Show,” where she discussed homosexuality, while fielding questions from and debating with the popular radio host.

“Aren’t you against gay marriage and — that gays are wrong?,” Stern asked.

Jackson hinged her response upon the Bible and her belief that the holy book is God’s word. Rather than giving her own views on the matter, she answered by referring those with questions about her views to the Christian scriptures.

Victoria Jackson & Howard Stern Spar Over Gay Marriage, God & the Bible

Photo Credit: “The Howard Stern Show”

“You have to take it up with God. God made the rules. He made a man and woman’s bodies fit together,” she responded. “He made the Ten Commandments. I believe the Bible is God’s word and I base all my worldview on the Bible.”

In response to this, Stern proclaimed that the Bible was written by man and he sought agreement from Jackson on this point. Rather than responding directly, the actress continued to defend herself, claiming that she has homosexual friends and that she doesn’t have disdain for them.

“I have gay friends…and I don’t…make their identity their sexuality,” she said, adding in reference to a college friend who happens to be gay, “Why is identity his sexuality?”

Jackson told Stern that she doesn’t believe that gay marriage exists (she seemed to mean that stands against it, regardless of what the law says) and that, since the beginning of time, the definition of marriage has been one man and one woman. Stern challenged her on these points, asking why the definition can’t be amended.

“Because that would make God mad,” she proclaimed.

Watch the exchange, below:

–

Related:

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (173)

Nevermind
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:23pm
Jeremy

America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. So saying we’re “not a Christian nation” is really just semantics, trying to nitpick to get a different point across.
*******

You call them semantics but most call them facts. It is a matter of record that we arent a christian nation, sorry to burst your bubble. Also are you aware our Constitution is in direct violation of the bible so you r” founded on Judeo christian values” goes right out the window.

The 1st commandment is ” thou shall have no gods before me” while the 1st amendment gives us freedom of religion . SO if we are based on those principles as you said why did our first ammendment contradict the 1st commandment?

The answer is simple but hard for fairy tale readers to grasp. We are not a christian nation, not matter how much you wish it to be these are facts

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- JRGJR
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:35pm
  It means that the freedom of religion is that the Government can’t make you belong to one denomination like the Church of England did. Quit trying to twist the meaning.
  Long winded people make me sick.
  
  Report this comment
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:36pm
  Nevermind Your arguments are so limited it’s almost comical. The simplicity in which you choose to argue your point is actually quite sad to me. I do not think I could be happy limiting myself to thought that requires so little of me. For you it isn’t semantics, it is redefining broad thought into small mindedness.
  
  Report this comment
- theotherberean
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:39pm
  Yes we are. Deal with it.
  
  Report this comment
- Kerrain
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:40pm
  NEVERMIND, I found it interesting that you said the constitution is against the 10 Commandments. Specifically
  ******************************************************************
  The 1st commandment is ” thou shall have no gods before me” while the 1st amendment gives us freedom of religion . SO if we are based on those principles as you said why did our first amendment contradict the 1st commandment?
  ******************************************************************
  Getting that from those two sources is completely illogical. Unless you can state that the Bible states which religion you MUST be. All the constitution does is GUARANTEE our right to follow God as our conscious dictates.
  
  Since it does not state what religion you must be it is not possible that the Constitution violates the Commandment to have no gods before me. I believe it also fails to command that we worship the Government so you base argument is very lacking.
  
  Report this comment
- mdlwoods
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:42pm
  Nevermind, I want you to lay out the facts that you say show we were not founded as a Christian nation, based on Judeo-Christian beliefs. I also want you to lay out facts to show how many of our Founders WERE NOT Christians. The facts is, we were founded as a Christian nation, based on Judeo-Christian beliefs. Our founders, including Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Adams, etc. spent many many days and months researching differing types of governments. They then based our goverment on Christian values and the rules for a Republic where the STATES would rule their people and the FEDERAL government would only provide for our protection and oversee whatever might not be covered by the States. Further, more than 75% of those who founded this nation were Christians. Contrary to popular modern progressive belief, Thomas Jefferson was a Christian. Just because he read and researched other religions, just because he said Question with Boldness, Even the Very Existence of God…, did not mean he was not a Christian. He signed all of his letters with referenced to “Our Lord.” If he was not a Christian, then who was he referencing? Obama????
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:46pm
  Nevermind, your point is very well taken and makes great sense. It’s true as well. But you’ll never get through to people that have been brainwashed since they were children. They were terrified with horror stories and blackmailed into swallowing an ancient load of hogwash, just like the muslim kids are in the Middle East. Brain washed humans are difficult to help.
  
  Report this comment
- NILAP
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:52pm
  The US Constitution was inspired by God as the Mormon prophet Joseph Smith wrote about. It was meant for all faiths – believers or not. It will in the future embrace as the foundation of a world government again as Joseph Smith envisioned, all religions. God loves believers and non believers alike – therefore He created a Republic, a democracy instead of a theocracy. I am not a Mormon, a Christian or a Muslim but I believe this US Constitution is as divinely inspired as any passage in any of the holy books including the Bible.
  
  Report this comment
- jman-6
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:52pm
  I get your point n technically your right only for interpreted legal reasons. What I mean by that is if you look at most of the founders writings both public n private, they never intended the 1st amendment to cover any other religion(s) than Judeo-Christianity! That was to protect baptists from catholics or methodist and vice versa to include Jews! It was mainly to never allow a state-church mandate!
  
  Report this comment
- theotherberean
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:54pm
  I think you’re the one who is brainwashed.
  
  Report this comment
- PutMoreOnMyPlate
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 7:39pm
  Rather to be small-minded than short-sighted.
  
  Report this comment
- Wilbur D Pig
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:26am
  Nevermind,
  You are operating under the notion that snarky=witty.
  
  Are you one of those guys that thinks being a wise-a$$ means you are smart, just because it contains the word “wise” in it?
  
  Report this comment
- crisnick
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:38am
  Most of these colonists were coming from an area where they were persecuted for their denomination. They were Christian denominations, though. They were afraid the U.S. might declare a national church, like the Church of England, instead of letting them have those denominations. The fact remains that you cannot make a person religious at all, and that’s what freedom of religion is all about. God wants you to come to Him of your own volition, not because the law says you have to.
  
  Report this comment
- oneamericanguy
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 1:22am
  Well in the words of O’Reilly, you sir are a pinhead. Freedom to worship GOD… think about this from the standpoint of the times. The founders never thought of worshipping a flower pot or the devil. What kind of twisted fool would even think such a thing? Freedom to worship GOD without the state getting in the way of HOW to worship and not founding a state religion.
  
  Report this comment
- HUGHS500
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 3:57pm
  You obviously have no grasp on the Bible nor do you understand the Constitution. If (by chance) you tried to understand the Bible in comparison to our founding you would discover several unmistakable parallels. One of which blows your idea about freedom of religion out of the water. Free will. So after you read the Declaration of independence, Articles, The U.S. Constitution along with the “federalist papers” (A great insight), then compare it all to the Bible, come back here and we’ll discus our “fall from grace” and discover why Atheists are so “hell bent” (no pun intended) on denying God. If he is a fairy tail as you claim then why does he make you so angry? Why do atheists spend so much time money and energy trying to prove his nonexistence while at the same time ignoring other faiths with a dark side? Also, If fairy tails bother you so much then why not go after the Disney corporation? Or better yet, the science community, they have some real knee slappers.
  
  Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:21pm
Why in the world is Victoria Jackson doing Howard Stern’s show? Hopefully it’s to witness to him.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:35pm
  What? Are you a Jehovah’s Witness?
  
  Report this comment
- Tractorboy
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 7:54pm
  Squid……..Good day…..Jesus went to the sinners all the time, if we are to be good Christains sometimes we need to go where the sinners are, then, when their lives fall apart we also need to be there to life them up, be our brother’s keeper. God Bless
  
  Report this comment
- Amarath01
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:06pm
  Maybe she should read her bible some more… If it makes god mad let GOD DEAL WITH IT. Its not her role… no in fact god commands her not to judge the merits of gay marriage for others, he has claimed the judgment of others rights and wrongs for him. Not her , you , or me. This is what the bible teaches so why is she ignorant of it.
  
  Do people just not care about fact, right or wrong, anything? Are destined to only live to force others to comply to our wills? What is wrong with this picture.
  
  Report this comment
- MemphisViking
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 10:21pm
  AMARATH01, maybe you should read it a little more. We are most certainly told to judge sin. The Bible tells us not to judge people, but we’re supposed to judge sinful actions, especially when they are spelled out in the Bible and there’s no judgment involved.
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:19pm
lwoot

We don’t have to declare ourselves a Christian Nation in order to believe in christian principles and values. You don’t even have to be christian to believe in them.
****-*
Well in a country that has a constitution that says we have religious freedom it would be wrong to impose those christian values on those who do not share your belief. Since our right is to have religious freedom so impose your values would take that right away from people. If you want to practice your beliefs that is fine, just keep them to yourself.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:40pm
  Well then I guess we better throw away those laws that believe murder, stealing, and fraud are wrong. That would be imposing my religious beliefs upon a secular nation. It’s not about what divides us in our beliefs. It’s about what unites us.
  
  Report this comment
- theotherberean
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:41pm
  The Constitution guarantees the right of free expression of faith.
  
  Of course, laws are only for stupid people. Not progressives.
  
  Report this comment
- mdlwoods
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:47pm
  See: JRGJR’s response to your first post and then go do some historical research, some real research, and find out the truty about our founding and our founding fathers. Your arguments are soooo progressive twisted talking points about our founding that it is comical. You need to use your own mind and read something other than progressive propaganda.
  
  Report this comment
- USA-Ron
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 10:31pm
  Nevermind quote: If you want to practice your beliefs that is fine, just keep them to yourself.
  
  good one nevermind, freedom of religion is good for america, if others that come to USA or have
  come to USA, would just keep it to themselves ……….. Christians came here first
  
  of course the freedom stop with religions that use their faith as their constitution
  
  do NOT allow those to bring their faith/constitution to USA and attempt convert
  or kill Christians as infidels.
  
  ain’t gonna happen
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:20am
  The way LWOOT and most of these religious believers think is fascinating. Do they think in a logical way? No. Is their thinking clear and unconfused? No. Do proven facts support their positions? No. Do they use convolted thinking to support their beliefs? Yes.
  
  People who believe in the supernatural because they were threatened with eternal pain, misery and violence and promised an eternity of feeling loving elation if they just blindly obey and believe are being misled. It also speaks to their critical thinking skills and their gullibility, especially with all the information about the history of humanity and our abandonment of most other superstitious beliefs.
  
  Report this comment
- SoNick
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:07am
  @lloot
  you seem to believe that condemning murder and theft is a specific characteristic of Christianity. Sorry, but you don’t own the Golden Rule. I am an atheist and I live by Do Unto Others every single day. Murder was wrong before Christianity came along.
  
  Report this comment
NILAP
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:18pm
God has always supported gay and straight monogamous marriage and has always been opposed to polygamy – as practiced in the Old Testament and in Islam. God/Allah never gave Muhammad permission for polygamy. The Bible and the Koran in many passages contain the word of men not God. Prophets are imperfect but still prophets to be respected but God wishes us to assess their teachings with justice and kindness. We regular folks too have a role to play in how God reveals truth to humanity.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:28pm
  “God has always supported gay … monogamous marriage…” Are you insane or just delusional?
  
  Report this comment
- jman-6
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:38pm
  GOD has “NEVER & NEVER WILL” condone the homosexual lifestyle or change HIS definition of marriage!! Its an abomination to HIS HOLINESS!! However HE is a gracious n loving GOD and will forgive them if they will repent! Most blazers won’t take kindly to your false doctrinal post! I’m writing this as a christian rebuke to your post and would suggest you get on your knees n pray!! And read the warning in Rev. 22:19! Giving you the benefit of the doubt but my gut says your of your father n you know what I mean by that!
  
  Report this comment
- mdlwoods
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:52pm
  God so abhorred homosexuality and deviant sexual lifestyles that he even destroyed to cities and all their inhabitants. Remember Soddam and Gamorrah????? I don’t think I have ever heard a more idiotic statement than yours saying that God has always approved of homosexuality!!!! Why don’t you share with us your basis for that opinion? Also, Islam is not a moral religion, it is more of a cult for deviant men to be able to carry out their deviant sexual practices on their women and to make women their slaves!
  
  Report this comment
- jrc99
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 5:03pm
  “God has always supported gay….monogamous marriage….as practiced in the Old Testament….”
  
  Really? Care to explain Sodom and Gomorrah? As found in the Old Testament. I’ll be waiting…*rolls eyes*
  
  Report this comment
carl_in_ohio
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:18pm
I think she did a great job.
I’m proud of her for standing up for her principles and views.

GOOD JOB.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Verceofreason
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:51pm
  Glad I’m an Athiest
  Guess I can live anyway I like!
  No guilt, no concept of sin. Ho heaven, no hell.
  Why, I’m not even pregnany but think I’ll have an abortion. As Akin Said.
  But since I’m not pregnant, I guess it really ain’t a baby killing.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Cabrito_Goat
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:12pm
  In other words, no accountability for our actions. YAY! Sign me up!
  
  Report this comment
moreteaplease
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:16pm
In response to this, Stern proclaimed that the Bible was written by man
—————————————
Yes, and those who wrote the Bible did so through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. That’s why the Bible is called the inspired word of God.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:38pm
  That’s false. A divine entity would have had women involved as well, just as they are involved in modern life. Your beliefs are false, without a foundation in truth, fact, reason or reality. Which is why the rest of us won’t have them used to make laws we all have to live under. And don’t start with the thou shalt not kill stuff. that’s common sense.
  
  Report this comment
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:52pm
  Why not start with thou shalt not kill? It is an issue depending on when one believes it is OK or not to kill. Common sense has one role in that argument and broad thought into it will bring you basic principles and values that guide belief as to whom, why, and when it’s ok to kill.
  
  Report this comment
- geomann
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:54pm
  A divine entity would have involved women? Who says? I’m sure equestrians would have prefered if horses were involved too, but it isn’t up to us.
  
  Women are held very highly in the Bible, make no mistake. They are clearly as important as men. God has set up a structure where men are heads of households when it comes to reponsibility, just as Jesus was/is responsible for us, and God the Father is responisible for Jesus the Son. Please don’t get hung up on this, as we are all equal in the eyes of the Lord, but we each have a part to play.
  
  Report this comment
- mdlwoods
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:59pm
  to TheKing (I won’t include Glenn in that name), your name suggests that you follow Glenn and his beliefs about this Country. Do you not realize that without his faith in God, Glenn would not be reaching the conclusions that he reaches? God is guiding him. We have seen many miracles happen around Glenn in the past 4 years and those miracles happened because of his faith. You are obviously a troll, here only to bash and disrupt. You have no relevant arguments to back up your hit and run statments, therefore, I suggest that you take your little trolling boat and troll off to some other site and try to learn something along the way.
  
  Report this comment
- Verceofreason
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 6:00pm
  My inspiration tells me to avoid such drivel.
  
  Report this comment
- Darthmaximus
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:50pm
  We know why He was invented. As humans began their existence on this planet. We started out as small hunter gather groups of no more than 100 people. Inside these groups was an elder man that all would go to for the answers and for help. As these groups growed larger and larger their was no longer an elder man that primitive humans could go to… so they invented an imaginary friend to help them when they were hurting or scared or needed advice. This was wonderful for early man as he could carry this “elder man” with him wherever he went. As humans progressed we created books and tales to share our own personal God with other humans. Some Gods were more popular and stood the test of time others died off like Zeus, Thor and Rah. Who is to say that they do not exist? Not me.
  
  Report this comment
OneofMany
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:10pm
Yeah, Howard, let’s just change marriage to be whatever seems “loving” … for one it might be “loving” for a 40 year old man to marry a 8 year old boy (NAMBLA)… for another it might be “loving” for a woman to marry her horse… So why can’t the godless left just admit they are godless and make a truthful argument.. “we don’t believe in God and so anything goes”… Why, because only about 3% of the population would support that. Maybe less, even some atheists see the value in the 10 commandments.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:17pm
  OneofMany From I have heard and seen of Howard in the past I am sure he would be all for it and have a wonderful time featuring both on his program.
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:02pm
For the record the United States isnt a christian nation, that is fact by treaty of tripoli ratified by congress and signed by John Adams. So unless you Teabaggers want to propose a bill that this is a christian nation your silly beleifs are to be to yourself and not passed onto those who dont share your belief in fairy tales

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:11pm
  We don’t have to declare ourselves a Christian Nation in order to believe in christian principles and values. You don’t even have to be christian to believe in them.
  
  Report this comment
- Jeremy
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:16pm
  America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. So saying we’re “not a Christian nation” is really just semantics, trying to nitpick to get a different point across.
  
  Report this comment
- cessna152
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:19pm
  Dope… once again spewing lies. Let me guess, you’re for separation of Church and state, right? Then why is government involved in the RELIGIOUS institution of marriage? Care to explain? Also, read the Declaration of Independence… our freedoms come from God, not from government.
  
  This country’s heritage is that of the God of Abraham. See how it works out when you try to change the heritage of countries in the middle east, Russia and China.
  
  Report this comment
- Southpaw
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:20pm
  “As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”
  
  I think you have to look at who they are writing to and how the recipients viewed Christianity. They are making a treaty with a people who see Christianity as attacking Muslims (through the Crusades). The GOVERNMENT is not founded on the Christian RELIGION (meaning it doesn’t have the goal of converting everyone). It was, however, founded on Judeo-Christian values, just not as a theocracy.
  
  Report this comment
- qpwillie
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:23pm
  @Nevermind
  My favorite fairy tale is as follows:
  
  Once upon a no-time (Time is a product of the physical universe), there was an infinitely small point of potential energy which came from nowhere and was located nowhere (Space is also a product of the physical universe). For no plausible reason whatsoever, that point of potential energy suddenly exploded and the eventual result of that explosion was a perfectly working universe. ….and they all lived happily ever after.
  
  Now there’s a fairy tale for you.
  
  Report this comment
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:25pm
  @QPWILLE
  
  Well said…..
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:28pm
  I agree, it takes MUCH MORE faith to beleive that everything came from nothing (or to be exact a ‘point of singularity’), than to believe that everything was intelligently created by a God who always existed.
  
  Report this comment
- Habakkuk31718
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:39pm
  http://www.ministers-best-friend.com/Treaty-of-Tripoli-False-Claims-Atheists-Hide.html
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:41pm
  QPwillie, it is a fairy tale the way you stated it. But only a fool rejects the very scientific method that is responsible for all the modern day things he enjoy using. Science will eventually unravel the mystery of the universe. Your supernatural childish stories have nothing to do with any of it.
  
  Report this comment
- qpwillie
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:55pm
  @beckistheking
  OK, how about you explain to us all where this point of potential energy was located and how it came to be there.
  
  The problem with atheists is, they can’t stand the thought that there could be something greater than themselves. That old “book of fairy tales” calls it “pride” and has much to say about it. You should research it.
  
  Report this comment
- qpwillie
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 5:04pm
  @beckistheking
  For the record, science is one of my favorite subjects and it is very likely that I know more about it than you do.
  
  Report this comment
- mdlwoods
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 5:15pm
  Let me tell you Nevermind (wow, such a negative sounding name, must be sad to be negative all the time) I would much rather believe in that “fairy tale” as you call it, and be right in my beliefs, than be you, and be wrong…….
  
  Report this comment
- Owt_Raged
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 7:08pm
  I am so tired of this argument. The treaty is not valid and hasn’t been for a long time. Stop trying to take the treaty out of context. It doesn’t work.
  
  When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
  
  We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
  
  Why would God be mentioned twice in the first to paragraphs if it was not a founding principle of our country?
  
  And if you believe it is not so, then you only have the rights given to you by the government, which makes you much less free than the rest of us.
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:00pm
Malachi 2:16
I hate divorce,” says the LORD God of Israel

Mark 10:12

And if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery

So clearly in the bible it says ifa women divorces and remarrys she is commiting adultery. Isnt committing adultery agasinst one of the 10 commandments? SO according to her religion she is a sinner just as a homosexual ( even though Jesus never said anythign about homosexuals , it was leviticus) .

To quote matthew and show what is wrong with this women
Why do you look at the spot of dust in your brother’s eye? But you do not see a big stick in your own eye!

She is more worried of the sin of others than her own. Fake christians are funny

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- shimauma
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:18pm
  How do you know that she is not repentant of her sin? What all you secular folks refusing to acknowledge a creator never seem to get is that Christians aren’t perfect, they are merely repentant of their sins, and have asked for God’s Forgiveness, His sheild in the form of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice for us all. If we accept that, then our sins are forgotten. PERIOD! Some of us are so happy about that we would like everyone to have the same chance. What seems to bug secularists the most is that they don’t want to hear of others being happy because the non-believers are so unsatisfied with their own lives.
  
  Victoria is merely trying to share the good news, and even though the Bible says many will refuse to hear, she’s still catching those that are looking for light. God Bless her in her effort!
  
  Report this comment
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:24pm
  Victoria, just as any Christian, will tell you that we are sinners and don’t think we’re better than anyone. If fact, the first step in becoming a Christian is admitting your lowly, helpless, sinful state and repenting of it. The only difference between a Christian and any other sinner is that God has forgiven us by our faith in His Son. We still sin, we just try not to do it on purpose.
  
  Report this comment
- Verceofreason
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:48pm
  They pick and choose to support their bigotry and idiocy.
  
  Report this comment
- Owt_Raged
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 7:25pm
  God hates divorce, so? So do most humans except for the lawyers who get rich off of it.
  
  Report this comment
jp2feminist
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:52pm
Oh yeah, Howard! Why don’t we just change the definition of marriage? And why don’t we just change the definition of anything? Why don’t we just come into your studio and take over your microphone and kick your sorry **** out in the street? Why not? Who said you are entitled to any rights to a syndicated show? Why can’t we just change the rules for you, Howard???

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
True American66
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:49pm
For those people who don’t believe in God, the best explanation for why gay marriage isn’t recognized as legal and shouldn’t be is because no two people of the same sex can ever PROPAGATE the species. From the beginning of “Marriage” as a legally defined entity, it has been given special treatment and consideration among members of a society solely for that reason. When civilized society understands the importance of propagating the species, it understands the absolute importance of rearing that offspring at optimal levels for societal benefit require one committed male and one committed female to achieve the stated goal….PERIOD!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Watermain
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:42pm
If everyone were gay how long would the human race be around?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Verceofreason
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:47pm
  Stupidest comment of the week so far.
  When are YOU going gay?
  
  Report this comment
bornagaincowgirl
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:41pm
God BLESSED Adam and Eve and told them to multiply and replenish the earth.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:51pm
  That was a myth. Besides that, one’s unproveable religious beliefs don’t give them the authority to make laws that govern those who don’t believe as they do.
  
  Report this comment
- john vincent
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:12pm
  beck-
  Appears you suffer from myopia-
  ‘laws that govern those who dont believe?????????’
  
  Where do you suppose authority came from??? Would you like to know that the first sin, in which by the way you share, was one of authority? Try blowing through a red light or stop sign; then tell the police you do not believe as he, that the law is for you as well? Your response
  
  Your issue is one of authority, and this is the salient point that ALL atheists share to their demise. You may call Adam and Eve a myth, does not change the immutable truth.
  
  Your response to Cowgirl was weak and breaks down at every level
  
  Report this comment
- cause_glen_said_so
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:13pm
  So eve had two sons and to multiply further, had sex with her children and so on……………..
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:24pm
  This thread is a very good indicator of why Victoria told Stern, “Take it up with God.”
  We believe in our God, and believe He will redeem us on the day of judgement. We believe in His authority and judgement. He does not force those who do not believe to live the same way that we have chosen, but He does force them to die an everlasting death. For this reason, we take pity on you who do not believe and put your trust in Christ our Savior.
  
  Report this comment
- CLEttinger
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:28pm
  Beck – actually it has been genetically proven that the human race can be traced back to one female (Eve).
  
  Report this comment
- TxSon
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:34pm
  Genesis 4:13 Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is more than I can bear…I will be a restless wanderer and whoever finds me will kill me.” If Adam, Eve and their children were the only human inhabitants on earth, who would there be to kill Cain? The obvious answer is that Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel were NOT the only people.
  
  Genesis 4:19 Lamech married two women… So, it is NOT against the biblical principles to marry more than one woman. If it WERE against biblical tenets, why then does the bible talk about it without condemnation?
  
  Report this comment
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:45pm
  @CAUSE_GLEN_SAID_SO
  
  You’re so ignorant it hurts. You obviously missed the verse Genesis 5:4
  
  ” And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:”
  
  Did you catch that? Sons and daughters.
  
  I had 5 kids by the time I was 35, I bet you can have A LOT before you turn 800. The sons married the daughters at the beginning. So there was at best 2 generations of incest. And there is no indication or need of parent – child incest.
  
  You can disbelieve that if you like. What you can’t do is lie about what it says.
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:49pm
  Hogwash John Vincent. Your myths and delusional beliefs are not the burden of others. The public is not subject to your nonsense and your scriptures. Off you go.
  
  Report this comment
- chiefsfan88
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:52pm
  It seems any time the topic of homosexuality comes up the ignorance and foolish speech erupts. Let’s start by calling it by what it is. They are not “gay”, that is a hijacked word, and they are technically “homosexual”. The LORD calls them sodomites and wicked. Their sin is grievous and an abomination unto the LORD. It’s not homophobic Christians saying this it is the LORD our God, if you have a problem with it take it up with Him.
  
  @Cause – I don’t even know where to begin with your comment. The entire statement is in error. It is a theological nightmare. Do a little homework so you don’t look so foolish. Adam and Eve bore many children, if you live over 900 years you could make allot of babies. Yes their children would have married each other, not a problem in a genetically pure beginning. Marrying your close relatives was stopped by Moses as the genetic pool was most likely becoming tainted at that time. Nowhere does the Bible say Eve knew her children, Adam was her husband.
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 5:01pm
  Squidveto, when you try to apply logic and reason to the bible, you’re way out on thin ice. You’ve succeeded only in making yourself look like a gullible easily-led fool.
  
  Report this comment
- john vincent
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 5:07pm
  beck is….checkmated
  
  God WILL have the last word, after all, its His creation
  
  Report this comment
- Verceofreason
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 8:09pm
  Did you know Adam and Eve were black? Very black.
  
  Report this comment
- cause_glen_said_so
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:13am
  Looks like my point has been made and thanks to all who helped prove that no one has the answer. One says there were OTHER PEOPLE…yet god only created two. One says you can have alot of kids before you turn 800 another says the same but the age is over 900 and that marrying a “close relative” was stopped…hello, they were ALL related. Seems the “experts” on the subject are just as “foolish” and “ignorant” as I
  
  Report this comment
hi
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:40pm
Gays don’t care about marriage. They have an agenda to shut down the church. When gay marriage is legal, they will be able to sue the church, pastors, wedding photographers, cake makers, and so on for discrimination.Worse, they will be more easily able to adopt children. Children have the right to have a mom and a dad. Children’s rights should trump gay rights.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
jwd66
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:37pm
I would ask the scientist who say gay people have no choice, was the b** hole genetically made for sex, and can women impregnate each other without male sperm?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- louise
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:57pm
  JWD66,
  I have said the same thing and then some. To People who want so desperately to be politically correct, I always tell (told) them that people are NOT “born that way”. I have always said that these folks who say they were gay from birth, at SOME POINT in their lives, they had to CHOOSE to have homosexual sex. They chose to have sex with the same gender. Why? To find out if they LIKED it.
  
  Do I hate homosexuals? No. I pray for them, but I do not hate them. I love them, but will never condone their CHOICE.
  If this post offends some people…I don’t care. I care more about what God has to say about this matter.
  
  Report this comment
- shimauma
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:21pm
  don’t forget that the “scientist” that say sexual deviants don’t have a choice, was probably very biased toward allowing sexual deviancy to become normal.
  
  Report this comment
Konservative PUNK
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:31pm
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
ROMANS 1:24-32

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- encinom
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:36pm
  Please explain how your beliefs in myths and superstitions should affect others in a Secular Republic. Your choose to live by an ancient book of myths should not dictate how I choose to live my life. Marriage is a basic civil right and in a secular republic there is no need for civil rights to be confirmed from the pews.
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:43pm
  Where do ‘civil rights’ come from? I mean, who defines them? Who says ‘this is a civil right, and that is not?’ On whose authority are these things determined? Our constitution, like it or not, says that our rights are endowed by our Creator. If you don’t like it, perhaps you can persuade Congress to dissolve it on that basis.
  
  Report this comment
- DimmuBorgir
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:46pm
  marriage is not a basic civil right.
  
  nevermind not even worth it
  
  Report this comment
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:48pm
  Well since marriage isn’t written into the civil rights laws as a civil right as yet, I guess we’ll have to wait for it to be written and passed. Until then I say we get rid of any federal government perks for a status of married to begin with and then we won’t have an issue. Federal Government created the problem by giving the perks so lets get rid of them and the problem.
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:53pm
  Encinom is dead on target correct. Religious beliefs are not law in a secular society. You people that believe so would be promoting Shariah Law if you were born in the Middle East.
  
  Report this comment
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:55pm
  As I said then get rid of federal marriage perks to begin with.
  
  Report this comment
- lwoot
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:58pm
  As well with the same argument you put forth, then marriage is a religious belief to begin with and has no place for government to be involved in the licensing and law. If we go the secular route of course.
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:06pm
  Marriage always has been and should always remain a function of the Church. The state has no right to grant or deny any person’s marriage. The state may recognize a marriage, just as it may recognize a person’s covenant or contract with another individual. The state does not possess any authority to legitimize or deligitimize covenants or contracts made between two private parties or citizens before their God or religious congregation.
  
  Report this comment
- OneofMany
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:14pm
  enicom… I’m sure you speak for the entire 3% of the population that support your “myth” theory… Evolution is the MYTH..
  
  Report this comment
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:38pm
  “The state does not possess any authority to legitimize or deligitimize covenants or contracts made between two private parties or citizens before their God or religious congregation.”
  
  This will come as a surprise to all the divorce courts. I guess all the divorce lawyers and judges aren’t as in tune with the law as you seem to be.
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:46pm
  You misunderstood me, what I said was that the governemnt, does not legally have the authority to facilitate the covenants made between private citizens, as in the case of a justice of the peace performing marriage ceremonies. Therefore, they should also not have authority to determine who can and cannot get married. They can legally choose to recognize or ignore these covenants, but as for telling individuals what kinds of contracts they can engage in, they have no authority.
  
  Report this comment
beckistheking
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:31pm
That SNL woman is a simpleton for taking that cobbled together collection of ancient writings seriously. Let’s see, the premise is that some all-powerful divine entity created the universe and the way this entity decided to interact with some creatures on a tiny spec called earth was to sire a mortal son and have him sacraficed? That’s it? that’s the best this entity could come up with? And why did this entity wait for hundreds of thousands of years while people roamed the planet before intervening and making himself known? It’s obviously all a myth like all religions. This SNL babe is nmot a very deep thinker. So she was on a comedy show for 10 minutes a long time ago. Who cares what she thinks anyway?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:40pm
  Who care what you think anyways? Your unspeakable ignorance of the Bible notwithstanding. Better men than you have denied the Bible. Yet, it’s still the best selling book of all time.
  
  “The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God”
  -King Solomon
  
  Report this comment
- SREGN
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:41pm
  Sorry to break it to you, but more people care about what she thinks than about what you think. Don’t feel bad, I’m in the same boat, I just happen to agree with her though.
  
  Report this comment
- hi
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:48pm
  Fulfilled prophecy is what sets Christianity apart from other religions. Jesus fulfilled over 300 specific things written about Him 700+ years before He was born. Examples are where He would be born, of a Virgin, from the line of David, that His hands would be pierced. (crucifixion was not practiced when that was written) and He will die 483 years after the declaration of Araxerxes to rebild the temple in 444 BC.
  He will be burined in a rich man’s tomb. His side will be pierced, bones unbroken, heart will rupture, darkness will come over the land at midday, given gall and vinegar, garments will be divided and won by the casting of lots, He will pray for his persecutors, He will be executed among sinners,The price of his betrayal will be thirty pieces of silver, his betrayal money will be cast to the floor of my temple, it willbe used to buy the pottr’s field, he will be forsaken and deserted by his disciples, and so on…see Josh McDowell for list.
  
  Report this comment
- David Ross
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:52pm
  No, for sure Beckistheking, you have cornered the market on “deep thinking”. Tell me again how the big bang created life out of mud? Maybe the deep you speak of is the excrement you stand upon.
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:58pm
  Typical replies form you dentally challenged gullible non-thinkers. As for you “HI” the Jesus myth was a template used for other religions that preceeded the alleged time of his birth, if he even really existed at all. Listen to this expert scholar who actually studied original texts. The Bible was cobbled together and is full of errors, inconsistencies and falshoods. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB4MPBg60Ho
  
  Watch and learn.
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:01pm
  You just dug your hole deeper David Ross and now you’re standing in it. That kind of comment you made only makes you look bad. The facts remain – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB4MPBg60Ho
  
  Report this comment
- theotherberean
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:53pm
  Bart Ehrman is perhaps the most influential skeptical New Testament scholar in North America. Several of Ehrman’s books have become standard textbooks in many universities. His skepticism is not well-founded, however. This interview features New Testament scholar Mike Licona who answers a number of Ehrman’s major contentions. http://www.4truth.net/Ehrman/
  
  Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:30pm
Well done Victoria.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- louise
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:59pm
  Snow…amen
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:30pm
Want to know what else makes god mad? Divorce!! But she didnt seem to care about God getting mad in 1990 when she got a divorce. So its ok for her to make god angry and sin but noone else? I love the hypocrisy of Christians. Its good for them to sin when it suits them but anyone else its a problem.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:40pm
  I am offended that the word ‘divorce’ does not include people who never got married. It is not fair that some people have the luxury of getting divorced while others are denied this opportunity simply because they never found someone to marry them. This is a moral outrage. Congress should define ‘divorce’ as ‘people who haven’t seen each other for a long time’. Only then will all of us have the same right to call ourselves ‘divorced’.
  
  Report this comment
- sWampy
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:42pm
  The bible doesn’t say you can’t get divorced, it gives a list of positions in the church you can’t serve once you are divorced, but t doesn’t force 2 people that can’t live with each other to live with each other. Stop trying to tell lies and half truths to make your bigoted position seem legitimate.
  
  Report this comment
- john vincent
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:47pm
  konserve-
  well played
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:55pm
  Thanks, I am also working on legislation to legalize abortion for furry critters such as kittens and puppies, in cases of incest and rape. I think that if my dog couild speak, she would want me to jam a vacuum tube into her uterus and suck the brains out of her unborn litter.
  
  Report this comment
- David Ross
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:56pm
  Swampy, your argument has one flaw and that flaw is it’s based upon facts. Nevermind is allergic to facts and truth for that matter so he/she won’t respond.
  
  Report this comment
- beckistheking
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:05pm
  It’s all a load of hogwash. All religions are made up by MEN. Women weren’t even welcomed to participate. What a crock. What divine entity would allow half his created chosen creations (women) to be treated like second class citizens?
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB4MPBg60Ho
  
  Report this comment
- girlnurse
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:12pm
  You are talking apples and oranges. Maybe there was infidelity in which case the bible does okay divorce. We don’t know Victoria’s personal life details. She is not “judging” gays and their sin either. She is saying that we (as a society) should not endorse a sinful “institution” such as gay marriage and encourage children that the perverted lifestyle is a good alternative, which it is not.
  Thats all she is saying and many gays even agree with that. It is only the radical, militant gays who are trying to shove it (literally) down society’s throat! We don’t want to do anything that will cause a young child to sin or adopt such a lifestyle and that is NOT being hypocritical.
  That is like saying because I am a drug addict and I want to live that lifestyle, the laws should be changed to accept it as a viable lifestyle choice! Srsly..meh..
  
  Report this comment
- theotherberean
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:58pm
  “What divine entity would allow half his created chosen creations (women) to be treated like second class citizens?”
  
  The same one that gave us you.
  
  Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:26pm
Brilliant in its simplicity …
A. Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men.
B. Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women.
C. Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies.
D. In three generations, there will be no Democrats.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Watermain
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:41pm
  Nice.
  
  Report this comment
- Zipit
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:00pm
  Hard to say Banjarmon! Seems to me that there will always be someone born with their hand out!
  
  Report this comment
- shimauma
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:27pm
  as long as liberals are allowed to spout their evil agenda in our schools on our tax dollar, there will always be liberal demoncraps.
  
  Report this comment
momrules
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:24pm
Good for you Victoria. I have also reached the point that I am through debating the homosexual issue. The same sex marriage issue is nonsense. How distasteful to hear a man refer to another man as his wife or a woman to call a woman her husband. By corrupting the word and meaning of marriage they have also corrupted the words husband and wife.

As Victoria so eloquently put it…….Take it up with God. Everything is His creation. His universe, His world and His rules.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Exrepublisheep
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:18pm
Harridan.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Verceofreason
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 6:09pm
  Vat’s vit the schmatta on her head? Oy.
  
  Report this comment
john vincent
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:16pm
Here we go again; another attempt to define marriage. The lady is correct, ‘God made male and female,’ therefore he defines what marriage is.

A male and another man can be coupled I guess in a strange way, but please do not change the meaning of a word: marriage is between a man and a woman. There really is no controversy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:28pm
  If homosexuality is so natural, why does it not occur in the wild?
  I don’t remember seeing any National Gegraphic specials about the two rams fighting for the love of a third ram.
  Words have meanings. ‘Socialism’ has a definition, as does ‘marriage’. You can change the definition of ‘socialism’ to mean anarchy, but that doesn’t change what ‘socialism’ was. Similarly, simply changing the definition of ‘marriage’ to incorporate all kinds of new meanings it never had previously doesn’t make it any more natural.
- The_Jerk
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:35pm
  Homosexual marriage isn’t a religious issue. It’s secular. The state has no obligation to promote, protect, legitimize, homosexual relationships any more than it does for first cousin, mother-son, father-daughter, mother-daughter, father-son, multiples… on and on, concerning any relationship that the mind can conjure up. The only relationship that should be protected is the adult male to adult female relationship, and that is for the perpetuation of society.
  
  Report this comment
- john vincent
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:41pm
  konserve-
  wait a few minutes; an atheist will tell you that the unnatural act is common in nature, but they will leave out it is an aberration, and not the norm. That unnatural kinship in the good book is called ‘unseemly,’ and common sense both learned and observed, prove this.
  
  Report this comment
- Konservative PUNK
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:50pm
  Please, call me Punk.
  
  Report this comment
- DimmuBorgir
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:51pm
  BUT BUT BUT
  
  there there were those 2 penguins… out of millions.
  
  grasping for straws
  
  Report this comment
- Welcome Black Carter
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 6:04pm
  “I don’t remember seeing any National Gegraphic specials about the two rams fighting for the love of a third ram.”
  
  No self respecting ram would allow itself to be violated in that way…
  
  Report this comment
CWPrequired
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:15pm
Stern who?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- whatthecrazy
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 4:22pm
  He is a nasty idiot on radio with nothing to say that isnt trashy…………………
  
  Report this comment
Vickie Dhaene
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:12pm
God IS mad and we shall pay the price for perversion. Rome fell and so will the USA.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- john vincent
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:19pm
  It also needs to be said that Stern is just as vulgar, debased, decadent, vile, and perverse as any.
  
  Report this comment
- momrules
  Posted on October 16, 2012 at 3:33pm
  Vickie…….If we are repulsed and angered by the perversions rampant in the world and of course in America can we even imagine how angry God is? He did give us a big heads up in The Revelation though.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.