At Least 91 People Reported Dead After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…120+ Injured…Many Children Among Dead…Some Children Drowned…Heartbreaking Pictures…Reporter Struggles to Share Terrible News…

Watch Live: Continuing Coverage of Oklahoma Tornado Aftermath

Politics

Ann Coulter Explains to ‘Sexist, Misogynist Pig’ Piers Morgan Why Men Shouldn’t Tell Women to ‘Calm Down’

Oct. 27, 2012 6:59pm Erica Ritz

Ann Coulter Calls Piers Morgan a Sexist, Misogynist Pig With a Teeny, Tiny Male Ego

(Photo: CNN)

Conservative columnist Ann Coulter appeared on CNN with Piers Morgan Friday, where she explained why women shouldn’t be able to vote just minutes after calling the host a “sexist, misogynist pig.”

After watching the new “Voting Is Like Doing It” Obama advertisement, Coulter said the clip is a perfect illustration of why we should consider raising the voting age, and repealing the 19th Amendment.

“It’s going to be my exhibit henceforth for both of the groups I want to take the vote away from– young people and women, all in one combo platter,” she joked. “It was a rash experiment and we should reconsider the 19th Amendment.”

After that, Morgan claimed Coulter called him a “sexist, misogynist pig” during the commercial break.

“Can you explain why?” he asked. “What have I said that’s been remotely sexist?”

“Calm down,” Coulter replied, imitating the host.

She explained:

It is the conservative female’s obligation to– I am not hyperventilating, I’m disagreeing with you, which apparently is insulting your teeny, tiny male ego.

It is the most insulting, condescending, sexist thing to say to a female– generally conservative– who disagrees with you. No, it’s my obligation to back down and accept your point. And if I don’t, “You’re not being calm.” [Emphasis added]

Watch the clip, via Mediaite, below:

(H/T: Mediaite)

–

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (208)

papatom48
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:00pm
Way to go, Annie!!!! About time someone put one of these moronic blowhards in their place. And lets not forget, as Bill Murray said in Ghostbusters, ‘He’s from out of town, so he’s got nothing to say about any of this.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- NHwinter
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:21pm
  Tell it to Bill O’Reilly too. Bill told a lady judge to calm down the other evening. Bill to a judge, how arrogrant.
- FesteAinoriba
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:38pm
  We Love Ann. BTW, she was right to use the word retarded. Any 53 year olds who believe that socialism is a viable path to economic prosperity is retarded – particular if they are so addle-minded to think of themselves as intellectuals.
- dealer@678
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:49pm
  I cant stand O’rielly anymore. He’s a closet progressive and it’s shows bigtime
- The_Almighty_Creestof
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 11:13pm
  I would have liked to have watched it, but can’t get passed all the ads
  
  Report this comment
- VoteBushIn12
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 12:49am
  Way to go Ann?
  
  She’s calling someone sexist because they told her to “Calm Down” yet she is arguing that women should not be allowed to vote. Hhmmmm, I’m confused.
  
  I would absolutely LOVE to have a debate with Ann just to get a better understand of how demented and convoluted here reasoning is.
  
  We need more intellectuals in this world and fewer over the top pundits that throw around words they don’t understand just for the sake of confrontation. The real travesty is I don’t think any of her loyal viewers (you Blaze bangers included) have any idea what those words mean.
  
  Even in death, it is the triumph of natural selection that you have promoted the survival of your species. With that in mind, I encourage you all to help the homosapien race and kill yourself.
  
  Report this comment
- Chuck Stein
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:43am
  @ Festeainoriba
  Obama is 51 (born Aug.4, 1961), not 53. Apart from that, I agree with you.
  Also, glad that folks are ignoring the obvious troll immediately above this post.
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 2:20am
  VOTEBUSH…
  
  Shhh… I’ll tell you a big secret….
  when Rush calls Sandra Fluke a slut…
  and Anne Coulter says women shouldn’t vote…
  and when i say we should “give all the Arab women to China in exchange for them forgiving our debt”……
  It’s happening with a subtle tongue planted in the side of our cheek.. It’s called “Black Humor”…
  
  They are philisophical suppositions designed to provoke the most gullible idiots into opposing them…
  
  Oops… i didn’t mean to imply that you were an idiot. Forgive me VOTEBUSH.
  
  Report this comment
- gb123
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:24am
  Let’s call him by his real birth name: Piers Stefan O’Meara
  Yet another one that changed his name for fame. Does that sound familiar? Sorry Barry.
  
  Report this comment
- cosette
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:43am
  @ Votebush…. Please define Blaze bangers. Concerning your final statement encouraging some of us to “kill” ourselves, are you serious? Did you really mean that? If so, I must tell you, I have been a visitor to this site since it’s inception and I have had several disagreements with people from the left, but in all that time I have never read a more hateful statement by anybody. If you are serious it is my belief that you should be ostracized by all decent people who read this. There is no room in civil discussion for that level of vitriol. It is a sad state of affairs if your ideology drives you to hate your fellow Americans to the point where you wish them dead. So sad.
  
  Report this comment
- 13thCousinOfTheAntiChrist
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 6:12am
  @VOTEBUSHIN12 Thank you for proving yet again that when a progressive doesn’t have evidence to back themselves up, they resort to name-calling. Really, can’t you guys think of anything better than “idiots?” You and emperor0013 (not on this site yet, that I know of) aka Patrick Stoehr would make good friends, if not lovers. Why not use that extensive vocabulary you presume we wouldn’t comprehend and come up with something better? How about knuckle-dragging dolts? Mouth-breathing simpletons? Cretinous products of incestual relations?
  
  BTW, If you really were as intelligent as you imply that you are, then you would know that **** sapien is a species, not a race.
  
  Thank you for continuing the level of class and tolerance I have grown to expect from liberals.
  
  Report this comment
- jamestoms
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 6:30am
  The stuffy know-it-all Brit sounds like the rest of the traitors.
  
  Report this comment
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 8:11am
  Vote bush in 12
  
  I was going to respond but your post was demented and convoluted as you were throwing around them there big darn words that only those edumacated Harvard types who go to those collegiate propaganda type thingys know how to say. We just some backwoods country bumpkins round here. We got our god and our guns that we clingin to here. Gotta go beat my wife now.
  
  And for the record, mr wizard, I’d love to see you debate Ann. Tool.
  
  Report this comment
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 8:21am
  Whoa doggy! Them there ares strong words votebush!
  
  Now lookie here youngan, us god farin folks don’t like to hear all that noise comin out the mouths of you intellectual types. We may not know what pseudo- inta….intelll….what was that word again? Anyhow, we sure do thank fellas like you for helpin us country folk understand the happenins of the world. Without fellas like you we’d be uninformed dumb bumpkins. That there 200k paper from the ivy tree sure serves you well.
  
  Who’s running for president again?
  
  Report this comment
- Pantloadian
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 9:50am
  Mr AntiChrist – You say, “when a progressive doesn’t have evidence to back themselves up, they resort to name-calling.”
  
  Ms Coulter says, “sexist, misogynist pig.”
  
  Ergo, you’re saying Ms Coulter has no evidence to back herself up. Or are you just throwing darts randomly?
  
  Report this comment
- jblaze
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 10:13am
  I’m with you on O’Reilly, he really misses the point on most everything!
  
  Report this comment
- Chuck Stein
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 12:22pm
  Earlier, I posted:
  “Also, glad that folks are ignoring the obvious troll immediately above this post.”
  I take that back.
  
  Report this comment
- jaylew
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:27pm
  @VOTEBUSHin2012 ……it is really a pretty poor use of post iPad 1 decorum…..to not know how to create a username that does NOT contain the name BUSH in it since no Bush is running for anything. And let me tell you my little closet drag queen….that in a debate…on any subject…even one of your own choosing…that Ann Coulter would rend you asunder. As in eviscerate. Since it’s Halloween and you have chosen to throw the Camp Kill Yourself tone in to your post I will gladly add it to mine…..In a debate…Ms Coulter would leave your entire bowels laying on the desk before you. And then most likely in a pure “Bill Clinton to Paula Jones tone”…..she would advise you to “Go get that upper lip checked out by a doctor”. I am somewhat amused by your non-use of the word Halliburton however….as apparently the spell check queue of your new iPad has not reached the letter “H” yet.
  
  In closing….you really can’t be serious having a wanton “love” of debating Ms Coulter…..unless and of course you yourself are in possession of a general death wish. Because that is just exactly what the end result would be in the rhetorical sense. You are to Ann Coulter as the teenaged girl on Elm Street is to Freddie Krueger. The only difference between Ann Coulter and Freddie Krueger in this context…is that she is real and he is not. So I too would love to see you debate Ms Coulter this Halloween weekend…..you would be looking backwards well past November 6th.
  
  Report this comment
- BlueEyedInfidel
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:35pm
  I <3 Ann!!! Calling Obummer a ****** is an insult to retarded people!!
  
  Report this comment
hugo65hsv
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:57pm
Along with all the comments here praising Ann Coulter from a male point of view.. I’d like to add: Does somebody know where in America available woman like her can be found ? Even without her looks and well keep appearance, I would fall for her on her character alone.. That being said she’s right about what she says and with very good well thought out reason.. Pier not worth commenting on..

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Mrs.Cee
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 11:02pm
  Go to church! We hang around God fearing men.
  
  Report this comment
- SLAPTHELEFT
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 8:23am
  Bravo mrs. Cee!
  
  Report this comment
- cosette
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 9:42am
  @ Mrs.Cee….. Ditto & Kudos!
  
  Report this comment
- PATTY HENRY
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:35pm
  @ HUGO65HSV and make it a CATHOLIC CHURCH. These women respect and Love Jesus, GOD and the HOLY SPIRIT and try to emulate MARY but are not subject to “what someone else is wearing” or church being a “fashion show” – not to say that other Church women don’t but …..
  
  I agree with ANN. Women who have made homes, raised kids, helped thier husbands not only live better lives, but they raise better kids, have a better home and their husbands do better too. This isn’t saying women don’t have a mind, we do, but now we can look back and realize that the Communists made a very assertive effort from the 50′s on to rip America apart: Take GOD out of our schools, destroy our history (text book revisions) , infiltrate our schools with communists, take WOMEN OUT OF THE HOMES.
  There is nothing more impressive than a well groomed woman who runs a great home, who volunteers in the community and who has raised wonderful kids, been a great wife. NOTHING else gives as much pleasure or is more appreciated by those close to her. I also don’t believe women should be Priests/Preachers (Sunday School Teachers? Sure ) And look how outspoken I can be… I believe in people speaking their minds and being aware of what is going on, but I’ve shared this feeling for decades…A woman’s place IS in the home, after about 20 years she can pursue anything, she can study for it while she is at home, now many people can work from home. ANN ROCKS!
  
  Report this comment
- santababy52
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 11:25pm
  There are plenty of us commenting on conservative websites who have done our homework,m understand the issues, and do the research to make sure what we read is from primary sources. And like the lady said in the comment before me, it is easy to find us in church.
  
  Report this comment
- glennpatstu
  Posted on October 29, 2012 at 2:40pm
  well, if you are into chicks with adam’s apples like Ann’s your best bet is to head down to your city’s nearest gay/tranny bar. Plenty of ‘gals’ that look like Ann down there. Weirdo.
  
  Report this comment
Carlinpa
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:50pm
I love how Anne can put pierce in his place all without using one single vulgarity or obscenity. Anne is awesome!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Chuck Stein
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 11:49pm
  I told my wife to “calm down.” Once.
  
  Report this comment
- SREGN
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 9:51am
  Me too. Only I was stupid enough to try it a few times. I think back in that gym class in middle school that was “girls only” they told them that “calm down” actually means “escalate to physical violence”.
  
  Report this comment
- jaylew
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:31pm
  @ChuckStein…..i told my wife to calm down twice….because apparently I forgot what happened the first time. It happened so quickly that once i woke up i had manmesia…which is of course a made up word….but one i certainly understand to this day.
  
  Report this comment
- bobdog19006
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 4:33pm
  The human brain is a marvellous organ, capable of completely forgetting pain.
  
  The male human brain, on the other hand, is incapable of learning from the experience.
  
  I stepped into this one myself. Once.
  
  Report this comment
- mokyfellow
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 8:27pm
  Chuch Stein….I slapped my wife’s hand !!…..Once and only once!!!
  
  Report this comment
beatobama
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:47pm
Thursday night Bill O’Reilly told Judge Jeanine Pirro to “calm down”. I found it condescending and disrespectful to not only a woman but to one who holds the title “The Honorable”, and wrote him an email stating my objection. Naturally it was not aired.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Spinmamma
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:16pm
  Yes, I don’t believe I have ever heard any talking head tell the out-of-control-shouting-over-everyone males to “calm down.” It is incredibly sexist, and I am glad you called O’reilly (who in my opinion is grossly over-rated) on it. Kudos to Anne also. I think Piers thought he would embarrass her by bringing it up once they were back on the air. He is a mental midgit next to her.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyBloodhound
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:25pm
  I agree.. It really got me steamed. I felt bad for the judge. O’Reilly was out of line.
  
  Report this comment
- CatB
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 10:57pm
  Judge Pirro went off on Obama tonight at the beginning of her show .. I LOVE her passion for those killed in Benghazi .. I also am OUTRAGED!
  
  Report this comment
- jujubeebee
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 7:36am
  I have been finding O’Reilly a bit too arrogant to actually hold that time slot. I told him so a few years back. There are others more worthy of hosting that show and Laura Ingraham is one of them. Judge Pierro was spoken down to and O’Reilly does that to alot of his guests. He interrupts and he has been acting like his opinion is the best. Alot of people should be having that prime time slot…..years ago I’d have given it to Glenn Beck because he was actually bring forth information. O’Reilly’s info is recycled stuff that was already on Fox in every time slot before him. I like Laura better than O’Reilly. He may be past his prime. He got on Letterman and just tried to play it cute. That may be what he thinks is smart but it came across as pandering.
  
  Report this comment
- bobdog19006
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 4:35pm
  Bill O’Reilly has a tendency to be a bloviating, condescending, overpaid windbag most nights.
  
  Can’t stand the fellow.
  
  Report this comment
- jaylew
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 6:45pm
  I too…..for a couple years in fact…have found O’Reilly to be rather full of himself to the point of excess…..he does deserve the following comment though with much respect…..his television ratings in terms of drawing the typical sycophant away from other much more liberal spew and garbage….OReillys ability to do that is nearly miraculous from a political standpoint…..I mean he literally destroys every other cable news network and most network shows during his time slot….and we all owe him a debt of gratitude for that. I don’t like his imposing bullying schtick most times but for every soul watching him….is another soul that has a chance to be saved politically….on that one point I hope we all might agree….better to watch OReilly or nothing at all during that time slot. It really does tweak OReilly that neither Obama or Romney will set foot in his studio this year though. It genuinely has OReilly tweaked…..and that’s actually a good thing…when his is knocked down a notch or two he generally is more effective and efficacious.
  
  Report this comment
redhotmomma
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:37pm
Gotta Love Ann Coulter ! She doesn’t let these jerks run all over her ! “And she was right..he has no business telling her to calm down….

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SREGN
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 9:46am
  I agree with Ann wholeheartedly. We should end woman suffrage. There are literally hundreds of millions of women out there going through the most miserable suffrage imaginable. I can’t even begin to tell you the horrific effect this has had on our country. Won’t you please take the time to sign this petition to end woman suffage? And to vote for ending it when it gets on the ballot? Thank you from the bottom of my heart on behalf of women everywhere.
  
  Report this comment
- Sensible_Centrist_Democrat
  Posted on October 29, 2012 at 3:15pm
  @sregn
  Nice troll attempt.
  How are you people applauding her when she advocates disenfranchising women. If you believe women shouldn’t have the right to vote, then you me necessarily view women as second class citizens.
  
  Report this comment
spinelessdave
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:20pm
piers deserves the tattooed pudge muffin in the video,
Ann would turn him into a castratti !

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DZ-015
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:00pm
  I think it’s too late, Piers is already fixed.
  
  Report this comment
DadRocked
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:10pm
I am yet to be an Ann Coulter fan nor followere BUT thie person says and speaks their mind… I do respect that!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- red1
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:51am
  If you are judging Ann by her TV appearances alone, you don’t have a true picture of her. You need to read her writing, it is brilliant.
  
  Report this comment
- PATTY HENRY
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:45pm
  ANN COULTER’S BOOKS are clever, well written, quick and totally researched. I keep them as research reference books which I will turn over to my kids/grandkids. She really cares about the TRUTH
  and you’ve missed a lot by not reading her books. One is better than the next!~
  
  Report this comment
Watermain
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:09pm
I’ll bet girly man Piers is still hyperventilating after being taken out by Ann Coulter. Hide your face Piers.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 762x51
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:47pm
  Ann could take that metro-sexual weenie in two rounds.
  
  Report this comment
piper60
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:04pm
Why Piers Morgan has a show, I cannot fathom. He has no talent, and isn’t that great to look at. Typical English twit.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Jezreel
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:58pm
It looks like I am not the only women who has been saying that women need to have their rights to vote taken away. If women are responsible for an evil son of a B like Obama being elected, it shows you that needs to happen.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Nahash
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:11pm
  only people who work and actually pay taxes should be alowed to vote
  
  Report this comment
- Baerlin
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 7:45am
  I don’t want to take anyones “Right to Vote” away. That being said, I believe there should be a test of current events and you should at least know who represents you in Washington. Watching some of current man on the street videos that have aired lately has only given this argument more validation, I believe. Check out the Obama supporters slam Romney policys……..
  
  Report this comment
- skinflint
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 9:44am
  Not just young women but very young people as a whole. Their decisions are generated by passion/emotion/impulse due to immaturity of the frontal brain. Young people do not achieve this adult mechanism until roughly the mid to late 20s. Neuropsychologic fact. Great deal of research into this from perspectives of sociologists, neurologists, psychologists and extending deeply into the arena of law as evidenced by a flood of teen and young adult offenders into the system. Reading some of these case studies, we think, “what in the he!! was that kid thinking?” Immature frontal lobe development.
  
  I agree with Coulter here. To avoid the impulsivities associated with youth, the voting age should be raised to, say, 30 and like the previous poster believes, a voter should have a vested interest in the country; have experience in the work force, pay taxes and perhaps should even have owned property. Why should one be able to vote for instituting a tax or rules upon others if one does not participate or have a vested interest in the system him/herself?
  
  Just food for thought.
  
  Report this comment
- SREGN
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 10:01am
  But Obama is so cool and ethnic and stuff. And he has that awesome swagger. And Romney looks so straight-laced and stuff. I can’t see him meeting my needs. And everybody knows my needs are what the universe revolves around. So I’m going to vote for Obama. See, it’s simple.
  
  Report this comment
- obfuscatenot
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 11:40am
  As a woman, I am greatly offended at the “history” of women’s suffrage. A small tidbit of truth with a lot of revisionist embellishments- kinda like Michelle Obama “recreating history” -huh? Women as a group did not have a special “right” to vote. The right to vote was for property owners. So IF a couple owned a farm, or a house or a business( as stake in the Country) they had a vote. Imagine the headache of a very rural country and travel, and paper ballots etc, the head of the household voted-a representative if you will-for a number of reasons. If a woman owned something, as a widow, inheritance or goodness sakes she earned it- she got to vote! Imagine a rule or regulation the Government actually followed, by no means am I claiming a woman’s life was easy.(I hate even saying that but to avoid the standard-so are you saying a woman’s life was easy?- snarky comment, I do) To claim the filter of ownership in the Nations wealth was not prudent THAT should be your argument, not that women couldn’t vote. This infuriates me. It would only make this country great again tomorrow, if net taxpayers(those who actually own a stake in the Country) were the voters. Those who paid the dues decided. Imagine. We should all get to vote in SEIU elections or AFL-CIO elections, after all they operate in our Country. Who cares if we pay dues or not we should all decide.
  
  Report this comment
- Hephzibah
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 12:25pm
  For a long time I’ve thought women voters are a major tool of leftist bullies, but then eliminating all women would eliminate informed women like Ann Coulter, myself, and other conservative women. Maybe only taxpayers ought to be allowed to vote. Wouldn’t the lefties pitch a fit about that? There goes their base! Margaret Thatcher was right.
- jimv2000
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 3:50pm
  If you don’t think women should vote, then by all means, start with yourself.
  
  Report this comment
- objectivetruth
  Posted on October 29, 2012 at 10:35am
  I’m totally enraged by the lot of you.Our sons and daughters can volunteer for the military[putting their lives on the line for your freedoms] marry make contracts yet you seem to think they shouldn’t vote.I think its you traitors to america who shouldn’t vote.Need to own property or pay end of the year taxes to vote?Many people don’t pay taxes at the end of the year. Either it isn’t owed or they have sense enough, to set up their taxes so that they pay the appropiate amount on their estimated taxes.Still not owing at the end of the year.This is your basis for removal of the right to vote.Who the hell died and made any of you friggin looney tunes head honcho?Absolutely noone.You are the same elitist bunch of fools our forefathers[as in the revolution]fought to free us of.Go back to england or the rest of the god forsaken socialist hell holes you hale from or slithered away from.
  
  Report this comment
mike551
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:56pm
You go girl !! IMPEACH THE MUSLIM OBAMA NOW!!! GET US OUT OF THE UN!!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Watermain
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:07pm
  And get the damn UN out of the US. Now.
  
  Report this comment
- barber2
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 10:55pm
  WATER: The more I hear about the anti-American decisions of the UN , the more I agree with you.
  
  Report this comment
truemedia
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:51pm
Romnesia will cure the any running Obamarrhea you had struggled with for the PAST FOUR YEAR.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
QuincySmith
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:45pm
Calm down, Piers!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- marybethelizabeth
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:56pm
  Ann Coulter makes her living acting out. Her hysterics are her schtick. It is who she is.
  
  Mr. Morgan should have known that it is impossible to have a rational give-and-take conversation with Mz. Coulter. He should have known what to expect.
  
  She really gives the Republican agenda a bad name.
  
  Report this comment
- Watermain
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:11pm
  @Mary: You’re wrong. republicans like her because she tells it like it is.
  
  Report this comment
- pdw
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:23pm
  The fact is she just ****** off libs with the truth.
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:46pm
  Mary you don’t like Coulter’s politics so she’s acting out and it’s her ‘schtick’? You’re being hysterical calm down.
  
  Report this comment
- spfoam1
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:43pm
  @MARYBETH……Unattractive women rarely miss an opportinity to take a shot at an attractive one. The high school photo you use for your avatar reveals the motive for your attack on Coulter.
  
  Report this comment
h20sue
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:42pm
Hey Ann,

I’m a profound admirer. My feelings are, Piers is probably built with a toothpick. You get my drift, so he tries to over compensate. He’s so proud of himself, his nose is so far up his **** he can’t smell. Don’t let him get to you, because “real women” understand what his problems are… He’s also a die hard liberal, so need I say more. Add the two together and what do you get? A real …….

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Metallicat
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:40pm
“Calm down” is a mans knee jerk reaction to dealing with irrational women who scream,cry or resort to violence to get their way,which isnt only a Republican woman thing,theyre all crazy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Spinmamma
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:21pm
  Huh!! I never knew that.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyHarriet
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:36am
  “Calm down” is a man’s way of attempting to take control. Period.
  
  TELLING another adult person, especially one with which you are having an intellectual exchange of ideas, to “calm down” is a demeaning and subtle way of being dismissive, rude and even abusive.
  
  The fact is, women raise their voices and speak louder and in a higher pitched voice when they are sure of themselves, passionate about something, when they are heavily invested in an idea, and/or when there is a good chance the other person isn’t really engaged in respectful listening.
  
  Men, poor souls, relate this at a deep level with the tone of voice Mommies use when their little boys are peeing on the dog or eating dirt from the vegetable garden.
  
  Do a little “inner work”, my friend, and give 1/10 of the effort women in general give to try to understand the male species. We women are truly tired of doing most of the heavy lifting for you guys.
  
  As to Ann Coulter, I like her spunk and grit and the “calm down” comment from Piers or O’Reilly to these highly accomplished, well-spoken women is really pathetic and belies a possible dislike of women, or at least of COMPETENT women.
  
  Report this comment
- Pantloadian
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 9:58am
  Ms Harriet . . . While I admire your spunk, and I appreciate your willingness to assume the mantle of responsibility for both genders, I’m sorry but I can’t take your insight, character or maturity for granted. Tell you what, come back to me when you can prove you’re able to navigate the complexities of a mall parking lot. Then we’ll talk about “life.”
  
  (See? Now that wasn’t really fair of me. In fact, it sounds like I’m overcompensating for my insecurities. And we can all do better, right?)
  
  Report this comment
- QuincySmith
  Posted on October 29, 2012 at 8:29am
  Metallicat;
  
  ““Calm down” is a mans knee jerk reaction to dealing with irrational women who scream,cry or resort to violence to get their way,which isnt only a Republican woman thing,theyre all crazy.” ~~~ And oblama’s way of treating everyone, except Valerie Jarrett.
  
  Report this comment
- objectivetruth
  Posted on October 29, 2012 at 12:22pm
  Actually the screaming hysterics are from dealing with a irrational male who masks it in calmness.After about the thirty’th time of calmly explaining why something won’t work we finally lose it when they insist calmly that it will.[After a few times of going along to get along and the diasters it ensues, you will speak up, I assure you]
  Men attempt to manipulate women by going out of their way to make us angry. Then step back and calmly proclaim that its all our fault.If they could they would go back in time and blame us for every war diaster that has ever happened.Now if you will excuse me I hear the bellow that its my fault waterloo was lost.Gotta run.
  
  Report this comment
Oraclevoiceofreason
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:37pm
Ann Coulter is my Idol and only Condie Rice may be smarter but not nearly as brash and bold. And the Brit Morgan can’t keep up

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Oneirishman
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:47pm
  Just a side question completely unrelated, are you aware of a vile poster here with the monicker VERCEOFREASON?
  
  Report this comment
- barber2
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 10:42pm
  ONE: Missing ? I think VERCE has probably just morphed into some new name . They do. Like JUSTTIM / ELIASIUM/ ILIKEPEOPLE….they just keep re-cyclying themselves ….
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 10:51pm
  i dunno guys…
  
  pretty sure i’ve never seen VERCE and DORA post simultaneously…..
  
  & they both adopted that “toast” logo around the same time?
  
  I’m thinking home computer/ work computer thing….
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:52am
  Hi East,
  
  Bazinga…..
  
  Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:34pm
.
Wish all women were as brilliant as Ann Coulter.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:59pm
  There are several that post here that are much more brilliant than Ann Coulter.
  
  Report this comment
- SREGN
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 10:22am
  If all women were as brilliant as Ann Coulter, us guys would never be able to win an argument.
  
  Report this comment
cranberry
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:34pm
OMG I love you Ann Coulter, you GO! Piers is an idiot who thinks he is all that. Well Piers, on television she put you in your place. He was totally uncomfortable.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Arnold_Ziffel
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:27pm
The answer is that there should be three qualifications to vote:
1) Citizen
2) Registered
3) Holder of a taxpayer’s verification card from the IRS stating that you filed and had a net pay IN greater than or equal to zero.

No skin in the game, no vote.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Stelex
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:36pm
  I’ve been screaming that for years……only those paying in and have skin in the game should be able to vote. Topped off with term limits and a nice sprinkle of a balanced budget amendment. That would be a good start for this country.
  
  Report this comment
- woodyee
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:38pm
  Amen!
  
  Report this comment
- woodyee
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:39pm
  Let’s simplify it for the Leftists – If you’re taking instead of making, you ain’t voting!
  
  Report this comment
- TheCalmOne
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:41pm
  People who lose their jobs through no fault of their own shouldn’t be allowed to vote?
  
  Report this comment
- ModerationIsBest
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:51pm
  What a lunatic.
  
  Report this comment
- HeywoodJ
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:52pm
  no representation without taxation? i dig it
  
  Report this comment
- pdw
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 8:29pm
  I do not agree I am retired and no longer pay income taxes as I no longer make enough where I have to pay anymore. But they sure do get enough without me having to pay income taxes. I still do not like thieves in office no matter which party this party has made many know that no other time in their lives did their vote mean so much to the future of our country.
  
  Report this comment
- Stelex
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 9:51pm
  Weather you like it or not, human nature is to take care of oneself. If you need the gov…you’ll vote for the gov. At the expense of the working class. I believe in safety nets but not safety lives. Only those who are contributing to society and not living off it should be allowed to vote. I’ve been on both side’s and any one who say’s they will do whats good when there hurting is a liar and a thief.
  
  Report this comment
- Zekron
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 11:09pm
  And, served at least 2 years in the military.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyHarriet
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 1:41am
  100% agree.
  
  That would, with one fell swoop, eliminate all this dependent society crap. You’re on the public dole? You aren’t going to vote to keep the Democraps in power so you can continue to be a slug. End of the Democraps. See how easy it is?
  
  Report this comment
- Arnold_Ziffel
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 8:38am
  @Thecalmone
  
  Stay calm! What I am suggesting would not necessarily impact the unemployed, unless they stay on the dole too long. I’d even be willing to allow a 1 year grace period, so long as there was a record of paying IN in the previous year, maybe 2.
  
  Report this comment
- cykonas
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 11:26am
  Most of the posts in this thread are a confirmation of what I’ve said for years. Republicans/conservatives are just as willing to take a dump on the Constitution when it doesn’t suit them as are the Democrats/liberals.
  
  The way to solve the “having skin in the game” problem is to eliminate the myriad government programs/agencies/bureaus that ****** the private enterprise system from creating jobs and to eliminate the dole for all but the most disadvantaged among us.
  
  The solution does not lie in dis-inclusion. The solution lies in productive inclusion. Relative analysis that does not include our Constitutional foundations is little more than mental masturbation. It feels good but it’s unlikely to result in anything productive. Peace.
  
  Report this comment
- Lt_Scrounge
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 11:52am
  One of the founding fathers said that the Republic would only last until the people realize that they are able to vote themselves largesse from the public coffers. They have been doing exactly that for the last 50 years. The result is that the country is rapidly approaching the tipping point wherein the hosts are experiencing a lower standard of living than the parasites that are feeding off of them. How hard is it to simply stop being part of the solution and become part of the problem when you see people living on welfare, food stamps and subsidized housing having a higher standard of living than you do despite the fact that you’re working over time? All of which is paid for with the tax dollars taken from your check thereby making it harder for you to get ahead.
  
  Report this comment
- cykonas
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 11:55am
  An ironic side note. The word that was starred out by an editor, or an auto-editor in my previous post is R-E-T-A-R-D, meaning “to cause to function at a less than optimal level”.
  
  The irony, in my mind, is that just the other day there was a Blaze article where the same word was in the headline and in the context was clearly used in a different and pejorative manner.
  
  I’m wondering if I should be suspicious that this site is being run or monitored by the Government. You know; do as I say, not as I do. :-) Peace.
  
  Report this comment
- jaylew
  Posted on October 28, 2012 at 7:00pm
  Absolutely correct…..if you are a welfare recipient….completely reliant on others tax remittances upon which whacky Uncle Sam has then decided should feed you and clothe you or shelter you…and let me digress for a second here….and make my point crystal clear: If you are a person who swipes a Food Stamp Card through a card reader at the grocery store ….while at the same time are sporting a nice new set of fake fancy fingernails…then YOU TOO are included this…..because apparently you can’t feed yourself but you can buy fancy nails and fake weaves and **** pieces…..but if you are on ANY form of public assistance at all….then you should only be able to cast a vote that represents your fractional ability to provide for yourself. Of course the typical progressive will immediately bring out and invoke the 4\5ths prior constitutional error or some other totally unrelated notion to my premise here. Those who as mentioned..have a whole horse in the race get a vote….those that do not have a whole horse…get a portion of a vote….we will quickly see then how the Democrats have managed to polarize and divide the electorate in this nation. What reason would an entire ghetto or barrio have for voting for anyone who might interrupt their meager but free nonetheless lifestyle and living conditions?….I have seen way to many Lincoln Navigators parked in ghettos to not know just exactly what is going on….and it is one silly Democrat inch short of thievery.
  
  Report this comment
- objectivetruth
  Posted on October 30, 2012 at 11:20am
  I’m so sick of all of you.You claim to believe in the constitution.Obviously you don’t.So what else is new.Liberal elitists hidng behind the conservative mantra.Tell me did you take your training from the muslims or the socialists?
  531 TAX PLAN.All will have skin in the game.Your argument is then totally lost.Whatever will you do to massage your overblown egos then?
  There are plenty of welfare fraudsters out there.Most of those either don’t vote or couldn’t care less.The only people you will hurt are those who have experienced some sort of crisis and need emergency help.They are the same ones who leave the welfare rolls as soon as they can.You don’t like the entitlement society.Join the crowd.I’m even more sick of them than most of you are.I’m simply not willing to trash the constitution that our forefathers fought and died for simply because I don’t like the later day laws.Remove the entitlements not the right to vote.
  
  Report this comment
neverending
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:23pm
Explained as only Ann Coulter can do it. Gotta love her.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
vashli19
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:17pm
Ann wants to take the vote away from herself? She is so FOS!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- HeidiTreadwater
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:29pm
  Pay attention now, Vashli. She was being sarcastic.
  
  Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:12pm
She’s too much woman for all of today’s “metro-sexuals”.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
marcus_arealius
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:11pm
Ann, I’m not being sexist in saying you have such beautiful eyes. It’s simply a fact.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
gyro
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:10pm
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeek

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
The-Monk
Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:09pm
Looks like that idea Piers Morgan was thinking about just got trashed…..

…. a date with Ann.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- asybot12
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 7:21pm
  Thanks LOL but one thing is for sure ANY guy NOT thinking about getting a date with her is sexist or seriously ill, she is a beautiful, smart and intelligent woman.
  
  Report this comment
- jeanr
  Posted on October 27, 2012 at 10:18pm
  Mann Coulter stands up to pee. I’ve seen it.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.