Death Toll Revised Down to 24 After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…100+ Injured…Children Among the Dead…Stunning Pictures…Woman Finds Dog During Interview!

WATCH on TheBlaze TV: Latest Updates on Tornado Aftermath, Including Updates From Glenn Beck in Oklahoma

Politics

Krauthammer Reacts to Debate: ‘This Was a Boxing Match, This Was Heavyweight, This Was Frazier, Ali’

Oct. 16, 2012 11:54pm Jason Howerton

Fox News contributor and syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer said Tuesday night’s presidential debate was a “boxing match,” both candidates circling around each other on a stage that even resembled a boxing ring.

“We love this stuff. This was a boxing match, this was heavyweight, this was Frazier, Ali,” Krauthammer said.

“At one point I thought they were sort of going to use their mics as weapons and it would turn into the Taiwanese Parliament where you get these fantastic fist fights,” he added.

According to Krauthammer, Romney did just as well as he did in the first presidential debate, however, Obama “clearly had a good night,” especially compared to his poor performance in the first debate.

“I thought there was one point where Romney did really well.. that was on the larger general issue on the failure of this administration,” he explained. “When Romney went large, he did well. When Romney went small, trying to answer each point here and there, I think Obama got the better of him.”

He also said Obama was “completely at sea” when the issue of Libya came up.

“He was asked about the security in Libya at Benghazi, he didn’t even try to answer because he had no answer,” Krauthammer said.

However, he said Romney missed a “huge opening” to keep the pressure on Obama regarding the White House’s misleading statements on Benghazi. At one point, Obama said it was “offensive” that Romney would accuse anyone in his administration of playing politics or misleading on the issue.

“The obvious retort was: ‘Mislead? You sent out your UN ambassador to mislead America on five television shows in one morning, implying it was about a video, talking about a riot. There was none. There wasn’t a video involved in this issue in Benghazi,” Krauthammer added.

He also said moderator Candy Crowley’s intervention on the Libya question where she said President Obama called it an act of terror in the Rose Garden the day after the attack was “essentially incorrect.”

“He did not call it a terror incident,” he said.

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (104)

Apple Bite
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 5:03am
Too bad we’ll never see Lou Dobbs moderating these types of debates. That Crowley was given more than enough lead way to be part of two of them, suggests that MSM is doing their best to throw this election to Obama.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- turkey13
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:56am
  That woman never got the point that this was Town Hall format and it was about the canidates and not her. She wasn’t even needed – a good computer Geek could have disabled the other mike while they took turns and had their own time limit!
  
  Report this comment
- omni3460
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:56am
  Add your comments
  
  Report this comment
- omni3460
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:59am
  Lou Dobbs would be great. Krauthammer was incorrect however stating Romney did not go after Obama on the Video, etc. Romney could of been clearer in thought, however Crowley interferred…one could see how Obama was saying “Candy, Candy”….help me. Some of the questions came from the left wing – one woman could not remember her most important question in life (had to go to her pocket to find question)…I found that laughable.
  
  Report this comment
- Hanner
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:04am
  I liked the debate. I didn’t like all of the Obama lies. I also didn’t like Crowley trying to defend Obama either. For those of you that found the debate DISGUSTING let me help you…..crawl back in your closet and cower in fear. If you can’t stand up for something and speak out against lies then you don’t need to be in this conversation. You “disgusted” people don’t seem to have a backbone of any kind. MEN WILL BE MEN! Quit trying to Feminize us!!! I’m going to drag my knuckles, and scratch my **** because I AM A MAN, and I like it. I will also call out a liar for being a liar if I am faced with it. Romney and Obama acted like men last night. Obama lied through the whole thing, but he still acted like a man. Get over it you “disgusted” people.
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:16am
  The European press has caught on the that Obama has a limited speaking vocabulary & rhetorical repertoire.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/v/erYpXzE9Pxs%26
  
  Where is Obmam without TOTUS?
  
  Report this comment
- bobbiejean
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 7:31pm
  @APPLE BITE, Oh yeah! Lou Dobbs! Love the man and he would be good.
  
  Report this comment
Camptown Races
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 3:55am
Krauthammer may “love this stuff”, but it made both my wife and I nauseous. He might want to call it Ali versus Frazier, I call it a domestic squabble. Whatever it was, it was a disgrace.

I had a chance to watch the 1992 debate the other night. (I think CSPAN aired it) How absolutely far we have sunk. It’s a damn shame when the ghost of an independent candidate from 1992, ala Ross Perot, can outdo BOTH these guys twenty years later in talking points and cutting to the chase. Seriously, go back and watch that debate.

Can’t even believe what I witnessed. For two supposed “men” to be vying for the most powerful position on the entire planet….. you could have fooled me. This is the BEST we have on this planet to hold this position??? This is it??? Really???? REALLY???!!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Moozmom
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 6:22am
  It was nauseating. These two men are far from the best the planet has to offer. The real powers that be will not allow the best candidate to run. We all know that. Our candidates are processed by a group of individuals prior to us even knowing the candidates names. After the power group gives a candidate the nod, only then are they allowed in our presence. It’s not that the world lacks true men of integrity and intellect; it’s the good old boys that will not allow them to serve.
  
  Report this comment
- Stopit
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 6:30am
  Agree.
  
  Tamney at Forbes called it nauseating. It was to me, so I turned it off. Two socialists running.
  
  http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2012/10/17/romney-v-obama-was-a-nauseating-draw-and-both-deserve-to-lose/
  
  Report this comment
- jujubeebee
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:50am
  Not me. I wanted to see agression in Romney. If someone was lying about me for a year and lying as they were standing next to me I would want to slap them and I am not a man. You may not like it but I did. Romney could have gone further in my opinion.
  Take some maalox.
  If you are undecided or claiming independent then you have either lived in a cave or are too stupid to vote. The rest of us would like to see Obama get his nose bloodied!
  
  Report this comment
PointBreak
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 3:09am
Only next to Obama could RINOmney seem like a good idea. We are SO screwed.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- PATTY HENRY
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 3:18am
  Speak for yourself hot shot. PS it just occurred to me that Ron PAUL is a short little dude, I should have remembered that.
  
  Report this comment
- Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 7:26am
  @Patty,
  
  So you like your police state, budget defitics and government health care do ya? Yeah, then Romney is your guy. Wait. So is Obama.
  
  Report this comment
Mrs.Cee
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:55am
There are a few things that bother me and I simply do not understand. One of those besides the obvious is why the bloody hell is Hillary taking the blame on her? What does she gain or what is it that she does not want to lose by doing this? What is the strategy in this case, because I know there is a major strategy at play here. And now, all of a sudden Mighty Obama wants to be hero in chief and in a very subtle way takes responsibility for whatever may have happened. Whoever is investigating this must, and should not omit in any way shape or form asking direct questions as to who knew what and when, and why the bloody hell did Obama mention the video in his UN speech if he is now claiming that he referred to the attack as a terrorist attack.

In my humble opinion Romney is 5 minutes smarter than anyone else in the Obama camp. I am foreseeing some big guns being pulled out in the next few days on this very issue. Romney allowed it to play as it did on purpose, all he wanted to get Obi to say on the record is that he called it a terror attack. Obi has no idea what is in store for him. Axelrod, the entire communist gang and all the soap in the world won’t be able to clean up the $hit Obi got himself into with just that one statement.

I wonder, how stupid does Obama really think we are?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- hereandnow
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 4:55am
  great comments… I believe that Hillary has done this to distance herself from barry and come off as a bigger person. Obee is indecisive (without val) just as he was in his voting record in the senate and the decision to get Osama. She knows someone has to stop this and now that she has come out, Obee wants to say the buck stops at him in order to try to show responsibility. I think there is a rift between the two as she has stated that she will not continue as SOS in a second term. She knows that he is living a fairy tale and unfortunately, she will get respect for this.
  
  Report this comment
- jujubeebee
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:53am
  Obama promised to pay off her debt from the last time she ran could be a reason. Obama may be using his gangster political style to hold something over her head as blackmail. Or three…she thinks she better fess up to her part so that the public will get past it, forget and let the blame dissipate.
  
  Report this comment
- bdsconserv
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 6:19pm
  have you seen the video of the woman getting her “free” “obama phone”? that says it all. there are masses of stupid folk out there ready to pull the lever for obama. seriously depressing.
  
  Report this comment
Wango
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:22am
You know what they say . . .You don’t? . . . OK, here you go . . . “Winners don’t complain about the refs.”

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- OhioRifleman
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:29am
  Trollin’ trollin’ trollin’
  Though his ego’s swollen
  And he’s really as-holin’
  Wangooooo
  
  Don’t try to understand him
  Just do your best to stand him
  Soon he’ll be having a good cry
  
  If he’d just remember
  Dems dread this November
  ‘Cause that means the end of the line
  
  Move ‘em on – Head ‘em up
  Head ‘em up – Move ‘em out
  Move ‘em on – Head ‘em up
  Romney
  
  Cut ‘em out – Ride ‘em in
  Ride ‘em in – Cut ‘em out
  Ride ‘em in, Romney
  
  Report this comment
- Al J Zira
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:09am
  OhioRifleman: Now that’s good commentary!
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:21am
  OHIORIFLEMAN, LOL, that was funny.
  
  Report this comment
- OhioRifleman
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:47am
  Actually, that was not an original work. Credit for the Rawhide Wango Remix goes to Wool_Free_Vision, I’m just using it to troll the troll.
  
  Report this comment
- Stelex
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:48am
  That’ll be stuck in my head all day …..
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:04am
  Wango’s swollen, because he is infected & it’s systemic.
  
  Look up Wango in UrbanDictionary.com.
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:11am
  Wango,
  
  If you want to know what Europeans really think of the Obama see the YouTube vid linked.
  
  Obama is patronizing.
  
  Obama speaking ability leaves a lot to be desired. I guess his handles read puppet masters can only porogrram him with a pittance. Too bad he didn’t have TOTUS with him, when making off the cuff remarks with all his photo shoots with foriegn prime ministers.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/v/erYpXzE9Pxs%26
  
  Report this comment
- DSTSS2010
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 6:28pm
  WANGO, I think OHIORIFLEMAN got you by the “Raw Hide”.How did it feel?
  
  Report this comment
kalayaan
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 1:49am
After the first debate….I am voting for Romney for President!!!!!

After the second debate…I AM VOTING FOR ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TelepromoterNChief
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 5:24am
  There didn’t even have to be a debate, I’m still voting for Romney.
  Romney could lose every debate and I’d still vote for Romney.
  
  Report this comment
RevRiles
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 1:47am
Krauths is cool (Obama won on points but not substance which means he is a very good liar.)

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jujubeebee
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:01am
  Points and win/lose doesn’t matter. What matters more is who came across as better equipped to run the country. That person was the more experienced one….the one who has actually had success in his life~in business, in running a state, in working with the opposition, in having a budget and working within it. We had 4 years of talking. Obama has no success to his credit~in or out of office. The only thing he was successful at was getting elected with hope rhetoric. He is all hot air even if you don’t think he is a liar (which he is). Romney has the record. Obama has only a mouth.
  
  Report this comment
Kisha
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 1:01am
I have to agree with Krauthammer. He seems to completely grasp exactly what happened in this debate, the most. IMO. Not to say that Romney didn’t do well. He did. However, it’s difficult to fight a good liar when your being bullied by the POTUS and the Moderator!

Unfortunately evil plays dirty!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Amarilloan
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:31am
  Yep! Romney had to fight two battles. But he gave as good as he got.
  
  Report this comment
freedomisasfreedomdoes
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:57am
Romney creamed Obama. Romney took on both bullies in the ring. Walk tall and carry a big stick. Not channeling Biden gaffe.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
R.A. Bullseye
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:56am
Did anyone else notice that Romney said he believes in God….Obama didn’t even broach the subject because he doesn’t.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- JimmyP
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:18am
  Yes, Obama BELIEVES in god (small “g” intentional)
  
  Obama believes and acts as if he, Obama, is God.
  
  He jumps to conclusions about a police officer who works to diffuse a justifiablly p.o.’d home owner and finally has to draw the line that regretably results in the homeowner being carted off in cuffs, then he attempts to be “neutral” about a white-Hispanic (whaaaat?) saying that if he had a son, he would look like dope-smoking Choom-kid who put the beat-down on a guy abt to be made a card carrying member of the dead BUT he needs to give the planned and plotted murder of 4 Americans enuf time to get past Nov 6th (according to MIchelle).
  
  He doesn’t need the bothersome opines of his own people in Congress (e.g., all of them Ds and Rs), military personnel and anyone other than Jarrett or Mooshelle but he appoints more czars than the Tsars!
  
  Three cheers for Obama, he is not running for President, he is running away from President by voting “Present”.
  
  Report this comment
- Stelex
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:51am
  He believes in the one “true” god……with a small g……Allah. Wouldn’t have been prudent for him to bring it up in the debate. I do believe his stool was facing Mecca
  
  Report this comment
lylejk
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:55am
Charles is right; love the boxing match. Even glad BO at least showed up this time. I call it a draw, but the libs will call it a win for BO. Don’t think this debate persueded any of the uncommitted into going one way or another and a draw will always favor the challenger. :)

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- portague
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 1:11am
  That is exactly what they are doing declaring Obama the winner and Krauthammer was wrong about the point thing Obama he lost the debate. check this
  
  CNN Poll: Obama wins overall, Romney wins many issues
  so how many issues did romney win
  
  “Still, Romney won in other key areas:
  *On who would better handle the economy: 58 percent Romney; 40 percent Obama.
  *On who would better handle health care: 49 percent Romney; 46 percent Obama
  *On taxes: 51 percent Romney; 44 percent Obama
  *On who is a stronger leader: 49 percent Romney; 46 percent Obama
  *On who is more likeable: 47 percent Obama: 41 percent Romney
  *On who cares more about your life: 44 percent Obama; 40 percent Romney
  *On who answered more directly: 45 percent Romney; 43 percent Obama”
  http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2012/10/cnn-poll-obama-wins-overall-romney-wins-many-issues/
  
  wait a second on the 7 issues Romney won 5 and Obama won 2 so how exactly did Obama win the debate? It is like people were watching a different debate Romney (if like him or not) moped the floor with Obama on key issues to the people energy, jobs, economic policy, tax issues, and possibly more that I am forgetting. The polling does not add up when adding in key issues that were picked to be polled.
  
  Report this comment
- 4kidsandacat
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 8:22am
  Sadly Portague, the nimrods on Obama’s side will vote for him based on his “likeability” (personally I can’t stand the man, I don’t get it). They won’t investigate the facts of the debate and see that the commie lies through his teeth and every other bodily orifice. That’s how he won the debate. I am still unbelievably livid over Candy Crowley’s display last night, I just can’t get over the fact that she was making points for Obama! I was waiting to see what he would say and he never answered Romney’s question, she did it for him! I’m over these horrendous moderators, incredibly Lehrer’s was the best in light of these last two and he’s still taking all kinds of flack for it.
  
  BTW, tangent: was it me or did Obama look pigeon-toed last night?
  
  Report this comment
- jujubeebee
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 9:12am
  If the uncommitted could not see the overall picture then they are too stupid to vote. Romney will win because his case was made ~not on debate points but on his success record. He sold that. Romney has been successful in his life~successful in business, successful in running a state, successful in making a budget and following it, a successful record which shows he is capable on taking on this country’s problems. Obama doesn’t have a record of success at anything.
  As Romney said on the campaign trail “Hope is not a strategy”. Talk is cheap. The overall picture those idiots that have no clue what is going on will surely have gotten a glimpse of that in this debate.
  
  So tally up points is not going to make any difference. They are applying for a job and people will want experience this time around.
  
  Report this comment
theromsters
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:49am
Why the HELL was Candy debating for Obama about Benghazi. That was one of the most misleading arguments over the word “terror” and left one to believe Obama called it a terrorist attack when he was referring to the video being an act of terror. Terrorist Terrorist Terrorist

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Taxpaying Contributor
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:38am
The fourth branch of gumint really letting us down on this Libya thing!
Candy guarding for the narrative… for shame…
The lens of history may expose these things, but we don’t have the time!!!!
No matter who the facilitators in the media prefer, this foreign policy crap is gong down!!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Uranium Wedge
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:56am
  When you pile up crap as high as a mountain, it no longer looks like a pile of crap.
  This is the Ocrapa administration. And that is what the “undecided” see. They see a mountain, and not a pile of crap.
  
  Report this comment
curlyque
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:33am
Crowley should never be allowed to moderate anything ever again. Romney had Obama right where he wanted him. He could have exposed him for the lowlife liar he is on national television. Crowley took that chance away with her ignorant interference. Obama and the MSM treat American citizens like we are so stupid we do not even understand what we see and hear with our own eyes and ears.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- PATTY HENRY
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 3:26am
  But note: On Frank Luntz’s Focus Group…Indies from Nevada, most of whom voted for Obama last time…solid swing to ROMNEY with great comments (watch if you can) …..
  They complained about the LIES from Obama as well and said ROMNEY looked like A PRESIDENT. Kept his cool, handled the situation and yes, Candy made a really big mistake..trying to walk it back now.
  In the meantime, this LIBYA debacle will finish Obama. Next week: Foreign Policy… what is Obama going to say? One lie after another. So while some thought it was a draw or a very slight win for Obama (CBS had him 4 points up and equal amount thought is was draw (the rest said Romney won.. 34-30 and 36 draw …something like that…. It’s really hard to debate a solid liar. That little exhibition really shows AMERICA how Obama has gotten away with all this C**P all this time… now we’ve seen it for sure – first hand. COME ON NOV 6!!!! PRAY HARD!!
  
  Report this comment
- 4kidsandacat
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:17am
  Black voters came out in droves last election to vote in the first black president (or second, depending on whether you believe that title belongs to Bill Clinton), even those who had never bothered to vote in any previous election. I don’t think they will bother again this election, they accomplished the historical moment that they wanted and the whole climate of the economy this time around is just not inspiring enough for those generally disinclined to come to the voting booth to do so on November 2. While I would definitely agree that non-black voters who didn’t want to seem racist helped him tremendously, I think that moment has passed as well. Obama is in trouble, no doubt about it. Trying to be the cool kid is not working for him, his **** is too grey and he looks like somebody’s dad trying to use the latest slang.
  
  Report this comment
voting-for-romney
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:31am
That was not a fight, that was cramming too many questions in too short of a span of time, in order to make a sitting President look good if he could have a conversation about the issues without really “debating them”? How do you call that a debate when there were so many limits?

Clearly we are not energy independent, the prices of goods and services, particularly energy (did you bill go down last month) are going up, and Mitt Romney, without any real sense of drama, but with humble humility, reminded us that the prices of health care is going to go up?

Do we really have to talk about how we don’t owe people money anymore, we owe the government for big ticket loans? We did not cut out the middle man, we just made it harder for you not to go to the government for the things you need?

I mean, yeah, if you are paid millions of dollars to write stuff in the media and are not really affected by all this stuff, you might think that was highly entertaining? The rest of us are mortified? It’s obvious some of these news events revolve around election events and that just does not bother people?

No answers for Libya, when it obviously it was neglect, or God forbid the creation of a gun free zone? Fast and Furious tragedy in no gun zones, and still no curious mention of the fact the wife of Univision is an ambassador to the UN, not one tweet that offer appears out of the blue?

That is debate, or the script for a movie?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- glckgrl
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:55am
  I really liked it when Romney reminded Obama that some of his investments also included businesses that had Chinese investments.
  
  The moderator seemed to prefer the president, to put it mildly.
  
  Report this comment
- 4kidsandacat
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:31am
  Obama did not answer one question that I can think of, aside from the ones that Romney pushed him on so hard that he could not get around them. And even those were poorly answered. The gas price question? That answer was so ridiculous I about fell out of my chair laughing. So gas prices get lower before an economic disaster? How does that work exactly?
  
  Report this comment
DOSLYNX
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:28am
One of the things that saddens me is how James Madison would view this debate.

In Federalist #37, Madison talks about the convention and how such an important issue as the constitution should be debated. He lamented the vexing passions even in his own time:

“It is a misfortune, inseparable from human affairs, that public measures are rarely investigated with that spirit of moderation which is essential to a just estimate of their real tendency to advance or obstruct the public good…”

I am already becoming weary of the spectacle of these Jerry Springer debates. Compare Nixon-Kennnedy, where the opponents respected the American people by being civil.

Obama and Biden have decided they really, really want to confront by scoring points on who can insult the best. It is because they are losing.

Romney, you could tell prefers the Madison ethos. The president is a serious office and Romney will perform and respect his duty in it in ways not seen since I was young man. People will see, even those opposed to him, how much more they will value the highest office in the land.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
TXview
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:25am
When is Romney going to say Obama wasted 4 years of OUR LIFE?
Romney missed opportunities but when the cup runnith over what can you do?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
crusaderx9
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:19am
Candy Crowley LIED – and it was blatant.

Don’t pull punches, she LIED – deliberately.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BODYBAG
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:16am
“Change You Can Xerox”
—- Hilary Clinton, 2007

No Mercy
ROMNEY / RYAN 2012

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Wango
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:27am
  Norah O’Donnell: “Are you calling Mitt Romney a liar?”
  Newt Gingrich: “Yes.”
  
  Wow, that was easy. Nice T-shirt.
  
  Report this comment
- 4kidsandacat
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:28am
  Sure Wango, that’ll be as ineffective as anything else that has come from the Obama camp against Romney. Print away. They can’t waste any more money than they already have.
  
  Report this comment
4GODUSAANDISRAEL
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:10am
Obama still lying about Benghazi, is anyone shocked? I mean really? But Romney did miss a huge opening on that one.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Crazyotto
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:26am
  I disagree …anyone who cares knows Obama lied. What could Romney do outside of calling him a liar?
  Anyone who has watched the circus surrounding this tragedy knows the White House has perpetrated a cover-up and are responsible for trivializing the deaths of 4 Americans. This President is a disgrace.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 1:33pm
  Well, he COULD have just CALLED OBAMA A LIAR.
  
  I really liked the whole “blind trust” thing. Romney is on video twenty or so years ago, saying that basically, “Yeah, it’s a blind trust — but you can tell them what not to invest in.”
  
  Oops.
  
  Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:08am
Candy has come out now and said she made a mistake correcting Romney on Benghazi, that Romeny was correct. But she won’t go on national TV with millions of viewers and say that, too little, too late.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 4kidsandacat
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 10:26am
  My thoughts exactly! The damage, such as it is, is done.
  
  Report this comment
americansfightingforcommonsense
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:07am
Thank you Charles. You are exactly right. This president and Candy alike tried to mislead the American People once again. Spin Spin Spin. Deny Deny Deny!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Detroit paperboy
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:07am
Romney reminded me of Reagan ,,,,Obama reminded me of carter…………..you made me proud Mitt !!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- R.A. Bullseye
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:58am
  Yeah at one point Mitt did remind me of Reagan too…..Reagan without amnesty. ROMNEY !!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- Wango
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 2:27am
  Can you say that louder, Candy? heh heh heh
  
  Report this comment
MNR4Freedom
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:06am
Charles always nails it!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Mahtoska
Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:05am
Paragraph 19, Rose Garden Speech transcript.. The only reference to an “act of terror” was made as a generality and not specifically in regard to the Benghazi incident… Crowley showed her slip and the Emperor has no clothes!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RaydocX
  Posted on October 17, 2012 at 12:25am
  My eyes! I can’t see!
  Crowley realized she was wrong in mid correction… It was not called an act of terror, terror was merely mentioned in passing, AND it was not ‘about two weeks’ before they had claimed it was due to the movie… That was 4 days.
  
  Then again, in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king…
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.