World

How U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens May Have Been Linked to Jihadist Rebels in Syria (And It Involves Weapons)


Business Insider: Chris Stevens May Have Been Connected to Syrian Rebels and Weapons

WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 14: Intern Chris Jobson (R) and press assistant Isaiah Calvin (L) of Senate Democratic Media Center sign condolence book for Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens at the U.S. Capitol September 14, 2012 in Washington, DC. Credit: Getty Images

This article by Michael Kelley originally appeared on Business Insider. It will be the focus of Glenn Beck’s Monday show on TheBlaze TV at 5pm ET.

The details of the September 11 attack that killed four Americans at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi are still murky and there’s certainly more to be known.

Former CIA officer Clare Lopez argues that the key issue is “the relationship of the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya with Al Qaeda.”

That relationship, Lopez argues, could be connected to the rise of Islamic brigades in Syria, who recently created a “Front to Liberate Syria” to wage jihad against the Syrian regime and turn the country into an Islamic state.

That potential connection starts with who Ambassador Stevens worked with during the Libyan revolution and ends with who he hosted on the night of his death.

In March 2011 Stevens became the official U.S. liaison to the al-Qaeda-linked Libyan opposition and began coordinating U.S. assistance to the rebels.

The top military commander of the rebels, Abdelhakim Belhadj, was the leader of the pro-al-Qaeda Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).

After Gaddafi fell the LIFG disbanded and some of the fighters joined the amorphous group Ansar al-Shariah (Soldiers of Shariah), which reportedly participated in the attack that took Stevens’ life.

In November 2011 The Telegraph reported that Belhadj, acting as head of the Tripoli Military Council, “met with Free Syrian Army [FSA] leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey” in an effort by the new Libyan government to provide money and weapons to the growing insurgency in Syria.

Last month The Times of London reported the a Libyan ship “carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey.” The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs).

Those heavy weapons are most likely from Muammar Gaddafi’s stock of about 20,000 portable heat-seeking missiles—the bulk of them SA-7s—that the Libyan leader obtained from the former Eastern bloc.

Reuters reports that Syrian rebels have been using those heavy weapons to shoot down Syrian helicopters and fighter jets.

The ship’s captain was ”a Libyan from Benghazi and the head of an organization called the Libyan National Council for Relief and Support,” which was presumably established by the new government.

That means that Ambassador Stevens had only one person—Belhadj—between himself and the Benghazi man who brought heavy weapons to Syria. (The official U.S. stance is that it is opposed to providing Syrian rebels with heavy weapons.)

Furthermore, we know that jihadists are the best fighters in the Syrian opposition, but where did they come from?

Last week The Telegraph reported that a FSA commander called them “Libyans” when he explained that the FSA doesn’t “want these extremist people here.”

So this much is fairly certain: Libya has been sending seasoned Islamic fighters, heavy weapons and presumably money to Syria in support of the opposition.

The uncertain part is where Stevens, and the U.S. government, fits into all of this.

If the new Libyan government was sending jihadists and 400 tons of lethal cargo to Syria through a port in southern Turkey—a deal brokered by Stevens’ primary Libyan contact during the Libyan revolution—then the governments of Turkey and the U.S. surely knew about it.

Reuters reported that satellite photos exposed a CIA post in Benghazi, located 1.2 miles from the U.S. consulate, was used as “a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles” … and that its security features “were more advanced than those at rented villa where Stevens died.”

We also know that about a dozen CIA operatives and contractors left the Benghazi base after it was exposed. Could these two CIA groups be connected as start and end points to help funnel heavy weapons to the Syrian opposition?

We know that the CIA has been funneling weapons to the rebels in southern Turkey, but CNN reports that FSA members are “cutting their own deals to get weapons” from well-armed extremists so it raises questions about who the CIA is arming.

We know that U.S. weapons are ending up in the hands of hard-line Islamists in Syria. It turns out that many of these jihadists are the same ones that Stevens helped arm to topple Gaddafi.

On September 11 Stevens held an evening meeting with a Turkish diplomat before retiring to his room at 9 p.m. Gunfire and explosions began 40 minutes later. Is Steven’s guest for his last meeting just another eerie coincidence?

Either way it seems that the connection between Benghazi and the rise of jihadists in Syria is much stronger than has been officially acknowledged.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (210)

  • Wilma
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:22am

    Why would radical Islamists target the man, Stevens, facilitating their brethren in Syria with arms? What am I missing?

    Report this comment

    Wilma  
    • Silver Lining
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:41am

      A mob-style paid hit, perhaps? Did the Ambassador know too much? Did he hint that he might go public? Did he outlive his usefulness? This certainly begs MANY, MANY questions…

      Report this comment

      Silver Lining  
    • Misty Williams
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:48am

      It sounds as though he was caught between two groups that want to “liberate” Syria to different levels of “liberation”. One not as extreme as the other. If I read the article correctly, the more extreme of the two took offense. What a mess.

      Why is the U.S. helping to arm jihadis that want to institute strict Islamic rule that is anything but in favor of personal liberty for all or in line with freedom??

      Sounds to me like this administration is behaving in a very unAmerican fashion.

      We need to mind our own. This administration has made the wrong choices too many times. Before you know it, we’re going to see Muslim Brotherhood or another Anti-U.S., anti-FREEDOM group ruling Syria, too. Why is this administration backing people who hate the U.S. way of life?! Oh wait.. Obama… that’s right…

      Report this comment

      Misty Williams  
    • Silver Lining
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:50am

      In other words, perhaps the REAL question should be… WHO ordered the hit on Stevens? Or, to paraphrase an oft-used phrase from decades past….”What did the President and the Secretary of State know…and when did they know it?” This is going to make Watergate look like a playground kerfuffle.

      Report this comment

      Silver Lining  
    • Solanus
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:05am

      the radical islamists were working on behalf of someone else!!! who was the MAIN instrument behind ‘the giving of the arms’ . . . ? someone wanted poor Chris quieted.

      Report this comment

      Solanus  
    • Solanus
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:12am

      and who better to orchestrate a ‘mob-style’ paid hit? than the king of the mob himself – or the “Queen” of the mob herself . . . who is Valerie Jarrett anyway – besides the President’s right hand … maybe is BOSS!just check out Vernon Jarrett – her father-in-law:
      Jarrett was elected to the Illinois Council of the Communist Party’s youth wing. . . way back in the day

      Report this comment

      Solanus  
    • pragmaticpatriot
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:14am

      perhaps the turks didnt want to pay for the arms they just bought or christopher was a loose end.

      Report this comment

      pragmaticpatriot  
    • G-WHIZ
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:16am

      Was he “HIT” by the “rebels” to keep their position unknown….or was he “HIT” by the commies in our govt to keep “OUR ” envolvement/F.&F. secret?!

      Report this comment

      G-WHIZ  
    • Silver Lining
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:18am

      Bingo, Solanus. You win the big stuffed teddy bear. Watch the other hand. When leftists no longer have any use for you it’s time to watch your back. Beck meant it when he said to pray for the safety of this President, his family, and the Secret Service protecting him. If the leftists believe that somebody – ANYBODY – will be of more use to them as a martyr rather than a player they will try very hard to make that happen. They are getting squeezed tighter and tighter…and becoming more and more desperate. There are few things more dangerous than a cornered animal.

      Silver Lining  
    • joyces
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:30am

      @silverlining: That is about the best answer; it’s the nature of the beast.

      Report this comment

      joyces  
    • Moozmom
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:54am

      They are natural born killers. Stevens stood in their way; perhaps Stevens was reporting to a US official who the Al Queda group did not want to know about their activity. This is a great of example of just who our president is in bed with – and the president thinks he can control these islamist animals? I think not.

      Report this comment

      Moozmom  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:55am

      WILMA…Jihadis have no loyalties to anyone. We’ve seen them butchering fellow muslims throughout Afghanistan, the middle east and Africa. It makes sense to be monitoring where the weapons left behind by the Ghaddafi regime may be going…they will get to jihadis who will use them as they were used to take over the US consulate in Benghazi. It’s being reported that a more organized effort was being touted to attack more US embassies in the region in order to remove the US presence there.

      Also remember, the US was “the last flag standing” in Benghazi. The Red Cross had taken it’s mission out of the country. The British had taken their mission out of the country. The country is too unstable to permit diplomatic and humanitarian missions to be based there.

      Now…the Obama administration has reached a deal with the Jordanians to set up a post there to monitor the movement of weapons in Syria. We know Saddam had used Syria as an area to move his WMD’s to. We know Assad has a WMD arsenal also. And now Jihadis are pouring into Syria to fill the same power vacuum left behind in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia.

      It’s my suspicion that Stevens (under orders from Obama’s administration) was trying to pander to what they determined to be “moderate”or approachable jihadi elements in Libya in order to convince them we’re not hostile to them and to be able to monitor weapons caches. But that brings me back to my first point…Jihadis have no loyalties to any

      Report this comment

      AvengerK  
    • helllsbellls
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:06pm

      Silverlining……You may be close to the truth. Hells Bells.

      Report this comment

      helllsbellls  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:34pm

      also remember WILMA…there were attacks on the US embassy in Benghazi in April and June this year which went unreported until now. Clearly organized militants in Libya were probing our defenses before the 9/11/2012 attack on the embassy.
      What needs to be answered is why- after appeals for more security from the consulate- did the state department and the Obama administration actually reduce the security there? Was it Fast and Furious Libya style? Or was it just a gross mishandling by the Obama administration? The subsequent cover up is political, that’s no question.

      Report this comment

      AvengerK  
    • scjeff
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:44pm

      Syrian backed perhaps?

      Report this comment

      scjeff  
    • moonstruck2
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:22pm

      What you are missing is, thats what the government is giving you to swallow; the truth is that they were actually the people that the US and Nato thought they defeated. they are elements of the green charter ( the jamahiriya) Dont you know that the majority of the Libyan People loved Muammar Khadafy? and therefore knew who set up the whole scenatio…….the go between, ambassador stevens! Remember, when the devil plans a plan GOD Plans a Plan and GOD is the best of planners

      Report this comment

      moonstruck2  
    • steam engine
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 9:52pm

      Perhaps Obama needed a foreign affairs incident that would help him win the election. Perhaps this was a kidnapping that went wrong. Why if their were two ex seals at the safe house, we haven’t heard of a body count of dead insurgents? Were they not armed and would they not fight back? Something stinks to high heaven here. Either this administration is even more stupid than we believe or they are really hiding something that would put them all in jail.

      Report this comment

      steam engine  
  • dublinthewagons
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:15am

    Nobel pease prize winner on trial for crimes against humanity.
    The gallows will be busy soon enough.

    Report this comment

    dublinthewagons  
    • SimpleTruths
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:05pm

      Learn to spell.

      Report this comment

      SimpleTruths  
    • moonstruck2
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:43pm

      You might as well go all the way and scrutinize those that are part of the Shadow Government who operates behind the scenes manipulating the seat of the presidency! Obama is the Fall guy!!!

      Report this comment

      moonstruck2  
  • RaydocX
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:12am

    Thsi is the way to support foreign regimes, NOT sending in troops or drones… providing equipment… it worked in Afghanistan during the Soviet occupation and look at how well it is working AGAINST us for Iran in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    BUT i am not sure equiping these particular militias is in our best interest… not saying Syria’s Assad is a nice guy, but the smaller the American fingerprint on this turnover, the better.

    And this makes the shelling of Turkey by Syria seem less like a tragic accident… Our troops chafe at not being able to pursue Taliban from Afghanistan into Pakistan, because they follow political ROE (to their detriment)… you won’t find that in most nations (including Russia, China, North Korea), and if the bad guys are setting up in a border village and chewing up your direct troops day after day, hitting them at home would become the logical answer.

    Nevertheless, if our embassy was hit by radicals angry that we are not providing enough arms or arms fast enough, it’s proof the tap should be shut off and we can let the animals slaughter each other, then offer assistance to the victors as long as they will guarantee the appropriate human rights.

    Report this comment

    RaydocX  
    • moonstruck2
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:54pm

      It sounds like the Real Animal talking now! Meddling in other peoples affairs,furnishing arms to both sides ahhhhhh, i could go on but this tragic situation must continue to play itself out, and thats a shame, the loss of life is staggering..

      Report this comment

      moonstruck2  
  • noslave
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:10am

    must be a obama/hillary shell game?, to get weapons through an end run around the constitution,to acheive their goal to destroy america from within?? say your sending aid to rebels to fight in syria??but they wind up in libian enemys hands??in light of obamas and hillarys crew to mislead and lie to america,till they win re-election and answer to no one,stevens and the others were just an expendible bump in the road toward their goal??

    Report this comment

    noslave  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:24am

      say your sending aid to rebels to fight in syria??but they wind up in libian enemys hands
      —–
      Well, according to this story, a Libyan al-Qaeda affiliate was the liaison. Besides, the Syrian rebels are also al-Qaeda-affiliated jihadists.

      Hussein, you MISLED the American people at the Al Smith Dinner — again, for political gain. Who cares if UBL is dead. AL-QAEDA IS ALIVE AND WELL.

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
    • Ni
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:31am

      Do you remember Hilary mentioning in her eulogy to Chris Stevens that he came to Libya ON A CARGO SHIP? Isn’t that a weird mode of travel for an ambassador? Was she trying to drop a hint that something untoward was going on – surely we could track the ship and its’ cargo!

      Report this comment

      Ni  
    • williamak
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:03am

      now that is as true a statement,, as ive ever heard………theres alot of dirt thats swept under…you nailed it….thanks…….>>>>>>>

      Report this comment

      williamak  
  • charjan
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:10am

    One one hand we want some action against the Syrian Gov’t who has killed thousands of his own people and would not be surprised to find we have been aiding the rebel resistance in Syria, just as we did in Libya and Egypt,, etc, etc, etc.
    However, if we discover America was covertly aiding the rebels, we wish to expose the secret intentions of CIA, discover those that were involved and lynch the conspiritors as we did in the past. If we decide to send troops, then we are branded as waremonger – “Bushites”.
    Fickle??? To be an American is complicated!

    Report this comment

    charjan  
  • kryptonite
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:09am

    The question then arises, if Stevens was indeed helping Syrian jihadists, why would al-Qaeda kill him at a critical point in the Syria’s civil war? Remember Hussein had killed al-Qaeda’s second in command Abu Yahya al-Libi, who happened to be Libyan. So what exactly was Hussein’s plan? If Hussein was supplying weapons to jihadists, the CIA must have known they were all al-Qaeda. Doesn’t make sense to me.

    Report this comment

    kryptonite  
    • Bonnieblue2A
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 11:57am

      Why? Al-Qaeda in Libya had the arms in hand. The killing of such a high value target as an American Ambassador did more to rally up Islamic jihaddists than anything he could do for them alive. You simply cannot assume logic or reason when dealing with predators whose primary motivation is an Islamic calaphate.

      Report this comment

      Bonnieblue2A  
    • Leader1776
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:20pm

      Story was unraveling BEFORE the hit. Those involved knew it would come out. Stevens was ‘optimal’ to paraphrase a disgusting piece of human refuse.

      Report this comment

      Leader1776  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:27pm

      You have to understand..these groups are amorphous. Ansar al Sharia isn’t al Qaeda and can claim they’re not affiliated with al Qaeda, yet they act as al Qaeda surrogates none the less. They work towards the same goals. They certainly don’t disavow al Qaeda.

      Report this comment

      AvengerK  
  • razhunter100
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:04am

    Obama’s Pool Of Dead People
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=b8qKa0YJS-4&NR=1

    Breaking Colorado Massacre Linked To Historic Bank Fraud YES! Batman Rising .avi
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vo3CtAqymI&feature=plcp
    (libor scandal remember…)

    Report this comment

    razhunter100  
    • YAHUSHUAHRULES
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 2:16pm

      this for DITTO HEAD – Speaking of “OCT SURPRISES” consider this and the implications of it. Valerie Jarred is using her IRANIAN connections to make a so-called treaty where Iran would agree to stop its nuclear program for sanctions being lifted just before the election. Read all about it. Pray against it. This is a battle that will only be won by prayer. These people are so evil they will stop at nothing. A treaty with Islamists and infidels (us) is called HOODNA – (Islam is required by the Koran to make treaties in bad faith with infidels till the Islamists get the upper hand and then they break them), This is to give Obama support for re-election.
      Pray everything in darkness is brought to the Light. Everything hidden is revealed. Everything sealed is unsealed.
      http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-cuts-deal-with-iran-over-nukes/
      http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-cuts-deal-with-iran-over-nukes/

      Report this comment

      YAHUSHUAHRULES  
    • Ditto Head
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 8:20pm

      @YAHUSHUAHRULES
      I heard Dick Morris articulate that theory today on Hannity’s show.
      I think it’s far less likely than my Benghazi-perp theory.

      Report this comment

      Ditto Head  
  • TelepromoterNChief
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:04am

    Oh my.
    This is so not…..optimal.
    Hillary still going to fall on the sword for this one?

    Report this comment

    TelepromoterNChief  
  • readyfornov
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:00am

    So where did the drone come from that supposedly captured the last hour of the attack at the consulate?

    Report this comment

    readyfornov  
    • woodyee
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:07am

      Limbuagh reprted yesterday that their was a drone flying over the consulate for 6hrs, and that US officials watched the attack.

      Report this comment

      woodyee  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:13am

      The attacked lasted for several hours. The consulate video and the drone photos are MIA.

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
    • yougottabekidding
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:13am

      Do you think they were there in an attemp to get back the weapons that were not supposed to be there.
      That would not be the reason would it ? They didn’t want too many people there to know about it ! The more security the more people would know.
      The four Americans were the rats in the maze, there was no getting out !
      I wonder if they were there because of the global inititive? Wait thats bill clinton _________ hillary, hussain ? No hussain would never do any thing with out approval from congress !

      Report this comment

      yougottabekidding  
    • Ditto Head
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:15am

      I hate “October Surprises”, and I’m very concerned that a big one is about to drop. Namely, that the perpatrators (or at least a person or people who we will be told are the perps) of the Benghazi attack will be captured or killed prior to the election, possibly even prior to the Presidential foreign policy debate this coming Monday. This may be their ace-in-the-hole, and if it is, they’ll play it for all it’s worth. I hope I’m wrong.

      Ditto Head  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:15am

      Key word is “WATCHED”. Most of the time Obama is too afraid to fight for anyone’s life except his!

      If a drone could have got there, a plane from a aircraft carrier could have or should have been there.

      I guess gay ambassadors are not as important to the Obama Regime as straight ambassadors.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:26am

      Did Obama TiVo the 6 hours of video because hew was in a hurrty to get to his next fund raisers?

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • Farmgirl112055
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:44am

      DittoHead… I too have that same fear… Fox reported this am that one of the heads of the attack was seen drinking Mango juice in a swanky hotel. He gets wacked, and then they can claim that “We told you we would get them.” The question begs tho.. WHAT WERE THEY DOING IN THE FIRST PLACE?? TOTAL INCOMPETENCE..Fast and Furious Syrian Style..

      Report this comment

      Farmgirl112055  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:59am

    Oh man! I can already hear Chris Matthews, Martin Bashir, and Lawrence O’Donnel, along with others on Tuesday. The accusations will spew forth from their mouths so full of venom. It might just be funny, but I expect the real Dem-wits out there to eat it up.

    Report this comment

    RJJinGadsden  
    • barber2
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:15am

      Listened to NPR this morning ( painful but like to hear what the Democrats are putting out through their campaign mouthpiece , NPR ). Heard NO mention of the Obama ” not optimal ” comment on Stewart. Only a long segment about the Clinton / Springsteen political pep rally in Ohio . Good old NPR . Just another unofficially official mouthpiece for the Democrats who have the MSM pushing their agenda..Fast and Furiously…24/7. In NPR’s case, with tax payers’ funds. Disgusting bias.

      Report this comment

      barber2  
    • WakeUp
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:45am

      I’m sure they will distort the facts about some operation under Bush and claim that this started under his admin as they did with Fast & Furious. Of course that turned out to be just another lie, but lots of people believed it.

      Report this comment

      WakeUp  
  • Ilikepeople
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:56am

    I’m not a Muslim, and I don’t approve of their ways, but I surely can appreciate their candor in the way they call Americans dogs.

    Report this comment

    Ilikepeople  
    • woodyee
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:06am

      I don’t. I appreciate my own candor when I refer to those blood-thirsty, desert dwelling savages as Satan-worshipping pedophiles.

      Report this comment

      woodyee  
  • shogun459
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:56am

    Why would Obama issue no orders to rescue the Stevens when the attack went on for hours?
    Why would Obama go to bed and sleep when Stevens couldn’t be located?
    Dead men tell to no tales.

    Report this comment

    shogun459  
    • loriann12
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:05am

      Exactly, dead men tell no tales. Now, what was it he knew that O didn’t want to get out?

      I’ve noticed that Muslims like to punish according to the deed done. Cut the hand off a thief, etc. So just why did they gang rape Stevens?

      Report this comment

      loriann12  
    • redbone007
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 7:31pm

      Steven knew he was being set up that why he started a diary. He has just purchased the diary and started writing in a couple of days before he was dead.

      Report this comment

      redbone007  
  • Ilikepeople
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:52am

    As I said the monster that rules America is a monster that knows you’re dogs while telling you that you are not, and they throw you a fresh steak to get your attention of the slightly older steak.

    Report this comment

    Ilikepeople  
    • Ilikepeople
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:00am

      Even Unions have the same method for union members they don’t like especially if they know their jobs might be in danger soon in that they will turn that member into a fresh steak in the hopes the bosses will look at that member instead. Dogs.

      Report this comment

      Ilikepeople  
  • grams09
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:52am

    What’s with this government supplying guns to other countries and then touting taking our gun rights away? Hmmm.

    Report this comment

    grams09  
  • TerryJ70
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:51am

    Somebody better get to the bottom of this fast. This whole thing wreaks.

    Report this comment

    TerryJ70  
  • Gary_K
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:50am

    I have heard that Stevens may have been hit by the Russians as payback for their General being killed in Syria. I dont know if it’s true or not but it’s what some are saying.

    Report this comment

    Gary_K  
  • fergab
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:49am

    This will turn out to be Obama’s “Iran-Contra” scandal !

    Report this comment

    fergab  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:03am

      LOL. Yeah, but nothing was ever proven in regards to an Iran – Contra connection. I still giggle at the assertion that GHW Bush was able to commandeer a 2 seater SR71 during the Carter Administration to fly to Iran to work out the details. I would venture to say that such an aircraft would have been in Russian the next day had such actually happened.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • barber2
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:04am

      So far the Obama Administration has buried the Black Panther mess, Fast and Furious, the Zimmerman witch hunt, the body of Bin Laden, the Seal’s helicopter crash, the crazy many- titled video ( originally released in June but then translated and released for the Egyptian media @ September 8), Obama’s school records and now this mess. Any bets on what will happen about this ? Amazing what a political party can get away with when they have the media in their pocket…..

      Report this comment

      barber2  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:22am

      Barber2

      That is quite a list.

      We better win this election or we will be reduced tom samizdat.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
    • noslave
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 12:07pm

      you overlook the fact that bill and hillary got rich dealing drugs out of MENA ARKANSAS with CIA help to fund the iran contras,go figure they had their dirty little fingers in that pie also??

      Report this comment

      noslave  
  • tradexpertbuysell
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:49am

    I hope Romney knows this. This will counter Obama’s phony deal with Iran (IE: October Suprise) that also just came down.

    Report this comment

    tradexpertbuysell  
  • Ilikepeople
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:49am

    That’s the American way though even as it was with the O.J Simpson trial. Bury people in details giving them a motivating factor for the motive of the event, and then slowly erase the want of truth in the minds of people for their momentary taste for wanting the [why we allowed it to happen?]

    Report this comment

    Ilikepeople  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:46am

    No wonder Obama has been laying bricks of iron over this fiasco. They have been meeting and giving arms to proven terrorists; both in Libya and in Syria for the sake of the Caliphate. These SA-7 missiles are shoulder fired heat-seekers, and I have to wonder how long until they are turned upon our own people – military and civilian.

    How far does the treason of Obama and so many others go in this and many other matters?
    How much more blood will be found on Obama’s hands?
    How long until this blows the administration apart?

    If this matter of Libya-Syria does not bring down Obama, by resignation or by defeat in the elections, nothing ever will.

    Judgement has come upon the House of Obama; may it be just, true and swift in its completion from the Lord.

    Report this comment

    Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • woodyee
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:51am

      Let’s see if Gaybama goes through with the last debate: Topic? Foreign Affairs.

      Report this comment

      woodyee  
    • PATTY HENRY
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 5:07pm

      It’s clear, to those of us who have been around politics a little, that this is a COVER UP and now it appears that the well they tried to cover up goes far deeper than we thought…and it reaches back to
      SINS against AMERICA committed by this Traitor-in-Chief that will curl our toes. CORRUPT, EVIL.

      They have committed the worst sins against this NATION that any group of people have ever attempted. They are being exposed now. GOD IS CLEARLY AT WORK. THE PRAYERS are working. THE falling on our knees…working.

      THEY are fighting now like wildcats – they will tell ANY lie. They will make up stuff, ridicule decent people, deny their culpability ….they don’t want you to know that Michelle’s parents were associated with BILL AYERS’ PARENTS who were associated with Valarie Jarretts parents COMMUNISTS ALL;
      they do not want you to know that OBAMA along with Hillary Clinton and creeps like BOXER have sold us out to the U.N. in ways that we would never believe !!!
      IN ONE SIMPLE PARAGRAPH: People who don’t believe in GOD or GOD’S PLAN want to ‘fix things’ themselves only to get others to go along they have to kill many of them, and they want to be the ones making the decisions – those are people we call PROGRESSIVE LIBERALS – they are minions of SATAN, doing the Devil’s work. One of them conned us in 2008..but we caught on ! They tried to hog tie America/Americans but we caught on. PRAY HARD!!

      Report this comment

      PATTY HENRY  
  • Ilikepeople
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:44am

    Oh, who would have saw that coming? Now they will smear a person who isn’t even alive to defend themselves, and the narrative will be established of the details of what caused the attack rather than how it was allowed to happen. I didn’t see that coming a mile away.

    Report this comment

    Ilikepeople  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:55am

      Glenn had discussed this before just a few months ago. Christopher Stevens was just not mentioned by name. So, he’s not just taking a shot at a dead man with no reason. The question you should be asking yourself is Just who was Stevens working for? We do know the answer to that, its the administration through Hillary and the State Department. He was there to do the bidding of his bosses. Who, quite obviously let him down.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
  • oicu814me2
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:44am

    Here we go..

    Report this comment

    oicu814me2  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 10:18am

      Libya was the soource of a great many Al Qaeda in Iraq. They were either #1 or #2 in terms of Al Qaeda manpower. Saudi might have beat them.

      AL Qaeda resurgence borught to you by Barack Insane Obama.

      Report this comment

      Walkabout  
  • razhunter100
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:42am

    al-cia-da…created and maintained by the us govt.

    Report this comment

    razhunter100  
  • woodyee
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:41am

    This could well explain why SECURITY WAS PULLED from Stevens – dead men tell no tales!!!

    Gaybama is a murderer!!!!

    Report this comment

    woodyee  
  • ScreaminEagle
    Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:39am

    Guess Glenn could be right

    Report this comment

    ScreaminEagle  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:47am

      He has a fairly good record so far, as he admits, mostly what he gets wrong is the scale of the event in magnitude or the timing…and then not by much.

      Report this comment

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • lisalake
      Posted on October 19, 2012 at 9:58am

      Glenn was first to spell out this scenario. He is on top of the truth, and surely has informants in high places helping him. God Bless Glenn Beck.

      Report this comment

      lisalake  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In