Death Toll Revised Down to 24 After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…100+ Injured…Children Among the Dead…Some Drowned…Heartbreaking Pictures…Reporter Struggles to Share Terrible News

Listen Live: Glenn Beck Broadcasts From Impact Zone in Oklahoma

Politics

Which Obama Debate Gaffe Does Krauthammer Think Might ‘Cost the President Dearly’

Oct. 18, 2012 8:45pm Jason Howerton

Which Obama Debate Gaffe Does Charles Krauthammer Think Might Cost the President Dearly

HEMPSTEAD, NY – OCTOBER 16: Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney (L) listens as U.S. President Barack Obama answers a question during a town hall style debate at Hofstra University October 16, 2012 in Hempstead, New York. During the second of three presidential debates, the candidates fielded questions from audience members on a wide variety of issues. (Credit: Getty Images)

While many scored Tuesday night’s contentious presidential debate as a draw, or as a narrow victory for one of the candidates, Washington post columnist Charles Krauthammer thinks President Barack Obama made a gaffe — and a big one. One that will cost him dearly in the final debate on Monday.

In his Thursday column in the Washington Post, Krauthammer predicts this line from the president will come back to haunt him:

“And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the secretary of state, our U.N. ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, governor, is offensive.”

“If [Romney] gets it right this time, Obama’s narrow victory in debate No. 2, salvaged by the mock umbrage that anyone could accuse him of misleading on Libya, will cost the president dearly,” Krauthammer writes. “It was a huge gaffe. It is indelibly on the record. It will prove a very expensive expedient.”

Krauthammer blasted Obama for refusing to acknowledge that inaccurate information was repeatedly disseminated by his administration, including himself. With some time to prepare for the final presidential debate, “Romney will be ready” to capitalize on Benghazi in a major way. More from Krauthammer’s column:

No one misled? His U.N. ambassador went on not one but five morning shows to spin a confection that the sacking of the consulate and the murder of four Americans came from a video-motivated demonstration turned ugly: “People gathered outside the embassy and then it grew very violent and those with extremist ties joined the fray and came with heavy weapons.”

But there was no gathering. There were no people. There was no fray. It was totally quiet outside the facility until terrorists stormed the compound and killed our ambassador and three others.
The video? A complete irrelevance. It was a coordinated, sophisticated terror attack, encouraged, if anything, by Osama bin Laden’s successor, giving orders from Pakistan to avenge the death of a Libyan jihadist.

Not wishing to admit that we had just been attacked by al-Qaeda affiliates, perhaps answering to the successor of a man on whose grave Obama and the Democrats have been dancing for months, the administration relentlessly advanced the mob/video tale to distract from the truth.

To read Krauthammer’s entire column, click here.

Featured image from Getty Images.

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (250)

strawberry411a
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:04pm
When the audience claps after the president of the USA lies and is supported by a lying pathetic excuse for a journalist…………..we have a problem.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Secret Squirrel
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:17pm
  .
  They even lie about their lying.
  
  They know the MSM won’t say squat.
  
  Report this comment
- Totally Domestic
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:20pm
  It was a planned & canned Set Up
  
  Report this comment
- sooner12
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:31pm
  What?
  
  Report this comment
- rickc34
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:33pm
  When Obama talks about the Koran he calls it holy , but when he speaks about the Bible he just calls it scripture not the Holy Bible. Only God can make a thing Holy. So it shows his respect of one over the other. He lied saying he is a Christian.
  
  Report this comment
- mauna
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:11pm
  Strawberry, You are RIGHT!!!
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:40pm
  There is no such thing as an Obama gaffe when you have the “chosen people” controlled Marxist Media protecting him and only focusing on Romney talking about a binder. That’s how weak of ammo the commies have to work with, but they will. Thanks leftist “chosen people” for hijacking our media 100+ years ago.
  
  Report this comment
- pgson
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:09am
  The clapping was led by Michelle my Bell for her boy. She started it and a few in the back of the audience followed.
  
  Report this comment
- B-45
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:11am
  The one who started clapping was Moochelle Obama….what class.
  
  Report this comment
- RonPaulOrNoOne
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:17am
  When conservatives chant USA USA at a convention after passing a rule that controls every delegates right to vote who they want. We have a problem.
  
  Report this comment
- wordsofwisdom
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:52am
  @Secret Squirrel you are right on we are in a time warp. no main street media will tell the truth. This song is about politicians & how we are manipulated called “What’s Wrong With This Song” http://soundcloud.com/musicby-carl/whats-wrong-with-this-song
  
  Report this comment
- pamela kay
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:58am
  Agreed! STRAWBERRY411A, You nailed it.
  
  Report this comment
- TruthMonkey
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:36am
  The Vegas thing bothered me greatly when I watched it that day. Not only did he go to Vegas to raise money he is smiling and huging as he walks out on stage.
  I ask all of you if it were you on that stage would you or could you smile and hug each person as you walked out.
  As for me I would not have gone but lets say I did, my stern look when I walked out on stage would say it all (No Smiles No Hugs). There would be no doubt how I felt to anyone that was watching.
  
  Report this comment
- hereandnow
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:12am
  Journalists that support the idea of a video in order to attack our first amendment right just as they support fast and furious to attack our second, are not speaking in support of the Constitution, rather their own ideals or agenda. As Citizens of the United States, “We the PEOPLE” have rights, yet unfortunately, we’re apparently allowing our nations government to change the rule of law to: guilty until proven innocent rather than innocent until proven guilty (i.e. …Ruby Ridge, Elian Gonzales, Duke Lacrosse, etc.., even “the police acted stupidly”). Pathetic…? yes!
  
  Report this comment
- bobdiamond
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:28am
  I agree with Charles on everything except Obama’s narrow victory in the debate. I think in most voter’s minds, Romney looked and behaved more Presidential. This makes him the winner. Read political commentary at: http://smallcraftadvisorychronicles.blogspot.com/
  
  Report this comment
- TruufWarrior
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:14am
  This is disturbing in so many ways. These people know he’s lying and they still want to sniff his shorts. Just shows you the type of sorry voter base this serial liar has.
  
  Report this comment
- loriann12
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:53am
  But from what I hear it wasn’t the people clapping, because they didn’t want to break the rules. It was Michelle Antoinette that broke the rules to clap, and the press corps, or as our illustiriuos president says, press corpse.
  
  Report this comment
- highhard1
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 8:42am
  Here is my take on the obvious pre debate collaboration between Crowley and Obama. It is easy to see where they lied during the debate. During the speech the president referenced prior instances of terror attacks and that they would not be stood for. He only later in that paragraph refers to the attack in Libya and then refers to it a a terrible act. Not a terrorist attack. He spent the next two weeks blaming it on anything other than terrorism. It becomes all too obvious to see that the debate scenario was anticipated, planned for and rehearsed by Obama and his long time associate Crowley prior to the debate. Consider this, of all things for Crowley to have waiting at the ready in front of her at the Presidential debate, why did she have the Rose Garden transcript on cue? To me it is just too much for coincidence. As a final note, if Obama can stand in front of this country and brag that he “got Bin Laden” then he needs to stand and crow just as loudly that he got Chris Stevens. After all he was much more instrumental in the actions that led to the ambassador’s death than he was in tracking down and killing Bin Laden.
  
  Report this comment
- Independent4233
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:20am
  What was lost on every so-called “expert” pundit in the news, but picked up by those of us within the unwashed masses was the fact that Obama appeared arrogant, aloof, and did NOT “score” the points as described by these media people. Judging on theater rather than substance is the effort of fools.
  
  Obama just wasn’t presidential, and his denials could only be believed by children or the radicals in his base who live in a world all of their own making.
  
  We don’t need pundits to tell us what we can see with our own eyes and hear with our own ears.
  
  Report this comment
- Zer0
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:05am
  Say what they will, this thing is all but over. Romney will win in a landslide reminiscent of Reagan vs Carter. I find it hilarious that there are over 919,000,000 Google search results for the phrase “President Romney”. The people are coming to terms, even on a subconscious level of Obama’s impending loss. This is why you see Obama and his surrogates becoming increasingly desperate and shrill.
  
  Report this comment
- usafpatriot
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:11am
  The person who started the clapping was the queen herself (moosall).
  
  Report this comment
- signal_lost
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:44am
  If this was such a non partisan audience made up of folks who just haven’t made up their mind yet, why did they applaud Obama in his gotcha moment? Maybe these folks were undecided when the night began but made their decision for Obama before that point in the debate.
  
  Report this comment
- FstEti
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:38pm
  @HIGHHARD1: Thank you. I thought that I was the only one who picked up the fact that as soon as Romney asked Obama to restate that he had said that it was “a terror attack”, Obama immediately asked Crowley to “read the transcript” and in less than a second, Crowley responded then Obama said “can you say that a little louder, Candy”, at which time Michelle was the FIRST one to begin clapping. In my opinion the entire sequence was rehearsed; there is no other explanation as to why Crowley could have responded so quickly to, aside from being a gross misinterpretation, such an obscure comment from just one of many speeches from Obama following the attack. She didn’t just make a mistake, it was a setup.
  Does anyone know why Romney didn’t insist that at least one debate would be moderated by a journalist from FOX? It seems like blatant stupidity to me. Next up, Bob Schieffer on Monday. We will be having a similar discussion Tuesday morning.
  
  Report this comment
- Susie40
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:40pm
  Lost in all this lying is the fact. Our government arrested and charged man for making that video. He is in jail. He lost his right to free speech. He is innocent. The man became a huge target thanks to this administration. As usual, point in all directions except back at oneself even if it destroys someone else.
  
  Report this comment
- AKHDPETE
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:48pm
  That was the media in the back of the room who was clapping, look at the debate and you will see that none of the so called undecideds are clapping. Also the only other one that was clapping was moochelle my belle. Somebody else reported this all so a few days ago.
  
  Report this comment
- stocksdoc
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:54pm
  I think the clapping we heard was mostly off-camera “journalists”.
  
  Report this comment
- Watermain
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:02pm
  @rick: You have it right. He fawns over talking about the holy koran and minimizes the Bible. He won’t say that the attack in Libya was done by islamic terrorists for fear of offending those he is closest to.
  
  Report this comment
- Goodforall
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:10pm
  Those are his typical supporters-so ignorant of the facts and reality! They want a movie star for president-nothing else matters. Time to send all of these people packing! Obama is toast!
  
  Report this comment
- bdsconserv
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:58pm
  that debate was a setup in favour of obama. unbiased journalism is dead and rotten in this country.
  
  Report this comment
- babylonvi
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:08pm
  I don’t see why anybody would thing Barry won that debate. Sure, he was conscious, a plus from his last performance, but lie after lie after excuse and no real plan…..after almost four years is not a winner in my book. Add that to the fact he whined for the moderator to bail him out(hardly presidential) equals LOOSER in my estimation.
  
  Report this comment
- walkintruth
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:24pm
  Progressives cover up all their lies.
  
  Report this comment
- MIBUGNU2
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:42pm
  The Liberals I know, DON”T even want to talk about Libya..they
  act like nothing ever happened…I don’t know what kind of NEWS
  they get from the MEDIA, but most act like they don’t know what
  I’m talking about.. I usually watch FOX because I really don’t care
  to listen to the HATE and Vitriol that comes from some these people..
  especially MSNBC, these are really ANGRY folks.. I guess if you
  don’t have something of your own, tear the other guy down..SAD
  
  Report this comment
- billybillybilly
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:54pm
  And the loudest clapper, against the debate protocol, was none other than…….. yup Michelle.
  
  Report this comment
- 1940voter
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:56pm
  We have more then a problem , we have a public who has no clue as to the real world chaos that is going on every day. We have a public that has been lied to, facts distorted, facts omitted, and totally fooled into believing that this empty chair was qualified to be President. Maybe in Chicago at the dog pound but not 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
  
  Report this comment
- redsea
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:50pm
  And I am sure that any truth we do know is only the tip of the ice-berg. For the last year, since Ghaddafi was killed, Libya has been a hot bed of weapons attracting militant groups buying and selling the left behind NATO weapons, along with Momar’s stash. It has been a daily topic on the local news media of neighboring countries in the region, for only about 1 year now! Just think what inside intelligence sources know! Ambassador Stevens was in the middle of that hot bed, and denied repeated requests for increased security. I have no doubt there is a lot still to come out, and someone in Washington has some splainin’ to do! Obama’s arrogant stance and anger is surely rooted in fear of the splainin’ he’s got to do!
  
  Report this comment
- bobbyafra
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:31pm
  I don’t care what any of you say but GLENN BECK is the biggest ****** on earth.
  A Morning Zoo DJ has you all suckered by using false prophecies filled with emotions and scare tactics. And he is the millionaire. Suckers.
  
  Report this comment
- Travelassie
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:44pm
  Reportedly those claps came from Michelle Obama, when Candy Crowley stepped in to interrupt Romney when he was asking those questions of Obama and talking about the incident at Benghazi.
  
  It sounded like a few other people were also clapping, but it was reportedly started by Michelle.
  
  Report this comment
- I Luv America
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:57pm
  @BOBBYAFRA
  
  Why don’t you express your true feelings about Glenn Beck? (sarcasm implied) He must really be getting to you and your liberal cohorts for you to express so much anger. To me, this is just another example that liberals can’t handle the truth.
  
  Report this comment
- WATER-THE-TREE
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:41pm
  Barry knew that Crowely had the transcript, they had planned it all along, they knew this was going to come up…. but don’t worry the kind of people that support Barry can be seen in another clip on the Blaze, and if there are enough of them that vote twice Barry will be fine
  
  Report this comment
- WATER-THE-TREE
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:43pm
  Rick — even if he calls himself a Christian it is one that wants America damned, but you are right he is a muslim.
  
  Report this comment
- WATER-THE-TREE
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:50pm
  BOBDIAMOND—- I do not know how anyone could win a debate when every word that comes out of their mouth is a lie and BS. The only true statement that came from Bammy is that fact that some jobs just are not coming back.
  
  Report this comment
- crisnick
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 7:54am
  Right BobDiamond — I don’t see Obama as being the winner at all. The moment he lost his cool about Benghazi, he showed what a baby he is. If you call him out or question him he has a tantrum.
  
  Report this comment
- dmerwin
  Posted on October 21, 2012 at 9:43am
  “And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the secretary of state, our U.N. ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, governor, is offensive.”
  Uh, they did, including you.
  
  Report this comment
forgetyou
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:01pm
Where are all the people from the hood in these dicussion groups. I follow all the different places that have discussions like this and I have never seen them showup. Krauthammer some time’s say’s some great things like this but he also stated that obummer won the debate. I have gone over all the talking points in said debate and I am astonished that he said that. All the things of substance that Rommey brought up that showed obummer for want he has done. Now two day’s later we get all the evidence of his lie’s. this guy was is a loser and I just hope you folks who voted for him the first time can swallow your pride and do the right thing this time. One mistake is forgivable but two isn’t.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- pgson
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:17am
  Exactly. Krauthammer only says enough to be considered token conservative, but he has consistently dropped the hammer on conservatives when he gets the chance. Both the Ryan debate and now the second Presidential debate, Fox goes to him first and his declaration is to practically declare wins for both Biden and Obama. Oh, if you *watched* Biden, according to him, he lost. But on *substance,* somehow that lying weasel won. As Limbaugh said, and he was talking about Charlie here, primarily, telling lies aggressively does not equal winning on making your points, or substance, or style. People see a lie for what it is. You’ll note that even the left media always follows what Dr. Krauthammer says. He is not to be trusted.
  
  Report this comment
- DennisHabern1
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 6:42am
  I am attempting to regain my faith in the American public that they will do the right thing
  
  on November 6, 2012. Some things are inevitable: the Blacks, the Muslims, the Hispanics and
  
  even the American woman, will still vote for this Moron, regardless of what they know he represents,
  
  putting “SELF,” ahead of “COUNTRY,” if you follow, but the Moron will not receive what he received
  
  in 2008, because I believe that American’s have finally asked themselves, “ARE WE BETTER OFF
  
  TODAY,” than we were 4 years ago when the Moron was elected the POTUS. Let’s be clear, he
  
  is not my POTUS.
  
  Report this comment
Tankertony
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:01pm
Look mommy, no trolls.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Just_Bubba
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:18pm
  I think I heard a “yipe…yipe…yipe” as they ran home to their mommies basement and his apron strings. They only seek safety from all of us evil conservatives who are going to ruin the world like we did back when our earnings actually went up.
  
  Report this comment
Tankertony
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:00pm
It’s over for the Prez. It’s 1980 all over again. And like Reagan, Mitt will do such a great with the economy that he will win again in a landslide in 2016.

This will set the stage for the Palin-Rubio administration, which will continue the Conservative Restoration through the years 2020-2080.

Goodbye left, we knew ye’, and didn’t like ye’, at all.

Tea!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Teaparty_Grammy
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:27pm
  I hope you are right. After the totally treasonous, unprincipled way the lying Democrats and their media lapdogs have behaved in foisting an unvetted Communist POSER on the US as POTUS by covering up his radical past and covering FOR his dismal performance as POTUS, they should NEVER be trusted, ever again, and I don’t see how ANY thinking American could EVER vote for aother Democrat.
  
  The Democratic party needs to pass into history, and a new party created to take its place–one that is loyal to the principles upon which this country was founded. The Republicans are certainly far from perfect, and need competition to keep them honest–but these lying, radical America-haters are NOT a viable alternative and we need to make sure they do not EVER again get their bloodstained hands on the reins of power, as they have conclusively proven in the past decade that they can’t be trusted to be loyal to their own country and their fellow Americans..
  
  Report this comment
- AxelPhantom
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:57pm
  Grammy,
  
  The one thing I bring up to my liberal sister-in-law (she is too far gone to bring back to reality) is that “we” in the Tea Party and in the 9-12 project are trying to police our own, the dems have no such group. IF she is serious about disliking corruption, cronyism and waste (like she claims) then she should start something like TEA focused first on getting the skunks out of Washington that are stinking up her party and stop focusing so much on the faults of the other side. If both parties were willing to work on that, can you imagine where we could be in 50 years? We would truely take our government back!
  
  Report this comment
- BODYBAG
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:58pm
  @TANKERTONY
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:00pm
  It’s over for the Prez. It’s 1980 all over again. And like Reagan, Mitt will do such a great with the economy that he will win again in a landslide in 2016.
  ———————————————————–
  You’re right. This country wont go near another DEM for President for decades after that.
  
  Does anyone else remember in 2008, right after Barry was elected, the MSM
  headline for MONTHS was that the GOP was demolished and would wander the
  wilderness for years trying to regroup?
  
  Such much for your messiah.
  
  Romney / Ryan 2012
  
  Report this comment
- For my Liberty!
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:48am
  I believe that Ovomit will lose, but….ONE thing to consider…. PROGRESSIVES have been trying for over 60 years to “Change America” They used the name Communism first, and when it was unpalatable, changed it to Liberal, then Progressive. IF they see that what they have been trying to do for so long is about to crash and burn–WHICH it is, They WILL take DESPERATE Measures, because they know if they FAIL, it will be DECADES before they can try again. Expect Martial law to be declared after the elections–IF it makes it until then, IF they feel for SURE Obama will lose, something might start BEFORE the elections. Either way, They WILL try to stop Romney from being sworn in…..watch for it…..and be ready…
  
  Report this comment
- Government_Goodies
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:14am
  Just one tweak: 2020 is Ryan/Rubio
  
  Report this comment
- highcarry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:57am
  for my liberty, also i wonder how worried they may be about a transition team coming in and seeing what they have been doing behind our backs. there could be many jailable offenses uncovered. oh, did i say could be.
  
  Report this comment
- 7VIRTUES
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:48pm
  @TankerTony, I would have said Cain/Rubio, but he’ll be retiring pretty soon, so that’s a bit unlikely unless Romney retire’s after his first term. Oh well, I think Romney would make a fine two term president!
  
  Romney/Ryan all the way!
  
  Report this comment
- DOra Glasberg
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 1:31am
  Palin. Palin?
  I have no comment.
  
  Report this comment
Rambo49
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:49pm
Not to mention the Administration spent $70,000 tax payer dollars to run a tv ad apologizing to Pakistan for the video.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Miami
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:52pm
  It all depends upon the moderator to minding his place?
  
  If Romney is allowed to present his case, without the stuttering Obbbbama or clamoring media braking in with cheers or boos.
  
  Report this comment
- Miami
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:58pm
  Hell Soros could/would knockout a satellite to save his puppet
  
  Report this comment
- djhrr
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:21pm
  Rambo49 I cannot believe people are not outraged about that! I am, but no one else seams to be.
  
  And while on the subject of money lies. How about the joke of spending the money for the wars to fix the economy. Except that is borrowed money!!!
  
  Report this comment
Jeff Bassett
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:48pm
I am amazed no one else is bringing up that twenty two embassies were under attack on that supposed isolated incident. It was an Islamic uprising to protest on 911. It was A: a religious organization’s attack on our nation, B: Preplanned across several nations, C: An act of war, D: preplanned to the point our own intelligence agencies had warning and our ambassador has asked for extra protection.

Talk about a no brainer slap in the face for this administration.
And it happened the day after Obama bragged that he had wiped out the terrorist threat.

Talk about a Carter re-run, this should be grounded into Obama in a debate. And… given the news article that many democrats have no clue it happened, it is another great talking point on how the media has sheltered the president by not covering that our ambassador was killed, sodomized with a knife and 3other guards killed in a premeditated attack that could have been prevented and was casually buried by Obama and the press in collusion. The last moderator surely demonstrates that last part of the talking point.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:10pm
  It is wise to note that all the embassies that had these staged riots are countries that are given foreign aid by our tax money. This was coordinated rioting over a fake movie to remove our first amendment rights and advance Islam in the U.S. through the United Nations agenda of the OIC…0′s 57 states of terror.
  
  Report this comment
ambrosia
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:38pm
Romney will be prepared to take the Boy-King out
this coming debate,
This is all about foreign policy, of which this failed prez
knows nothing about.
He’s too busy rearranging his New World Order to give any clear thought
or attention to the real danger of a world gone mad, especially the Middle East.

I hope Romney brings up this creep’s bowing & apology tour-
those despicable images are ingrained in every American’s memory.
We do not forget, he sullied our country’s spirit…on purpose !

He threw cold water on Netanyahu & Israel
while chumming it up with warm whispers to Medved & Russia.
We know what he says when caught off mic,
just imagine what this lying cad says behind the scene ?

He cares nothing about this country or her people.
Anyone who would shove his atrocious ObamaCare down the throats of Americans,
knowing the majority opposed it, is proof enough.
He wants your vote but not your voice,

He has caused more damage by his sheer arrogance,
than any other president.

He can’t change the facts & Romney will come armed with them.
He won’t have to petulantly say, “Please proceed, Governor”
because Romney has enough goods on failed foreign policy
to make him squeal like the pig, he truly is !

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
shakedowncrews
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:35pm
Remember what the crowd shouted at the embassy in Egypt: ““We are all Osama,” referring to bin Laden.
Remember that Obama had killed a Lybian al Qaeda leader with a drone strike and al Qaeda called for revenge in the weeks in advance to the attack.

Clearly, Obama doesn’t want people to acknowledge that the attacks were in revenge for killing al qaeda leaders, and that despite his attempts to kill al qaeda leaders (which I support), it hasn’t damaged al Qaeda as much as he wants everyone to believe.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Prochef
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:46pm
  and what happens when thier Obama osama movie comes out? just days before the election . If the administration really felt the movie trailer created that outcome…. your move Obama. nevermind just move in January to Hawaii
  
  Report this comment
- Guayacano
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:22pm
  So then why does he go to the U.N. and say, “The future cannot belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”?
  
  I guess you could say that he is trying to appease the Muslims, but then he should just make up his mind. Killing Bin Lade obviously did not appease the Muslims, but apologizing to them when they kill four of our own might and seeming to stand up for their prophet at the U.N. might, but he can’t have it both ways.
  
  If he coddles Muslims when they kill four of own, then we should be outraged. If he condemns Muslims for killing four Americnas, then they will be further incensed. Obama needs to make up his mind. Either he is going to stand up for the rights of Americans as he has sworn he would do, or he should go somewhere else and defend the Muslim extremists as his reaction to the Libya attack suggests he wants to do.
  
  Report this comment
Tortilla
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:27pm
All Romney had to say to Obama was, “You play politics with security. When Bin Laden was caught you didn’t waste a moment. You could have kept it to yourself and waited until all the information that was found in the Bin Laden compound was sorted out. Perhaps caught fifteen or so more terrorists with that information over a couple months and THEN came out stating that he was caught. What you did was offensive, you didn’t care about the security of America. All you cared about was telling everyone you caught Bin Laden and then calling Hollywood. A huge missed opportunity because of one man’s ego.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jaylew
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 12:13am
  and then of course no time was lost dumping his bullet riddled face and body at sea……I have never seen such a quick burial….that burial was performed even quicker than Timothy McVeighs death sentence. Apparently the country can do some things quicker than others….like NOT approve the Canadian pipeline for example.
  
  Report this comment
Carol1955
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:22pm
There probably isn’t anything this guy could say or do that would keep a significant number of liberals from voting for him. This is a fact that we must burn deeply into our minds from this point on into the coming years.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- godlovinmom
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:29pm
  Keep in mind and prosecute.
  
  Report this comment
- Idahomie
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:32pm
  Shoot
  
  Report this comment
paulusmaximus
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:17pm
Here the facts are displayed and we have had the opportunity to make informed decisions ( except for trolls of coarse ) not so the rest of the public I don’t trust they will make a wise choice.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Guayacano
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:14pm
We all know the question is not whether he tried to link the attack to the movie, but why? Muslim leaders have tried to use the video as a way of attacking American’s right to freedom of speech. Our freedom of speech causes riots–they say. Really? Who rioted? The Muslims are using this as they have before (see link below) to discourage people from talking bad about the Islam faith.

Let’s remember who rioted. They kill four people in the name of their religion and we’re not supposed to question it? We’re not supposed to say that killing in the name of Islam is a bad thing. This only proves that their are violent factions in Islam and that Muslims do have an agenda to subjugate the world to Islam.

So why then does Obama purposely link the attack to the videow? Why does he apologize for the video? Why does he go to the U.N. after Muslim leaders have plead to the U.N for stricter sanctions against those who speak out against Muslims and say, “the future cannot belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”? It might be a drastic charge, but doesn’t it look like our president participated in the attempt to use the outrage over the killings of our ambassador as a means of attacking our freedom of speech? We all saw how he behaved. We all saw him and his “team” persistently cling to their story. Now, it is up to us not to let him get away with it by trying to quietly sweep it under the rug.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Guayacano
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:19pm
  The link mentioned above: http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/17/opinion/frum-video-free-speech/index.html
  It pleads for Obama to stand up for our freedom of speech. He did not.
  
  Report this comment
- dawgsfan
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:43pm
  Guayancano – I agree with you 100%. They took a crisis and tried to make it fit their agenda. “Never let a crisis go to waste” if I’ve ever seen it. And you’re also right in that we have to remember how dangerous it is when we have a president trying to hinder our freedom of speech! That could be the scariest part of the whole scandal.
  
  Report this comment
- Rambo49
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:53pm
  Not to mention the Administration spent $70,000 of taxpayers dollars to run a tv ad apologizing to
  Pakistan for the video.
  
  Report this comment
jackact
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:12pm
“….Continue Gov. Romney”…
Obama’s repulsive arrogance surfaces.
How revealing.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DADDYWOREAWHITEHAT
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:25pm
  Re-surfaces. Again. & again. & again. No wait that’s his everyday normal arrogance. I’m sure it serves him well on vacation in Maine & Spain & on the golf course instead of a security briefing…..
  
  Report this comment
- floridareader
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:52pm
  @ Jackac
  What I’m going to say has nothing to do with the debate but with Obama’s arrogance.
  I just watched Mitt Romney’s and Barack Obama’s speeches at the Al Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, and while Romney thanked cardinal Timothy Dolan (host of the dinner), and mention several times the work of the Catholic Church helping the needy through the Foundation, Obama didn’t bother to mention neither Dolan nor the Catholic church and its work. Well, to be fair, only once mention the church when he was a couple of words from finishing his speech.
  Smith Foundation was founded back in 1946 by then cardinal Francis Spellman.
  
  Report this comment
keaton
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:11pm
What the ambassador said on the talk shows was untrue! Obama said they didn’t want to discuss it until they had the facts. Then why the story!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- barber2
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 11:22pm
  Remember that this is the administration of a guy whose college records are hidden. Tell you something ? All Lies. All Smoke and mirrors. All media collusion.
  
  Report this comment
V-MindMeld
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:10pm
In the shown debate picture on this artlical, it looks like Romney is thinking, “well you lying sack of sh*@t” lol

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- godlovinmom
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:30pm
  I went back and looked at it…you’re right…LOL
  
  Report this comment
- NancyO
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:42am
  What’s wrong with that? I think most of us agree he’s right!
  
  Report this comment
coyote1hell
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:09pm
Picture says…UHHHHHH, before I say anything, without a telepromter…uhhhh…I like to suck my teeth…..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
CS Lewis FAN
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:08pm
this isn’t as alarming as Obama’s admission he will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban, or how he continues to take us down the same road as the USSR, Chinese Communists, Fascist Italy and National Socialist Germany. But since most Obamazombies are too ignorant to know about Benghazi, or anything else of significance other than how “dey gettun dey Obama stash”, they best point to get convince the undecided or swayable is to continue to remind them that the “rent is too da*n high” and gas is near $4.00, which isn’t Bush’s fault.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
FSM_47
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:08pm
Well it was definitely ‘Not Optimal’ for the State Dept not to protect their people.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
turkey13
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:07pm
I hope he has paid his taxes if Obama is re-elected!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- idarusskie
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:14pm
  if he hadn’t he would be getting audited already like many of Romney s contributors
  
  Report this comment
coyote1hell
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:07pm
What I saw was, a Fool, trying to cover for Himself and Joey B….did not happen…Evict the fool, and NOW!!!!….

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
bgotts27
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:06pm
I find it highly offensive that four of our citizens are brutally savaged and murdered, and our President lies consistently about it for weeks.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BoyScout_Mom
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:49pm
  And blame an American’s first amendment right…
  
  Glenn had a pretty interesting point on tonights show, in new New Normal of Media Blackout of the TRUTH nowdays. Where is the story of this guy they caught attempting to Bomb the FEDERAL RESERVE in NYC with 1000 pounds of TNT?… Seriously, Where is This Story???? Nobody’s covering it…
  
  So Who Do You Suppose Obama would have blamed/pinned bombing the FEDERAL RESERVE on… had they not caught the guy…
  
  Let’s see… wait for it… Ron Paulians maybe?… You know, our homegrown chatterer terrorists…
  
  Report this comment
- SimpleTruths
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:42pm
  Nobody’s covering it? It was on the front page of the New York Times, on every newscast on TV.
  
  Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:01pm
STOP!!!!……….

Hammer- Time!!!…..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpn2oyEaX8

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- MooseyStuff
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:12pm
  http://youtu.be/DRMBxnxWiNQ
  
  Report this comment
- RebelPatriot
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:21pm
  This administration and it’s agenda is built on lies and deceit in order to destroy the American Dream.
  
  If people do not realize the very existence of a free Republic on this planet is at stake this November.
  
  Once the US is made a socialist, government nanny state, freedom as we have known it will be gone forever,.
  
  I would rather take my chances with the capitalist that employ me than a government of tyranny that will enslave me.
  
  We need jobs and inexpensive energy, not rules, quotas, restrictions and bureacratic agencies limiting our ability to provide for our families.
  
  And we most assuredly don’t need the government in our homes, automobiles and airports harassing us like common criminals. They need to focus on national security at the border and abroad.
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:39pm
  @MOOSE….
  LOL!…… guessing they couldn’t get Jim Carrey to do Mask III?
  
  Report this comment
U.N.hater
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 8:52pm
Check this out changes up next debate huh.http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-cuts-deal-with-iran-over-nukes/

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Eastinfection
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:06pm
  Even though your prose is less than spectacular U.N., i will not dismiss your thesis. I have been burned by judging your crudeness too quickly before (Lybia). Kudos on, once again, being ahead of the curve my friend….
  
  Report this comment
- flyingscotsman
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:13pm
  All this is is Iran suckering us in with the hope to help the candidate they believe will let them carry through with their nuclear program.
  
  That candidate is Obama and a pseudo oil branch is nothing but a lure to a desperate Obama to accept anything to resurrect his campaign
  
  The Iranians will not honor a stoppage… this is an attempt to re – elect Obama because they know Romney stands with Israel.
  
  We have a sworn enemy attempting to re-elect Obama and Obama and the leftist media will be all to happy to “play” along.
  
  Report this comment
- Anonymous T. Irrelevant
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:17pm
  The boy-king and his Iranian keeper, Valerie, will do anything to stay in luxury and power. Let them eat cake.
  
  Report this comment
- PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:59pm
  U.N. HATER – So, Valarie Jarrett thinks she will be next sec of hud? Iran should start buying U..S property? This deal does not sound good for U.S. citizens. Iran is close to collapsing? Sanctions are working? Isn’t that a good thing to get rid of Khamenei? 0 will do ANYTHING to destroy this Constitutional Republic. The evidence is enormous. I have read about this Iran deal coming at other websites for a while now. It seems 2 devils are making a deal over what will destroy us first.
  
  Report this comment
- 67GTA
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 10:39pm
  Temporary halt? Now we are negotiating with terrorists? Insanity!
  
  Report this comment
Gary_K
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 8:48pm
barry (father unknown) does not like people in general or this country and it shows when he talks about this tragedy. basically he doesn’t give a s&^%.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- doncski
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:00pm
  I always called him a heartless bass turd. That’s why he doesn’t get things done. He always figured that there are going to be ‘bumps in the road’ on the way to changing this country and he can care less.
  
  Report this comment
- barber2
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:25pm
  Obama is reptilian.
  
  Report this comment
- godlovinmom
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:39pm
  GaryK..I think you are right…him or his wife or those losers they are surrounded by …could give a darn about America…and they have the mentality to do as much damage as they possibly can before we throw them out…I am actually embarassed by our leadership in America.
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:44pm
  BARBER…
  
  “Obama is reptilian.”
  
  Agreed… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV2AYZ6Y3ds
  
  Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on October 18, 2012 at 8:47pm
Nailed it, Krauthammer! Bless you!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GlennaBeckski
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:07pm
  @KICKA ~~ I used to absolutely adore Charles, UNTIL I found out he’s a member of the Council on Foreign Affairs.
  
  http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall2.htm
  http://100777.com/myron
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on October 18, 2012 at 9:58pm
  @ Beckski…
  
  I’m not troubled by this.
  Keep your friends close…
  …and your enemies closer.
  
  Report this comment
- pgson
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:24am
  Krauthammer started his *illustrious* career as a speechwriter for Walter Mondale… That should tell you everything you need to know about this poser conservative. And he’s a doctor of … psychiatry… Which he started his psychiatric career out serving under the Carter administration before graduating to speechwriter status…
  
  That is why he states things that hurt conservatives in one breath, and which the left follows like lapdogs (Obama won the debate … on substance…), while stating something that bolsters them in the next breath (this gaffe will cost the President dearly…).
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.