Watch Live: Second House Hearing on IRS Scandal

Check Out Today’s Hot Posts on TheBlaze Blog!

Politics

A Neo-Marxist Who Sought Cultural Revolution — Harvard Prof. Roberto Unger

Oct. 19, 2012 11:22am Tiffany Gabbay

–

As America reels from the U.S. embassy attacks in Cairo and Benghazi — the latter of which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, two Navy SEALs and a civil servant dead — some are questioning where, exactly, President Obama acquired his various domestic and foreign policy stances.

To trace the genesis of the president’s world view, some believe it is imperative to examine the cast of characters woven into the tapestry of the Obama’s life — from his Communist mentor and father-figure, Frank Marshal Davis to his political benefactor Bill Ayers; from his spiritual guiding light Rev Jeremiah Wright, to his Harvard Law Professor, the self-proclaimed Marxist revolutionary, Dr. Roberto Mangabeira Unger.

You might recall Dr. Unger from a scathing video he posted in June entitled, “Beyond Obama,” in which the political theorist called for the president’s defeat in 2012. The reason Unger turned on his former acolyte? Apparently, Obama has not been radical enough for Unger in advancing the cause of progressivism — which is what the professor considers the true calling and nature of the Democratic Party.

In his acerbic monologue, an austere yet distinguished Unger indicted the president on an array of charges including embracing a policy of “food stamps” while abandoning the American worker. Ultimately, Unger said that in order to truly restore the Democratic Party ”as the vehicle for the progressive alternative in the country,” Obama must be defeated.

“President Obama must be defeated in the coming election. He has failed to advance the progressive cause in the United States.”

Unger’s salvo continued as he excoriated the president for pursuing Obamacare at the expense of the overall economy.

So just how progressive is Dr. Roberto Unger?

Hailing from the world’s sixth largest economy, the Roscoe Pound Professor of Law at Harvard University has authored over two dozen books on social theory, legal and economic thought, political alternatives and philosophy in the vein of the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School.

Unlike the “father of Communism,” however, Unger believes not in a synchronized mass-nationalization of a country’s means of production, but rather in a world-wide revolution that is achieved subtly and in stages, whereby institutions are “reformed” or replaced one-by-one.

At home in Brazil, Dr. Unger has a long and well-documented history of political activism, working in the country’s early opposition parties against militarism and authoring the founding charter of the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party in 1980. Later, he would become affiliated with the far-left Workers Party’ and serve as an adviser on the presidential campaigns for Leonel Brizola and Ciro Gomes.

Unger, too, had his own political aspirations and formed a presidential exploratory committee for himself in 2000 and again in 2006. While his bid was ultimately unsuccessful, the professor did garner a cabinet position in Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s second-term administration as Secretary of Strategic Affairs. Oddly, the relationship between the two men had had a rocky foundation, as Unger frequently penned articles calling for Lula’s administration “the most corrupt of Brazil’s history” and calling for his impeachment.

Alas, the saying goes, “if you can’t beat’em join’em,” and that is precisely what Unger did after Lula’s advisor’s thought it better to bring Unger into the tent, rather than keep him outside of it where he, likely, would do more harm than good.

Unger would hold his cabinet position with Lula from 2007 to 2009. While in his role, Unger reworked Brazil’s national defense strategy and played a key role in forming much of the country’s labor laws.

Still, speculation has abounded that Unger proved too radical even for the pro-Hugo Chavez, pro-Mahmoud Ahmadinejad “Lula” and in 2009 Unger left his cabinet position to return to Harvard.

Professor Unger and his pupil

According to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Remnick’s book, “The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama,” the president took two classes with Unger — Jurisprudence and Reinventing Democracy — both of which were not popular choices among “conventional students,” who considered the conceptual theories embraced by Unger, along with his dry nature, “impenetrable.”

“His course descriptions in the catalogue were impenetrable and you knew he was worse in class,” a former peer of Obama’s told Remnick.

The fact that Obama chose to take not one, but a subsequent class with Unger is perhaps indication alone that the impressionable student was, at least somewhat taken by abstruse the Brazilian political theorist.

According to a scholarly volume authored by Unger for the Harvard University Press, Critical Legal Studies, as a movement, was spawned in the seventies by young Harvard Law scholars who rejected the theoretical framework of traditional American jurisprudence. Indeed, according to Unger, critical legal studies was formed in “the leftist tradition” and its intent was to inform “a practice of politics.”

“The Critical legal studies movement has undermined the central ideas of modern legal thought and put another conception of law in their place,” Unger wrote in his thesis. “This conception implies a view of society and informs a practice of politics.”

“What I offer here is more a proposal that a description,” he continued. “But it is a proposal that advances along one of the paths opened up by a movement of ideas that has defied in exemplary ways perplexing, widely felt constraints upon theoretical insight and transformative effort.”

“Critical legal studies arose from the leftist tradition in modern legal thought and practice. Two over-riding concerns have marked this tradition.”

Of course, critical legal studies was founded on the basis of “critical theory,” the neo-Marxist philosophy of the Frankfurt School — an institute formed by German intelligentsia in 1923 — which for all intents and purposes blended the socio-political theories of Karl Marx with the psychology of Sigmund Freud.

As the Nazis rose to power in the 1930s, academics at the Frankfurt School fled to the U.S. where they inevitably took root in American universities, including Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

According to author Dr, Gerald Atkinson, “these intellectual Marxists included Herbert Marcuse, who coined the phrase, ‘make love, not war,’ during the anti-Vietnam War demonstrations.”

Atkinson contends that by “promoting the dialectic of ‘negative’ criticism, that is, pointing out the rational contradictions in a society’s belief system, the Frankfurt School ‘revolutionaries’ dreamed of a utopia where their rules governed.” Further, critical theory “had to contain a strongly imaginative, even Utopian strain, which transcends the limits of reality” and, conveniently, its tenets “would never be subject to experimental evidence.”

In other words, Unger, along with others proponents of this school of thought believe their logic and their logic alone is proof enough that critical theory is incontrovertible.

“Only the superior mind was able to fashion the ‘truths’ from observation of the evidence,” Atkinson continues. “There would be no need to test these hypotheses against everyday experience.”

Now recall that Unger’s approach to realizing the full effects of cultural Marxism in both everyday life and in political application was to do so slowly. Likewise, the Frankfurt School and its adherents sought to create a utopia via a “revolution,” but this revolution, according to Atkinson, would only be accomplished by “fomenting a very quiet, subtle and slowly spreading ‘cultural Marxism’ which would apply to culture the principles of Karl Marx bolstered by the modern psychological tools of Sigmund Freud.”

“Thus, ‘cultural Marxism’ became a marriage of Marx and Freud aimed at producing a ‘quiet’ revolution in the United States of America. This ‘quiet’ revolution has occurred in America over the past 30 years. While America slept!”

Unger’s Jurisprudence class, which he once described as “relatively small and very intense,” turned out to be a “radical critique of contemporary Western political thought and legal theory and Obama’s most prolonged academic exposure to the rudiments of Critical Legal Studies.” According to one classmate, Unger’s class was a “multi-step argument” that sought to undermine presumptions of Western legal thought.

The second of Unger’s courses in which Obama enrolled was “Reinventing Democracy,” which offered another critique of Western democracies — or “neo-liberalism” as the professor dubbed it – and explored the path he felt democracy should take.

Of the Reinventing Democracy course, Remnick writes:

“Unger argued against the ‘mandarins’ who presided over contemporary democratic society and tried, in often highly experimental terms, to urge a rethinking of Western institutions. He urged the adoption of a ‘universal social inheritance’ going well beyond the terms of the New Deal.”

Unger maintained throughout his course that, in the late twentieth century, the Democratic Party had failed to follow through on the precedent set in the New Deal. Of course, no class of Unger’s would be complete without a portion dedicated to expounding on the Republican’s capitulation to big-money and the “white” middle-class majority.

“Everyone recognized that this late-twentieth-century exercise in conservative statecraft would not have enjoyed such success had the Democratic Part, and the progressives in general, not abdicated so completely their responsibility to build and to defend a national alternative.” Unger said.

He went on to explain that leftists feared undoing their “defeat” without prompting a “crisis of dimensions” mirroring that of the Great Depression.

Unger’s view of Obama

According to Remnick, Unger has disputed some classmates’ claims that Obama was actually turned off by the theoretical nature of Unger’s curriculum. Rather, the professor noted that Obama “shared in the more philosophical part of the discussion as vigorously as he did the more context-oriented part.”

Unger went so far as to say that presenting his conversations with Obama “under the lens of the trope of philistine activist against starry-eyed theoretician” did both student and professor a great disservice.

Unger, who may have later gone on to be critical of the president, nonetheless defended his acolyte to Remnick, saying that Obama was “always interested in ideas, big and small” and that he “excelled at the style of sociability that is most prized in the American professional and business class.” Unger claims that while Obama did not master the art of “charismatic seduction” during his school days, “he became a virtuoso at it nevertheless.”

Ultimately, Unger viewed Obama, at least at the time “The Bridge” was written, a true American elite, even contending that Obama was “in a real sense, the first American elite president—that is the first who talks and acts as a member of the American elite—since John Kennedy.” Curiously, Unger failed to recall that President George H.W. Bush, too, was an Ivy League graduate and whose family background, much like Kennedy’s (and unlike Obama’s) comprised a legacy of American stature and privilege.

Remnick asserts that Unger continued a correspondence with Obama via BlackBerry even into the presidential campaign, although Unger maintains he never actually became Obama’s “friend.” In fact, the self-proclaimed revolutionary said he specifically kept his distance so as not to hurt the Illinois senator’s presidential bid.

“I am a leftist, and, by conviction as well as temperament, a revolutionary…Any association of mine with Barack Obama in the course of the campaign could only do harm.”

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (66)

Tanner Smith
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:57pm
The country would be better off if we could elect someone that has no connection with either Yale, Harvard and Univ of Chicago. Oh yes and Princeton the home of crazy Paul Krugman.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- AmericanFightingMan1
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 11:50pm
  This POS Unger ought not take another breath of North American air. After due process of law, his fate should likely be that of the Rosenbergs.
  
  You remember the Rosenbergs right? Civilians convicted of espionage and put to death. Those were the days when Americans had real men running things. We are a lost people now. We need to rediscover the American grit that allowed us to terminate our enemies. Better than the alternative (as we are discovering now).
  
  Report this comment
OhWait
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:01pm
This professor is the biggest blowhard I’ve ever heard in my life. He talks–apparently off the cuff–like he wrote and rewrote every phrase for maximum obfuscation. There are no stumbles of phrase, no ‘umm”, no sentences stopped and restarted midsentence, as any normal person would speak. Nothing. It’s like it’s all written down and he memorized it for recital with exact cadence and emphasis. After each sentence or two, I have no idea what he just said. After a paragraph, I would not be able to summarize what he’d just said, either. It’s like cotton candy: you know something is there; you just can’t quite get a hold of it.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Individualism
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:41pm
NoHarvard 2012

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
moosebeeusa
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:07pm
In 2008 I posted on the Slate I didn’t think that nationalizing industries , government controlled of our wealth, will support a positive results. I guess we’ll see. The people need to start another party find another way, but is close to what we had in 1976. The 1776 party comes to mind. Who hires these radicals to teach our young adults anyway..? they have to be hopped up on goofballs brain wash as a child and was told to be a leachier. un-American sobs.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Newone
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:43pm
Communists could not beat the United States, Europe with their military, “”so they INFILTRAT high-level Government Offices, Federal Court, Recruit Students In Key Universities, Control Mainstream News Media, World Stock Markets””, To Set Their Plan Into Motion.
Got the U.S. “Job Outsourcing Program Started” by using American corrupt stock market greed, have almost all U.S. S&P 500 companies jobs moved to China, “Causing China’s Economy to Skyrocket”, by getting the world hooked on their cheap Chinese manufactured stuff.
Now the United States and Europe and parts of Asia, economies are collapsing, because there is no manufacturing foundation “”Without A Manufacturing Foundation you have no Job Tax or Export revenue being generated””, now that the world has very little money to buy cheap Chinese stuff with, the Chinese economy is starting to collapse.
China saw big opportunity in outsourcing jobs coming in, Trillions of dollars being loaned out to different countries including the U.S. Generating Interest Income, and now no chance of ever getting repaid, because world economies are collapsing.
So China is going to go down with the rest of the world “” this is the Communist plan to get the world to destroy itself ””, what country went bankrupt all most self-efficient now, and is being real quiet watching all of this unfold, Hoping Their Plan Works Russia.
How did they INFILTRATE immigrants from the 40s and 50s have children groom them fo

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Newone
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:32pm
  How did they INFILTRATE immigrants from the 40s and 50s have children groom them for the job of INFILTRATION of KEY UNIVERSITIES and then into what is listed above.
  
  Report this comment
Diane TX
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:17pm
The “key” is cultural Marxism. Google those words, or start at this link I’ve provided.

http://www.wnd.com/2007/05/41737/

What happened, in short, is that America’s traditional culture, which had grown up over generations from our Western, Judeo-Christian roots, was swept aside by an ideology. We know that ideology best as “political correctness” or “multi-culturalism.” It really is cultural Marxism, Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms in an effort that goes back not to the 1960s, but to World War I.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ManThong
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:32pm
  “an austere yet distinguished Unger”
  
  Stalin was austere yet distinguished, as well.
  
  Report this comment
- timpclimber
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:34pm
  Thanks, excellent article
  
  Report this comment
lerose55
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:06pm
STOP trying to Civilize these other Countries. We have enough of our own problems, stop Foreign Aid Fix ourselves.

First of all, get Obama out of office, he is one of them, you can’t get the stripes off no matter how hard you scrub. He has secured his past life from us, his birth certif., his 3 passports under different names, drug problems, he has many known Comminists friends he keeps ex: Mr. Ayers, Mr & Ms Jarred, Malcom X, Frank Marshall Davis,he openly wears his Muslim Islamic gold ring,( look it up).He is waving it in front of our faces daily. He has put us in alot of debt, he involved us w/Fast & Furious, he went to bed while Mr. Stevenson was being toutured and killed, given weapons to known terrorist, Obama background is very questionable with his Islamic ties. I don’t think he should be in the postion of being leader of the USA.

I honestly think he is here to weaken & destroy America, he could not do it all in the last 4 years so he is trying to get 4 more years to get the job done. Start doing your homework before the election, I am sure you will walk away wondering if he is on the side of the American people.

A 2nd thing maybe Obama getting himself elected was to get control over these other Countries use our Military and then let brotherhood take over. Who knows all I know is he not here for the American citizens. He and the Mrs.cannot be trusted, both their backgrounds are very questionable. I hope I am wrong.

God Bless Us & God Bless America

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- timpclimber
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 6:36pm
  Great comment, as my dad used to say,” A Zebra wearing a blanket wil still act like a Zebra.”
  
  Report this comment
- DennisHabern1
  Posted on October 20, 2012 at 7:40am
  The Moron that currently resides in the White House, is not on the side of we Americans,
  
  which I am sure that Puten can attest to that after the Moron’s tape conversation with Russia’s
  
  former president, if you follow. God only knows what Puten and the Moron have conspired against
  
  the U.S.
  
  Report this comment
tipofthespear42
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:49pm
President Romney needs to E.O. “everything” Obama has E.O.’ed on day one!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Bugleboy99
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:40pm
“What kind of stupid people are we, allowing communist revolutionaries to pollute the minds of our young people?”

That is the same question that Sen. Joseph McCarthy was asking. And look what happened to him. No, the American people are naive and subject to propaganda just like the people of many other nations in this world. The weakness of the American republic is that it tolerates it’s enemies living right in among them. It is too kind and benevolent of a nation to round up and kick out those who would subvert and destroy it. Americans believe that people living in the USA can believe in and promote any philosophy or form of government they so desire. It is free country they say. Believe whatever you want. The voter will keep things in check. Communists lick their chops at this kind of thinking. They know that in the long run they will be able to grow in number, infiltrate and eventually control the US government and it’s institutions (news media, education, film industry, courts etc). There is a weakness in the present US form of government, and that is allowing those who would tirelessly seek destroy them to live among them and insidiously promote their odious form of government. It’s what Khrushchev meant when he said “we will bury you”. Eventually there is a price to pay.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- MacWell
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:14pm
  I believe a better Krushchev saying was when he said that the west, (America) will sell us (USSR) the rope we use to hang them.
  
  Report this comment
Lotus503
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:07pm
What kind of stupid people are we, allowing communist revolutionaries to pollute the minds of our young people…and to pay them from taxpayer’s coffers to do it? Outlaw tenure and purge all of these low-life commies out of our colleges and universities, NOW!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- tipofthespear42
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:57pm
  Impeach these people already and kick them ALL out of “OUR COUNTRY”!!
  
  Report this comment
iamnotu
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:00pm
The one good thing about the emboldenment of the progressives and communists in this country is that they feel free to expose themselves. This is wonderful as we now know who to come and remove from this country when everyone else finally realizes that their cause is treasonist and they should really be executed.

Really people, there is a fine line between freedom of speach and sedition and treason. These idolitors speak bolder and bolder, at some point, which I believe has already been passed, people will finally stop being so tolerant of this distructive ideology!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Shirley in USA
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:10pm
  It can’t come soon enough for me!
  
  Report this comment
- 123456beatriz
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:25pm
  This guy is a Lunatic loser. Can you see his eyes? His eyes are empty and full of Envy and rancor. Horrible “person”. One more! Bitter man.
  
  Report this comment
Balthazor
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:24pm
Were it not for the demonization of Joe McCarthy and “McCarthyism”, perhaps we would still be able to see communists as the enemy, and as morally repugnant as the nazis. Sadly, people these days seem to see communism as just another way of thinking, and it’s the tea party that’s the enemy.

The only good communist is a dead communist.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Arshloch
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:16pm
No article needed. Only the words ‘harvard and professor’ explain the entire problem.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- JRook
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:26pm
  another great example of how low even pseudo journalists can go. pure garbage.
  
  Report this comment
- iamnotu
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:05pm
  JROOK, what is pure garbage? The truth or your world view?
  
  Report this comment
- Bernice Durdan-Rowland
  Posted on October 21, 2012 at 8:32pm
  Obama was not a “Professor” – he was merely a “lecturer” – - who thought he knew everything and still does….. I’ve got news for him, he does NOT know how to run America – he has no clue…. I suggest he go back from where he came and “lecture” some on else…..
  I need to make another statement, “yes, he does know how to run American, right into the ground” – - -
  well, it won’t happen !!!!!!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
thelaststandonearth
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:14pm
Send Unger back to Brazil. We don’t really need someone like that poisoning U.S. citizens.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
justangry
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:59pm
So if Obama’s #1 founding father is a neo-marxist who sought cultural revolution and Romney’s philosophies aren’t really any different then Romney must be 1. A laissez fair capitalist or B. Another POS collectivist?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- thelaststandonearth
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:06pm
  You are angry.
  
  Report this comment
- Shirley in USA
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 3:13pm
  A Ron Paul supporter can be spotted a mile away by this spouting the untrue assumption that Romney is the same as Obama. They can’t be further from the truth on this!
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 4:25pm
  What socialist program is Romney proposing to do away with? What rights taken by Obama (and many in the GOP) is he proposing that we restore? Is he wanting to restore us to sound money or is he wanting to keep the same system we have that was created by a Fabian socialist named Keynes? You can call me names all you want. You can’t answer the question. He’s better than Obama on energy and regulatory policy if you believe he won’t change his mind. He’s worse than Obama on expanding the wars (which is really disgusting) Everything else is the same with slight variations on who pays more in the PROGRESSIVE tax code. I’d be ready for cap and trade and a gun grab if Romney wins and has a republican house and senate to give him everything he wants.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:08pm
  Come on now, if he wasn’t a liberal progressive surely he’d be advocating rolling back some of their programs. Anyone care to answer or do we concede that he’s just another progressive representing the ruling class of internationalists and their quest for world socialism?
  
  Report this comment
zoro51
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:38pm
fire REMOVE THIS ANTI AMERICAN PIECE OF ****

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:03pm
  I’m game. I just don’t want to replace him with the same crap.
  
  Report this comment
Alleycat22
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:36pm
Redistribution of all wealth, by pathological liars like Barry and JFK, only understood by Elite American liars and jealous pin heads. Did I miss anything?? Put this clown and Soros in a cell with Tyson and Hillary and film it!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
progressiveslayer
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:35pm
Harvard is full of anti-American A holes like this and it’s been like that since the 30′s maybe earlier.
That’s what Harvard does is churn out Marxists and communists like that bastard,just because they have a first amendment right of free speech doesn’t mean Harvard or any ivy league college has to hire them.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:07pm
  Watched an Ayn Rand video the other day ragging all over Harvard and their philosophy. It was some good stuff. Don’t forget they’re a active member in the CFR. I imagine their law school only promotes one ideology. I’ll try to find it for you.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:29pm
  Around the 4:40 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ex-rVkOFHU&feature=fvwrel
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:59pm
  Yeah she knew back then what was going to happen to America with our colleges teaching all their collectivism BS. She fled communism only to see it take hold here and the vast majority of the populace are too GD gullible or stupid to know the extent of tyranny they live under. Thanks for the clip,I’ll be saving that one.
  
  Report this comment
Gwohsau
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:55pm
Folks, you need to understand the greatest threat is the hidden one. It is not the out in the Open Marxist or socialist. It is the group that actively recruits fantasyland revolutionaries like Unger and others to twist the minds of youth during education. This has been an on going project of the Fabian Socialists who in fact stopped calling themselves socialists and began using the name Progressive to hide their end objective. It has been written about at length their control from within and corrupt the economy strategy for many years. The study has been widely ignored or insulted by many Socialist educated journalists but you can read the work of Zygmond Dobbs yourself on line. Simply Google Keynes at Harvard….their whole strategy is laid out and is coming true! http://www.keynesatharvard.org/

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ray2447
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:19pm
  A major way that Marxist radicals are trying to take over America is by stealing the next generation of voters on America’s colleges and universities today. Marxist propaganda is routinely spewed from taxpayer funded colleges and universities all across America as shown in “Marxist Valley College” at Youtube. http://tinyurl.com/44btbq8
  
  Report this comment
DOra Glasberg
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:45pm
This whole Obama’s Founding Fathers is as much Malarkey
as D’Souza’s 2016. Get a grip folks. Get a grip.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Gwohsau
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:58pm
  Thanks for avoiding any specifics that might have gotten in the way of your rebuttal….
  
  Report this comment
- txannie
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:06pm
  Actually, I think we ARE getting a grip…or rather our grip back. It’s you, obama and your ilk that have loosed freedom’s grip and we, conservative wage earners that are finally getting our “grip” back by taking back our freedom from blood suckers like you and obama’s ilk. You don’t like my opinion?…tough, go cry on a liberals’ shoulder.
  
  Report this comment
- DOra Glasberg
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:54pm
  How can one produce a specific – of nothing?
  Are you all mind readers?
  Of course Prune Danish, 2016, thinks a father leaving his son at 2 has
  a life long, profound political influence.
  Well, how CAN one argue with that?
  
  Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:44pm
How many different Marxist theories are running in 0′s radical mind? The U.S. college professors that have invaded the U.S. from leftist countries are against our very principals of self-government by the people and against our U.S. Constitution. They should be debated and mocked for what they represent and thrown out of these institutions and out of our country at the very least. They have even affected the media and hollywood as evidenced by their leftist agenda. How do we fight the Fabians and Frankfurt schools of revolutionary Marxism where they have been instilling Radical Marxism it in the minds of American youth for over 60 years without objection…almost in the dark from the parents that are footing the bills for their children being educated to NOT uphold the Constitution or our inalienable rights from God but instead, ANTI everything We The People have fought and died for to preserve for our posterity. The ONLY good thing about 0 being elected is that he has shown, thanks to the diligent, who have recognized it…..Who, Where, How and Why we are facing the hideous assaults from inside our country that we have witnessed. Now must fight to PURGE them from our infected systems and Restore the U.S Colleges and Universities to One Nation Under God. The Academics Are the Cause and have shown us the Effects of the Leftist Agenda in all it’s Hideous Forms it has Assumed. It Must DIE NOW! No more minds should be subjected to this evil way of thinking.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
8jrts
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:55am
Proves the old saying….those that can…do….those that can’t….teach. If this egg head could actually create something, he wouldn’t be trying to take it from everyone else. No wonder Barry follows his teachings.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
PaulreveresDarknight
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:51am
This 0 scares me so much. Bengazi+F&F. They work together for blind shiek. Tali wacker+little girl. VA Teachers+muslim hand signs. UN arms treaty! + internet tax treaty! + Oil wells treaty are being pushed during lame duck?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 8jrts
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:58am
  Romney’s going to have writer’s cramp from all the repeals he’s gonna have to do on day one.
  
  Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:49am
So little time, so much wealth redistribution to accomplish.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Christopher4500
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 1:08pm
  The wealth has already been redistributed and is continuing to consolidate — to the very top income brackets over the last 30 years. Funny how the kool-aid drinkers ‘decide’ that a “redistribution of wealth” is occurring only when they are told by corporate backed media that it is. It is happening alright, but in the opposite direction they would have you believe.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:02pm
  Gonzo, That’s really funny and all, but what wealth distribution is Romney proposing to stop? I agree with do have a problem with Marxism/collectivism, but see it controlling both major parties. Don’t you?
  
  Report this comment
Gary_K
Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:31am
barry bath house ( father unknown), ” know me by the people who surround me”

What a POS he is !

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.