WATCH: Live Coverage of Massive Tornado Damage Near Oklahoma City…Kids Trapped at School…Homes Demolished…Triage Units Being Set Up

Live BlazeCast at 2pm ET: The curious John Kerry Picture — plus your comments

Politics

‘There Was No Protest!’: Megyn Kelly’s Fox Panel Turns Into Shoutfest Over Libya Attack

Oct. 18, 2012 4:38pm Madeleine Morgenstern

A Fox News panel devolved into a shouting match Thursday during a discussion about the terrorist assault on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, with anchor Megyn Kelly raising her voice as well.

Kelly questioned Simon Rosenberg, president of progressive think tank NDN, on President Barack Obama’s initial response to the attack, particularly when he referred to “efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.”

“Simon you’re telling me he wasn’t trying to tie the tape to what happened in Benghazi there?” Kelly asked.

“Megyn, I don’t think people knew at that point what had happened,” Rosenberg said.

“Then why is he doing that, why is he making the association?” Kelly interjected.

“The tape was relevant because that weekend that [U.N. Ambassador] Susan Rice spoke on television there were protests against the tape in dozens of cities across the Middle East,” Rosenberg said. “The tape was still roiling the Middle East, it was still a factor in the debate at that time and to deny it is just ignorant.”

“To deny it is not ignorant,” Kelly cut in. “There was no protest at the Benghazi consulate on the day of the attack!”

“The tape was relevant and was causing trouble in dozens of other capitals around the Middle East,” he said.

“But not in Benghazi!” Kelly said.

Rosenberg later insisted that Rice’s comments about a military-style assault against the consulate proved “there was never confusion about the military nature of the strike. What there was confusion of in Benghazi was the role of the video.”

Watch the full exchange below (two parts):

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (142)

rockymtngal
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:41pm
There is no way that Obama can sweep this under the rug. When he stood up to address the UN, he was still blaming everything on that video, not on anything else. This guy is trying to spin this event by continuing the whole cover up and Obama clearly didn’t say this was a terrorist attack, until much later. Ya can’t dig a hole this big and climb out of it. The facts speak for themselves and instead of Obama’s attitude towards Romeny stating how dare question him about what went on is someone who is in a corner and has to seem indignant. Sorry Obama, you lose.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DarkJello
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:44pm
  Team Obama has sown the seeds of confusion on Benghazi fromt he start.
  
  The last nail in the coffin was Obama lying, again, during the debate.
  
  Big, obvious lies right from his mouth do nothing but hurt his chances to win. Yeah!
  
  Report this comment
- Michael61
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:16pm
  CNN transcript from September 20, White House press conference: “The White House, for the first time Thursday, declared the attack that killed Stevens and three other people a terrorist attack.”
  
  Everybody knows that Romney was correct in his accusations, they just try to cover Obama up, as usual.
  
  Report this comment
- Michael61
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:17pm
  Hey, libs… Quote from Obama’s speech:
  
  “The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We’re working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I’ve also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.
  Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.”
  
  So, Obama did blame the Benghazi attack on the video. On September 12th, and 13th, and 14th, and 15th, and 25th… And he lied, and lied, and lied…
  
  You guys can eat another crow.
  
  Wait for another debate. That was only the first stab at Obama. He will be cooked and well done after the next debate. You will be lucky to win in 3 states (New York, California, and Hawaii)…
  
  Report this comment
- michael48
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:40pm
  the DNC has collapsed…you cannot get an answer out of ANY of them…HE!! even (should that time ever appear again) when they’re correct…it just seems they’ve inhaled the “pathological LIAR” drug and it stuck…forever..they’ve rendered themselves meaningless…
  
  Report this comment
- Calimann83
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:59pm
  Since when did Obama let truth get in his way. the media will make sure most Americans never know the truth.
  
  Report this comment
- LIBSALWAYSLIE
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 7:42pm
  The reason obama speaks so slowly is because it takes time to spin his lies into a web of deceit. But anyone with half a brain will eventually see this racist socialist for what he really is, and that’s why he’s falling in the polls. More and more people every day, are waking up from their media induce obama-coma and saying, “what the hell was I thinking!”
  
  Report this comment
- sWampy
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 8:25pm
  He speaks slowly because he is a half wit.
  
  Report this comment
- dealer@678
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:08pm
  I dont watch Fox News anymore. I’m not interested in hearing what the other side has to say about ANYTHING !!!
  
  Report this comment
- rose-ellen
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:04pm
  Since there were protest at other embassies at the time-then of course it was reasonable to think that an attack on the consulate in bengahazi could also be part of that protest over the film. That is logical and reasonable. It is still not clear what happened. In a post revolutionary libya where citizens had weapons -it was plausable that it was a response to the film -like the protests in cairo and elsewhere were!.It could also be alquada[whatever that means today] or a pro gadaffi militia exacting revenge on the americans for supporting gadaffis overthrow.Fox -right wing media and politicians are being dishonest here-not the obama administration.
  
  Report this comment
- nzkiwi
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:17am
  @ Rose-Ellen
  
  I’m sorry but you’re quite wrong. When you say that it is still not clear what happened, you are ignoring the minute-by-minute account of the survivors. The world knows exactly what happened, and in detail. This information was almost immediately available to the State Department and they have confirmed that.
  
  The administration CHOSE to lie. They chose to blame it on a silly video which, at that time, hardly anybody had watched. They sent Ms Rice out to lie to the American people. Mr Carney lied to the American people. Mr Obama, when he addressed the UN, lied directly to the whole world. The EVIDENCE is clear and unequivocable. That is the reason for this unabating furore.
  
  The reason why they deliberately lied is less certain. I personally believe that there are two strong possibilities:
  
  Firstly, to assist the push to adopt resolution 16/18 (in short, to criminalise criticism of Islam), and secondly, to cover up Ambassador Steven’s activities as they related to the material support of Al-Qaeda terrorists.
  
  You may rest assured that in this case, as with Watergate, the whole truth will eventually surface.
  
  Report this comment
- b.mclane
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:18am
  Just saw a heart sinking video where many college age, Ohio Obama voters never have heard about Bengazi and the death of the 2 Navy seals not assigned to the Consulate or the Ambassador’s security team, the assigned Embassy Tech Expert and Ambassador Smith !! Not aware of the controversy or the cover up and not aware 20+ Embassies had been under threat by rioting, Islamic hordes across the world whipped into a frenzy by our President and Sec.of State lying for over 2 weeks blaming an anti Muslim video. No clue of the reality of this man and his amateur Presidency.. Hope and Change is all that has sunk in so far.
  
  Report this comment
- pscully17
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:35am
  You are all missing the connected dots! Obamas,team pre devised this anti free speech narrative, way before the protests and the attacks….follow along here: 9 11, embassy attacked, 9 12, video narrative starts, media blasts the video blame,all week, the state dept sends out UN AMBASS. Susan rice on 5 major Sunday shows touting only the.video, spontaneous protests, suddenly Hillary jumps on narrative, buys ads in Pakistan to promote IT WAS THE.VIDEO, but the government didn’t make it…then Obama speaks at UN.. 6 times in front of the whole batch of Islamists, decries video and free speech….ITS ALL AN ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH! the unfortunate death of 4 people was a mistake, they didn’t account for…but the narrative of the video smells like a huge rat setup to promote the sale of anti free speech agenda, generated at the UN!! GET IT!
  
  Report this comment
- hereandnow
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:55am
  simon rosey is an idealist. Megan kept it in context proving that obee and Co. called the “act(s) of terror”, not “terrorist attack” (2 different things completely) a result of a video released months before. obee basically was saying that the video producer created an act of terror. simon, you can attempt to spin all you want claiming non partisanship, but fact is that obee and Co. clearly do not want to use the word terror(ist) with muslims be it extremists or not.
  
  Report this comment
- LogCabinRepublican
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:34am
  How much money are these people getting paid to LIE for the President – this is just insane. I don’t get how Obama still has supporters. How can anyone be so brainwashed. Good God, I am sick to death of these supporters of Obama just keep lying, I really don’t get this. How do these people sleep at night? I can’t get anyone of my friends understand this – are they just siding with him because of the color of his skin? I am sick of this blame game. Nobody can take the blame for something they did these days. They always have to blame someone else. And I’m sick to death that the Progressives think that everyone else is misinformed when it’s the Progressives who are the ones that don’t know the difference between hot or cold. I’m so glad that I have the opportunity to work/volunteer for the Romney/Ryan campaign :)
  
  Report this comment
- Obama Been Lauding
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:50am
  Let’s play Simon Says!!??
  Simon Says, put your blinders on and plug your ears, because you did not see all of these Obama minions, and you didn’t hear what they said.
  These idiots are spinning like a playgound full of tops!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- GeorgeRivet
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:21am
  It is absolutely stunning to watch the Obama supporters try to spin the truth. These people have to live in an alternate universe. Obama stands up in the U. N. two weeks after the event and tells a baldface lie and these people try to make us ignore what he said. Don’t they ever watch the tape of themselves obviously making complete fools of themselves without a clue that we are just not stupid enough to believe what they say.
  
  Report this comment
- rose-ellen
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 8:58am
  obama is not looking to criminalize free speech [critisizing islam- though apparantly they do resort to murdering people who are muslim and criticize american foreign policy [alalwaki ].]You have a myopic view-libyans rose up against a dictator and that you label anyone and every one alquada who opposses the status quo[western propped dictators or illigal occupation or invasions and occupation] shows how out of touch with reality you are. The world and it’s people do not belong to us and people have the right to oppose foreign meddling in their hoimelands!The ambassador [may he rest in peace] was told that bengazi was unsafe and to remain in the embassy at tripoli. He did not heed his superiors as he was over zelous to “help ” the free libyans.He was not prudent. His killers could have been pro qadaffi militias or linked to an alquada militia where one of their own had been murdered in yemen by our drone. A revenge attack.When you’re over there murdering people -there is bound to be revenge attacks.Stop clinging to a false ridiculous narrative.The world and it’s people do not act to give you Fox gulls your false narrative.Their reality on the ground transcends the lying narrative..
  
  Report this comment
- PilgrimStuckInBizarroWorld
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:25am
  The one making this American tragedy political is/was the Obama administration. Never let a crisis go to waste is there motto. Take away the first amendment rights of “We the People” to free speech was the plan to use this crisis. There first thought is how can we take more from “We the People” not what the heck went on and why is our Ambassador and three others dead.
  
  Report this comment
- MissingLink302
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:01am
  I don’t understand why these people will sit right in front of you and lie to your face. Do they really think we don’t know they are lying? What do they get out of blatant lying?
  
  Report this comment
- rEt_fiELdoP
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:37am
  Rose…. it’s obvious to me that you have never been to the middle east nor understand what is/has happened regarding the attack. Clearly, you believe (by your words) that there is a bias or a prejudice against the administration yet the words available for all to see demonstrate CLEARLY that they, the administration, denied it being a terrorist attack. Spin all you want with the “reasonable to assume” position however every single talking point from the very beginning indicated a posture stating it was the video that caused the uprising.
  
  Don’t blame people calling out what has been on the record from day one. Nuf said.
  
  Report this comment
- toto
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 12:24am
  Obama still can not MAN UP and call it radical ISLAMIC terrorism.
  
  Report this comment
Akridgerunner
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:28pm
It would seem that maybe… just maybe…. the prez has finally figured out just what he can and can’t get away with in his lying to the American people. He is so used to saying whatever he wants without being challenged for fear of being labeled a racist, but he’s gone too far this time. Thinking individuals just don’t believe a word he says any longer. He is, I think, done at long last, and it is time to heal the country.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Jenasus
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:26pm
Obama is a Muslim and Obama used the video to incite further terrorist actions in the Middle East.
Obama should be charged with terrorism.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KEEPINTHESKEERON
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:44pm
  You are absolutely right Jenasus. Obama promoted the video so that millions more could be offended not caring how many were killed in the process. He is guilty of inciting riots and murder.
  
  Report this comment
- Stu D. Baker-Hawk
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:44pm
  No, Obama should be charged with TREASON.
  
  Report this comment
- Vickie Dhaene
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:48pm
  Hear Hear.
  
  Report this comment
- scudster
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 7:27pm
  Lets water board him.
  
  Report this comment
- moron1
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 8:22pm
  Scudster, water boarding is too severe. The more humane way, the Obama way, is to use a drone missile if suspected of wrongdoing. No need to remove bystanders. Fire away.
  
  Report this comment
- sheriff32
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:38am
  You are absolutely wrong. Your hate is clouding your judgment.
  
  Report this comment
nesmond
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:23pm
I think if we can keep this conversation going until election day, Romney will win with a landslide. We all watched obama, rice and hillary blame the video for Benghazi. This makes them look so dishonest, but what can they do now? The hole they are digging just keeps getting deeper. They have done more to help the Romney campaign than millions of dollars in paid T.V. ads could ever do.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BCanook
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:45pm
  Gov Romney better get his thoughts together on this Libya thing for the next debate so he can slam dunk President Obama.
  
  Report this comment
Contrarian51
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:21pm
Just more of the left’s specialty – revisionist history. By this time next week, Susan Rice will have been holding eight terrorists at gunpoint in a heroic but vain effort to thwart the attack.

There just aren’t enough gullible fools left to save Barry at the polls next month.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- rose-ellen
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:06pm
  revitionist history is that rohmney did not even know obama had used the phrase acts of terror.
  
  Report this comment
- KarinS
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:47am
  Excellent post.
  
  Report this comment
- rEt_fiELdoP
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:44am
  Rose, again…. you assume the Gov didn’t know the phrase BO used… what the Gov was pointing to was BO had indicated he called it an act of terror the day following and not inclusive to his words on the WH grounds. IF ANYONE is protecting somebody, sounds as if you are championing BO which indicates to those who read these posts you are not serious in your analysis. By the way, it doesn’t matter who attacks us, terrorists are terrorists regardless of which organization they affilitate with…
  
  Report this comment
FreeAmerica2013
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:14pm
According to newspaper in Cairo and according to The Center for Advanced Defense Studies, the protests in Cairo and Tunisia were pre-planned anyway. The “video” just exacerbated the protests. http://c4ads.org/latest/?p=872 http://thedailynewsegypt.com/2012/09/13/further-violent-protests-against-anti-muslim-film/ “Before one can identify the social grievances that led some Tunisians and Egyptians to join in the protests, it is imperative to understand how these protests began. Egyptian Salafis manufactured protests, looking to arouse political violence against the US and challenge the US-allied Egyptian government. “Innocence of Muslims” was first introduced into the public consciousness in Egypt by Islamist newscaster Khaled Abdallah, who broadcast the the film’s trailer dubbed in Arabic on September 9, on the Salafi-supported television channel Al-Nas. A few hundred Salafis, who had reportedly been planning to protest at the US embassy on September 11 since before the video was broadcast, led the initial protests. Eventually, they were joined by approximately 1,700 others, mostly young men. Similarly, in Tunisia 300 hard-line Salafis led 1,000 protesters, again mostly young men, in an attack on the US embassy in Tunis.”

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
MeteoricLimbo
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:10pm
Simon says: BS BS BS BS. Time for Simon to take 5 steps backwards and give himself a mental enema.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Diane TX
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:08pm
Romney holds 7 point lead over Obama in National Gallup poll. Bob Beckel says: “If these numbers are true, it’s all over …. The election is over”

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
giatny
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:05pm
That is NOT the point! Whether he directly called it an act of terror, thought it was a video,
or didn’t know what had happened, his response should have been the same. He should have
sat in the oval office and called in every intelligence and state department employee UNTIL
he found out the exact details and ensured that other foreign civil servants were safe. It is
unconscionable that he left for Vegas after phoning an intelligence official to take care of it.
Later, telling the world that our intelligence was too incompetent to recognize an act of terror
on 9/11 was just as egregious and an insult to those who valiantly serve. One other point, any attack on a foreign embassy is an Act of WAR and should have been dealt with personally and seriously by Obarf. His campaign trips, tv appearances and speech at the UN round out his
despicable behavior. No more!!!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- JaxsonM
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:34pm
  said well!
  
  Report this comment
- JaxsonM
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:37pm
  ths sums it and is said so well.
  
  Report this comment
- DrTJ
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:29pm
  Agreed. An act of war. This is beyond political miscalculation. This president utterly failed and betrayed the American people, and we are sure to see further loss of American lives as a result.
  
  Report this comment
- OccamsSword
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:57pm
  But there is even more to it. It had to be purposeful
  the lack of beefed up security, especially after plenty of warnings, and the supplying of arms to
  Al Quaeda, who knows how treacherous and what ultimate schemes were really going on. There is still much more to this.
  
  Report this comment
nesmond
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:01pm
test

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RLTW
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:18pm
  Test, test, Obama is a liar!
  
  Report this comment
3Tesla
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:00pm
The “Foreign policy” I want to see addressed is Fast and Furious. Romney touched on it but allowing guns into Mexico so as to attack our 2nd amendment rights was treasonous. If
O- B-L-A-M-E-O is re-elected and appoints two new Supremes like Soto & Kago – kiss the 2nd amendment Good-bye.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jackact
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:11pm
  The question Romney should ask is simple, “Mr. President was Fast & Furious enacted by the DOJ with the sole purpose of compromising our guaranteed 2nd amendment rights”?
  Won’t get a straight answer but the wound is delivered in the form of the question.
  
  Report this comment
- KNEP
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:04pm
  Kiss the US of A goodby. The UN already has big plans (Agenda 21) and Obama is small potatoes compared to that. But his every action is pushing us farther and faster into decline. If he wins, will there ever be another election? I wasn’t sure we’d have THIS one!
  
  Report this comment
Nevermind
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:59pm
The mother of Amb Stevens has come out and said this shoudlnt be a political issue and that her son knew the dangers he faced. She asked this not to be made political and i can see the right truly have respect for the wishes of the dead and respect fo the mothers wishes.

There is an investigation , whihc she supports, and it has come rather quickly. Not like over a year as it took for 9-11 commision under the GOP watch

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:08pm
  While we sympathize with the family / mother, this is not a family issue. It is a national issue. She does not decide which issues effect the nation or the election. Sorry for the loss, but this entire mess needs to be discussed and answers need to be provided.
  
  Report this comment
- KNEP
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:07pm
  I heard the FBI didn’t go to the embassy and begin investigating for about 10 days….. how much evidence was left? CNN got in there many days before and found the ambassador’s diary. Who else found what else? How can they “investigate” 10 days after the event with many others running in and out of the site? I’m sorry for the parents, very sorry. But this is an international incident and it was a political position and politics are involved. Obummer didn’t do his job. He let this man die.
  
  Report this comment
- EveF.Destruction
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:27pm
  I wonder if her son knew his death would be described as a bump in the road, not optimal, and certainly not worthy of the prez canceling a trip to Vegas.
  
  Report this comment
grimmster
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:58pm
rosenberg stepped into a lions den by going up against Megyn.She chewed that pos up and spit his dumbass ass out.I used to think idiots like rosenberg were paid well to spew this kinda crap,truth is, the mentally deranged will say what ever they are told to say, for free…….It’s obvious this guy was speaking to obamas base,because they are the only ones stupid enough to believe that crap,video my ass…..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
eRtwngr
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:55pm
Watch out! Landslide in progress. RCP average just went blue: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map.html

The minions aren’t buying it, Obama.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Just_Us2
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:53pm
With the next debate centered around foreign policy, this is just a gift that keeps on giving all the way to election day……the left is obsessing over big bird, binders and lady parts….the right stays on message with economy as the main issue and middle east as secondary issue.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:53pm
We need to preserve our collective conscience as history is being rewritten before our very eyes.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:07pm
  Indeed, I hope there are many people keeping diaries and journals of these times; they will be needed to ensure the truth is told in the future.
  
  Report this comment
jackact
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:53pm
Go Megyn!
On the subject of terrorism.
Why would a Bangladeshi national choose the federal reserve in NYC as a primary jihadist target?
Wouldn’t the federal reserve, for arguments sake, be the primary target of a fiscal conservative?
Then the MSM tried to tie Obama’s possible presence in NYC into the story?
Something stinks here.
Is the tail wagging the dog?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
HKS
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:53pm
Liberals are just unbelievable, they listen to Rice say on tape it is black and argue bold face she said it was white. Like pound that lie until it’s the truth. Pitiful, just pitiful people.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- HKS
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 6:15pm
  Fox should ban liberals from their shows as they have nothing to bring to an intelligent conversation. Fox is degrading their programming.
  
  Report this comment
taxpro4u03
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:53pm
It’s not ‘ignorant,’ rather intellectual DISHONESTY. {Megan KNOWS this -} When a ‘conversation’ cannot be had in a civil manner upon which the basic PREMISE is agreed upon by those involved — there IS no civil discourse – it’s already OVER, as the ‘persuasive’ portion of debate is from that point on consists of theatrics to evoke an emotional response in both the participants and the observers at large…. The only thing which remains is, what it IS — ‘entertainment’ to FEED basal human animalistic hubris… Pure and simple. Calling a lamb’s tail a leg doesn’t change the very NATURE of what it IS….

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:52pm
This is why i no longer watch any of it. It devolves into liberal spin and the whole issue gets muddied up and no new facts ever emerge. They call it fair & balanced and i call it b & s. No truth. You will never get the truth from a liberal, it is against everything they believe.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
NinjaJuice
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:51pm
If they can see what happened in real time then they have a video of what exactly happened.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
FightingBear
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:50pm
The libs are still lying about this?

It seems at some point long ago, they would see the wisdom of simply admitting that the administration lied for the purposes of Obama remaining viable in his re-election bid.

I think that might sit better with the American People than continueing to lie and digging themselves in deeper

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AxelPhantom
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:47pm
“The Tape” was not an issue until Obama and his minions made it into an International spectical, THEN you saw riots elsewhere.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Diane TX
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:00pm
  I think Obama operatives pushed the tape, specifically on 09/11, to gen up reasons to limit free speech, and al Qaeda said – Look at what the stupid Americans are doing. This is a great distraction for our attack on Benghazi today.
  
  Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:46pm
Tick tock, tick tock….EtchASketch

Your 5 pm deadline is approaching….

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:02pm
  Hi MONK, Yeah, GEORGE had better hurry up to finish his work day.
  
  Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:46pm
@EtchASketch

Better hurry up……

Almost time to clock out. LMAO@U…….

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- grimmster
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 4:53pm
  Lol,Monk, you do know etchasketch is encinom dont you?
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 5:41pm
  GRIMMSTER, He has never denied it when I have called him George. This is the guy.
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k3FRCIDbco
  
  Report this comment
- Teaparty_Grammy
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:05pm
  Ah, yes – Encinom–our “multiple personality disorder’ resident troll.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.