Newsweek Magazine issued a bombshell announcement this morning, with editor-in-chief Tina Brown writing that the historic magazine, which was launched in 1933, will be transitioning to an all-digital format in the coming months. The final print issue of Newsweek is slated for release on December 31, 2012.
The shocking proclamation comes after years of financial strife for the magazine. As a result of these ongoing troubles, The Washington Post company sold Newsweek in 2010 and, that same year, the outlet merged with The Daily Beast.

Photo Credit: Newsweek
Rather than focusing upon these past blunders, Brown used the announcement as a vehicle to highlight the framework for Newsweek’s future — an expansion of the outlet’s “rapidly growing tablet and online presence, as well as its successful global partnerships and events business.”
Here’s how Brown framed these events that unfolded over the past few years:
Four years ago we launched The Daily Beast. Two years later, we merged our business with the iconic Newsweek magazine—which The Washington Post Company had sold to Dr. Sidney Harman. Since the merger, both The Daily Beast and Newsweek have continued to post and publish distinctive journalism and have demonstrated explosive online growth in the process. The Daily Beast now attracts more than 15 million unique visitors a month, a 70 percent increase in the past year alone—a healthy portion of this traffic generated each week by Newsweek’s strong original journalism.
At the same time, our business has been increasingly affected by the challenging print advertising environment, while Newsweek’s online and e-reader content has built a rapidly growing audience through the Apple, Kindle, Zinio and Nook stores as well as on The Daily Beast. Tablet-use has grown rapidly among our readers and with it the opportunity to sustain editorial excellence through swift, easy digital distribution—a superb global platform for our award-winning journalism. By year’s end, tablet users in the United States alone are expected to exceed 70 million, up from 13 million just two years ago.
The company’s new name will be Newsweek Global and it will be published as a single, global edition that is targeted at those using mobile devices and at opinion leaders who want to stay in tune with world events. Keeping in line with the model that Newsweek employed to bring in print revenue, users will access the condensed outlet on a paid subscription basis through e-readers and the Internet; select content will still be published on The Daily Beast.

Tina Brown (Photo Credit: Getty Images)
Brown notes that Newsweek feels it is the appropriate time to move to an all-digital model. While this option, in her estimate, wouldn’t have been possible just two years ago, today, she claims that news consumption has reached a “tipping point.” Potentially recognizing, though, that this announcement will create some angst among those loyal to Newsweek, Brown made it clear about the company’s intentions: “We are transitioning Newsweek, not saying goodbye to it.”
At the end of her announcement, the editor-in-chief did note that “staff reductions” and “streamlining” are on the table, as Newsweek Global prepares for its 2013 emergence. The changes are poised to take effect as the outlet celebrates its 80th anniversary next year.






















































































































Comments (67)
Detroit paperboy
Oct. 18, 2012 at 9:04amCanceled my subscription ten years ago because of their leftist slant……wasn’t even aware they were still around……….they did it to themselves….
Report this comment
contkmi
Oct. 18, 2012 at 9:22amYeah, I’m kinda thinking this falls squarely into the “Who cares?” file…
Report this comment
horsefeathers99
Oct. 18, 2012 at 10:02amI care…in the fact that whenever we go to a doctor’s office or other places to wait, people won’t be brainwashed anymore by their articles which are slanted liberally.
Now, there is still liveral magazines like Time, Rolling Stone, Mad etc, etc….
Report this comment
OutOfTheAether
Oct. 18, 2012 at 11:44am“a healthy portion of this traffic generated each week by Newsweek’s strong original journalism” “Strong original journalism” translates to: Spin, Slants, outright lies
Report this comment
The-Monk
Oct. 18, 2012 at 11:45amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85cL1HisrNc
Oh, that’s right….. someone already did. : )
Report this comment
dmerwin
Oct. 19, 2012 at 11:40amLast issue? So what?
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Oct. 18, 2012 at 9:04amLiberal media is failing. The Blaze probably gets more hits than The Daily Beast by a large multiple. Same with Breitbart and another dozen conservative news sites. Pay for Newsweek online? What are they smoking? They better get to selling ad space because they will never make it on subscriptions.
Report this comment
term limits for congress
Oct. 18, 2012 at 1:54pmThe 47%-ers are not going to subscribe and the 53%-ers are sick of being demonized.
Report this comment
TROONORTH
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:59amHere is the perfect example of a print news magazine that has failed because it’s offerings lean so far to the left that it became just another liberal mouth piece. It never fails to amaze me, that the editors and owners of these liberal rags feel it more important to spew their left wing drivel and eventually fail than it is to offer a balanced ‘voice’, providing what the public wants, and continue to make a profit and publish. Of course ‘profit’ is a bad word and these people prove themselves true believers in the socialist cause by throwing themselves on their swords in the name of liberalism.
Report this comment
jackact
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:59amGood riddance to this liberal rag.
Hopefully the decision was made too early to go electronic and Newsweek goes out of business.
Report this comment
LibsFIB
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:53amMy liberal boss who is a er doctor brings that toilet paper mag into work.
I dont think I ever believed their tilted reporting since the early 90′s in college.
My local paper props up this liberal tripe; global warming to how christian are freaks, etc…
Report this comment
ambrosia
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:53amOne by one, they fall.
This is only the beginning.
The Liberals rags & media eat themselves from within.
The same will happen with the network media.
It is all about the money-
when the advertising revenue cease,
these nincompoopers will have to change their ways or hit the skids-
just as Newsweek tried to do….too little, too late.
Andrew Breitbart’s dream was to see more Conservative media popping up,
to gain strength & knock the Libs off their high pedestals-
it’s happening.
There is POWER & dollars in the Conservative market-
sooner or later,
if they are smart,
even liberal companies will realize where their advertising revenue
is best spent,
that Conservative values dictate the marketplace & guide the country.
Slowly but surely, our voices & dollars will be heard & cultivated-
just as Breitbart predicted.
In America, TRUTH & DECENCY matter-
it will make one better or put them out of their self-inflicted misery.
Newsweek is the perfect example-
arrogant, false, instigative & divisive, just like the prez,
if they don’t respect the intelligence of any so-called “readership”,
their digital format will bite the dust, too !
Report this comment
reality based lifeform
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:51amPerhaps their latest cover story should have read ” We’re all unemployed now ! “
Report this comment
Jenny Lind
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:45amGlenn, Drudge, and Breitbart are telling truths, the others just shill for the left, so-by guys, when you lie, you die.
Report this comment
sndrman
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:41am“we’re all socialists now”=we’re all broke now because we backed the wrong ideology,an ideology where they believe they deserve everything for free…….you see more and more of the “progressive” more like liberal/socialist/communist printing and news outlets dwindling…….you’d think someone in that ideology would wake up and say hey we’re marketing to the owie kids and owie grownups who want freebies……
Report this comment
HKS
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:39amThey could have at least tried a novel idea, “QUIT TELLING LIES” and someone might have bought a copy.
Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:24am“Lincoln vs. Darwin: Who Matters More?”
A much more fitting cover would be
“Time vs. Newsweek: Who Matters Less?”
Report this comment
Daithi
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:52amThere really should be a LIKE button, as that was a great comment.
Report this comment
reality based lifeform
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:56amin Newsweeks case it would probably be Darwin . The magazine has failed to evolve so they will become extinct !
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Oct. 18, 2012 at 9:14ami actually thought they quit publishing both years ago…
Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Oct. 18, 2012 at 9:23amEastinfection
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:14am
i actually thought they quit publishing both years ago…
……………………
I can see how one could make that mistake, when they quit publishing truth years ago… Just one word, really.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:22amGive News Week another five years of this progressive forward leaning indoctrination attitude and they will be nothing more than a liberal blog.
Report this comment
Chromo200
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:13amI quit reading Newsweek and Times long time ago. Their news is biased. Newsweek will be a small on-line blog within a year. Until reporters and editors of newspaper and magazines go back to unbiased reporting and do proper investigating reporting, they will be history.
Report this comment
Your Name Here
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:13amAll the news that is unfit to print…
Report this comment
starman70
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:12amGREAT NEWS!!! Only there will be a little less paper to use as toilet paper. Of course, there is still the New York Times and the paper used in newsprint is softer and more absorbant than magazine paper.
GOOD RIDDANCE NEWSWEEK!!!! When you go digital, no one with any sense will subscribe to it anyway so soon you will completely DISAPPEAR! Another liberal mouthpiece in the trash heap of history.
Report this comment
RIGS
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:12amWho cares what TUNAFISH BROWN and the USELESS TIME MAGAZINE goes or does.
Report this comment
Gary_K
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:10amWho read it anyway?
Report this comment
Gonzo
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:16amI think the editor’s mom still had a subscription.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:25amGONZO, She must have passed away of natural causes, and that tipped their financial scale. Probably can’t afford the paper now, much less those barrels of ink. But, this idea will be called a Green Initiative.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Oct. 18, 2012 at 9:16amI’m sure they’d be fiscally solvent if they sold copies at $2 million a pop.
Report this comment
huey6367
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:10amDoes anyone still read this piece of left wing garbage? Yeah you look at it when you are getting your oil changed but does anyone read it?
Report this comment
MiCurmudgeon
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:10amLeaned so far to the left, that it tipped over and fell on it’s ****.
Report this comment
RightUnite
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:06amB-B-B-B-B-Buh Byeeeeee!! Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!
Report this comment
NOTAMUSHROOM
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:03am” select content will still be published on The Daily Beast.”
Well that says it doesn’t it?
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:03amOne more insturment of propgaganda Obama will demand gets bailed out and Federalized.
Report this comment
PA PATRIOT
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:03amEditorial LIBERAL PRINT = BROKE
Report this comment
Gonzo
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:00amAnother once great news organization destroyed by liberalism.
Report this comment
oddball130
Oct. 18, 2012 at 7:58amAnother Progressive mouthpiece bites the dust, just cant find a market to peddal their hate. Good riddence.
Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Oct. 18, 2012 at 8:34amNewsweek: “It looks like we gotta find ourselves another bridge.”
Time: “And where are we gonna come up with another bridge?”
Newsweek: “There you go, more negative waves. Have a little faith baby. Have a little faith.”
Report this comment