Death Toll Revised Down to 24 After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…100+ Injured…Children Among the Dead…Stunning Pictures…Woman Finds Dog During Interview!

WATCH on TheBlaze TV: Latest Updates on Tornado Aftermath, Including Updates From Glenn Beck in Oklahoma

World

Now Iran Is Denying the Report That It Will Hold One-on-One Nuclear Talk With the U.S.

Oct. 21, 2012 11:30am
Now Iran Is Denying the Report That It Will Hold One on One Nuclear Talk With the U.S.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attends a press conference in Tehran on Oct. 2, 2012. Iran on Sunday denied a report that it will hold one-on-one talks with the U.S. about its nuclear program. (Getty Images)

Iran is now echoing the United States in denying the report that the two countries will hold direct talks over Iran’s disputed nuclear program.

The New York Times reported Saturday that secret exchanges between U.S. and Iranian officials had yielded “in principle” an agreement to hold one-on-one talks for the first time. The White House quickly denied the report, with National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor calling it “not true.”

“We don’t have any discussions or negotiations with America,” Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said during a news conference Sunday, according to Reuters. “The (nuclear) talks are ongoing with the P5+1 group of nations. Other than that, we have no discussions with the United States.”

The P5+1 group is comprised of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council — the U.S., Britain, France, Russia and China — plus Germany. In his statement Saturday, Vietor also affirmed the only diplomatic solutions currently being pursued were through the P5+1, though added that the U.S. has “said from the outset that we would be prepared to meet bilaterally.”

“The president has made clear that he will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and we will do what we must to achieve that,” Vietor said.

–

​RELATED:

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (101)

1 2
  • soybomb315_II
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:27pm

    Ask yourself why the government of Iran would be adamantly denying talks with the west….

    Answer: Because it undermines the Iran regime’s narrative that the west wants to dominate their country. Tyrannical governments always try to scare their citizens in order to galvanize pro-government support

    Report this comment

    soybomb315_II  
  • Individualism
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:15pm

    Iran has the right to defend itself simple as that.

    Report this comment

    Individualism  
    • db321
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 2:10pm

      Hey Individualism your dead wrong ol’ Muslim Extremest breath. We have allowed Iran to have all the Weapons they want for years so they can defend them self. But they will never be able to have Nuclear Weapons PERIOD! I don’t care what your bed buddy Communist Gary Johnson says, or what Ron (Blow Hard) Paul Says. Iran is not going to be able to have Nuclear Weapons.

      Don’t take my word for it you anti-America blow hard, take God’s word for it. God warned Iran, America, Egypt or any other Country that tries to go against Israel, will have a long swim in the lake of Fire.

      Really am getting tired of your BS Individualism – you are an annoying idiot! Half the time you don’t even make since.

      Report this comment

      db321  
    • burned at edges
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 2:50pm

      The U.S.A has the right to defend itself too. That includes bombing the bat snot out of Iran if they make threats.

      Report this comment

      burned at edges  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 4:40pm

      @INDIVIDUALISM
      Iran has the right to defend itself simple as that.
      ——-
      BOOM! You were saying…?

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
    • Individualism
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 5:57pm

      Iran never threatened USA.

      Report this comment

      Individualism  
    • CrazyChicken
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 6:10pm

      Individualism is nothing more than Progressive/Communist ********. People like you should be put on a list and deported to some island in the distant South Pacific along with the *******, negroes, communists, baby killers and the America hating crowd, then America should drop a nuke on your limp wristed arse!

      Report this comment

      CrazyChicken  
    • Eastinfection
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 7:57pm

      INDI…
      “Iran never threatened USA.”

      Iran has said, on multiple occasions, that it will attack U.S. bases and interests if ISRAEL attacks Iran.

      Even if we aren’t involved from the start.. Iran will make sure we get involved.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dStRumKq7y8

      Report this comment

      Eastinfection  
    • needmoinfo
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 9:22pm

      Israel is capable of bombing Iran but only in self defense. Iran brags it will destroy Israel as soon as they have the capability. Iran is a loose cannon.

      Report this comment

      needmoinfo  
    • The_Pointy_End
      Posted on October 22, 2012 at 1:21am

      @INDIVIDUALISM

      Iran is a threat to the US.
      http://gerarddirect.com/2012/03/29/john-bolton-iran-must-be-stopped/

      Report this comment

      The_Pointy_End  
    • kathleenlee
      Posted on October 22, 2012 at 7:58am

      @individualism….iran has never made a threat against America???? what rock to you live under? they have even gone so far as to figure out what kind of ship it would take, to park off the east coast and fire a missile over the USA….yes, individualism, the USA…it is called an EMP and will send America back into the 18th century. Estimates that 90% of Americans will die in the first year…And as stupid as you appear to be…you will be one of the 90%…because you haven’t prepared…just keep wishing obuma gets back in, and your dreams of a socialist OWG..may come to pass. That still won’t stop the jihadists from nuking USA AND ISREAL. Wake up, what are you 12???

      Report this comment

      kathleenlee  
  • paperpushermj
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:13pm

    It needs to be said!
    .
    IRAN WILL ACQUIRE NUCLEAR BOMBS.
    .
    Their facilities are buried to deep and the Iranian reaction from an Attack will have World Wide Economic Repercussions.
    .
    All the posturing From the United States and Israel is just that…. Posturing

    Report this comment

    paperpushermj  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:18pm

      All underground facilities have a entrances and ventilation…..

      Block both and keep them blocked.

      Those inside will die and be hard to be replaced.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:28pm

      @monk

      You can only do that through ground forces, which would require an invasion

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:42pm

      Hi Soybom315,

      Nope, air power could do it. Locate those spots and bunker-blaster them. Don’t have to go that deep and air power can keep rescue parties away.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:51pm

      most likely, the ‘air vents’ would be on the side of hills/mountains and could not be seen from above

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:58pm

      Hi Soybom315,

      Air vents can have a different temperature from the surrounding area and can be located at night from the air.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 2:09pm

      ok, so if this is such a slam dunk – why are you guys so freaked out about Iran. Sounds like a simple operation….

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • Fedpro
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 2:22pm

      Two words: Bunker Busters!

      Report this comment

      Fedpro  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 2:27pm

      FedPro,
      “Two words: Bunker Busters!”

      Thanks for the correction. I said “bunker-blaster”.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 3:44pm

      Hi Soybom315,
      “Sounds like a simple operation….”

      Yep, it sure is. It’s the people that have no idea how to deal with this who are in charge. Community Organizers and Communist that pray to Marx or Islam for guidance. They hate America.

      And all they know how to do is talk, bow and apologize for America. They want America destroyed form both the inside and the outside. They have been in power to long but Obama and his crew are by far the worse ever. If he stays in office you will never see America again… only another 3rd world Country being sucked dry, bled dry, chopped up and redistributed. Sharia Law will become more common place here (it’s already here) and your days of being free will be forever lost.

      I see a strength in Romney that will not tolerate the dismantling of America. If he’s voted in you will see it in his actions concerning these issues. He will help America become more strong and independent. The next few weeks will determine if we go towards freedom or slavery.

      For the “relative”….. those are your only 2 choices.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 5:40pm

      And for the record monk, what you just described is still an act of war

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 7:32pm

      Hi Soybom315,
      “And for the record monk, what you just described is still an act of war”

      Good… it’s about time we get back to having a real war against a real Govt and not all these fake wars against people that dress like and hide among the common people, that last forever, have no winner and cost so much.

      Maybe the World leaders would have some respect for us then… they certainly don’t now.

      If I remember correctly Israel took out Syria’s weapons plant. Clinton bombed Libya. Obama helped bomb a few places too. The UN has done some aggressive actions also. All without declaring war.

      Only a real war puts Govt’s in check.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
  • Hickory
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:04pm

    Get it done, nuke Iran. The rest will then fall in line. Where do you want the first nuke to go off? Here or there? My choice is there.

    Report this comment

    Hickory  
  • KidCharlemagne
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:29pm

    This is all Dick Cheney’s fault for helping Iran to acquire nuclear power back during the 1970′s:

    ————————————
    “Yet Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and outgoing Deputy Secretary Paul Wolfowitz held key national security posts when the Ford administration made the opposite argument 30 years ago.

    Ford’s team endorsed Iranian plans to build a massive nuclear energy industry, but also worked hard to complete a multibillion-dollar deal that would have given Tehran control of large quantities of plutonium and enriched uranium — the two pathways to a nuclear bomb. Either can be shaped into the core of a nuclear warhead, and obtaining one or the other is generally considered the most significant obstacle to would-be weapons builders.”

    After balking initially, President Gerald R. Ford signed a directive in 1976 offering Tehran the chance to buy and operate a U.S.-built reprocessing facility for extracting plutonium from nuclear reactor fuel. The deal was for a complete “nuclear fuel cycle” — reactors powered by and regenerating fissile materials on a self-sustaining basis.”
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3983-2005Mar26.html

    Report this comment

    KidCharlemagne  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:49pm

      it’s as if these tussles were planned in advance…..

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:25pm

      KidCharlemagne,
      “Either can be shaped into the core of a nuclear warhead, and obtaining one or the other is generally considered the most significant obstacle to would-be weapons builders.”

      I’m fairly confident it’s the “zipper” that is the greatness obstacle.

      As for Paul Wolfowitz… he’s a maniac. He once said that “the US should go to war with China while we can still win”. There’s some very insane people that have been elected or put in power.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
  • MiCurmudgeon
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:26pm

    My Dad used to say, ” The fist liar doesn’t stand a chance.”

    Report this comment

    MiCurmudgeon  
  • AxelPhantom
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:14pm

    There is no point to holding “talks” of any kind with Iran as they have shown themselves to be dishonest brokers. They agreed to “inspections” with the UN and then when it came time to pay the piper kicked the inspectors out. They reached an agreement negotiated with the Rice Secretary of State and her surrogate Nicholas Burns, and then failed to show up on the appointed date to sign the agreement. There are many other examples. This cat and mouse game has been proven to be a waste of time, money and effort. They do not want an agreement, a negotiation or a treaty; THEY WANT A NUCLEAR WEAPON!!!!

    Report this comment

    AxelPhantom  
  • The-Monk
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:14pm

    What would the talks sound like if they ever happened?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsUscVoZcMQ

    Report this comment

    The-Monk  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:21pm

      And the second round of talks…..

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rw5MosKRm4

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:27pm

      yes, because you would rather have war than peace….And dont go blaming someone else, our fate is in our hands this time

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • momrules
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:33pm

      Exactly……no peace. Iran, the whole ME, the whole Islamic world will never settle for peace. They want and need war to bring about their desire to dominate the world, to destroy Israel and America.

      Kill or subjugate the infidel and happily die in that quest is the motto of Islam.

      Report this comment

      momrules  
    • dublinthewagons
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:33pm

      Bombs away

      Report this comment

      dublinthewagons  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:43pm

      Go on and fight the islamists. But do it as chrisitan crusaders, not by the american government. If it is a religious world war you want – then settle it amongst religous radicals without dragging all the world governments into it…. But that would require you to make personal sacrifice instead of sending other people’s children to die for your cause

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:48pm

      Hi Soybom315,

      Whenever a Monk looks at an external situation they always start with an inner assessment.

      Have you ever wondered why the most peaceful people on the planet are also the most dangerous? Monks are very skilled at war, offense and defense so they are prepared if the need arises. Therefore they are never afraid and at peace.

      I can tell you that in my personal Life I have been in many fights; yet I have never been hit nor have I had to hit someone else. I have never lost a fight and I never set out to win either. Training is very important so that neither side is hurt. The other gets so tried they give up or they get so scared they run away. I have personally been attached by 8 people once. There is a way to fight without causing injury or death. I can assure you that I am capable of both.

      Read this story by Chuang Tzu, “Fighting ****” and you might understand where I’m coming from.

      http://www.messagefrommasters.com/Stories/chuangtzu/Fighting_Cock14.htm

      This is what I see is needed in America as a Nation.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:53pm

      what you said has nothing to do with what we are talking about

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:57pm

      Read the very short story….

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:07pm

      war or peace. There is no other option

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • Gary_K
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:13pm

      I believe Soy doesn’t understand the story.

      Report this comment

      Gary_K  
    • RLTW
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:31pm

      If a radicalized maniac has a gun should we allow him bullets? Soy if you’re staring down the barrel of a gun do you assume it’s loaded or empty?

      Report this comment

      RLTW  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:51pm

      Hi Soybom315,
      “war or peace. There is no other option”

      Therein lies your weakness. With a Monk there is always a third solution.

      In the world of the relative; good bad, right wrong, up down, black white, hot cold, etc… there is always conflict.

      That’s why Eisenstein said, with a sad face…… “All things are relative…”

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:56pm

      and what is that mystery 3rd option that you always talk about but never say? You are delusional on this issue

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 2:16pm

      Hi Soybom315,

      It’s in the story……

      America needs to be the trained fighting rooster. Presently we are a joke around the World and Obama goes around bowing and apologizing. No one gives a hoot about what we say because we are the laughing stock of the World.

      Our word needs to be honored and feared. When we say “no nukes or else” they need to say “yes sir”. Presently, they laugh and flip us the bird.

      America has been turned into a Chicken and we need to be the Rooster. It’s the only way to live in peace with some of the other Countries.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 5:19pm

      @MONK
      Our word needs to be honored and feared. When we say “no nukes or else” they need to say “yes sir”.
      —-
      First, it’s too late for that. Second, you can’t instill fear in fanatics. Israel had to destroy Iraq’s nuclear reactor in 1981. We need to remove Hussein and destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities — in that order. If we fail at the former, the latter will never happen. If the latter never happens, Islam wins, America falls. End of story.

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 5:41pm

      ok, so it is war you want. That contradicts your ‘monk’ statements from earlier

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 5:46pm

      Hi Kryptonite,

      If you read my other posts here you’ll see my suggestion for shutting down those enrichment factories.

      Blow up the entrances and ventilation outlets (from the air), guard those areas (from the air) to stop rescue attempts, let the people inside die and continue satellite surveillance. They will be hard pressed to find replacement scientist and if they manage get one back open… start over. And if we can get our people inside…. blow the sucker up.

      Hopefully the old regime will die off and the Iranian people, not us, can put in place a better form of Govt.

      Any thoughts?

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 6:24pm

      @MONK
      I did read your other comments. I’m on board with that plan. But then you starting going off on an esoteric tangent — which you do every once in a while. :)

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 7:40pm

      Hi Kryptonite,

      You are correct. It’s not easy discussing these issues when not face-to-face so I do a bit of fishing to try to understand the other persons perspective and their background. It’s much easier when I can see the body language and hear the tone in a persons voice. All this online “chat” crap makes things so impersonal and separated that I have a hard time getting to the point quicker and being more deliberate or precise.

      Very nice observation on your part. : )

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 7:48pm

      Hi Kryptonite,

      Did you understand this story?

      http://www.messagefrommasters.com/Stories/chuangtzu/Fighting_Cock14.htm

      I use the word “understand” in the normal sense and not the Monk definition… which is completely different.

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • Eastinfection
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 8:01pm

      Hey Monk…

      Out of town… checking in for a moment..

      Will definitely read this story tomorrow..

      PS:.. you can always show them the Mountain Dew commercial ;p

      Report this comment

      Eastinfection  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 8:52pm

      I got your message East…

      Have a safe trip….

      Report this comment

      The-Monk  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 22, 2012 at 1:59am

      @MONK
      Did you understand this story?
      —-
      You’re asking the wrong guy. I see it through a Christian lens as the channeling of metaphysical/occult forces to intimidate, control or defeat your enemy. It’s powerful, even when exercised in inconspicuous ways.

      Normal interpretation? The oriental version of “peace through strength.”

      Note: My comment should have read: “started going off…” You think Betsy will give us an edit box for Christmas? (provided, of course, Blazers haven’t been shipped off to FEMA camps…)

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
  • soybomb315_II
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:14pm

    Thumbs up on nuclear program talks between the US and Iran. If we can settle this thing non-militarily, it will be a huge benefit for this country. But most likely, we would find another country to take Iran’s place

    Report this comment

    soybomb315_II  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:53pm

      Yes it would be great if peace talks would avert war but I get the feeling that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would use any peace talks as a stalling tactic to get his nukes ready.It’s easy for us to say let the peace talks begin but Israel is under threat of nuclear annihilation and if they feel Iran will strike first who are we to say anything about the situation.Israel can defend herself and if they feel the need to use nuclear weapons to defend themselves then Iran will just have to suffer the consequences of starting a war.

      Report this comment

      progressiveslayer  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:06pm

      You are familiar with all the protests that went on in Iran some years ago. The government of Iran hangs on by a thread – as a great many Iranians are moderate in their views. Therefore, the government of Iran set out for conflict with the west in order to galvanize pro-government support within their own country.

      Anyone who honestly looks at the situation in Iran comes to the same conclusion. But of course the blame islam argument is easier to make and plays into people’s perception of the world

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • justangry
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:22pm

      @Progslayer, Would Israel be willing to give up it’s nuclear weapons if Iran gave up their nuclear ambition? If not, and we know this isn’t going to happen, we do have to realize Iran will always seek them to ensure the MAD principle considering Israel has threatened to nuke Iran as early as 2007 and then we’ve also included them in the 7 countries in 5 years plan proposed by the Bush Administration and leaked by principled high ranking intelligence officers / generals that agree with us. I too think they’re bat crap crazy, but no more so than our neoconservatives. The biggest argument I hear is that Iran will pass them off to Hezbollah. Keep in mind Iranians arming Hezbollah is no different than what we’ve been doing and this assessment is based on nothing more than assumption and of course a mistranslation that even the Blaze is still running with despite admitting that it was indeed a mistranslation. Certainly we’ve been giving Al’Queda weapons to cause trouble in the Stans, but not nukes. It’s more logical that Iran would operate in much the same way, knowing that if Hezbollah used them, Iran would receive the retaliation. Keep in mind, brother there’s always a chance to avoid catastrophe through negotiation, but zero chance without. We both hate Obama, but in this case it’s a better alternative to what the neocons are advocating. At least that’s the way I see it. The more countries we invade the more impetus world wide for proliferation.

      Report this comment

      justangry  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:44pm

      Justangry I’m hoping like most people that war can be avoided but sadly I think it’s inevitable based on the rhetoric and the history in the middle east. I think we’ve had enough war and don’t need to get involved in another,we’re spread too thin and we’re broke. SOY Yes I’m familiar with the uprising and the regime crushing it after the sham reelection of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,the Imams rule that country so the hard line against Israel will be maintained. If their people want freedom from the Imams they’ll have to fight for it,the problem is who’s replacing who?,they could wind up with something worse if that’s possible.

      Report this comment

      progressiveslayer  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:55pm

      they would probably end up with a non-theological regime since that is what they have now. The religious nuts got in power as a result of decades of american intervention in Iran

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 6:02pm

      SOYBOMB
      You are familiar with all the protests that went on in Iran some years ago. The government of Iran hangs on by a thread – as a great many Iranians are moderate in their views.
      ——-
      You are positing a nonsequitur to make your point. Most Iranians are moderate, but it does not follow that the Iranian govt. is in danger of falling. Au contraire. It has grown in power since Hussein occupied the WH. Romney is right when he says, We have Iran four years closer to a nuclear bomb.” Or do you think Ahmednutjob is sitting on his @ss while Hussein plays golf?

      => “But of course the blame islam argument is easier to make…”
      ——
      Granted, far easier than the RP/Obama camps’ incessant apologies to Islam.

      Report this comment

      kryptonite  
  • damonblankenship
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:09pm

    Obama Admin is a embarrassment. The whole world laughs a these idiots. the entire Obama crew must be on meth. they dont care at all if anyone believes there lies or not, they just keep making fools of themselves, I just watched axlerod state that iran has no allies against the U.S. (meet the press) WOW Its SICKENING that America has become a joke.

    Report this comment

    damonblankenship  
  • AmericanLass
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:05pm

    Says one group of LIARS to another group of LIARS.

    Report this comment

    AmericanLass  
  • AJAYW
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:04pm

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and obama both want to bring Israel down. He will do all thats in his power to do it after the election if he wins

    Report this comment

    AJAYW  
  • Silversmith
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:01pm

    Lies lies lies ye-ah!

    Silversmith

    Report this comment

    Silversmith  
  • Gary_K
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:00pm

    It’s October…Surprise….another one.

    http://www.9news.com/news/world/295389/347/Gas-prices-could-soon-drop-50-cents-a-gallon

    Report this comment

    Gary_K  
  • pantokrator
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:57am

    That means it’s probably happening. Thank you Iran, for the confirmation.

    Report this comment

    pantokrator  
  • AJAYW
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:56am

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and obama are out of the same mold- Both liars and both POS.

    Report this comment

    AJAYW  
  • PaulreveresDarknight
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:56am

    We knew this move was coming. Hes helping little black brother set stage. Iran loves being in our politics. Russia is playing bully too. They are testing us. They want blood. Pray for USA & President Romney

    Report this comment

    PaulreveresDarknight  
  • kat747
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:46am

    Didn’t believe the so-called “one-on-one talks” when I first heard it.
    Didn’t believe the so-called “wait until after the election” excuse.
    Don’t believe that Iran wants to talk to us about anything !

    Just another Democratic ploy to let the voters THINK that Barry has a handle on foreign affairs
    so that he gets another term.
    The American People SAW what kind of handle Barry doesn’t have on foreign affairs – NOTHING BUT
    SCREW-UPS.

    Report this comment

    kat747  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:44am

    This confirms it – there are talks going on right now.

    Report this comment

    Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • AJAYW
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:53am

      on point

      Report this comment

      AJAYW  
    • kat747
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:54am

      Probably some sort of back-door-deal which will depend on Barry getting re-elected !
      Once a muslim, always a muslim.

      Report this comment

      kat747  
    • Gary_K
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 12:02pm

      barry (father unknown) …back door….are you trying to get him excited?

      Report this comment

      Gary_K  
    • Wool-Free Vision
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:02pm

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:44am

      This confirms it – there are talks going on right now.
      ………………….

      You get the wool-free comment of the day for this.

      Report this comment

      Wool-Free Vision  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:10pm

      @Wool:

      This is one reason I study history, especially of political leaders, so that when a pattern begins to emerge, a person can often figure out the layers of meaning beneath the outer shell.

      Report this comment

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • soybomb315_II
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:22pm

      @snow
      What does your evaluation of history in Iran from 1940 through 1990 tell you?

      Report this comment

      soybomb315_II  
  • DADDYWOREAWHITEHAT
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:42am

    Oh the transparency of this administration….
    Any laws that pass anymore are made in back rooms by 5 guys and the payoffs with taxpayer $$$ just make me wonder how we the people have a chance to make informed decisions about anything.

    Report this comment

    DADDYWOREAWHITEHAT  
  • woodyee
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:40am

    Well, they said they want to support Obammy – how better to fulfill their dream of completing a nuke to send towards Tel Aviv? They’re already conceding that Romney is a threat to them, and they want Obammy to win.

    Report this comment

    woodyee  
  • Gary_K
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:39am

    It sounds like the talks were not supposed to leak out.

    Something is very fishy, heh iran and barry fishy?

    Report this comment

    Gary_K  
  • RodT82721
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:39am

    Our savior, Barry the magnificent, has come up with another of his whoopers!

    Another leftist unprovable talking point, to show us how his policy is working. That ambassador from Benghazi, Chris Stevens and his 3 real protectors, are not available for comment.

    Report this comment

    RodT82721  
  • John 1776
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:38am

    (NYT) More liberal games to confuse the voters. Yet, I would fully expect that Iran might make some last minute “Big” announcement as they enjoy messing with our elections and are frightened of Romney.

    Report this comment

    John 1776  
    • Gary_K
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:55am

      The liberal (progressive/socialist/commie/) games will be the massive voter fraud….I think Romney will have to have a lead greater than 10% to win.

      Report this comment

      Gary_K  
  • ZAP
    Posted on October 21, 2012 at 11:36am

    obammy cover-up…

    Report this comment

    ZAP  
    • AZpatriotmama
      Posted on October 21, 2012 at 1:53pm

      The denials are an attempt to PRE-SPIN the REAL story – The Obama administration has negotiated to remove sanctions on Iran in return for a PHONEY ANNOUNCEMENT BEFORE THE ELECTIONS that a deal was made to halt uranium enrichment. The REAL deal is only to halt enrichment UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTIONS! It’s just another deceitful attempt to get Obama re-elected.

      When they knew the REAL story was about to break, they had the NYT release a watered down story then immediately released a denial of THAT story. WND.com has been on top of this story through an undercover CIA agent from the beginning. Here’s a quote from a 10/4/2012 story from WND.com:
      “One Obama representative, the woman, who had met Velayati before, urged Velayati to announce a halt, EVEN IF IT’S ONLY FOR A WEEK OR TWO, to uranium enrichment prior to the U.S. election…The U.S. representatives promised the Obama administration quickly would remove some sanctions on the Iranian central bank and oil industry, WITH FURTHER COLLABORATION AFTER THE ELECTION, the source said.”

      Here’s how the story unfolded starting on 10/4:

      http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/october-surprise-obama-secret-iran-deal-cut/
      http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-cuts-deal-with-iran-over-nukes/

      Report this comment

      AZpatriotmama  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love